Increasing Protein Content of Tomato Pomace using Solid-State Fermentation with Industrial Bakery Yeasts Increasing the protein content of tomato pulp by solid-state fermentation
Applied Food Biotechnology ,
Vol. 10 Núm. 1 (2023),
3 dey 2023
,
Página 47-59
https://doi.org/10.22037/afb.v10i1.39916
Resumen
Background and Objective: Tomato pomace as the major waste of tomato paste can be used in food formulation due to its nutritional and technological characteristics. The aim of this study was to create a cheap simple method to increase the protein content of tomato pomace, which could be used as a cheap and more efficient food source for livestock and poultry.
Material and Methods: The study was carried out in three stages: 1) selection of further appropriate yeasts by assessing effects of two types of avaiable Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces bulardi industrial yeasts and fermentation time in the moisture content of 5% tomato pomace with particle size of less than 500 μm on the protein content of tomato pomace, 2) asessment of optimum conditions for increasing the protein content of tomato pomace by assessing effects of four parameters of the quantity of the yeasts, initial moisture content, substrate particle size and cultivation time in three levels, based on the Taguchi method in nine experiments in laboratory scale, 3) increase of the protein content of tomato pomace in bench scale tray bioreactor by investigation of three factor substrate depth, distance between trays and substrate particle size in three levels and one aeration factor in two levels based on the Taguchi method.
Results and Conclusion: Saccharomyces cerevisiae and 5-d cultivation time were chosen to continue the study. Under optimal conditions in laboratory scale, 0.03 g dry yeast/g tomato pomace of yeast, moisture content of 70% (w w-1), particle size of less than 150–250 μm (mesh 100) and process time of 5 d, protein content of 24.72% with fat content of 3.29%, ash of 16.45% and carbohydrate of 55.52% (w w-1) were achieved. Under optimal conditions, including bed depth of 1.2 cm, tray distance of 4 cm, particle size of 250-500 μm (mesh 60) without aeration, the maximum protein content of 25.82% were achieved, which were more than 80%, compared to the primary tomato pomace protein content (14.21% w w-1). This is the highest protein content already reported for tomato pomace, using the simplest technology at the lowest cost.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest
- ■ Tomato pomace; ■ Solid state cultivation; ■ Saccharomyces cerevisiae; ■ Taguchi method; ■ Tray bioreactors; ■ Protein enrichment
Cómo citar
Citas
Sadh PK, Duhan S, Duhan JS. Agro-industrial wastes and their utilization using solid state fermentation: a review. Bioresour Bioprocess. 2018; 5:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-017-0187-z.
Zhiqiang L, Jiajia W, Ruiping G, Fayin Y, Guohua Z. Sustainable valorization of tomato pomace: A comprehensive review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2019; 86:172-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.02.020
Saini RK, Moon SH, Keum YS. An updated review on use of tomato pomace and crustacean processing waste to recover commercially vital carotenoids. Food Res Int. 2018; 108:516-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.04.003.
Montanari A, Bolzoni L, Cigognini IM, Ciruelos A, Gomez Cardoso M, de la Torre R. Tomato biobased lacquer for sustainable metal packaging. Acta Hortic. 2017; 1159: 159-166. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1159.24
Roja HN, Munishamanna KB, Veena R, Palanimuthu V, Solid state fermentation of tomato pomace waste by different lactic acid bacteria and yeast strains for quality and nutritional improvement. Agriculture Update. 2017; 12: 347-354.https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/AU/12.TECHSEAR(2)2017/347-354.
Manan MA, Webb C. Design aspects of solid state fermentation as applied to microbial bioprocessing. J Appl Biotechnol Bioeng. 2017; 4(1): 511-532. https://doi.org/10.15406/jabb.2017.04.00094
Shojaosadati SA, Babaeipour V. Citric acid production from apple pomace in multi-layer packed bed solid-state bioreactor. Process Biochem. 2002; 37: 909-914.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(01)00294-1.
Azadian F, Badoei-Dalfard A, Karami Z, Statistical optimization of cellulose production by Bacillus aerius AV10 in solid-state fermentation of cellulosic wastes and its partial characterization. J Cell Mol Res. 2018; 31: 409-420.https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=683974.
Wang L, Yang ST. Bioprocessing for Value-added Products from Renewable Resources, in: S T. Yang (Eds.), Solid State Fermentation and its Applications, Elsevier publishing, 2007: pp.465-489.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-52114-9.X5000-2.
Ge X, Vasco-Correa J, Li Y. Solid-state Fermentation Bioreactors and Fundamentals, in: C. Larroche, M.Á. Sanroman, G. Du, A. Pandey (Eds.), Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Elsevier. 2017: pp. 381-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63663-8.00013-6.
Paryad A, Rashidi M. Effect of Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on Apparent Digestibility and Nitrogen Retention of Tomato Pomace in Sheep. Pak J Nutr. 2009; 8(3): 273-278. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2009.273.278.
Krishania M, Sindhu R, Binod P, Ahluwalia V, Kumar V, Sangwan RS, Pandey A. Design of Bioreactors in Solid-State Fermentation, in: A. Pandey, L. Larroche, C. Soccol, Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering: Current Advances in Solid-State Fermentation, Elsevier Inc. 2018: pp. 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63990-5.00005-0.
Mitchell DA, Krieger N, Berovic M. Group I Bioreactors: Unaerated and Unmixed, in: D.A. Mitchell, N. Krieger, M. Berovic (Eds.), Solid-state Fermentation Bioreactors: Fundamentals of Design and Operation. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg. 2006: pp. 65-76.https://doi.org/ 10.1007/3-540-31286-2.
Boukhalfa-Lezzar H, Leghlimi H, Copinet E, Duchiron F, Mechakra-Maza A. Utilization of tomato pomace as a substrate for neutral protease production by Aspergillus oryzae 2220 on solid-state fermentation. Int J Adv Re. 2014; 2: 338-346.
Iandolo D, Piscitelli A, Sannia G, Faraco V. Enzyme production by solid substrate fermentation of Pleurotus ostreatus and Trametes versicolor on tomato pomace. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2011; 163:40-51. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s12010-010-9014-0.
Umsza-Guez MA, Diaz AB, Ory ID, Blandino A, Gomes E, Caro I. Xylanase production by Aspergillus awamori under solid state fermentation conditions on tomato pomace. Braz J Microbiol. 2011; 42:1585-1597. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517 83822011000400046.
Azabou S, Abid Y, Sebii H, Felfoul I, Gargouri A, Attia H. Potential of the solid-state fermentation of tomato by products by Fusarium solani pisi for enzymatic extraction of lycopene. Food Sci Technol. 2016; 68: 280-287. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.11.064.
Chegeni A, Babaeipour V, Fathollahi M, Hosseini SG. Development of a new formulation of air revitalization tablets in closed atmospheres using the Taguchi statistical method. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2022; 19: 4289-4304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03595-6.
Hosseini ES, Zeinoddini M, Saeedinia AR, Babaeipour V. Optimization and One-Step Purification of Recombinant V Antigen Production from Yersinia pestis. Mol Biotechnol. 2020; 62:177-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-019-00234-x.
Singh V, Haque Niwas SR, Srivastava A, Pasupulet M, Tripathi CKM. Strategies for fermentation medium optimization: An In-depth review. Front Microbiol. 2017; 7: 2087https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.02087.
Owusu-Apenten R. Kjeldahl Method, Quantitative Amino Acid Analysis and Combustion Analysis, in: R. Owusu-Apenten (Eds.), Food protein analysis: quantitative effects on processing, CRC Press, Boca Raton. 2002: pp. 1-42. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203910580.
Nielsen SS, Carpenter C. Fat Content Determination, in: S.S. Nielsen (Eds.), Food analysis laboratory manual: Springer Cham. 2017: pp. 121-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44127-6_12.
Rao RS, Kumar CG, Prakasham RS, Hobbs PJ. The Taguchi methodology as a statistical tool for biotechnological applications: a critical appraisal. Biotechnol J. 2008; 3(4): 510-523. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.200700201.
Yafetto L. Protein enrichment of cassava pulp by solid-state fermentation using Aspergillus Niger 2018. Stud Fungi. 2018; 3: 7-18. https://doi.org/ 10.5943/sif/3/1/2
Muniz CES, Santiago AM, Gusmao TAS, Oliveira HML, Conrado LD, Gusmao PP. Solid-state fermentation for single-cell protein enrichment of guava and cashew by-products and inclusion on cereal bars. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2020; 25: 101576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101576.
Maxwell OI, Chinwuba UB, Onyebuchukwu MG. Protein Enrichment of Potato Peels Using Saccharomyces cerevisiae via Solid-State Fermentation Process. Adv Chem Eng. 2019; 9: 99-108. https://doi.org/10.4236/aces.2019.91008
Said SD, Zaki M, Novita E, Asnawi TM. Local Trichoderma reesei in solid state fermentation: Effects of process variables. J Phys Conf Ser. 2019; 1376: 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1376/1/012043.
Munekata PES, Dominguez R, Pateiro M, Nawaz A, Hano C, Walayat N, Lorenzo JM. Strategies to increase the value of pomaces with fermentation. Fermentation 2021; 7: 299. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation7040299
Abdul Manan M, Webb C. Insights into physical characterization of solid state fermentation: from preliminary knowledge to practical application. J Biotech Res. 2019; 10: 271-282.
Samadi S, Mohammadi M, Najafpour GD. Production of single cell Protein from sugarcane bagasse by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in Tray bioreactor. Int J Eng. 2016; 29(8): 1029-1036.
Ray RC, Behera SS. Solid State Fermentation for Production of Microbial Cellulases. Chapter 3 in: Biotechnology of Microbial Enzymes, 2011; 43-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803725-6.00003-0
Zhang L, Sun X. Effects of rhamnolipid and initial compost particle size on the two-stage composting of green waste. Bioresour Technol. 2014; 163: 112-122.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.04.041.
Derman E, Abdulla R, Marbawi H, Sabullah MK, Gansau JA, Ravindra P. Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of empty fruit bunches of palm for bioethanol production using a microbial consortium of S. cerevisiae and T. harzianum. Fermentation 2022; 8: 295. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8070295
Kumitch HM, Stone AK, Nickerson MT, Korber DR, Tanaka T. Effect of fermentation time on the physicochemical and functional properties of pea protein-enriched flour fermented by Aspergillus oryzae and Aspergillus niger. Cereal Chem. 2020; 97(2): 416-428.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cche.10257
Abdul Manan M, Webb C. Newly designed multi‑stacked circular tray solid‑state bioreactor: Analysis of a distributed parameter gas balance during solid‑state fermentation with influence of variable initial moisture content arrangements. Bioresour Bioprocess. 2020; 7: 16.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-020-00307-9
He Q, Chen H. Pilot-Scale Gas Double-Dynamic Solid-State Fermentation for the Production of Industrial Enzymes. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2013; 6: 2916-2924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-012-0956-9.
Chen HZ, Zhao ZM, Li HQ. The effect of gas double-dynamic on mass distribution in solid-state fermentation. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2014; 58-59: 14-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2014.02.007
Rodriguez-Zuniga UF, Couri S, Neto VB, Crestana S, Farinas CS. Integrated strategies to enhance cellulolytic enzyme production using an instrumented bioreactor for solid-state fermentation of sugarcane bagasse. BioEnergy Res. 2013; 6: 142-152.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9242-y
- Resumen ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.viewed##: 891 ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.times##
- pdf (English) ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.downloaded##: 662 ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.times##