Studying Early Maladaptive Schemas and Personality Factors in Betraying and Injured Spouses
Social Determinants of Health,
Vol. 8 (2022),
1 January 2022
,
Page 1-10
https://doi.org/10.22037/sdh.v8i1.37259
Abstract
Backgrond :The family foundation is established by marriage. What is of utmost importance, is marital satisfaction which is one of the crucial concepts for the evaluation of happiness and stability in marriage.
Methods:The present research study is an applied descriptive-correlational and causal-comparative research ,aimed at studying the early maladaptive schemes and personality factors in the betraying spouses and those injured by betrayal.The statistical population of the present study included all betraying and injured couples and also ordinary married people of Mashhad city in 2020. They participated online in the study due to the coronavirus outbreak. To collect data, the Young Early Maladaptive Schemas Questionnaire (Short Form) and Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI) were used and collected using Pearson correlation coefficient, discriminant diagnostic analysis, and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) were analyzed in SPSS 22 software.
Result: There was a positive meaningful relationship between early maladaptive schemas with all personality factors among betraying partners and meaningful relationship between the maladaptive schemas with all personality factors except the self-destructive, schizotypal, and borderline disorder.Early maladaptive schemas and personality factors were able to predict marital infidelity in the injured group and betraying one; there was a meaningful difference between the three betraying, injured, and normal groups in terms of early maladaptive schemas and personality factors. two betraying and injured groups had higher maladaptive schemas and personality factors compared to the normal group.
Conclusion:Marital infidelity can have severe emotional consequences for the injured couple.
- Early maladaptive schemas, Personality factors, betraying, injured
How to Cite
References
2. Salimi H, Hajializade K, Ameri Siahoui M, Behdost P. 'Investigating the role of Corona stress mediators in relationship between internet addiction and marital and family conflict and violence', Counseling Culture and Psycotherapy. 2021;12(45):95-116. doi: 10.22054/qccpc.2020.53954.2480
3. Moreno N, Kahumoku-Fessler EP. Understanding infidelity: How perceptions of infidelity behaviors vary by sex and one's own infidelity experiences. American Journal of Family Therapy. 2018;46(2):107-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2018.1441760
4. Beltrán-Morillas AM, Alonso-Ferres M, Garrido-Macías M, Villanueva-Moya L, Sánchez-Hernández MD, Expósito F. The Relationship Between the Motivation to Commit Infidelity and Negative Affect and Self-Esteem: How Cheating in Romance Might Signal Positive Well-Being in Adolescents. Psychological Reports;2020. doi:10.1177/0033294120973947.
5. Samadi Kashan S, Pourghnad M, zamani M S. Marital Infidelity: Exploring Views, Factors and Consequences. Rooyesh. 2019;8(4):165-176. URL: http://frooyesh.ir/article-1-1475-en.html
6. Kianipour O, Mohsenzadeh F, Zahrakar K. Comparison of schema therapy and narrative therapy when combined each of them with marital enrichment program on marital infidelity tendency and marital satisfaction. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2018;7(2):27-54. https://fcp.uok.ac.ir/article_51182.html?lang=en
7. Karimi S, Yusefi R, Soleymani M. The role of personality traits in Prediction components marital infidelity. Clinical Psychology and Personality. 2020;15(2):97-109. doi: 10.22070/cpap.2020.2820
8. Waller G, Meyer C, Ohanian V. Psychometric properties of the long and short versions of the Young Schema Questionnaire: Core beliefs among bulimic and comparison women. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 2001;25(2):137-147. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026487018110
9. Aslankhani M, Abdoli B, Zamani Sani S, Fathi Rezaie Z. Emotional intelligence in athletes with disabilities. 2009;6(21):15-24. http://jip.azad.ac.ir/article_512331.html?lang=en
10. Schoenber MR, Dorr D, Morgan CD. The ability of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory Third Edition to detect malingering. Psychological Assessment. 2003;15(2):198-204. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.15.2.198
11. Chegini M, Delavar A, Garrayi B. Psychometric Characteristics of Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III. Journal of Modern Psychological Researches. 2013;29(8):135-162. https://psychologyj.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_4278.html?lang=en
12. Mogehi K. The scales represent the existence of that disorder in the individual. Study of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI);1994.
13. Farhoudian A, Sharifi V, Amini H, Basirnia A, Mesgarpour B, Mansouri N, Amin-Esmaeeli M, Salesian N, Mohammadi MR, Yousefi-Nooraie R, Rahimi-Movaghar A. Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in Iran: A systematic review. Iran J Psychiatry. 2020;2(4):137-150. https://ijps.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijps/article/view/454
14. Rasouli R, Pourshahriari M, Mortazavi M. Comparison of personality disorders in couples with normal and marital violence in Yazd, Tehran: International Conference on the Culture of Mental Pathology and Education;2019.
15. Khayat A, Attari Y, Karaei A. Predicting the tendency to betrayal based on personality traits and attachment styles in married people. Social Psychology Research. 2018;31(8):87-102.
16. Gholizadeh P. The relationship between personality traits and attitudes toward marital infidelity in women. Tehran: Sixth Conference on Psychology and Educational Sciences;2017.
17. Borhanizadeh S, Abdi R. The role of the dimensions of the dark triangle of personality in predicting the intimacy and attitude towards infidelity of couples seeking divorce. Thought and Behavior in Clinical Psychology. 2017;11(12):17-26. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=553289
18. Hadi S, Eskandari HN. Structural models predict marital commitment based on attachment styles and mediator variables self-control and early maladaptive schemas (in people with emotional extramarital relations). Counseling Culture and Psycotherapy. 2016;28(7):33-60. doi: 10.22054/qccpc.2017.7090
19. Mahambrey M. Self-reported Big Five personality traits of individuals who have experienced partner infidelity. Personal Relationships. 2020;27(2):274-302. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12315
20. Bilge Y, Balaban G. The Relationships between Personality Disorders and Early Maladaptive Schemas and the Moderating Role of Gender. Alpha Psychiatry. 2021;22(1):12-18. DOI: 10.5455/apd.114935
21. April ME, Schrodt P. Person-Centered Messages, Attributions of Responsibility, and the Willingness to Forgive Parental Infidelity. Communication Studies. 2019;70(1):79-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2018.1469525
22. Koolaee A, Motlagh T, Esmaili A, taghvaee D, Rahmatizadeh M. The comparison of early maladaptive schema and intimacy in married infidelity and non-infidelity men. IJPN. 2014;2(3):12-23. URL: http://ijpn.ir/article-1-395-en.html.
23. Porjorat M. A comparative study of early maladaptive schemas in women with marital infidelity experience and those who didn't have such an experience. Acta Med Int 2016;3(1):89-93. https://www.actamedicainternational.com/text.asp?2016/3/1/89/209729
24. Bakhtiari E, Hosseini S, Arefi M, Afsharinia K. Causal Model of Extramarital Affairs Based on Attachment Styles and Early Maladaptive Schemas: Mediating Role of Marital Intimacy and Love Styles. Iran J Health Educ Health Promot. 2019;7(2):245-258. URL: http://journal.ihepsa.ir/article-1-1152-en.html
25. Mark KP, Janssen E, Milhausen RR. Infidelity in heterosexual couples: demographic, interpersonal, and personality-related predictors of extradyadic sex. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40(5):971-82. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9771-z.
26. Arbanas G. Anxiety and Somatoform Disorders. In: Lew-Starowicz M, Giraldi A, Krüger T. (eds) Psychiatry and Sexual Medicine. Springer, Cham;2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52298-8_18
- Abstract Viewed: 173 times
- PDF Downloaded: 143 times