SBMU Journals
  • Register
  • Login

Archives of Men's Health

  • Home
  • About
    • AMH Policies
    • Editorial Team
    • Contact
  • Issues
    • Current
    • Archives
  • Indexing and Abstracting
  • For Reviewers
    • Peer review process
    • Peer Review Policy
    • Reviewer guideline
  • For Authors
    • Submissions
    • Author Guidelines
    • Article Withdrawal Policy
    • Peer Review Process
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • Ethical Consideration
    • Ethical Requirements
    • Plagiarism Policy
    • Authorship Conflicts
    • Malpractice Statements
    • Copyright Notice
    • Intellectual Property Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Artificial Intelligence & Authorship
    • Retraction Policy
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021): Continuous volume
  4. Original Article / Research Article

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021)

January 2021

Prevalence of Different Subtypes of Renal Cell Carcinoma among Patients who have Undergone Nephrectomy; Statistics of a Referral Medical Center in Iran

  • Zahra Mohajer
  • Afshin Moradi
  • Farzad Allameh

Archives of Men's Health, Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021), 6 January 2021 , Page e10
https://doi.org/10.22037/mhj.v5i1.34251 Published: 2021-03-01

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the third most common genitourinary cancer in the world, and has the highest mortality rates among these types of cancers. In the present cross-sectional assessment, the prevalence of RCC subtypes in a sample of Iranian patients diagnosed with RCC which have undergone nephrectomy surgery between years 2014 to 2019 in a referral medical center has been investigated. We have studied 68 patients, including 47 male and 21 female individuals with an average age of 55. The patients have been studied for demographic and pathologic information such as age, sex, tumor size, tumor subtype, TNM staging, Fuhrman nuclear grading, and other pathological information. The statistical analysis was done via SPSS software version 21. Quantitative data were examined by T test and qualitative data were assessed by Chi square test. As we observed in the results, the most common RCC subtype among these patients was clear cell 53%, followed by papillary 22% and chromophobe 19%, emphasizing the higher rates of chromophobe RCC compared to the statistics worldwide.

Keywords:
  • Renal Cell Carcinoma
  • Nephrectomy
  • Pathology
  • Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma
  • Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
  • Histology
  • pdf

How to Cite

Mohajer, Z., Moradi, A., & Allameh, F. (2021). Prevalence of Different Subtypes of Renal Cell Carcinoma among Patients who have Undergone Nephrectomy; Statistics of a Referral Medical Center in Iran. Archives of Men’s Health, 5(1), e10. https://doi.org/10.22037/mhj.v5i1.34251
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

1. El Mouallem N, Smith SC, Paul AK, editors. Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma: Biology and treatment advances. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations; 2018: Elsevier.
2. Lopez-Beltran A, Scarpelli M, Montironi R, Kirkali Z. 2004 WHO classification of the renal tumors of the adults. European urology. 2006;49(5):798-805.
3. Russo P, Jang TL, Pettus JA, Huang WC, Eggener SE, O'Brien MF, et al. Survival rates after resection for localized kidney cancer: 1989 to 2004. Cancer. 2008;113(1):84-96.
4. Cairns P. Renal cell carcinoma. Cancer biomarkers. 2011;9(1-6):461-73.
5. Zhou H, Zheng S, Truong LD, Ro JY, Ayala AG, Shen SS. Clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma is the fourth most common histologic type of renal cell carcinoma in 290 consecutive nephrectomies for renal cell carcinoma. Human pathology. 2014;45(1):59-64.
6. Lau WK, Cheville JC, Blute ML, Weaver AL, Zincke H. Prognostic features of pathologic stage T1 renal cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy. Urology. 2002;59(4):532-7.
7. Vijayalakshmi K, Shankar V, Bain RM, Nolley R, Sonn GA, Kao CS, et al. Identification of diagnostic metabolic signatures in clear cell renal cell carcinoma using mass spectrometry imaging. International journal of cancer. 2020;147(1):256-65.
8. Lucca I, Klatte T, Fajkovic H, De Martino M, Shariat SF. Gender differences in incidence and outcomes of urothelial and kidney cancer. Nature Reviews Urology. 2015;12(10):585.
9. Nicodemus KK, Sweeney C, Folsom AR. Evaluation of dietary, medical and lifestyle risk factors for incident kidney cancer in postmenopausal women. International journal of cancer. 2004;108(1):115-21.
10. Leibovich BC, Lohse CM, Crispen PL, Boorjian SA, Thompson RH, Blute ML, et al. Histological subtype is an independent predictor of outcome for patients with renal cell carcinoma. The Journal of urology. 2010;183(4):1309-16.
11. Lipworth L, Morgans AK, Edwards TL, Barocas DA, Chang SS, Herrell SD, et al. Renal cell cancer histological subtype distribution differs by race and sex. BJU international. 2016;117(2):260-5.
12. Qi P, Tsivian M, Abern MR, Passoni NM, McGinley KF, Polascik TJ, editors. Clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of surgically excised renal masses in African Americans. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations; 2014: Elsevier.
13. Wu J, Zhang P, Zhang G, Wang H, Gu W, Dai B, et al. Renal cell carcinoma histological subtype distribution differs by age, gender, and tumor size in coastal Chinese patients. Oncotarget. 2017;8(42):71797.
14. Chin AI, Lam JS, Figlin RA, Belldegrun AS. Surveillance strategies for renal cell carcinoma patients following nephrectomy. Reviews in urology. 2006;8(1):1.
15. Lam JS, Belldegrun AS, Figlin RA. Advances in immune-based therapies of renal cell carcinoma. Expert review of anticancer therapy. 2004;4(6):1081-96.
16. Marchioni M, Preisser F, Bandini M, Nazzani S, Tian Z, Kapoor A, et al. Comparison of partial versus radical nephrectomy effect on other-cause mortality, cancer-specific mortality, and 30-day mortality in patients older than 75 years. European urology focus. 2019;5(3):467-73.
  • Abstract Viewed: 194 times
  • pdf Downloaded: 170 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Make a Submission

Make a Submission

Developed By

Open Journal Systems

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Browse

  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

This journal is distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC 3.0. Design and publishing by SBMU journals. All credits and honors to PKP for their OJS. 

Powered by OJSPlus