Reflections on the Ethical Challenges of Bioterrorism
Akhlāq-i zīstī i.e., Bioethics Journal,
Vol. 11 No. 36 (1400),
17 Mordad 2021
,
Page 1-17
https://doi.org/10.22037/bioeth.v11i36.36152
Abstract
Background and Aim: The issue of bioterrorism has been considered by researchers in various fields. One of these fields is the ethical aspects that some governments have also considered, so that in the conferences reviewing the Convention on Biological Weapons, there has always been an emphasis on guaranteeing ethical performance. Therefore, in discussions about bioterrorism, it is important to know how ethics regard bioterrorism. Accordingly, the present article examines the challenges of bioterrorism from an ethical perspective.
Materials and Methods: This is a descriptive-analytical study using library and other available resources to investigate the ethical challenges of bioterrorism. The methodological approach of the present study is based on describing the current situation and critique and analysis of some views.
Ethical Considerations: In all stages of writing the article, honesty and trustworthiness have been observed and all materials taken from other scientific works are accompanied by accurate references.
Findings: The findings of this article indicate that bioterrorism faces several ethical challenges, the most important of which are: 1. Dual-use research that is likely to be misused; 2. The framework and scope of bio-defense in the face of the public rights and public freedoms of citizens; 3. Paying attention to the health of care providers in the face of bioterrorism attacks.
Conclusion: Rules of conduct and codes of ethics can complement the legal rules in the field of bioterrorism and be effective in preventing the phenomenon of bioterrorism as part of the UN and states criminal policy. Therefore, it is suggested for Iran to develop comprehensive and specific rules of conduct and ethical codes in each field of medical sciences by experts of related institutions, and preparing appropriate mechanisms for their implementation.
Cite this article as: Ebrahimi M, Taheri Bojd MA, Chahkandi Nejad A. Reflections on the Ethical Challenges of Bioterrorism. Majale "Akhlāq-i zīstī" (i.e., Bioethics Journal). 2021; 11(36): e26.
- Bioterrorism; Normative Ethics; Dual-Use Researches; Bio-Defense; Ethical Codes
How to Cite
References
- Townsend, R. & Espinoza, J., Combating the threat of bio-terrorism by non-state actors, UN Old Dominion University Model United Nations Society, 2015.
2 - F. Klietmann, W. & L. Ruoff, K.,"Bioterrorism: Implications for the Clinical Microbiologist", CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2001, p. 379.
3- Rahbarpour, M.," The concept of bioethics and its realm", Bioethics Journal, 2011; 1: 18-20. [Persian]
4 - Lederberg, J.,"Moral stance on biological weapons, Stanford University Report", January 21, 1998, available at: E:\Moral stance on biological weapons 1_21_98.html
5 - Maria T., Ana & Garrafa, V., Ethical Reflections on International Health and Biological Weapons, UNESCO, Año 2, 1(3), 2011, p. 79- 84.
6- Hakimiha, S.,"The criminal policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the fight against terrorism", Journal of Defense Policy, 2011; 76: 66-67 [Persian]
7 - Nofziger, R., Ethical Implications of Chemical, Biological and Nuclear Warfare, Goshen College, Biology Senior Seminar, 2002.
8- Karami, A. & Ghasemi, H.,"The role of biosafety regulations, biosecurity and ethical and legal guidelines in military medicine research in implementing the objectives of the Convention on Biological Disarmament", Quarterly Journal of Medical Law, 2010; 12: p. 172-179 [Persian]
9 - Bonin, S., Challenges to Biosecurity from Advances in the Life Sciences, United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute, 2021, available at: https://www.un.org/en/chronicle/article/challenges-biosecurity-advances-life-sciences
10- Tolayi, M."An Overview of the Prohibition Convention on the Development, Production and Storage of Biological Weapons and the Do's and Don'ts of Biology", Journal of Defense Policy, 1998; 25: 106. [Persian]
11 - Roffy, R. & Others, Critical Guidance: A Code of Conduct for Biodefense Scientists, Arms Control Association, 2008.
12- Abbasi, M. & Taheri, M.," Comparative study of ethics codes and guidelines in medical research", Bioethics Journal, 2015; 16: 11-13. [Persian]
13 - Evans, N. & Inglesby, T., Biosecurity and Public Health Ethics Issues Raised by Biological Threats, The Oxford Handbook of Public Health Ethics, 2019.
14 - D. Loike, J. & L. Fischbach, R.,"Ethical Challenges in Biodefense and Bioterrorism", Journal of Bioterrorism & Biodefense, 2013, p. 2- 5.
15 - Hills, K.,"Rejecting Quarantine: A Frozen-in-Time Reaction to Disease", In Ebola’s Message: Public Health and Medicine in the Twenty-First Century, edited by N. G. Evans, T. C. Smith, and M. S. Majumder, 2016.
16 - Evans, N. G., “Balancing the Duty to Treat Patients with Ebola Virus Disease with the Risks to Dialysis Personnel.” Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 10(12), 2015, 2263–2267.
17 - K. Wynia, M.,"Ethical Challenges in Preparing for Bioterrorism: Barriers Within the Health Care System", American Journal of Public Health, July 2004, Vol 94, No. 7, p. 1096.
18 - American Medical Association, Declaration of Professional Responsibility Medicine’s Social Contract with Humanity. American Medical Association, San Francisco, California, 2001.
19 - Koepsell D., On genies and bottles: scientists’ moral responsibility and dangerous technology R&D. Sci Eng Ethics 16, 2010, p. 119-120.
20 - A. Somerville, M. & M. Atlas, R., Ethics: A Weapon to Counter Bioterrorism, Science, New Series, Vol. 307, No. 5717, 2005, pp. 1881-1882.
21- Abbasi, M. & Others,"Legal analysis of ethical codes for blood donation and transfusion", Bioethics Journal, 2015; 16: 145-146. [Persian]
22 - S. Harris, Factories of Death: Japanese Biological Warfare, 1932-1945, and the American Cover-up (Routledge, London, 2002).
23- Valizadeh, A.,"Review and analysis of ways to strengthen the biological convention", Bioethics Journal, 2011, 75: 211. [Persian]
24 - U.S. Department of State,"Working Paper by the United States of America", Proposal submitted by the United States at the 2001 BWC Review Conference, November 26, 2001.
- Abstract Viewed: 545 times
- PDF (فارسی) Downloaded: 250 times