Exploring how core beliefs shape risky self-injury in teens: the bridge of emotional control challenges
Social Determinants of Health,
Vol. 12 (2026),
1 January 2026
,
Page 1-9
https://doi.org/10.22037/sdh.v12i1.48775
Abstract
Background: Teen years represent a pivotal phase of growth, fraught with distinct risks like tendencies toward self-injurious actions. Our research explored the straightforward connection between core life principles and such behaviors among teens, while probing how challenges in managing feelings act as an intermediary in this dynamic.
Methods: Employing a correlative design with structural equation modeling, we targeted Tehran high schoolers aged 14–18 from the 2023–2024 school term. Through multi-phase clustered random selection, 356 youths joined, filling out tools like the Self-Harm Inventory, abbreviated Portrait Values Questionnaire, and compact Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. We crunched numbers via SPSS 27.0 and AMOS.
Results: The proposed framework aligned well with real-world findings. As predicted, stronger life principles linked inversely to self-injury (β= 0.11, P=0.044). Emotional control issues tied positively to these behaviors (β=0.37, P=0.001). Notably, feeling management woes bridged part of the gap between principles and self-injury (β=-0.06, P=0.007).
Conclusion: This study highlights that personal values, emphasizing meaning, purpose, and prosocial behaviors (e.g., benevolence, universalism), protect against adolescent self-harm by enhancing emotion regulation. Integrating values-based interventions and emotion regulation training into prevention programs is recommended for clinicians and educators to reduce self-harm risks effectively.
- Adolescence
- Emotion
- Humanism
- Self-injurious behavior
How to Cite
References
1. Hooley JM, Fox KR, Boccagno C. Nonsuicidal Self-Injury: Diagnostic Challenges And Current Perspectives. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020;16:101–12. doi: 10.2147/ndt.S198806.
2. Jaworska N, MacQueen G. Adolescence as a unique developmental period. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2015;40(5):291–3. doi: 10.1503/jpn.150268.
3. Sisk LM, Gee DG. Stress and adolescence: vulnerability and opportunity during a sensitive window of development. Curr Opin Psychol. 2022;44:286–92. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.10.005.
4. Mousavi S, Shahsavari MR, Mirian ZS. The Associations between Parenting Styles, Family Power Structure, and Students’ Emotional Autonomy with the Mediating Role of Parent-Adolescent Relationship. Social Determinants of Health. 2024;10(1). doi: 10.22037/sdh.v10i1.44701.
5. Oppenheimer CW, Glenn CR, Miller AB. Future Directions in Suicide and Self-Injury Revisited: Integrating a Developmental Psychopathology Perspective. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2022;51(2):242–60. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2022.2051526.
6. Son Y, Kim S, Lee JS. Self-Injurious Behavior in Community Youth. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(4). doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041955.
7. Predescu E, Sipos R. Self-Harm Behaviors, Suicide Attempts, and Suicidal Ideation in a Clinical Sample of Children and Adolescents with Psychiatric Disorders. Children (Basel). 2023;10(4). doi: 10.3390/children10040725.
8. Toro GVR, Arias P, de la Torre-Luque A, Singer JB, Lagunas N. Depression, Anxiety, and Suicide Among Adolescents: Sex Differences and Future Perspectives. J Clin Med. 2025;14(10). doi: 10.3390/jcm14103446.
9. Wolff JC, Thompson E, Thomas SA, Nesi J, Bettis AH, Ransford B, et al. Emotion dysregulation and non-suicidal self-injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Psychiatry. 2019;59:25–36. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2019.03.004.
10. Paulus FW, Ohmann S, Möhler E, Plener P, Popow C. Emotional Dysregulation in Children and Adolescents with Psychiatric Disorders. A Narrative Review. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:628252. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.628252.
11. Aslan IH, Dorey L, Grant JE, Chamberlain SR. Emotion regulation across psychiatric disorders. CNS Spectr. 2024;29(3):215–20. doi: 10.1017/s1092852924000270.
12. Ershadi Manesh S. Inhibition and activation systems of behavior and suicide mediating role of cognitive emotion regulation. Social Determinants of Health. 2024;10(1):1–9. doi: 10.22037/sdh.v10i1.44488.
13. Ponizovskiy V, Grigoryan L, Kühnen U, Boehnke K. Social Construction of the Value-Behavior Relation. Front Psychol. 2019;10:934. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00934.
14. Bojanowska A, Urbańska B. Individual values and well-being: The moderating role of personality traits. Int J Psychol. 2021;56(5):698–709. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12751.
15. Ionescu CG, Ciuperca EM, Cotel A, Licu M. Personal values clusters and their associations to social media behaviors and psychological well-being. BMC Psychology. 2024;12(1):545. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02046-4.
16. Yasuma N, Watanabe K, Nishi D, Kawakami N. Personal values in adolescence and sense of coherence in adulthood: A cross-sectional study based on a retrospective recall. Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2020;40(3):262–7. doi: 10.1002/npr2.12111.
17. Yekta M, Farahani MN, Khanipour H, Shahgholian M. Investigating the Effective Factors in the Formation of Deliberate Self-harm in Adolescence: Mental Health Professionals’ Viewpoints. Practice in Clinical Psychology. 2023;11(2):151. doi: 10.32598/jpcp.11.2.839.1.
18. Sansone RA, Wiederman MW, Sansone LA. The Self-Harm Inventory (SHI): development of a scale for identifying self-destructive behaviors and borderline personality disorder. J Clin Psychol. 1998;54(7):973-983. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199811)54:7<973::aid-jclp11>3.0.co;2-h
19. Salimi A, Hashemi Nosratabad T, Khanjani Z. Structural causal relationships between ego strength and contextual relationships (family emotional atmosphere, peer communication, school bonding) with adolescent self-harm mediated by emotion regulation. Clinical Psychology Studies. 2023;14(52):148-77. doi: 10.22054/jcps.2024.17146.
20. Schwartz SH, Melech G, Lehmann A, Burgess S, Harris M, Owens V. Extending the Cross-Cultural Validity of the Theory of Basic Human Values with a Different Method of Measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2001;32(5):519–42. doi: 10.1177/0022022101032005001.
21. Soheili Sufiani MR, Pirkhaefi A, Mohammadi A. Determining the Psychometric Properties of the Schwartz Portrait Values Short Form Questionnaire in Farhangian University Students. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies. 2024;14(0):40.
22. Bjureberg J, Ljótsson B, Tull MT, et al. Development and Validation of a Brief Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale: The DERS-16. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2016;38(2):284-296. doi:10.1007/s10862-015-9514-x
23. Fallahi V, Narimani M, Atadokht A. Psychometric Properties of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale Brief Form (DERS-16): in Group of Iranian Adolescents. Journal of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences. 2021;29(5):3721-35. doi: 10.18502/ssu.v29i5.6772.
24. Peel-Wainwright K-M, Hartley S, Boland A, Rocca E, Langer S, Taylor PJ. The interpersonal processes of non-suicidal self-injury: A systematic review and meta-synthesis. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice. 2021;94(4):1059–82. doi: 10.1111/papt.12352.
25. Fadum EA, Carlsen E, Ramberg M, Strand LA, Håberg SE, Borud E, et al. Social and life skills in adolescents who have self-harmed: analysis of survey responses from a national sample of adolescents in Norway. BMJ Open. 2021;11(11):e054707. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054707.
26. Mansueto G, Jarach A, Caselli G, Ruggiero GM, Sassaroli S, Nikčević A, et al. A systematic review of the relationship between generic and specific metacognitive beliefs and emotion dysregulation: A metacognitive model of emotion dysregulation. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 2024;31(1):e2961. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2961.
27. Vafaei T, Samavi SA, Whisenhunt JL, Najarpourian S. The Effectiveness of Group Training of Emotional Regulation on Adolescent’s Self-injury, Depression, and Anger. Journal of Research and Health. 2021;11(6):383. doi: 10.32598/JRH.11.6.1602.4.
- Abstract Viewed: 56 times
- PDF Downloaded: 48 times