Physician's responsibility if the patient refers to his prior permission
Medical Figh,
Vol. 13 No. 43 (1400),
23 June 2021
,
Page 1-14
https://doi.org/10.22037/mfj.v13i43.34464
Abstract
Background and Aim: The phenomenon of medical malpractice, before being a medical subject, is a state that its conceptual identification and understanding is in the field of jurisprudential and legal studies. The present study has been developed by criticizing the physician's responsibility if the patient refers to his previous permission with the aim of changing the criteria and differentiating the physician's criminal and civil liability. Although the physician's liability has been dealt with in detail in jurisprudential sources, often with criminal scales, his liability or non-liability in case of patient referral from his former permission has remained silent.
Materials and Methods: The researcher has used a descriptive-analytical method to strengthen the physicians’ legal structure with a new depth in the second paragraph of Article 308 of the Civil Code with the focus on "pseudo-usurpation" or "judicial usurpation" and intends to explain not to refuse treatment by the doctor if the patient refers to his prior permission by reasoning human ownership on its members, proving iodine in seizure (treatment) of other property (patient’s body) and replacing civil liability based on compensation instead of criminal liability.
Conclusion: The study shows that physicians have invoked the reasons for preventing self-harm and the prohibition of induction of death, the rule of medicine and the moral responsibility of the physician for not referring the patient after the initial permission; On the other hand, patients by arguing for self-domination, corruption of permission in case of patient referral, believe in physician's positional responsibility. To resolve disputes between the patient and the physician if the patient refers to his prior permission, the legislature should choose one of two methods: either extend the non-recourse of the necessary contract to an agreement between the physician and the patient, or make the government responsible for the physician's actions, assuming the patient returns to his prior permission, by arguing for the rule of necessity, fostering a compassionate and responsible medical community, rescuing the person at risk of death, and the rule “whoever benefits from something he is responsible for the damage”, of course, the second method is more efficient.
- Permission patient physician referral responsibility
How to Cite
References
Mahmoud Abd al-Rahman H, Mojam Estelahat, Al-Tarath Arabi, Beyrut, 1414. Vol 2. p. 124. [In Arabic]
Shahroudi M, Journal of Ahl al-Bayt Jurisprudenc, Qum: Institute of Islamic Culture and Thought, 2009. Vol 42. p. 230. [In Persian]
Hashemi M, Farhang-e Fiq Motabeq. Qum: Seminary of Qum, 1426. Vol 3. p. 336. [In Persian]
Mahmoud Abd al-Rahman H, Mojam’ Istelahat, Al-Tarath Arabi, Beyrut, 1414. Vol 1. p. 445. [In Arabic]
Taheri H, Civil Law, Qum: Office of Islamic Publications Affiliated with the Society of Teachers of the Seminary of Qum, 1418. Vol 1. p. 205. [In Persian]
Shahroudi M, Journal of Ahl al-Bayt Jurisprudenc, Qum: Institute of Islamic Culture and Thought, 2009. Vol 42. p. 230. [In Persian]
Najafi S, Jawahir al-Kalam fi Sharh Shariah al-Islam, Beyrut: Dar Ihya al-Tarath al-Arabi, 1414. Vol 29. p. 52. [In Arabic]
Shahroudi M, Journal of Ahl al-Bayt Jurisprudenc, Qum: Institute of Islamic Culture and Thought, 2009. Vol 2. p. 448. [In Persian]
Ameli Z, Masalik al-Afham fi Sharh Sharay’ al-Islam, Qum: Islamic Ma’arif, 1413. p. 42. [In Arabic]
Humairi N, Shams al-Ulum wa Dawa 'al-Kalam al-Arab min al-Kalum, Beyrut: Dar al-Fikr al-Ma’asir, 1420. Vol 4. p. 2462. [In Arabic]
Makarem Shirazi N, Medical Jurisprudence, Qum: Qum Islamic Propaganda Office Publications. 1427. p. 436. [In Persian]
Hashemi M, Farhang-e Fiq Matabq, Qum: Seminary of Qum, 1426, Vol 1, p. 331. [In Persian]
Qurashi A, Dictionary of the Qurʾan, Tehran: Dar al-Kitab al-Islamiy, 1412. Vol 1. p. 58. [In Persian]
Isfahani S, Vasilat al-nejat, Tehran: Mehr Printing House, 2014. Vol 179. [In Arabic]
Hashemi Shahroudi M, Culture of jurisprudence according to the religion of Ahl al-Bayt (as), Qum: Islamic jurisprudence on the religion of Ahl al-Bayt. 1382. Vol 1. p. 332. [In Persian]
Mohaqqeq Damad M, Medical jurisprudence. Tehran: Legal Publications.1389. Vol 2. p. 587. [In Persian]
Najafi M, Jawahir al-Kalam fi Sharh Sharay’ al-Islam, Beyrut: Dar Ihyaa al-Tarath al-Arabi, 1414. Vol 31. p. 342. [In Arabic]
Taheri H, Civil Law, Qum: Office of Islamic Publications Affiliated with the Society of Teachers of the Seminary of Qum, 1418. Vol 4. p. 317. [In Persian]
Makarem Shirazi N, Medical Jurisprudence, Qum: Qum Islamic Propaganda Office Publications. 1427. p. 134. [In Persian]
Naraqi M, Anis Al-Tajjar, Qum: Daftar Tablighat Islami Publications, 1425. p. 341. [In Arabic]
Langroudi M, Legal Terminolozhy, Qum: Ganj Sokhan Publications, 1991. p. 23. [In Persian]
Langroudi M, Legal Terminolozhy, Qum: Ganj Sokhan Publications, 1991. p166. [In Persian]
Maraghi M, al-Anavin, Qum: Jamiat Modaresin, 1417. p. 183. [In Arabic]
Yazdi M, ghavaed Fiqh, Qum: Daftar Tabliqat Islami, 2009. p. 131. [In Persian]
Langroudi M, Legal Terminology, Qum: Ganj Sokhan Publications, 1991. p. 298. [In Persian]
Shahidi M, Hoquq Madani, Qum: Daftar Tabliqat Islami Publications, 2012 . p. 32. [In Persian]
Shahidi M, Principles of contracts and obligations, Qum: University of Tehran Press. 1391. p. 131. [In Persian]
Khansari S, Jame 'al-Madarik fi Sharh Mukhtasar al-Nafi', Qum: Ismailian Institute. 1405. Vol 3. p. 476. [In Arabic]
Maraghi M, al-Anavin, Qum: Jamiat Modaresin, 1417. p. 184. [In Arabic]
Khomeini R, Tahrir al-Wasilah, Qum: Daftar-e-Islami Publications affiliated with the Society of Teachers of the Seminary of Qum, 1425. p. 239. [In Persian]
Katouzian N, Civil Liability, Tehran: Tehran Publishing, 1999. p. 65. [In Persian]
Tabatabai Yazdi M, Al-Urwa Al-Wathqi, Beyrut: Dar Al-Tafsir Institute, 1409. Vol 2. p. 586. [In Arabic]
Emam H, Civil Law, Tehran: Islamic Publications, 2011. Vol 1. p. 108. [In Persian]
Yazdi M, qava’id Fiqh, Qum:Daftar Tabliqat Islami, 2009. Vol 1. p. 56. [In Persian]
Hoseini Ameli M, Miftah al-Karamah, Qum: Al-Bayt Institute, Qom, 1417. p. 74. [In Arabic]
Hekmatnia M, Civil Liability in Imamiah Jurisprudence, Qum: Islamic Propaganda Office, Institute of Islamic Sciences and Culture, p. 181. [In Persian]
Maraghi M, al-Anavin, Qum: Jamia’t Al-Modaresin, 1417. p. 507. [In Arabic]
Naraqi M, Anis Al-Tajjar, Qum: Daftar Tabliqat Islami Publications, 1425. p. 341. [In Arabic]
Taheri H, Civil Law, Qum: Office of Islamic Publications affiliated with the Society of Teachers of the Seminary of Qum, 1418. Vol 2. p. 298. [In Persian]
Safaei M, Hoqooq Madani, Qum: Daftar Tabliqat Islami Publications, 1390. p. 25. [In Persian]
Taheri H, Civil Law, Qum: Office of Islamic Publications affiliated with the Society of Teachers of the Seminary of Qum, 1418. Vol 2. p. 378. [In Persian]
Ameli Z, Al-Rawdah al-Bahiyyah in the explanation of the people of Damascus Qum: Davari Bookstore, 1410. Vol 7. p. 317. [In Arabic]
Taheri H, Civil Law, Qum: Office of Islamic Publications affiliated with the Society of Teachers of the Seminary of Qum, 1418. Vol 2, p. 298. [In Persian]
Wejdani Fakhr Q, Al-Jawahir Al-Fakhriya in Sharh Al-Rawdah Al-Bahiyya, Qum: Samaa Qalam Publications, 1426. Vol 13. p. 496. [In Arabic]
Emami H, Civil Law, Tehran: Islamic Publications, 2011. Vol 3, p. 361. [In Persian]
Taheri H, Civil Law, Qum: Office of Islamic Publications affiliated with the Society of Teachers of the Seminary of Qum, 1418. Vol 2. p. 298. [In Persian]
Keshavarz B, Analytical study of the new law, 2010. p. 176. [In Persian]
Khomeini R, Tahrir al-Wasilah, Qum: Daftar-e-Islami Publications affiliated with the Society of Teachers of the Seminary of Qum, 1425. Vol 2, p. 520. [In Persian]
Khomeini R, Tahrir al-Wasila, Qum: Daftar-e-Islami Publications affiliated with the Society of Teachers of the Seminary of Qum, 1425. Vol 2. p. 935. [In Persian]
Safaei M, Hoqooq Madani, Qum: Daftar Tabliqat Islami Publications, 1390. p. 95. [In Persian]
Almurawij H, Alshurut Al-fiqhiat, Qum: al-ghufran, al-safhatu, 1379. p. 290. [In Persian]
Fadil Muahidi linakrani M, Qanun a-leuqubat al-'Eslamii, Qum: almarkaz alfiqhiu lil'ayimat, almujalad, 1390. Vol 1, p. 127. [In Persian]
Muhaqiq Damad M, Qawa’id al-Fiqh. Qum: markaz nashr Al-eulum al-Islamiyah, 1406. Vol 4. p. 85. [In Persian]
Langroudi M, Legal Terminolozhy, Qum: Ganj Sokhan Publications, 1991. p. 642. [In Persian]
Yazdi M, Ghava’id Fiqh, Qum: Daftar Tabliqat Islami Publications, 2009. p131. [In Persian]
Khansari S, Jame 'al-Madarik fi Sharh Mukhtasar al-Nafi', Qum: Ismailian Institute, 1405. Vol 6. p. 476. [In Arabic]
Najafi M, The jewel of the word in the explanation of the laws of Islam. Beyrut: House for the Revival of Arab Heritage, 1404. Vol.27. p. 293. [In Arabic]
Ameli Z, Bahia shrine in the Explanation of Damascus Dam. Tehran: Davari Bookstore, 1410.Vol 15. p. 327. [In Arabic]
Ghasemi M, Jurisprudence Treatment. Qum: The jurisprudential center of the Imams, 1395. p. 43. [In Persian]
Musavi Bojnourdi M, Rules of jurisprudence. Tehran: Imam Khomeini Publishing House. 1379. Vol 1, p. 37. [In Persian]
Ameli Z, Masalak al-Afham fi Sharh Sharia al-Islam. Qum: Islamic Knowledge, 1414. Vol 7. p. 72. [In Arabic]
Makarem Shirazi N, Encyclopedia of Contemporary Jurisprudence. Qum: Imam Ali Ibn Abi Talib School, 1385. Vol 4. p. 93. [In Arabic]
Rouhani S, Fiqh al-Sadiq, Qum: Imam Sadeq (AS) School, 1412.Vol 24. p. 224. [In Arabic]
Makarem Shirazi N, Medical Jurisprudence, Qum: Islamic Propaganda Office Publications, 1427. p. 56. [In Persian]
Sharif Kashani M, Facilitating Masalak. Qum: Al-Muliya School, 1404. p. 10. [In Persian]
Najafabadi H, Mabani Hokumat Islami, Qum, Muasese kihan, 1409, Vol 7, p. 270. [In Persian]
- Abstract Viewed: 321 times
- pdf (فارسی) Downloaded: 80 times