Fair Treatment in the Light of Ethical Principles in Quasi-Judicial Authorities
Akhlāq-i zīstī i.e., Bioethics Journal,
Vol. 11 No. 36 (1400),
17 August 2021
,
Page 1-16
https://doi.org/10.22037/bioeth.v11i36.35317
Abstract
Background and Aim: The importance of paying attention to ethical principles in the judicial proceedings and in quasi-judicial authorities is one of the needs that is felt today in trials, especially in criminal quasi-judicial authorities. Our purpose in this article is to explain a fair trial based on ethics and fairness in criminal quasi-judicial authorities.
Materials and Methods: This research has been done using descriptive-analytical method.
Ethical Considerations: This article is written Considering of the principles of Honesty and fidelity.
Findings: Findings show that in most quasi-judicial authorities, the trial process is not conducted in a fair manner and based on the principles of fair trial. It is necessary to rely on ethical principles and to extend the principles governing judicial institutions to quasi-judicial institutions, to provide a basis for fair trial in criminal quasi-judicial authorities.
Conclusion: The existence of similarities such as litigation, decision-making, decision-makers in quasi-judicial authorities in relation to judicial authorities, litigants, preventing the decision-making of incompetent persons and the nature of punishments, are among the most important reasons for spreading the principles of fair trial and complying with them in quasi-judicial authorities.
Cite this article as: Fardoost GH-R, Rajabi A, Rajabiyeh MH, Golkhandan S. Fair Treatment in the Light of Ethical Principles Quasi-Judicial Authorities. Majale "Akhlāq-i zīstī" (i.e., Bioethics Journal). 2021; 11(36): e36.
- Quasi-judicial authorities; Ethical principles; Fair Trial
How to Cite
References
Jafari Langroudi MJ. Legal Terminology. Tehran: Ganj-e Danesh; 2005. p.273. [Persian]
Katuzian N. Transitional Law, Conflict of Laws in Time. Tehran: Mizan; 2018. p.222. [Persian]
Saber M. Criteria and Guarantee of Fair Trial in the Preliminary Research Stage. Journal of Teacher of Humanities, Comparative Law Research. 2009; 13(4): 143-175. [Persian]
Fazaeli M. Fair Trial of International Criminal Courts. 1st ed. Tehran: Shahrdanesh Publications; 2008. p.60. [Persian]
Dehghan F. Quasi-criminal authorities of Iran in the category of principles of criminal territory. Ph.D. Thesis. Qom: Qom University; 2017. p.294-317. [Persian]
Fletcher GP. Basic Concepts of Criminal Law. Translated by Seyedzadeh Thani SM. Mashhad: Astan Quds Razavi Publications; 2016. p.59. [Persian]
Shams A. Basic Civil Procedure. Tehran: darak Publications; 2014. p.41. [Persian]
Hadavand M, Aghaei Toogh M. Special Courts of Iran in the Light of the Principles and Rules of Fair Trial. Tehran: Khorsandi Publications; 2017. p.33. [Persian]
Fanazad R. Quasi-Judicial Authorities. 1st ed. Tehran: Khorsandi Publications; 2016. p.32. [Persian]
Emami M. Theoretical foundations of quasi-judicial authorities and their legal status in Iranian law. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, Shiraz University. 2004; 21(2004): 93-110. [Persian]
Nejabatkhah M, Afshari F, Mousavizadeh S-SH. Pathology of the structure and competencies of specific administrative authorities in Iranian administrative law. Journal of Legal Perspectives. 2017; 12(77-78): 199-224. [Persian]
Fallahzadeh AM, Alidadzadeh R. Judicial Supervision of the Opinions of Special Administrative Judicial Authorities in Iran and Lebanon. Journal of Comparative Law Studies. 2019; 10(2): 639-664. [Persian]
Bayati A. The Legal System Governing the Protection of Public Order and Ensuring Freedom of Association. New Research in Administrative Law. 2020; 8(2): 67-94. [Persian]
Mahmoudi J. Judiciary and Decriminalization from the Perspective of Constitution and Administrative Law. Journal of Theology and Law. 2006; 4(19): 104-121. [Persian]
Tajarlou R, Taghavi ZA, Poshtdar H. The role and function of the National Dispute Resolution Commission from the perspective of principles of fair trial. Journal of Public Law Research. 2015; 17(49): 155-177. [Persian]
Emami M, Mousavi SN. Theoretical foundations of quasi-judicial authorities and their position in Iranian law. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, Shiraz University. 2004; 21(2): 93-110. [Persian]
Mashhadi A. Principles and issues of court costs in administrative lawsuits. Quarterly Journal of Public Law Research. 2018; 20(59): 217-237. [Persian]
Hajipour Kondroud A. Assessing the applicability of the principle of openness of hearings in specialized administrative authorities. Journal of Modern Administrative Law Research. 2017; 4(1): 95-118. [Persian]
- Abstract Viewed: 252 times
- PDF (فارسی) Downloaded: 97 times