بیوتکنولوژی غذایی کاربردی
  • ثبت‌نام
  • ورود
  • فارسی
    • English
    • العربية
    • 简体中文
    • Español (España)
    • Français (France)
  • صفحه اصلی
  • اطلاعات مجله
    • درباره مجله
    • تیم سردبیری
    • نمایه نامه ها
    • بیانه حریم خصوصی
    • سیاست و دستورالعمل داوری
    • سیاست سرقت علمی
    • سیاست بایگانی
    • تاریخچه مجله
  • شماره‌ها
    • شماره جاری
    • بایگانی‌ها
    • دست‌نوشته‌های پذیرفته‌شده
    • در دست انتشار
  • Publication Ethics
  • راهنمای نویسندگان
    • Submission
    • نامه درخواست به مجله
    • فرم کپی رایت
    • تضلد منافع
  • تماس با ما
جستجوی پیشرفته
  1. صفحه اصلی
  2. بایگانی‌ها
  3. دوره 12 شماره 1 (2025): Continuous
  4. Review Article

دوره 12 شماره 1 (2025)

ژانویهٔ 2025

Microbes in Action: Powering Sustainable Fermentation for Food, Pharma, and Bioeconomy

  • P. Saranraj
  • Ramesh C. Ray
  • Nayak Ashish Kumar
  • B. Lokeshwari
  • K. Gayathri
  • P. Sivasakthivelan

بیوتکنولوژی غذایی کاربردی, دوره 12 شماره 1 (2025), 4 ژانویهٔ 2025 , صفحه 1-24 (e20)
https://doi.org/10.22037/afb.v12i1.49836 چاپ شده: 2025-08-30

  • مقاله
  • دانلود
  • ارجاع
  • مراجع
  • آمار
  • اشتراک

چکیده

Background and Objective: Fermentation, a microbial-driven metabolic process, has been utilized for millennia to produce, preserve, and enhance food and beverages, evolving from traditional practices such as yogurt and wine to modern applications in biofuels and pharmaceuticals. Fermentation has been found to have its earliest evidence more than 7,000 years ago. The principle of fermentation was established in the 19th century, based on the foundational research of Pasteur, who bridged the connection between microbial activity and chemical change, setting the stage for modern microbiology and biotechnology. This review explores microbial roles in fermentation, bridging traditional and biotechnological advancements by comparing bacterial and fungal processes, analyzing key metabolites, and highlighting genetic innovations.

Results and Conclusion: The review comprehensively explores the pivotal role of microbial fermentation, spanning traditional practices to modern innovations, highlighting the extensive diversity of 195 bacterial and 69 fungal species, with lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae being prominent examples. It compares bacterial and fungal fermentation processes, noting that bacterial fermentation often yields higher protein content in products like fermented soybean meal (FSBM), and discusses key metabolites, including primary (amino acids, organic acids, vitamins) and secondary (antibiotics, antitumor agents) compounds, for their industrial and health applications. The review also examines various fermentation methods and their suitability for different products, emphasizing advancements in genetic engineering for strain optimization, while underscoring the health benefits of probiotics and fermented foods and the potential of emerging technologies to address food security and sustainability. In conclusion, microbial fermentation bridges ancient traditions with cutting-edge science, offering transformative potential across industries, where innovations in genetic engineering and process optimization drive efficiency and sustainability, and the expanding microbial repertoire continues to unlock novel applications, integrating fermentation technology with modern biotechnological tools to address global challenges in nutrition, health, and environmental sustainability.

Keywords: Biofuel production, bioeconomy, CRISPR-Cas9, food security, probiotics, solid-state fermentation (SSF), submerged fermentation (SmF), sustainability, synthetic biology.

Microorganisms have played a central role in human life, particularly during the food fermentation process. Fermentation has been utilised over the centuries to produce, conserve, and flavour beverages and foods, enhancing their nutritional and sensory qualities. Fermentation is a metabolic process that uses microorganisms to break down carbohydrates into alcohol, organic acids, gases, or other desired by-products [1]. The fermentation processes were induced by naturally occurring populations of bacteria, yeasts, and moulds, whose synergistic activity produced characteristic textures, flavours, and nutritionally beneficial advantages. This has evolved from a mystical art to a science with the discovery of microorganisms by pioneers like Antonie van Leeuwenhoek and Louis Pasteur [2]. Development of microbiology, molecular biology, and bioprocess engineering has made it possible to identify, isolate, and genetically improve microbial strains for large-scale fermentations. Fermentation has numerous applications in the biotechnology industry, including the production of antibiotics, vaccines, enzymes, biofuels, biodegradable plastics, and food products. Considering recent health and sustainability concerns, microbial fermentation offers promising routes for producing plant-based meat alternatives, upcycling agro-industrial waste into high-value products, and generating nutraceuticals and pharmaceuticals.

Probiotic fermentation is another contemporary area of research in food fermentation. It refers to the process where live microorganisms, known as probiotics, are introduced to a food or substrate to undergo fermentation, resulting in a variety of beneficial changes [3]. This process enhances the food's nutritional value, digestibility, and flavour, while also introducing beneficial bacteria that can positively impact the consumer's gut health [4]. Probiotic technology leads the functional food sector based on strain specificity, gut microbiota interaction, and individualised nutrition.

Contamination control issues, regulatory acceptance of genetically modified strains, consumer acceptability, and scaling up of new technology are being addressed more effectively through interdisciplinary and collaborative partnerships at a global level [5]. The function of microbes in fermentation is a balance between tradition and innovation, promoting an interrelated and symbiotic collaboration between human creativity and microbial activity. Fermentation is a biotechnology that has been utilised for millennia to flavour and preserve food, produce drinks, and create pharmaceuticals. Its roots date back to microbes that transform raw material into staple foods, such as bread, cheese, wine, and beer [2]. Fermentation is coupled with technology to produce a wide variety of products, ranging from traditional fermented foods and specialty beverages on one end and antibiotics, biofuels, and recombinant proteins on the other [6].  The metabolic diversity of microbes has been utilised to produce both submerged and solid-state fermentation systems, each offering distinct advantages for specific applications. The introduction of synthetic biology, genetic engineering, and omics technologies has further transformed microbial fermentation with improved metabolic pathways for precision biomanufacturing.

Technologies such as continuous fermentation, immobilised cell systems, and electro-fermentation have enhanced process efficiency and sustainability. Additionally, their applications in cellular agriculture, biodegradable plastics, and waste valorisation reflect the ability of fermentation to address key challenges in food security, healthcare, and environmental sustainability. Fermentation is alternatively referred to as Zymology or Zymurgy and was practised by humans since the Neolithic era (around 10000 BC). Industrial fermentation involves the use of microorganisms, such as bacteria and fungi, to produce goods beneficial to humans and acidic products with applications in the food industry [7]. Fermentation rate depends on the concentration of microorganisms, cell types, cellular constituents, enzymes, temperature, pH, and the aerobic fermentation factor.

  1. Inventory of microbial species used in fermentation

Over the past two decades, the number of microbial species used in fermentation processes has significantly increased. The 2002 International Dairy Federation Inventory, which catalogued 82 bacterial species and 31 yeast and mould species, has been replaced by the current Inventory of Microbial Food Cultures, which now includes 195 bacterial species and 69 yeast and mould species [8]. This growth is attributed to advanced genomic sequencing techniques, increased demand for a variety of fermented foods, and advancements in microbial biotechnology. The bacterial repository has experienced a meteoric rise in lactic acid bacteria (LAB) genera, with lactobacilli comprising 45 different species used in dairy, meat, vegetable, and cereal fermentations [8]. In 2020, the Lactobacillus genus was significantly reorganized, with many species being reclassified into new genera. This included the creation of 23 new genera. For example, Lactobacillus casei is now Lacticaseibacillus casei, and Lactobacillus plantarum is now Lactiplantibacillus plantarum. Lactobacillus rhamnosus is now Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, and Lactobacillus brevis is now Levilactobacillus brevis. Lactobacillus salivarius is now Ligilactobacillus salivarius, and Lactobacillus fermentum is now Limosilactobacillus fermentum [9]. The number of Bifidobacterium species increased from 4 to 10 due to their importance in probiotic applications. The yeast and mould inventory has grown from traditional Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Aspergillus oryzae species to include a broad range of non-traditional species such as Pichia kudriavzevii for cocoa fermentation and Neurospora intermedia for oncom production. The identification and utilisation of extremophiles, such as thermophilic Geobacillus species in hot fermentations and halophilic Archaea in high-salt processes, has triggered diversification of microorganisms. It also includes engineered strains developed through the application of both traditional mutagenesis and novel genetic techniques, such as lactose-positive yeast strains for use in dairy applications and bacteriocin-producing LAB variants for enhanced food safety. Regulatory reforms and enhanced safety assessment procedures have enabled the inclusion of previously underutilised species. Concurrently, market demand for flavor, texture, and health-affecting effects has spurred the utilization of microbial diversity from globally dispersed traditional fermented foods [9]. The diversity of microorganisms involved in fermentation processes spans a wide range of taxonomic groups, including bacteria, yeasts, and filamentous fungi. These microbes play pivotal roles in transforming raw substrates into valuable fermented products. As illustrated in Figure 1, the taxonomic distribution highlights the predominance of LAB and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in traditional and industrial fermentations, alongside other key genera such as Aspergillus sp. and Bifidobacterium sp. This microbial richness underscores the versatility of fermentation technology across food, pharmaceutical, and bioeconomic sectors.

The distribution of microbial species used in fermentation was systematically categorised across relevant taxonomic units, as detailed in Table 1 (bacteria) and Table 2 (fungi/yeasts). Table 1 highlights the predominance of lactobacilli (45 species) and Bifidobacterium (10 species) among LAB, alongside Bacillus (over 30 species), which are also utilised for industrial enzymes. Table 2 emphasizes Aspergillus and Saccharomyces as key fungal genera, with Aspergillus niger for organic acids and Saccharomyces cerevisiae for ethanol. Some taxa, such as Acetobacter (vinegar) and Pichia (recombinant proteins), reflect diversification. This structured classification shows the microbial richness harnessed in traditional and modern fermentation biotechnologies.

2.1. Bacteria

2.1.1. Actinobacteriaceae

The microbial richness in the manufacture of fermented foods has undergone extensive taxonomic resolution and growth, indicative of advances in genomic research for the microbial ecology within food substrates. The genus Brachybacterium is a component of the surface microbiota of artisanal cheeses, such as Gruyère and Beaufort. It plays a role in proteolysis and flavour enhancement through its enzyme activities. Microbacterium gubbeenense is a significant member of the classical red-smear surface cultures employed in surface-ripened cheeses, playing a role in colour development and aroma profile [29]. The genus Bifidobacterium has undergone taxonomic revisions, with the redescription of Bifidobacterium infantis and the addition of Bifidobacterium thermophilum due to its significant roles in functional food applications for probiotic dairy products. Brevibacterium aurantiacum is utilised for its essential role in the ripening process, contributing to the flavour complexity and the distinctive orange colour of such cheeses. The Propionibacterium genus, including Propionibacterium freudenreichii subsp. globosum and Propionibacterium jensenii (now reclassified as Acidipropionibacterium jensenii) [30].

2.1.2. Firmicutes

The International Molecular Foods inventory has expanded significantly with advances in microbial taxonomy and the growing industrial demand for specialised starter cultures in a diverse range of food matrices. Some notable additions include three species of Carnobacterium, Tetragenococcus, Weissella, Enterococcus faecalis, Lactobacillus, Staphylococcus, and Streptococcus. Carnobacterium is essential for meat fermentations, and Tetragenococcus comprises species required for high-salt fermentations, such as those used in the production of soy sauce and fish products. Weissella splits species previously classified as part of the Leuconostoc mesenteroides complex for their distinctive phylogenetic and metabolic characteristics [31]. Enterococcus faecalis is the starter for dairy, meat, and vegetable fermentations, whereas the lactobacilli comprise 82 species. The Staphylococcus genus contains 13 species, which prove their critical contribution towards meat fermentation. This also allows for the specific selection of strains to achieve goal-directed fermentation results, such as balanced acidification and aroma formation in sausages or maximum gas formation in sourdough.

2.1.3. Proteobacteriaceae

The International Molecular Foods stock has been supplemented with specialised microbial species, which cover conventional fermentation practices and new biotechnological developments. Acetic acid bacteria, such as Acetobacter sp. and Gluconacetobacter sp., play a crucial role in the production of vinegar, as well as in the fermentation of cocoa and coffee, and in imparting flavour sensations. Halomonas elongata is a halotolerant organism that has been indicated in meat fermentation systems due to its resistance to high sugar levels and acidic environments [32]. This expanded microbiota enables specificity in the fermentation process, as observed in Acetobacter pasteurianus strains used to produce artisanal balsamic vinegar. Zymomonas mobilis, due to its novel pyruvate decarboxylase and alcohol dehydrogenase II pathway, prefers the irreversible production of ethanol. The industrial application of these microbial resources has demonstrated quantifiable effects, wherein Gluconacetobacter europaeus strains reduced vinegar-making times by 30–40 % and specific Zymomonas mobilis isolates achieved 15–20 % productivity gains in ethanol production, making fermentation more feasible for tequila production.

 

2.2. Fungi

2.2.1. Yeast

Fungal taxonomy employed in food production has been extensively utilised, as numerous species formerly associated with the genus Candida have been reassigned to more phylogenetically accurate genera. This has significant implications for food science and industry, enabling more accurate strain selection, process optimisation during fermentation, product uniformity, and the prevention of spoilage risk [33]. Examples are Dekkera bruxellensis, Debaryomyces hansenii, Hanseniaspora uvarum, Kazachstania turicensis, Metschnikowia pulcherrima, Pichia occidentalis, Rhodosporidium spp., Saccharomyces pastorianus, Saccharomycopsis fibuligera, Saturnisporus saitoi, Sporobolomyces roseus, Torulaspora delbrueckii, Trichosporon cutaneum, Wickerhamomyces anomalus, Yarrowia lipolytica, Zygosaccharomyces bailii, and Zygosaccharomyces rouxii. The persistence of some Candida species with unknown teleomorphs of fungal life cycles, to explain their sexual phases or validate their taxonomic position using genomic information. The functional properties of these microorganisms are being utilised increasingly, such as Metschnikowia pulcherrima's use in biocontrol to inhibit moulds on vineyards and Wickerhamomyces anomalus's delivery of killer toxins that inhibit spoilage yeasts in fermented foods [34].

2.2.2. Filamentous fungi

Fungi are well-established in Asian food fermentation traditions, and have been added to the list of microorganisms used in fermented foods in Europe. There is significant potential in adopting well-established fungal starter cultures from Asian food fermentation traditions and incorporating them into European practices. Key fungi include Aspergillus oryzae, Aspergillus sojae, and Rhizopus oligosporus, which are essential to produce Asian fermented foods and beverages such as miso, soy sauce, sake, awamori liquors, and Puerh tea. Fusarium species, such as Fusarium domesticum and Fusarium solani, are utilised in European food applications, including cheese fermentations, Vacherin cheese production, and the development of meat alternatives. Penicillium species dominate fungal applications in European dairy traditions, with Penicillium camemberti being used in bloomy-rind cheeses such as Camembert and Brie. European charcuterie traditions utilise Penicillium nalgiovense and select strains of Penicillium chrysogenum for mould-fermented sausages, while Lecanicillium lecanii shows promise for cheese ripening applications. Fungal contributions beyond fermentation to include colourant production, with species like Epicoccum nigrum and Penicillium purpurogenum capable of generating natural pigments [35]. This fungal application highlights the rich diversity of fungal species in global food systems and the significant opportunities for cross-cultural transfer of fungal technologies in Asian fermentation fungi to European practices for novel product development.

  1. Comparison of bacterial and fungal Fermentation

Fermented Soybean Meal (FSBM) is a highly nutritious protein source, thanks to the unique metabolic pathways and enzymatic activities of the microorganisms involved. Both fungal and bacterial fermentation processes effectively reduce antinutritional factors and enhance the nutritional quality of the resulting products. However, there are notable differences in specific components that influence the suitability of FSBM for various dietary and health applications [36]. Both the fungal and bacterial fermentations increased crude protein content through microbial biomass accumulation, with fungal-fermented FSBM showing a 19.4% increase in soluble protein, a crucial indicator of digestibility, and a more substantial 63.11% increase in bacterial-fermented FSBM. These fermentations also reduced the immunoreactivity of soybean meal, which is essential for minimising allergic responses and enhancing food safety. Amino acid profiles show that crucial amino acids generally remain stable during fermentation, but specific changes occur depending on the microorganism used. These findings have practical implications for animal feed and human nutrition, where FSBM is increasingly used as a high-quality protein source. A comparative parameter of bacterial and fungal fermentation processes is shown in Table 3.

  1. Metabolites produced by micro-organisms

Microorganisms play a crucial role in fermentation processes, generating diverse metabolites that have been utilized for centuries in food preservation and have evolved into high-tech biotechnological applications [46]. Primary metabolites, including amino acids, nucleotides, vitamins, organic acids, and alcohols, are generated during the growing stage of microorganisms and are of industrial importance. Genetically modified strains, such as Corynebacterium glutamicum and Brevibacterium species, maximise the yield of these metabolites. Secondary metabolites, such as antibiotics, antitumor compounds, and immunosuppressants, are produced during the stationary phase of microbial cultures and have had a profound impact on medicine and agriculture [46]. Downstream processing and fermentation technology enable the effective extraction and purification of these metabolites, facilitating their commercial exploitation. The green advantages of microbial fermentation are being leveraged in global initiatives to achieve a circular bioeconomy.

Microorganisms play a crucial role in fermentation processes, generating diverse metabolites that have been utilized for centuries in food preservation and have evolved into high-tech biotechnological applications [46]. Primary metabolites, including amino acids, nucleotides, vitamins, organic acids, and alcohols, are generated during the growing stage of microorganisms and are of industrial importance (Figure 2). Genetically modified strains, such as Corynebacterium glutamicum and Brevibacterium species, maximise the yield of these metabolites. Secondary metabolites, such as antibiotics, antitumor compounds, and immunosuppressants, are produced during the stationary phase of microbial cultures and have had a profound impact on medicine and agriculture [46].

4.1. Primary metabolites

Primary metabolites are small, essential molecules found in all living cells that serve as intermediates or end products of metabolic processes. Primary metabolites comprise amino acids, nucleotides, vitamins, solvents, and organic acids, with applications in industry ranging from human and animal nutrition to the production of biofuels and solvents. Innovative applications include the use of monosodium glutamate and nucleotides in food processing, as well as organic acids such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in pharmaceuticals and water treatment. Additionally, bio-based organic acids like succinic acid are utilised in green packaging and textile production [47]. The production of these metabolites at an industrial scale largely depends on microbial fermentation, where microorganisms are genetically and physiologically engineered to overproduce target molecules through sophisticated biotechnological measures. Technological advancements in bioreactor design and downstream processing methods have further enhanced fermentation processes, with the inclusion of systems biology tools providing a systemic view of cellular metabolism and identifying primary genetic targets for manipulation. The transition to a sustainable and circular bioeconomy has raised demand to produce metabolites using low-value, renewable feedstocks, such as lignocellulosic biomass, molasses, and waste glycerol [48]. The output of economically feasible purification processes for high-value metabolites, and the scaling-up of optimised laboratory processes to industrial scale, without decreasing their productivity.

4.1.1. Amino acids

The global amino acid market, valued at over $6 billion, is a rapidly growing sector in industrial biotechnology. Monosodium glutamate, the most widely produced amino acid, is produced through large-scale fermentation processes using high-performance bacterial strains, primarily Corynebacterium glutamicum and its subspecies. Industrial microbiology has successfully achieved inhibition by developing auxotrophic mutants and antimetabolite-resistant mutants to deregulate metabolic pathways and prevent feedback inhibition [49]. Modern strain development often combines both strategies, creating microbial producers with multiple deregulated pathways capable of hyperaccumulating desired compounds. Recombinant DNA technology has revolutionised amino acid production by enabling precise genetic modifications, such as the introduction of plasmid-borne biosynthetic operons, the overexpression of genes encoding rate-limiting enzymes, and the strategic cloning of feedback-resistant enzyme variants. Metabolic engineers have also enhanced production by introducing heterologous genes or amplifying the first committed step in amino acid biosynthesis to maximise carbon flux toward desired products [50]. Amino acid production may involve synthetic biology to design novel biosynthetic pathways, artificial intelligence (AI) to predict optimal genetic modifications, and the exploration of non-conventional hosts for specialised applications.

4.1.2. Nucleotides and nucleosides

The industrial production of nucleotides through microbial fermentation has gained significant commercial traction due to the growing demand for guanylic acid and inosinic acid, which serve as potent flavour enhancers in the food industry. Three primary biotechnological processes dominate nucleotide manufacturing: (1) the enzymatic hydrolysis of yeast RNA using fungal nucleases to yield adenosine monophosphate (AMP) and guanosine monophosphate (GMP), which are subsequently deaminated to produce inosine monophosphate (IMP); (2) the fermentative production of nucleosides (inosine and guanosine) by metabolically engineered Bacillus subtilis mutants, which are later phosphorylated to their respective 5′-nucleotides; and (3) the direct fermentation of sugars to IMP using high-performance Corynebacterium glutamicum strains genetically optimized for purine overproduction [51]. A nucleotide biosynthesis is the feedback inhibition exerted by intracellular AMP and GMP, which regulate purine metabolism through the allosteric control of key enzymes, such as phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate synthetase and amidophosphoribosyl transferase. This regulation can be studied using adenine auxotrophic mutants and exploiting antimetabolite resistance strategies, including the deletion of IMP dehydrogenase.

4.1.3. Vitamins

Microbial fermentation is a vital aspect of industrial vitamin production, with over 50 % of commercially manufactured vitamins destined for animal feed supplementation. Seven vital vitamins or vitamin-like compounds are produced through microbial processes: β-carotene (provitamin A), vitamin B12 (cobalamin), vitamin B2 (riboflavin), vitamin B13 (orotic acid), vitamin C (ascorbic acid), γ-linolenic acid (vitamin F), and ergosterol (provitamin D). Riboflavin production has transitioned from chemical synthesis to microbial fermentation, driven by economic and environmental considerations [52]. Vitamin B12 production is another microbial triumph, with Propionibacterium shermanii and Pseudomonas denitrificans strains engineered to produce approximately 100,000 times more cobalamin than their metabolic needs require. Biotin production has traditionally relied on chemical synthesis through the multi-step Reichstein process; however, this route incorporates a crucial bioconversion step employing Gluconobacter oxydans mutants optimised for high sorbitol tolerance. Genetically modified Erwinia herbicola strains incorporating Corynebacterium genes enable direct conversion of glucose to 2-keto-L-gulonic acid (2-KLG), the immediate precursor to ascorbic acid.

4.1.4. Organic acids

Microbial fermentation is the primary method for industrial-scale production of organic acids, utilising microorganisms such as fungi, yeasts, and bacteria to synthesise various acids. Citric acid is the most widely produced organic acid and is crucial in food and beverage applications due to its solubility, taste, and Generally Recognised as Safe (GRAS) status. The pharmaceutical industry allocates approximately 15 % of its production to anticoagulant formulations, effervescent tablets, and drug delivery systems. Citric acid production in Aspergillus niger occurs through glycolysis and the tricarboxylic acid cycle. Candida oleophila can generate remarkable yields in continuous fed-batch systems through nitrogen-limited cultivation with glucose excess [53]. Acetic acid production through microbial vinegar fermentation is one of the oldest biotechnological processes. The lactic acid industry has undergone a paradigm shift from chemical synthesis to microbial production of lactic acid, which acts as a precursor for biodegradable polylactic acid plastics. Metabolic engineering strategies have revolutionised and enabled the carbon flux through their pathways, including the overexpression of rate-limiting enzymes and the development of novel transport systems. The substrate hydrolysis with acid production allows acid-tolerant organisms to reduce neutralisation costs, and synthetic microbial consortia facilitate mixed acid production from complex feedstocks [53, 54].

4.1.5. Alcohols

Ethyl alcohol (ethanol) is a major metabolite produced through microbial fermentation, with global production exceeding 100 billion litres per year. This is primarily produced from sugar-based or polysaccharide-rich feedstocks using specialised yeast strains adapted to specific carbohydrate substrates. Brazil's Proálcool program is the world's most advanced bioethanol economy, producing 12.5 billion litres annually from sugarcane juice and molasses through highly optimised Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentations, achieving ethanol concentrations of 8 – 12 %. The United States primarily uses corn starch hydrolysates as a substrate, generating over 60 billion litres annually as an oxygenate, which reduces greenhouse gas emissions by 40 – 50 % compared to fossil fuels and serves as a renewable alternative to methyl tert-butyl ether. The transition from first-generation to second-generation ethanol production has spurred intensive research into overcoming biomass recalcitrance through combined physicochemical pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification using cellulase and hemicellulase cocktails from Trichoderma reesei and Aspergillus species [55]. Glycerol (glycerin), traditionally synthesised from petrochemical propylene, has seen renewed interest in microbial production, with the osmotolerant yeast Candida glycerinogenes yielding 130 g/L at 63 % theoretical efficiency through optimised fed-batch strategies [56].

4.1.6. Miscellaneous Primary Metabolites

Microbial polysaccharides are essential biopolymers utilised in various applications, including food, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and industrial processes. The most commercially used microbial exopolysaccharide is xanthan gum, produced by the bacterium Xanthomonas campestris through the aerobic fermentation of glucose or sucrose. Dextran, synthesised from sucrose by Leuconostoc mesenteroides strains, serves medical purposes as a blood plasma volume expander, an iron-dextran complex for anaemia treatment, and as a chromatographic matrix for protein purification. Pullulan, a fungal exopolysaccharide, exhibits unique film-forming properties, which are utilised in edible packaging, oxygen barrier coatings, and the production of pharmaceutical capsules. Other microbial polysaccharides include scleroglucan for oil recovery, curdlan for use in Japanese foods, bacterial alginate for wound dressings, and succinoglycan for applications in concrete and ceramics [55]. Hyaluronic acid, traditionally extracted from rooster combs, is now predominantly produced through streptococcal fermentation for ophthalmic surgery and cosmetic dermal fillers. The polyhydroxyalkanoate family of biodegradable plastics offers petroleum-free alternatives for packaging, medical implants, and 3D printing filaments [56]. Table 4 summarizes some examples of primary metabolites produced by microorganisms.

 

 

4.2. Secondary metabolites

Microbial organisms produce secondary metabolites, which are natural compounds with significant impacts on human health, agriculture, and biotechnology. They include antibiotics such as penicillin and tetracyclines, medicinal compounds, toxins, biopesticides, and bioactive compounds that affect plant and animal growth [57]. These complex molecules are synthesised during the idiophase of microbial growth and are phylogenetically restricted to specific microbial taxa. The secondary metabolites fulfil six important ecological roles: facilitating sexual reproduction, altering membrane permeability, serving as chemical warfare agents, enabling mutualistic interactions, regulating intricate morphological processes, and influencing population-level behaviours. The industrial synthesis of these compounds has revolutionised medicine since the 1940s, with β-lactam antibiotics having saved an estimated 200 million lives annually. Agrochemical uses are similarly revolutionary that managing parasitic nematodes and insect pests, while gibberellic acid increases yields [58].

4.2.1. Antibiotics

Antibiotics are biologically active molecules that target fundamental microbial processes, including DNA replication, RNA synthesis, protein synthesis, cell membrane integrity, cell wall biosynthesis, electron transport, and sporulation and germination pathways. The global antibiotic market comprises approximately 160 antibiotics and their derivatives, dominated by major structural classes, including β-lactams, peptide antibiotics, macrolide polyketides, tetracyclines, aminoglycosides, ansamycins, and glycopeptides. Modern antibiotic development employs three complementary strategies: semisynthetic modification of natural scaffolds, genetic engineering of biosynthetic pathways through recombinant DNA technology, and optimisation of fermentation processes [59].

Recent antibiotics include daptomycin, a lipopeptide derived from Streptomyces roseosporus, due to its unique calcium-dependent membrane disruption mechanism, which is effective against vancomycin-resistant Entero-cocci, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. The indus-trial production of these sophisticated fermentation technol-ogies and emerging strategies to address antimicrobial resistance includes genome mining of uncultured microbes and the computational design of synthetic antibiotics.

4.2.2. Antitumor agents

Since the discovery of actinomycins in 1941, microorganisms have become a significant source of potent anticancer agents. Soil-dwelling actinomycetes produce complex compounds like Mitomycin C, Bleomycin, and anthracyclines, as well as epipodophyllotoxins like Etoposide and the enediyne antibiotic Calicheamicin. Taxol, a paclitaxel stabilised by endophytic fungi, has been used in the treatment of breast, ovarian, and lung cancers [60]. This production still relies on plant cell culture due to the challenges is commercially viable fungal fermentation titres. Camptothecin targets topoisomerase I by stabilising the covalent enzyme-DNA intermediate. The limited commercialisation of plant cell culture processes highlights the technical challenges and substantial costs associated with scaling up plant-based production systems.

4.2.3. Pharmacological agents

The discovery of microbial-derived pharmacological agents through targeted enzymatic screening has revolutionised modern medicine, generating over $1 trillion in pharmaceutical revenue. The natural product drug discovery pipeline faces significant challenges during clinical development due to inadequate target engagement, pharmacokinetic profiles, metabolic instability, formulation difficulties, unexpected immunogenicity, or dose-limiting toxicity. The pharmaceutical industry's use of natural product discovery has a paradoxical effect on drug exploration funding, particularly for antibiotics and oncology agents, where microbial metabolites have histor-ically played a dominant role. Biotechnology companies have made remarkable advances by applying innovative approaches to microbial drug discovery, including genome mining of uncultured microorganisms through metagen-omics, CRISPR-Cas9 activation of silent biosynthetic gene clusters in actinomycetes and fungi, heterologous expression of giant biosynthetic gene clusters in optimised chassis organisms, and high-content screening platforms combining mass spectrometry and bioactivity profiling [61]. Modern techniques are overcoming limitations of natural product discovery, with improved culturing methods enabling the growth of previously "unculturable" micro-organisms. As the antimicrobial resistance crisis reevaluates soil actinomycetes as sources of novel antibiotics, pharma-ceutical companies are increasingly partnering with biotech firms and academic groups to access innovative microbial platforms, suggesting a renaissance in the discovery of microbial natural products. Table 5 summarizes some examples of secondary metabolites produced by micro-organisms.

  1. Types of Fermentation Process

Fermentation reactions are driven by microbial processes that fall into three main categories, based on their metabolic pathways and products: lactic acid fermentation, alcoholic fermentation, and acetic acid fermentation (Fig. 3). Lactic acid fermentation, facilitated by LAB, is used to produce yogurt, cheese, sauerkraut, and kimchi. Alcoholic fermentation, driven by yeasts such as S. cerevisiae, converts sugars into carbon dioxide and ethanol, forming the basis of beer, wine, and bread making. Acetic acid fermentation, carried out by Acetobacter species, oxidizes ethanol to acetic acid, which is essential in vinegar production and condiments [61].

Further, there are two methods of fermentation processes: solid-state fermentation (SSF) and submerged fermentation (SmF). SSF is mainly used in enzyme production and the production of fermented foods such as cheese, tofu, etc, while SmF is more prevalent in industrial antibiotic and organic acid production due to its better process control [61]. Technologies like mixed-culture fermentation improve the production of complex products, and anaerobic digestion by methanogenic archaea converts organic waste into biogas to fulfill renewable energy requirements. Advanced genetic engineering devices, like CRISPR-Cas9 and synthetic biology, streamline the microbial engineering process with optimised metabolic routes [62]. Recombinant microbes are utilised in precision fermentation for the production of animal-free proteins and therapeutics, ensuring sustainability in biotechnology.

Fermentation reactions are driven by microbial processes that fall into three main categories, based on their metabolic pathways and products: lactic acid fermentation, alcoholic fermentation, and acetic acid fermentation (Figure 3). Lactic acid fermentation, facilitated by LAB, is used to produce yogurt, cheese, sauerkraut, and kimchi. Alcoholic fermentation, driven by yeasts such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae, converts sugars into carbon dioxide and ethanol, forming the basis of beer, wine, and bread making. Acetic acid fermentation, carried out by Acetobacter species, oxidizes ethanol to acetic acid, which is essential in vinegar production and condiments [61].

5.1. Lactic acid fermentation

Lactic Acid (LA) is the main metabolic byproduct that LAB generates. LA finds numerous uses in food, cosmetics, textiles, and pharmaceutical industries [62]. LA can be used to produce packaging materials, fibres, and foams by transforming into polylactic acid (PLA), which is a green, biodegradable, and biocompatible polymer. In addition, LA is applied in the food and beverage industry to manufacture soft drinks, sweets, milk products, and bakery products, as it has an acidulant characteristic. In the cosmetic industry, LA is utilised as a moisturiser because it can retain water, as a skin lightener, and as a rejuvenator, as it can prevent tyrosinase formation [63]. The medical sector also employs LA because it is utilised in the production of topical creams, lotions, surgical dressings, and prostheses. Lactic acid fermentation improves protein solubility as well as the availability of certain micronutrients and limiting amino acids. This process significantly reduces the levels of tannins (50 %), phytates, and oligosaccharides (90 %). Raw materials containing starch undergo LA fermentation to form the amino acid lysine, vitamins such as vitamin B and K, folate, and micronutrients in the fermented products. Agricultural substrates can be utilised for LA production. Substrates mainly consist of carbon and nitrogen compounds. A lignocellulosic agricultural residue has three main polymers: cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. Pretreatments are a crucial factor in the conversion of biomass into LA [64].

Alkali pretreatments enhance the enzymatic digestibility of the fibres. However, lignocellulosic materials are mostly pretreated with acids. The primary issue with acid pretreatment is the production of small amounts of cell growth inhibitors, which can further deactivate enzymes and affect the efficiency of LA bacteria during fermentation. LA is commonly made through biotechnological methods involving LA fermentation and biochemical alterations [65]. The production yield of LA depends on the pH (3.5 – 9.6), temperature (5 – 45 °C), and LAB strain producers, and the presence of nutrients (such as amino acids, peptides, nucleotides, and vitamins). Various strains from the genera Leuconostoc, Lactococcus, Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, Enterococcus, Streptococcus, Vagococcus, Aerococcus, Carnobacterium, Tetragenococcus, Oenococcus, and Weissella have been identified as LA producers. These industrial food fermentations primarily utilise Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Leuconostoc, and Pediococcus as starter cultures

5.2. Alcoholic Fermentation

Alcoholic fermentation (AF) is a process used for thousands of years to produce wine. At the industrial level, microbial fermentation is used to convert cellulose and hemicellulose into fermentable sugars, which are then used to produce ethanol [61]. During AF, yeast generally ferments raw materials in the presence of oxygen, but it can also perform fermentation in the absence of oxygen. When oxygen is lacking, the fermentation process occurs in the cytoplasm of the yeast. Under anaerobic conditions, Pyruvic acid (C3H3O3) is first converted into acetaldehyde, an intermediate molecule that releases carbon dioxide before being transformed into ethanol. During AF, NAD+ is reduced to NADH, which facilitates an electron exchange necessary for ATP production. Thiamine is an essential vitamin for the metabolism of yeasts, and its deficiency can even lead to yeast death [66]. Additionally, thiamine acts as a cofactor for various enzymes involved in the production of wine-related flavour compounds. It also plays a role in yeast survival via thiamine-dependent stress protection functions. Nitrogen is another essential factor for the growth and metabolism of yeast. A deficiency of nitrogen is considered a general reason for sluggish or stuck fermentation. Nitrogen is supplied externally by ammonium salts to prevent fermentative problems [67]. AF includes the fermentation of wine, beer, and cider. Non-Saccharomyces yeasts were considered contaminants in wine and beer production. Procedures such as pasteurisation, sulfite addition, and equipment cleaning were used to eliminate these microbes and their role in the spontaneous fermentation of wine, thereby enhancing the final product's sensory quality.

5.3. Acetic acid Fermentation

Acetic acid bacteria (AAB) are aerobic, Gram-negative bacteria that possess a strong ability to oxidize ethanol and synthesize acetic acid, in addition to their resistance to acid. They are generally utilized in industrial vinegar fermentation to produce vinegar, fruit vinegar, gluconic acid products, and to facilitate the formation of biofuel cells. AAB has played a notable role in the manufacturing of fermented foods and beverages, including lambic beer, kombucha, vinegar, and kefir [61]. AAB is also called ‘oxidative bacteria’ that oxidize carbohydrates, ethanol, and sugar alcohols into various products like aldehydes, ketones, and organic acids. Fruits and vegetables rich in nutritional components, such as amino acids, organic acids, phenols, vitamins, and minerals, are primarily used to produce fermented vinegar [68]. These components can aid in digestion, facilitate fatigue recovery, and support diabetes management, while also possessing anti-obesity and anticancer properties. Acetic acid is primarily derived from natural gas or mineral oil and serves as a crucial industrial feedstock. In the industrial sector, acetic acid is generally utilised in the production of vinegar. It is also used to form vinyl acetate, which is used in vinyl plastics, adhesives, textile finishes, and latex paints, an industry that is expanding rapidly due to increased demand for synthetic fibres. At the industrial level, acid stress arises from low biomass and a low production rate, which has been proven to be a significant constraint in the process [69].

  1. Methods of fermentation

Fermentation technology has evolved from traditional practices to current technologies, utilizing microbial physiology in various industries. SSF utilizes moist solid substrates to produce concentrated enzymes and flavors [70, 71]. In contrast, SmF employs liquid media in aerated bioreactors for the large-scale production of pharma-ceuticals, such as penicillin and streptomycin. Surface fermentation techniques have been enhanced in bed reactors to increase oxygenation and productivity. Batch fermen-tation remains essential for traditional foods such as yoghurt and wine, as well as for contemporary biopharmaceuticals that require strict aseptic conditions [70]. Continuous fermentation systems support cultures in exponential growth by continuously feeding nutrients and harvesting product, allowing for high yields in the production of bioethanol and single-cell protein. Recent innovations have provided immobilised cell fermentation, enhanced stability, and recycling in high-fructose corn syrup processing and wastewater treatment. Extremophile fermentation methods employ thermophiles or acidophiles under extreme conditions for niche applications such as biomining [71].

6.1. Submerged Fermentation

Submerged fermentation (SmF) is a method in which microorganisms grow in an aqueous nutrient broth with a high free water content, transforming microbial cultivation from an art to a science. It is typically carried out in stirred-tank or airlift bioreactors, offering control over key parameters such as dissolved oxygen, pH, temperature, and nutrient concentration, thereby enabling optimal conditions for microbial growth. The transition from traditional surface culture methods to submerged systems represented a significant leap in productivity, enabling Aspergillus niger to produce citric acid levels ranging from 5 g/L to over 200 g/L through more efficient oxygen transfer and metabolic control in deep-tank fermenters. Current SmF applications span various industries, including pharmaceuticals, food technology, and biofuel production, for their industrial enzymes [72]. High-density culture methods and sophist-icated fed-batch operations have achieved record product titres, with industrial enzymes reaching 50 g/L and monoclonal antibodies at 510 g/L. Advances in bioreactor design, including disposable single-use systems and wave-mixed bags, have enhanced sterility and flexibility for vaccine manufacturing with mammalian cell cultures [73]. SmF is irreplaceable due to its scalability and reproducibility, presently supporting the commercial manufacture of more than 60 % of biopharmaceuticals and 80 % of industrial enzymes.

 

 

6.2. Solid State Fermentation

Solid-state fermentation (SSF) is a method that combines traditional food production with biotechnological processes. It involves cultivating microorganisms on humid solid substrates without the use of free-flowing water, thereby simulating their natural environments while conserving energy and maximising benefits [70, 71, 74]. This ancient method, long used for Asian food fermentations such as tempeh and koji, has been revitalised as an advanced biomanufacturing platform by contemporary process engineering and the improvement of microbial strains. Modern SSF applications span various industries, including food, enzyme production, and biocontrol. Recent innovations have overcome conventional SSF limitations by utilising automated tray bioreactors, rotating drum systems for heat removal, and packed-bed reactors with real-time CO2 monitoring, thereby enhancing the process [75]. Despite scale-up and process control issues, SSF's low water demands and capacity to use 80 % lower-cost substrates make it an essential technology for sustainable production [76, 77]. The technology's scalability is demonstrated by its industrial applications, including the production of fungal enzymes, organic acids, and bioactive compounds, which feature reduced purification complexity [78]. SSF faces challenges, including heat accumulation in dense substrates and non-uniform microbial growth resulting from substrate heterogeneity. A comparative analysis of SSF and SmF is given in Table 6.

  1. Probiotic bacteria in fermentation technology

Probiotics are beneficial microorganisms that can modulate gut microbiota, enhance intestinal barrier function, and stimulate immune responses. They have shown clinical efficacy in managing gastrointestinal disorders, metabolic conditions, and immune-mediated diseases [91].  Probiotics are being used in non-dairy carriers, such as fruit juices, cereal-based substrates, chocolate, and freeze-dried pharmaceutical formulations [91]. The physiological robustness of probiotic strains is crucial, as it requires acid tolerance, bile resistance, and the ability to adhere to mucosa. They exert beneficial effects through mechanisms such as competitive exclusion of pathogens, production of antimicrobial compounds, modulation of intestinal epithelial tight junctions, and immunomodulation.

The LAB are the backbone of probiotic formulations due to their GRAS status and multifunctional metabolism. Modern probiotic development employs advanced screening techniques, omics analyses, and stabilisation technologies. The concept of "next-generation probiotics" encompasses engineered strains with targeted function-alities and consortium formulations that combine traditional probiotics with prebiotic fibres [92]. The probiotics lie in precision formulations tailored to individual microbiomes, engineered live biotherapeutics for non-gut indications, and integration with faecal microbiota transplantation protocols.

Probiotics are beneficial microorganisms that can modulate gut microbiota, enhance intestinal barrier function, and stimulate immune responses (Figure 4). They have shown clinical efficacy in managing gastrointestinal disorders, metabolic conditions, and immune-mediated diseases [91]. Probiotics are being used in non-dairy carriers, such as fruit juices, cereal-based substrates, chocolate, and freeze-dried pharmaceutical formulations [91]. The physiological robustness of probiotic strains is crucial, as it requires acid tolerance, bile resistance, and the ability to adhere to mucosa. They exert beneficial effects through mechanisms such as competitive exclusion of pathogens, production of antimicrobial compounds, modulation of intestinal epithelial tight junctions, and immunomodulation. The LAB are the backbone of probiotic formulations due to their GRAS status and multifunctional metabolism. Modern probiotic development employs advanced screening techniques, omics analyses, and stabilisation technologies. The concept of "next-generation probiotics" encompasses engineered strains with targeted functionalities and consortium formulations that combine traditional probiotics with prebiotic fibres [92].

  1. Microbial fermentation of food products

Microbial fermentation is a biotechnological process that uses bacteria, yeasts, and moulds to transform raw agricultural materials into nutritious, palatable, and shelf-stable foods. It is used in cereal, legume, vegetable, meat, fish, and dairy fermentations, sourdough bread production, and the conversion of sugars to ethanol and CO₂. Filamentous fungi undergo proteolytic and amylolytic transformations in traditional Asian staples, including soy sauce, miso, and tempeh. Modern applications combine traditional knowledge with precision fermentation, using defined starter cultures to standardise artisanal products [93]. Emerging technologies use omics tools and synthetic biology to control pathogens and ensure process consistency. The global fermented food market, valued at $700 billion, spans dairy (40 %), alcoholic beverages (30 %), and plant-based products (20 %). Innovations include probiotic-enriched non-dairy alternatives, low-alcohol wines, and mycoprotein-based meat analogues. Challenges persist in scaling artisanal processes, such as maintaining microbial viability in low-moisture fermented meats and controlling phage infections. These also include CRISPR-engineered starters for reducing allergens, substrate fermentations, and personalised fermented foods tailored to their microbiomes [94]. Microbial fermentation plays a transformative role in converting raw vegetables and soybeans into nutrient-rich fermented products. This process enhances bioavailability, reduces antinutritional factors, and introduces beneficial bioactive compounds (Figure 5). Traditional practices like kimchi and tempeh production exemplify how microbial activity improves sensory and functional properties, while modern applications leverage precision starter cultures for consistency and scalability

8.1. Fermented vegetable products

Microbes play a central role in vegetable fermentation, connecting traditional food preservation methods to novel biotechnological developments. Spontaneous vegetable fermentations with Leuconostoc, Lactobacillus, and Pediococcus species have resulted in their relevant products, such as sauerkraut, Korean kimchi, and fermented olives [94]. Major innovations utilise this microbial richness to convert vegetable matrices into functional foods, including sauerkraut-like beetroot kvass, fermented using Lactocaseibacillus casei A4, and soybeans fermented with Bacillus subtilis. Primary methods such as high-pressure processing and SSF of okara enhance protein content and decrease oligosaccharides. The microbial vegetable fermentation utilises precision ecology strategies, including AI-based predictive models and sophisticated bioreactor designs, with real-time metabolomics capabilities [95].

Pharmaceutical uses are unfolding, e.g., oral vaccines developed in fermented lettuce that produce cholera toxin B sub-units, and the vegetable waste upcycling circular bioeconomy through Aspergillus oryzae fermentation for glucoamylases production in starch processing. This shift from traditional craft to industrialised biotechnology illustrates that microbiological innovation persists in elevating simple vegetables into potent tools for nutritional security, sustainable agriculture, and preventive medicine [96].

8.2. Fermented cereal products

Cereals are a multifaceted substrate for microbial fermentation, providing a rich matrix of carbohydrates, proteins, and bioactive compounds that serve as both microbial growth media and prebiotic materials. Nevertheless, their nutritional composition must be strategically fortified through fermentation to compensate for internal constraints, such as the low bioavailability of proteins and antinutrients. Conventional cereal-based fermentations worldwide demonstrate the ecological microbial capacity to enhance free amino acids, reduce phytate levels, and produce bioactive peptides. Oat is a viable cereal matrix because it contains a high proportion of β-glucans, which promote Bifidobacterium activity and constitute protective colloidal systems. Maize fermentation presents special challenges due to its high starch content and poor protein quality [97].  Common fermented cereal-based foods include bread, dosa, idli, ingera, etc [98].

Sourdough is a type of bread that uses the fermentation of wheat flour by naturally occurring yeast and lactobacilli to raise the dough. Sourdough bread, at its most basic, is made from three ingredients: flour, water, and salt. Sourdough bread is often considered healthier than regular bread due to its fermentation process, which can improve nutrient absorption and potentially benefit gut health [99]. While both types of bread can be part of a healthy diet, sourdough's unique characteristics offer some advantages.

Engineered consortia of lactobacilli can be used to convert nixtamalized maize into nutritionally fortified products by enhancing free folate levels and minimising aflatoxin contamination. Rice fermentation undergoes a metabolic renaissance during germination, yielding a nutrient-rich substrate that supports exceptional probiotic growth. Next-generation fermentation technologies are surpassing cereal limitations, including extrusion pretreatment, pulsed electric field treatment, and microencapsulation strategies [100]. The emerging field of cereal-based probiotic foods involves precision-fermented designer synbiotics, such as CRISPR-engineered Lp. plantarum strains that produce cereal phytases, and AI-based bioreactor systems for maximising fermentation conditions in real-time.

8.3. Fermented legume products

In traditional fermented food processing, legumes such as soybeans, lentils, chickpeas, and mung beans are subjected to fermentation by autochthonous microorganisms. The fermentation process involves the breakdown of complex macromolecules like proteins and carbohydrates into simpler, more bioavailable forms. Microorganisms such as Bacillus species, LAB, and yeast play key roles in these transformations, producing enzymes that degrade anti-nutritional factors and enhance nutrient bioavailability [101]. The resulting fermented products range from Asian soy-based condiments like nato, miso, and tempeh [102] to African condiments that include dawadawa and ugba [103].

8.4. Fermented meat products

Meat serves as a protective substrate for probiotic bacteria, providing an ideal environment for LAB to thrive. Modern probiotic meat fermentations use facultative heterofermentative LAB strains that convert carbohydrates into lactic acid and switch to heterofermentative pathways when sugars are limited [104]. Advanced strain selection focuses on meat-adapted probiotics with bile salt hydrolase activity and acid tolerance. Lactobacillus amylovorus and Lactobacillus gallinarum are effective in fermented meats due to their proteolytic activity and resistance to meat-derived stressors. Process optimisation involves controlled fermentation at 20 - 26 °C with 85 – 95 % relative humidity for 48 - 72 h, followed by drying at 12 – 15 °C. Technological challenges include preventing probiotic inhibition by traditional curing agents, optimising aw reduction, and managing lipid oxidation [105]. These also include CRISPR-engineered Latilactobacillus sakei strains, AI-optimised fermentation protocols, and hybrid products combining plant proteins with probiotic-fermented meat for sustainable functional foods.

8.5 Fermented fish products

Fermented fish products are a vital part of traditional diets in many coastal and Southeast Asian cultures, where they serve as a source of protein, probiotics, and unique flavors. These products are typically produced through spontaneous fermentation, relying on indigenous microbes, such as LAB and halophilic Tetragenococcus species, to break down proteins and lipids, thereby enhancing digestibility and shelf life. Examples include fish sauces (e.g., Thai nam pla), pastes (e.g., Korean jeotgal), and dried fermented fish (e.g., African lanhouin), each with distinct regional variations in preparation and microbial consortia [106]. The fermentation process involves salting, aging, and enzymatic hydrolysis, which reduce the pH and inhibit pathogenic bacteria while generating bioactive peptides, free amino acids, and umami compounds, such as glutamate. LAB strains such as Lactobacillus plantarum and Pediococcus pentosaceus dominate these fermentations, contributing to preservation and health benefits, including antioxidant and antihypertensive properties [106]. However, improper fermentation can lead to the accumulation of biogenic amines (e.g., histamine), necessitating the use of strict hygiene and starter cultures for safety [107].

8.5 Fermented dairy products

Fermented dairy products have been consumed for millennia, initially as a method of food preservation before their health benefits became widely recognized [2]. These products are created by fermenting milk or other raw ingredients with the help of microorganisms, predominantly LAB, which contribute to the fermentation process. LABs are responsible for the development of bioactive compounds that offer a range of health advantages, such as immunomodulatory, antimicrobial, and antioxidant effects. Popular fermented dairy products, including yogurt, kefir, and cheese, are consumed globally and contribute to improved gastrointestinal health, enhanced digestion, and potentially lower risks of conditions like osteoporosis, diabetes, and inflammatory bowel diseases [108]. Additionally, fermented dairy products support the gut microbiome, which has a significant influence on overall health, making them a valuable component of a balanced diet [109].

Modern advancements focus on optimizing fermentation conditions (e.g., temperature, salt concentration) and introducing defined starter cultures to standardize quality and accelerate production. Emerging techniques, such as bacteriophage therapy to control spoilage bacteria and omics tools to profile microbial dynamics, are further refining these traditional processes [110]. Despite their cultural significance, fermented fish products face challenges in global acceptance due to strong odors and sensory preferences. Innovations like deodorization techniques and hybrid products (e.g., fish-vegetable blends) aim to broaden appeal while retaining nutritional benefits. Research continues to explore their potential as functional foods, particularly for gut health and mineral bioavailability [111].

The role of microorganisms such as Leuconostoc, Lactobacillus, and Pediococcus in vegetable fermentations like sauerkraut and kimchi highlights the significance of lactic acid bacteria (LAB)-driven acidification in spontaneous fermentation processes (Table 7). Similarly, Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Aspergillus oryzae are crucial in the solid-state fermentation of cereals and soy products, resulting in traditional foods like tempeh and miso. Controlled fermentation of meat products utilizing species like Lactobacillus amylovorus enhances preservation and probiotic content. In fermented fish products, microbial action by Lactobacillus plantarum and Tetragenococcus is key in flavor development and preservation strategies (Table 7).

  1. Genetic recombination in microbial fermentation

Genetic recombination has revolutionised microbial fermentation, allowing targeted genetic modifications that optimise fermentation efficiency, expand substrate utilisation, and unlock new bioactive compound synthesis. This approach bridges the ancient fermentation practices with their industrial applications, enabling the engineering of strains with enhanced metabolic capabilities, improved yield, and novel functionalities. In industrial applications, recombination has limitations like those of random mutagenesis; however, it enables the strategic stacking of beneficial traits [112]. For example, it facilitates the amplification of Biosynthetic Gene Clusters (BGCs) in Streptomyces spp. for antibiotic overproduction, the insertion of heterologous pathways into Saccharomyces cerevisiae for enhancing bioethanol production, and in Lactobacillus spp. for increasing lactic acid yield. Synthetic biology tools, such as CRISPR interference (CRISPRi), multiplex automated genome engineering, and recombinase-assisted genome rewriting, enable precise pathway optimisation. The engineering of Escherichia coli strains exemplifies this to enhance shikimate pathway activity to produce aromatic compounds, and the modification of Aspergillus oryzae for increased protease secretion in soy fermentation. Recombination also facilitates the activation of silent gene clusters, uncovering cryptic metabolites with pharmaceutical potential, such as the discovery of novel polyketides in Penicillium through promoter swapping or the heterologous expression of fungal BGCs in S. cerevisiae for scalable drug precursor synthesis [113]. In food fermentation, genetically stabilised Lactobacillus hybrids exhibit robust acid tolerance and phage resistance. At the same time, recombinant Acetobacter strains with enhanced cellulose synthase activity revolutionise kombucha production for the synthesis of biodegradable materials. The environmental and economic benefits of recombinant fermentation with engineered Clostridium spp. Converting lignocellulosic waste into butanol at 90 % theoretical yield and Yarrowia lipolytica recombinants producing omega-3 fatty acids from agro-industrial byproducts [114].

  1. Novel genetic technologies for microbial fermentation

The evolution of microbial fermentation has been significantly transformed by the advent of novel genetic technologies, including precision genome editing, synthetic biology, and computational bioengineering. These technologies have enabled unprecedented control over microbial metabolism, unlocking new possibilities in industrial biotechnology, food production, and pharmaceutical development [115]. CRISPR-Cas9 systems have emerged as the cornerstone of modern genetic manipulation in fermentation science, allowing for targeted gene knockouts, precise promoter engineering, multiplexed genome editing, base editors, and prime editors. Synthetic biology platforms, such as Gibson Assembly and Golden Gate cloning, facilitate the construction of entire biosynthetic pathways. Meanwhile, cell-free transcription-translation systems accelerate the prototyping of metabolic circuits before their integration into the chromosomal genome. Machine learning (ML) algorithms predict the optimal genetic modifications by analysing multi-omics datasets, as demonstrated by AI-designed lactobacilli strains with 300 % increased lactic acid productivity through optimised redox balancing. Advanced Genome-scale models (GEMs), such as iJO1366 for Escherichia coli and iMM904 for Saccharomyces cerevisiae, simulate metabolic fluxes to identify knockout targets [116]. Novel DNA synthesis technologies enable the construction of entire synthetic chromosomes, while in vivo genome rewriting systems allow megabase-scale deletions in Streptomyces spp. to eliminate competitive routes. Phage-assisted continuous evolution enables the generation of hyperactive enzymes in real-time, while directed evolution platforms produce stable microbial mutants. Epigenetic engineering tools are employed to silence unwanted genes without introducing permanent mutations, while RNA interference dynamically regulates metabolic fluxes. Microbial consortia engineering employs quorum-sensing circuits for population management, allowing division-of-labour fermentations [117]. New technologies, such as DNA data storage within microbial genomes and biological cryptography, are pushing the frontiers of fermentation beyond its conventional uses. A quantum biology understanding of electron transport chain manipulation yields Rhodobacter strains that produce 200 % more hydrogen. Connecting these technologies with traditional fermentation techniques ensures the responsible application, most notably in food-grade microbes [118]. These encompass neuromorphic biocomputing within fermenters, completely autonomous AI-based strain evolution, and nanotechnology-supportive microbial hybrids [119, 120].

The integration of advanced genetic technologies has revolutionized microbial fermentation, enabling precise control over metabolic pathways and unlocking novel applications in biotechnology. Techniques such as CRISPR-Cas9, synthetic biology platforms, and machine learning algorithms have been instrumental in optimizing microbial strains for enhanced productivity and functionality (Figure 6). These innovations facilitate targeted gene editing, pathway engineering, and real-time metabolic flux analysis, bridging the gap between traditional fermentation practices and modern industrial demands. For instance, AI-designed microbial strains have demonstrated significant improvements in yield, while synthetic consortia engineering allows for division-of-labour fermentations, further expanding the scope of microbial applications in sustainable biomanufacturing.

  1. Challenges and Future Directions

Despite the significant advancements in microbial fermentation, several challenges remain that hinder its full potential. Major challenges in the scalability of fermentation processes, particularly in SSF, are issues like mass transfer, heat accumulation, and heterogeneity of microbial growth [74, 75, 80]. In SmF, the high costs associated with downstream processing limit the economic feasibility of large-scale production [121]. Another critical issue is the regulatory and consumer acceptance of genetically modified microorganisms, which, despite their potential to enhance yield and efficiency, often face scepticism due to safety and ethical concerns [122]. Furthermore, contamination control and maintaining consistent product quality across batches remain persistent hurdles in industrial fermentation [121].

           Looking ahead, the integration of emerging technologies such as AI and ML offers promising solutions to optimize fermentation processes. These tools can predict optimal conditions, monitor real-time fermentation dynamics, and identify genetic modifications to enhance microbial performance [123]. Another future direction is the development of more robust and versatile microbial strains through advanced genetic engineering techniques like CRISPR-Cas9 and synthetic biology. These innovations could enable microbes to utilize a broader range of substrates, including agricultural and industrial waste, thereby promoting sustainability and reducing production costs [124].

Sustainability will also play a pivotal role in the future of fermentation. The shift toward circular bioeconomy models emphasizes the need to valorize waste streams and reduce the environmental footprint of fermentation processes. For instance, leveraging lignocellulosic biomass and other low-cost substrates can make fermentation more eco-friendly and economically viable. Additionally, the exploration of extremophiles - microorganisms thriving in extreme conditions could unlock novel applications in harsh industrial environments, further expanding the scope of fermentation technology [125]. Finally, interdisciplinary collaboration will be essential to address these challenges and drive innovation. Partnerships between academia, industry, and regulatory bodies can accelerate the development of safe, efficient, and scalable fermentation processes. By combining traditional knowledge with cutting-edge science, the field can overcome current limitations and unlock new opportunities in food security, healthcare, and environmental sustainability. The future of microbial fermentation lies in its ability to adapt, innovate, and integrate diverse technologies to meet global demands.  

  1. Conclusion

Microbial fermentation is an intricate process that combines human ingenuity and microbial metabolism, blending ancient techniques with cutting-edge biotechnology. It has progressed from being an empirical process to a sophisticated science, stimulated by discoveries in microbiology, molecular biology, and genetic engineering. The discovery and description of numerous microbial species have broadened the platform of fermentation, enabling the production of a vast array of metabolites, including primary compounds such as amino acids, organic acids, vitamins, and alcohols, as well as secondary metabolites like antibiotics and pharmacologically active metabolites. These transformation processes have revolutionised various industries, including food, beverage, pharmaceutical, biofuel, and biodegradable. The application of new genetic technologies, including CRISPR-Cas9, synthetic biology, and computational bioengineering, has improved the efficiency and precision of microbial fermentation. Techniques like SSF and SmF have been optimised to suit sustainable waste valorisation, enzyme production, and the synthesis of high-value compounds. Probiotic technology synergises fermentation and human well-being, providing value-specific benefits in gut microbiota modulation, immune system enhancement, and disease prevention. Conventional food product fermentation has been optimised with the application of precision starter cultures, omics technologies, and AI-based process optimisation. The future of microbial fermentation is bright, with transdisciplinary innovation integrating synthetic biology, nanotechnology, and AI, presenting multiple opportunities in cellular agriculture, personalised nutrition, and a circular bioeconomy.

  1. Declaration of competing interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

  1. Authors’ Contributions
  2. Saranraj conceptualized the manuscript, supervised the research, and contributed to the writing and editing of the original draft. Ramesh C. Ray provided critical insights into the review's structure and content, focusing on microbial diversity and fermentation processes. Ashish Kumar Nayak contributed to the sections on genetic engineering and modern biotechnological applications. B. Lokeshwari and K. Gayathri assisted in compiling data on microbial species and metabolites, as well as reviewing the literature. P. Sivasakthivelan contributed to the sections on fermentation methods and comparative analyses. Kianoush Khosravi-Darani provided expertise on industrial applications and the health benefits of fermented products. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
  3. Using Artificial Intelligent Chatbots

No artificial intelligence chatbots have been used in any section of work.

کلمات کلیدی:
  • Biofuel production
  • bioeconomy
  • CRISPR-Cas9
  • food security
  • probiotics
  • solid-state fermentation (SSF)
  • submerged fermentation (SmF)
  • sustainability
  • synthetic biology
Microbes in Action
  • pdf (English)

ارجاع به مقاله

Saranraj, P., Ray, R. C., Ashish Kumar , N., Lokeshwari, B., Gayathri, K., & Sivasakthivelan, P. (2025). Microbes in Action: Powering Sustainable Fermentation for Food, Pharma, and Bioeconomy. بیوتکنولوژی غذایی کاربردی, 12(1), 1–24 (e20). https://doi.org/10.22037/afb.v12i1.49836
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.acm-sig-proceedings##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.acs-nano##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.apa##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.associacao-brasileira-de-normas-tecnicas##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.chicago-author-date##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.harvard-cite-them-right##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.ieee##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.modern-language-association##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.turabian-fullnote-bibliography##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.vancouver##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.download.ris##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.download.bibtex##

مراجع

Behera SS, Ray RC, Das U, Panda SK, Saranraj P. Microorganisms in fermentation. In: Berenjian A, editor. Essentials in Fermentation Technology. Learning Materials in Biosciences. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16230-6_1

Ray RC, Paramithiotis S, Thekkangil A, Nethravathy V, Rai AK, Martin JGP. Food fermentation and its relevance in human history. In: Martin JGP, De Dea Lindner J, Melo Pereira GVM, Ray RC, editors. Trending Topics on Fermented Foods. Cham: Springer; 2024. p. 1-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72000-0_1

Soemarie YB, Milanda T, Barliana MI. Fermented foods as probiotics: A Review. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2021; 12(4): 335-339. https://doi.org/10.4103/japtr.japtr_116_21

Latif A, Shehzad A, Niaz S, Zahid A, Ashraf W, Iqbal MW, Rehman A, Riaz T, Aadi RM, Khan IM, Ozogu F, Rocha JM, Esatbeyoglu T, Korma SA. Probiotics - Mechanism of action, health benefits and their application in food industries. Front Microbiol. 2013; 4: 1216674. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1216674

Strobel GA, Hess WM, Ford E, Sidhu RS, Yang X. Taxol from fungal endophytes and the issue of biodiversity. J Ind Microbiol. 1996; 20(5): 149-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01574765

Demain AL, Fang A. Emerging concepts of secondary metabolism in actinomycetes. Actinomycetology. 1995; 9(3): 1156-1166.

Lum AM, Huang J, Hutchinson CR, Kao CM. Reverse engineering of industrial pharmaceutical-producing Actinomycetes strains using DNA microarrays. Metab Eng. 2004; 6(4): 333-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2003.11.001

Grafenham TY, Schroers HJ, Nirenberg HI, Seifert KA. An overview of the taxonomy, phylogeny, and typification of nectriaceous fungi in Cosmospora, Acremonium, Fusarium, Stilbella, and Volutella. Int J Mycol. 2011; 17(5): 1111-1120.

Khosla C, Keasling JD. Metabolic engineering for drug discovery and development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003; 2(12): 1019-1025. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd1256

Bourdichon F, Casaregola S, Farrokh C, Frisvad JC, Gerds ML, Hammes WP, Harnett J, Huys G, Laulund S, Ouwehand A, Powell IB, Prajapati JB, Seto Y, Ter Schure E, Van Boven A, Vankerckhoven V, Zgoda A, Tuijtelaars S, Hansen EB. Food fermentations: Microorganisms with beneficial technical uses. Int J Food Microbiol. 2012; 154(3): 87-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.12.030

Sharma R, Garg P, Kumar P, Bhatia SK, Kulshrestha S. Microbial fermentation and its role in quality improvement of fermented foods. Fermentation. 2020; 6(4): 106-120. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation6040106

Gao L, Wu X, Zhu C, Jin Z, Wang W, Zhou Y, Chen J. Metabolic engineering to improve the biomanufacturing efficiency of acetic acid bacteria: Advances and prospects. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2020; 40(4): 522-538. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2020.1743231

Kubicek CP, Rohr M. Citric acid fermentation. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2016; 3(4): 331-373. https://doi.org/10.3109/07388558609150788

Soumahoro S, Ouattara HG, Droux M, Nasser W, Niamke SL, Guyot JP. Acetic acid bacteria (AAB) involved in cocoa fermentation from Ivory Coast: Species diversity and performance in acetic acid production. J Food Sci Technol. 2020; 57(5): 1904-1917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-019-04226-2

Demain AL. Fungal secondary metabolism: Regulation and functions. In: Sutton B, editor. A Century of Mycology. Cambridge University Press; 1996. 233-254.

Grindley JF, Payton MA, van de Pol H, Hardy KG. Conversion of glucose to 2-keto-L-gulonate, an intermediate in L-ascorbate synthesis, by a recombinant strain of Erwinia citreus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988; 54(7): 1770-1775. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.54.7.1770-1775.1988

Valentino V, Magliulo R, Farsi D, Cotter PD, O'Sullivan O, De Angelis M, Gobbetti M, Franciosi E. Fermented foods, their microbiome and its potential in boosting human health. Microb Biotechnol. 2024; 17(1): e14428. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.14428

Donadio S, Sosio M. Strategies for combinatorial biosynthesis with modular polyketide synthases. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2003; 6(6): 489-500. https://doi.org/10.2174/138620703106298716

Rawoof SAA, Kumar PS, Vo D-VN, Devaraj K, Mani Y, Ramalingam S, Subramanian S. Production of optically pure lactic acid by microbial fermentation: A review. Environ Chem Lett. 2021; 19(1): 539 - 556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01083-w

Wang ZX, Zhuge J, Fang H, Prior BA. Glycerol production by microbial fermentation: A review. Biotechnol Adv. 2001; 19(3): 201-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-9750(01)00060-X

Jaeger KE, Reetz MT. Directed evolution of enantioselective enzymes for organic chemistry. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2018; 2(1): 68-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1367-5931(98)80034-1

Gamarra NN, Villena GK, Gutierrez Correa M. Cellulase production by Aspergillus niger in biofilm, solid state and submerged fermentations. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010; 87(2): 545-551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2540-4

Todorov SD, Botes M, Guigas C, Schillinger U, Wiid I, Wachsman MB, Holzapfel WH, Dicks LMT. Boza, a natural source of probiotic lactic acid bacteria. J Appl Microbiol. 2008; 104(2): 465-477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03558.x

Kantola J, Kunnari T, Mantsala P, Ylihonko K. Expanding the scope of aromatic polyketides by combinatorial biosynthesis. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2003; 6(6): 501-512. https://doi.org/10.2174/138620703106298716

Merli G, Becci A, Amato A, Beolchini F. Acetic acid bioproduction: the technological innovation change. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 790: 149292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149292

Lutz S, Ostermeier M, Moore GL, Maranas CD, Benkovic SJ. Creating multiple-crossover DNA libraries independent of sequence identity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001; 98(20): 11248-11253. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.201413698

Rasheed S, Bashir K, Kim JM, Ando M, Tanaka M, Seki M. The modulation of acetic acid pathway genes in Arabidopsis improves survival under drought stress. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1): 7831-7842. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26103-2

Ahmad A, Banat F, Taher H. A review on the lactic acid fermentation from low-cost renewable materials: Recent developments and challenges. Environ Technol Innov. 2020; 20: 101138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.101138

Brenner S, Johnson M, Bridgham J. Gene expression analysis by massively parallel signature sequencing (MPSS) on microbead arrays. Nat Biotechnol. 2000; 18(6): 630-634. https://doi.org/10.1038/76469

Gabriele Andrea Lugli, Christian Milani, Francesca Turroni, Sabrina Duranti, Leonardo Mancabelli, Marta Mangifesta, Chiara Ferrario, Monica Modesto, Paola Mattarelli, Killer Jiri, Douwe van Sinderen, Marco Ventura. Comparative genomic and phylogenomic analyses of the Bifidobacteriaceae family. BMC Genom. 2017; 18: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3955-4

Abedi E, Hashemi SMB. Lactic acid production – producing microorganisms and substrate sources-state of the art. Heliyon. 2020; 6(8): e04974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04974

Zhang YX, Perry K, Vinci VA, Powell K, Stemmer WPC, Del Cardayre SB. Genome shuffling leads to rapid phenotypic improvement in bacteria. Nature. 2002; 415(6872): 644-646. https://doi.org/10.1038/415644a

Nielsen J. Metabolic engineering. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001; 55(3): 263 -283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530000318

Diop MB, Destain J, Alvarez VB, Konte MA, Thonart P: Use of Nisin-producing starter cultures of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis on cereal-based matrix to optimise preservative factors over fish fermentation at 30 °C, typical of Senegal. J Food Process Technol. 2015; 6(8): 432-445. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7110.1000432

Zhao H, Chockalingam K, Chen Z. Directed evolution of enzymes and pathways for industrial biocatalysis. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2002; 13(2): 104-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-1669(02)00291-4

Petrova P, Petrov K. Lactic acid fermentation of cereals and pseudocereals: Ancient nutritional biotechnologies with modern applications. Nutrients. 2020; 12(4): 1118-1133. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12041118

Ohnishi J, Mitsuhashi S, Hayashi M, Ando S, Yokoi H, Ochiai K, Ikeda M. A novel methodology employing Corynebacterium glutamicum genome information to generate Lysine-producing mutants. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002; 58(2): 217-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-001-0883-6

Pulz O, Gross W. Valuable products from biotechnology of microalgae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004; 65(6): 635-648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-004-1647-x

Won SH, Kim YJ, Choi KT, Choi JS, Park HD, Kim JY, Kim TJ. Fermentation characteristics of unripe Citrus unshiu vinegar production using acetic acid bacteria isolated from traditional fermented vinegars. Prev Nutr Food Sci. 2024; 29(2): 220-228. https://doi.org/10.3746/pnf.2024.29.2.220

Kumar A, Kanwar SS. Lipase production in Solid State Fermentation (SSF): Recent Developments and Biotechnological Applications. Proc Biotechnol Mol Biol. 2012; 1(1): 1-14.

Suenaga H, Mitsokua M, Ura Y, Watanabe T, Furukawa K. Directed evolution of biphenyl dioxygenase: emergence of enhanced degradation capacity for benzene, toluene and alkyl benzenes. J Bacteriol. 2001; 183(18): 5441-5444. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.183.18.5441-5444.2001

Marshall SH. DNA shuffling: Induced molecular breeding to produce new generation long-lasting vaccines. Biotechnol Adv. 2002; 20(1): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-9750(02)00020-2

Giraud F, Giraud T, Aguileta G, Fournier E, Samson R, Cruaud C, Lacoste S, Ropars J, Tellier A, Dupont J. Microsatellite loci to recognise species for the cheese starter and contaminating strains associated with cheese manufacturing. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010; 137(3): 204-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.11.010

Ness JE, del Cardayre SB, Minshull J, Stemmer WP. Molecular breeding: The natural approach to protein design. Adv Protein Chem. 2000; 55: 261-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3233(01)55007-1

Wang GY, Keasling JD. Amplification of HMG-CoA reductase production enhances carotenoid accumulation in Neurospora crassa. Metab Eng. 2002; 4(3): 193-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2012.12.005

Ray RC, Joshi VK. Fermented foods: Past, present and future scenario. In: Ray RC, Montet D, editors. Microorganisms and Fermentation of Traditional Foods. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2014. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17307

Houbraken J, Frisvad JC, Samson RA. Sex in Penicillium roqueforti. IMA Fungus. 2010; 1(2): 171-180. https://doi.org/10.5598/imafungus.2010.01.02.03

Trefzer A, Blanco G, Remsing L. Rationally designed glycosylated premithramycins: Hybrid aromatic polyketides using genes from three different biosynthetic pathways. J Am Chem Soc. 2002; 124(21): 6056-6062. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0175937

Sengun IY, Karabiyikli S. Importance of acetic acid bacteria in the food industry. Food Control. 2011; 22(5): 647-656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.11.008

Wittmann C, Heinzle E. Genealogy profiling through strain improvement using metabolic network analysis: Metabolic flux genealogy of several generations of lysine-producing Corynebacterium sp. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002; 68(12): 5843-5859. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.12.5843-5859.2002

Nakamura CE, Whited GM. Metabolic engineering for the microbial production of 1,3-propanediol. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2003; 14(5): 454-459. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-1669(02)00297-5

Lynch KM, Zannini E, Wilkinson S, Daenen L, Arendt EK. Physiology of acetic acid bacteria and their role in vinegar and fermented beverages. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2019; 18(3): 587-625. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12440

Panda SK, Mishra SS, Kayitesi E, Ray RC. Microbial processing of fruit and vegetable wastes for production of vital enzymes and organic acids: Biotechnology and scopes. Environ Res. 2016; 146: 161-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2015.12.035

Kumari P, Mehta A, Sehgal R, Ray RC, Gupta R. Microbial enzymes and organic acids production from vegetables and fruit wastes and their applications. In: Ray RC, editor. Fruits and Vegetable Wastes: Valorization to Bioproducts and Platform Chemicals. Singapore: Springer; 2022. p. 237-257. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9527-8_10

Behera SS, Saranraj P, Ray RC. Microbial bioethanol fermentation technologies - Recent trends and future prospects. In: Gómez Castro FI, Guti-Errez-Antonio C, editors. Biofuels and Biorefining. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2022. p. 75-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824116-5.00011-8

Raillard S, Krebber A, Chen Y. Novel enzyme activities and functional plasticity revealed by recombining highly homologous enzymes. Chem Biol. 2001; 8(9): 891-898. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1074-5521(01)00061-8

Anastassiadis S, Aivasidis A, Wandrey C, Rehm HJ. Process optimisation of continuous gluconic acid fermentation by isolated yeast-like strains of Aureobasidium pullulans. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2002; 80(6): 677-684. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.10522

Tobin MB, Gustafsson C, Huisman GW. Directed evolution: The 'rational' basis for 'irrational' design. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2000; 10(4): 421-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-440X(00)00114-3

Suganthi R, Benazir JF, Santhi R, Ramesh Kumar V, Anjana Hari, Nitya Meenakshi, Nidhiya KA, Kavitha G, Lakshmi R. Amylase production by Aspergillus niger under solid state fermentation using agroindustrial waste. Int J Innov Agric Res. 2011; 1(1): 1-12.

Bongaerts J, Kramer M, Muller U, Raeven L, Wubbolts M. Metabolic engineering for microbial production of aromatic amino acids and derived compounds. Metab Eng. 2001; 3(4): 289-300. https://doi.org/10.1006/mben.2001.0196

Moodley P, Ray R C. Kana E.B. G. Advances in Lignocellulosic Biofuel Production Systems. Elsevier; 2023. p. 436. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2020-0-04155-1

Abedin MM, Chourasia R, Phukon LC, Sarkar P, Ray RC, Singh SP, Rai AK. Lactic acid bacteria in the functional food industry: Biotechnological properties and potential applications. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2023; 63(25): 7721-7739. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2023.2227896

Qiu X, Zhang Y, Hong H. Classification of acetic acid bacteria and their acid-resistant mechanism. AMB Express. 2021; 11(1): 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-021-01189-6

Pramik MJ. Genentech develops recombinant technique for producing vitamin C. Genet Eng News. 1985; 5(1): 1 - 2.

Nissen TL, Kielland Brandt MC, Nielsen J, Villadsen J. Optimisation of ethanol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by metabolic engineering of the ammonium assimilation. Metab Eng. 2000; 2(1): 69-77. https://doi.org/10.1006/mben.1999.0140

Omura S, Crump A. The life and times of Ivermectin - A success story. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004; 2(12): 984-989. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro984

Joshi C, Khare SK. Utilisation of deoiled Jatropha curcas seed cake for production of xylanase from thermophilic Scytalidium thermophilum. Bioresour Technol. 2011; 102(2): 1722-1726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.035

Willke T, Verlop KD. Biotechnological production of Itaconic acid. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001; 56(4): 289-295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530100514

Patnaik R, Louie S, Gavrilovic V, Perry K, Stemmer WPC, Ryan CM, del Cardayre S. Genome shuffling of Lactobacillus for improved acid tolerance. Nat Biotechnol. 2002; 20(7): 707–712. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt734

Singhania RR, Patel AK, Soccol CR, Pandey A. Recent advances in solid-state fermentation. Biochem Eng J. 2009; 44(1): 13-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2008.10.019

Behera SS, Ray RC. Solid state fermentation for production of microbial cellulases: Recent advances and improvement strategies. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016; 86: 656-669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.10.090

Ncube T, Howard RL, Abotsi EK, van Rensburg ELJ, Ncube I. Jatropha curcas seed cake as substrate for production of xylanase and cellulase by Aspergillus niger FGSCA733 in Solid state fermentation. Ind Crops Prod. 2012; 37(1): 118-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.11.024

Mogensen JM, Varga J, Thrane U, Frisvad JC. Aspergillus acidus from Puerh tea and black tea does not produce Ochratoxin A and Fumonisin B2. Int J Food Microbiol. 2009; 132(2-3): 141-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.04.011

Xiao JZ, Takahashi S, Nishimoto M, Odamaki T, Yaeshima T, Iwatsuki K, Kitaoka M. Distribution of in vitro fermentation ability of lacto-N-biose I, a significant building block of human milk oligosaccharides, in Bifidobacteria strains. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010; 76(1): 54-59. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01983-09

Kar S, Gauri SS, Das A, Jana A, Maity C, Mandal A, Das Mohapatra PK, Pati BR, Mondal KC. Process optimisation of xylanase production using cheap solid substrate by Trichoderma reesei SAF3 and study on the alteration of behavioural properties of enzymes obtained from SSF and SmF. Bioproc Biosyst Eng. 2013; 36(1): 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-012-0761-x

Ray RC, Behera SS, Awogbemi O, Sooch BS, Thatoi HN, Rath S, Aguilar-Rivera N. Beyond enzymes and organic acids, solid-state fermentation as an alternative for valorizing fruits and vegetable waste into novel bio-products in a circular economy: A critical review. AIMS Microbiol. 2025; 11(2): 462-500. https://doi.org/10.3934/microbiol.2025021

Znad H, Markos J, Bales V. Production of gluconic acid from glucose by Aspergillus niger: Growth and non-growth conditions. Process Biochem. 2004; 39(11): 1341-1345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(03)00270-X

Labuschagne PWJ, Divol B. Thiamine: A key nutrient for yeasts during wine alcoholic fermentation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021; 105(3): 953-973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-11080-2

Roca-Mesa H, Sendra S, Mas A, Beltran G, Torija M-J. Nitrogen preferences during alcoholic fermentation of different non-Saccharomyces yeasts of oenological interest. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(2): 157-165. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020157

Vamvakas S-S, Kapolos J. Factors affecting yeast ethanol tolerance and fermentation efficiency. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020; 36(7): 114-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-020-02881-8

Saqib AAN, Farooq A, Iqbal M, Hassan JU, Hayat U, Baig S. A thermostable crude endoglucanase produced by Aspergillus fumigatus in a novel solid state fermentation process using isolated free water. Enzyme Res. 2012; 15(4): 528724. https://doi.org/10.4061/2012/528724

Kubo Y, Rooney AP, Tsukakoshi Y, Nakagawa R, Hasegawa H, Kimura K. Phylogenetic analysis of Bacillus subtilis strains applicable to natto. Int J Ferment Technol. 2011; 2(1): 1-8.

Zhu J, Liu H, Zhang J, Wang P, Liu S, Liu G, Wu L. Effects of Asn-33 glycosylation on the thermostability of Thermomyces lanuginosus lipase. J Appl Microbiol. 2014; 117(1): 151-159. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12491

Sybesma W, Burgess C, Starrenburg M, Van Sinderen D, Hugenholtz J. Multivitamin production in Lactococcus lactis using metabolic engineering. Metab Eng. 2004; 6(2): 109-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2003.07.001

Pyo Y, Kwon KH, Jung YJ. Probiotic functions in fermented foods: Anti-viral, immunomodulatory, and anti-cancer benefits. Foods. 2024; 13(15): 2386-2395. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13152386

Qiao L, Yang G, Wang P, Xu C. The potential role of mitochondria in the microbiota-gut-brain axis: Implications for brain health. Pharmacol Res. 2024; 200: 107434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107434

Qu F, Zeng W, Tong X, Feng W, Chen Y. New insights into the influence of fermentation temperature on the quality and bioactivities of black tea. LWT. 2020; 117: 108646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108646

Rao Y, Qian Y, Tao Y, She X, Li Y. Influence of oxygen exposure on fermentation process and sensory qualities of Sichuan pickle (paocai). RSC Adv. 2019; 9(65): 38083-38091. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ra05994f

Vamvakas SS, Kapolos J. Factors affecting yeast ethanol tolerance and fermentation efficiency. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020; 36(7): 114-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-020-02881-8

Vickram S, Manikandan S, Deena SR, Mundike J, Subbaiya R. Advanced biofuel production, policy and technological implementation of nano-additives for sustainable environmental management – A critical review. Bioresour Technol. 2023; 387: 129660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129660

Mishra SS, Behera PK, Kar B, Ray RC. Advances in probiotics, prebiotics and nutraceuticals. In: Panda SK, Shetty PH, editors. Innovations in Technologies for Fermented Foods and Beverage Industries. Cham; Springer; 2018. p. 121-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74820-7_7

Vilela A. An overview of CRISPR-based technologies in wine yeasts to improve wine flavour and safety. Fermentation. 2021; 7(1): 5-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation7010005

Wang F, Zhu L, Hadiatullah H, Li Z, He J. Enhancing flavour with non-Saccharomyces during vinegar alcoholisation: A mechanism study. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2023; 58(3): 1424-1434. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.16584

Montet D, Ray RC, Zakhia-Rozis N: Lactic acid fermentation of vegetables and fruits. In: Ray RC, Montet D, editors. Microorganisms and Fermentation of Traditional Foods. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2014. p. 108-140. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17307

Wang J, Hao S, Ren Q. Uncultured microorganisms and their functions in the fermentation systems of traditional Chinese fermented foods. Foods. 2023; 12(14): 2691-2705. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12142691

Yousefi Darani A, Paquet Durand O, Zettel V, Hitzmann B. Closed loop control system for dough fermentation based on image processing. J Food Process Eng. 2018; 41(8): e12801. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.12801

Zhang H, Wang L, Wang H, Yang F, Chen L. Effects of initial temperature on microbial community succession rate and volatile flavors during Baijiu fermentation process. Food Res Int. 2021; 140: 109887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109887

Blandino A, Al-Aseeri M, Pandiella S, Cantero D, Webb C. Cereal-based fermented foods and beverages. Food Res Int. 2002; 36(6): 527-543. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-9969(03)00009-7

Ribet L, Dessalles R, Lesens C, Brusselaers N, Dubief MD. Nutritional benefits of sourdoughs: A systematic review. Adv Nutr. 2022; 14(1): 22–29. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.advnut.2022.10.003

Zhao YS, Eweys AS, Zhang JY, Zhu Y, Bai J. Fermentation affects the antioxidant activity of plant-based food material through the release and production of bioactive components. Antioxidants. 2021; 10(12): 2004 - 2015. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10122004

Aderibigbe EY, Visessanguan W, Somphop B, Yutthana K, Jureeporn D. Sourcing starter cultures for Parkia biglobosa fermentation Part II: Potential of Bacillus subtilis strains. British Microbiol Res J. 2014; 4(2): 224-234. https://doi.org/10.9734/BMRJ/2014/6471

Chan EWC, Wong SK, Kezuka M, Oshiro N, Chan HT. Natto and miso: An overview on their preparation, bioactive components and health-promoting effects. Food Res. 2021; 5(3): 446-452. https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.5(3).587

Adebo JA, Njobeh PB, Gbashi S, Oyedeji AB, Ogundele OM, Oyeyinka SA, Adebo OA. Fermentation of cereals and legumes: Impact on nutritional constituents and nutrient bioavailability. Ferment. 2022; 8(2): 63–70. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8020063

Malakar S, Paul SK, Jolvis Pou KR. Biotechnological interventions in beverage production. In: Grumezescu AM, Holban AM (Eds). Biotechnological Progress and Beverage Consumption. Academic Press; 2020. 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816678-9.00001-1

Mankar AR, Pandey A, Modak A, Pant KK. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass: a review on recent advances. Bioresour Technol. 2021; 334: 125235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125235

Panda SH, Ray RC, Sheikha AFE, Montet D, Worawattanamateekul W. Fermented fish and fish products: An overview. In: Montet D, Ray RC, editors. Aquaculture Microbiology and Biotechnology. Vol. 2. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2011. p. 132–172. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10923

Gao X, Li C, He R, Zhang Y, Wang B, Zhang L, Luo H. Research advances on biogenic amines in traditional fermented foods: Emphasis on formation mechanism, detection, and control methods. Food Chem. 2023; 405(A): 134911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134911

Abdi Moghadam Z, Darroudi M, Mahmoudzadeh M, Mohtashami M, Jamal AM, Shamloo E. Functional yogurt, enriched and probiotic: A focus on human health. Clin Nutri. 2023; 57: 575–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLNESP.2023.08.005

Companys J, Pla Pagà L, Calderen Pérez L, Llaurade E, Solà R, Pedret A, Valls RM. Fermented dairy products, probiotic supplementation, and cardiometabolic diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Adv Nutri. 2020; 11(4): 834–863. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/advances/nmaa030

Wang J, Hao S, Ren Q. Uncultured microorganisms and their functions in the fermentation systems of traditional Chinese fermented foods. Foods 2023; 12(14): 2691–2705. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12142691

Zhao YS, Eweys AS, Zhang JY, Zhu Y, Bai J. Fermentation affects the antioxidant activity of plant-based food material through the release and production of bioactive components. Antioxi. 2021; 10(12), 2004–2015. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10122004

Marano G, Mazza M, Lisci FM, Ciliberto M, Traversi G. The microbiota–gut–brain axis: Psychoneuroimmunological insights. Nutrients. 2023; 15(6): 1496-1505. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15061496

Gao L, Wu X, Zhu C, Jin Z, Wang W, Zhou Y, Chen J. Metabolic engineering to improve the biomanufacturing efficiency of acetic acid bacteria: advances and prospects. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2020; 40(4): 522-538. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2020.1743231

Gao X, Li C, He R, Zhang Y, Wang B, Zhang L, Luo H. Research advances on biogenic amines in traditional fermented foods: emphasis on formation mechanism, detection, and control methods. Food Chem. 2023; 405 (A): 134911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134911

Garg D, Samota MK, Kontis N, Patel N, Bala S, Chawla P. Revolutionising biofuel generation: Unleashing the power of CRISPR-Cas mediated gene editing of extremophiles. Microbiol Res. 2023; 275: 127443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2023.127443

Singh H, Chopra C, Singh H, Malgotra V, Wani AK, Singh RP. Gut-brain axis and Alzheimer's disease: therapeutic interventions and strategies. J Funct Foods. 2024; 112: 105915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2023.105915

Socała K, Doboszewska U, Szopa A, Serefko A, Włodarczyk M, Zielińska A, Poleszak E, Fichna J, Wlaź P. The role of the microbiota-gut-brain axis in neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders. Pharmacol Res. 2021; 172: 105840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105840

Sahu L, Panda SK. Innovative technologies and implications in fermented food and beverage industries: an overview. In: Panda SK, Shetty PH, editors. Innovations in Technologies for Fermented Food and Beverage Industries. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74820-7_1

Qiu X, Zhang Y, Hong H. Classification of acetic acid bacteria and their acid-resistant mechanism. AMB Express. 2021; 11(1): 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-021-01189-6

Rasheed S, Bashir K, Kim J-M, Ando M, Tanaka M, Seki M. The modulation of acetic acid pathway genes in Arabidopsis improves survival under drought stress. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1): 7831-7845. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26103-2

Reihani SFS, Khosravi Darani K. Influencing factors on single cell protein production by submerged fermentation: A review. Electron J Biotechnol. 2019; 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2018.11.005

Mirsalami SM, Mirsalami M. Advances in genetically engineered microorganisms: Transforming food production through precision fermentation and synthetic biology. Future Foods. 2025; 11: 100601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2025.100601

Xu F, Su L, Wang Y, Gao H, Hu K, Ben R, Guo Y, Li X, Chu J, Tian X. Artificial intelligence-guided fermentation process regulation reveals metabolic rewiring in gentamicin C1a overproduction. Bioresour. Technol. 2025; 436: 132968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2025.132968

Zhao J, Fang H, Zhang D. Expanding application of CRISPR-Cas9 system in microorganisms. Synth Syst Biotechnol. 2020; 14(5): 269-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synbio.2020.08.001

Wang Y, Qian J, Shi T, Wang Y, Ding Q, Ye C. Application of extremophile cell factories in industrial biotechnology. Enz Microb Technol. 2024; 175: 110407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2024.110407

  • چکیده مشاهده شده: 1484 بار
  • pdf (English) دانلود شده: 568 بار

آمار دانلود

  • لینکدین
  • تویتر
  • فیسبوک
  • گوگل پلاس
  • تلگرام

##plugins.block.developedBy.blockTitle##

سامانه مجله باز

زبان

  • English
  • فارسی
  • العربية
  • 简体中文
  • Español (España)
  • Français (France)

اطلاعات

  • برای خوانندگان
  • برای نویسندگان
  • برای کتابداران
  • صفحه اصلی
  • بایگانی
  • ارسال مقاله
  • درباره‌ی مجله
  • تیم سردبیری
  • اطلاعات تماس

AWT IMAGE

The journal of "Applied Food Biotechnology" is licensed under a  CC BY-NC 4.0. International License.

قدرت یافته از OJSPlus