Vol. 10 No. 2 (2023)

Antibacterial activities of purified monolaurin obtained from enzymatic glycerolysis of palm kernel olein-stearin blend against Bacillus subtilis

Applied Food Biotechnology, Vol. 10 No. 2 (2023), 18 Esfand 2023 , Page 129-140
https://doi.org/10.22037/afb.v10i2.40728

Abstract

Background and Objective: Monolaurin can be produced by enzymatic glycerolysis of a mixture of palm kernel olein-stearin (PKOo-PKS). Monolaurin has the ability as an antibacterial agent against both gram-positive and negative bacteria. Limited studies investigated the activity against bacteria of monolaurin on B. subtilis cell and spores. Therefore, this research aimed to study the effect of a purified monolaurin obtained from enzymatic glycerolysis of PKOo-PKS blend on growth, spore germination, cell surface hydrophobicity, and cell structure of B. subtilis FNCC 0060.

Material and Methods: Monolaurin was produced using palm kernel-olein blend material under the best enzymatic glycerolysis conditions and purified using solvent (hydroalcoholic) method. The effect of a purified monolaurin on B. subtilis growth and spore germination was studied using nutrient broth. Analysis of cell surface hydrophobicity (CSH) was carried out using MATHS (microbial adhesion to hydrocarbons) assay, while the cell structure was observed using Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM). As an experimental design, the completely randomized design (CRD) was used, and each treatment was triplicated. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan multiple range tests (DMRT) were used to analyze the data, which revealed a significant difference.

Results and Conclusion: This result showed that purified monolaurin inhibited the growth of B. subtilis FNCC 0060. Meanwhile, the development of B. subtilis in nutrient broth with monolaurin at 100-5,000 ppm was slower than without. A higher concentration in the medium decreases the specific growth rate and increases the doubling time. Spores of B. subtilis FNCC 0060 in nutrient broth with monolaurin at 100-1,000 ppm concentration were delayed in germination up to seven days of incubation. The presence of monolaurin significantly reduces the percent adherence of bacterial cells. Furthermore, the cytoplasm of B. subtilis FNCC 0060 appeared to have shrunk considerably, causing cell cytoplasm damage and disorganization of the components.

Keywords:
  • Antimicrobial lipid; Fat blend; Glycerol monolaurate; Monoglyceride; Palm kernel oil

How to Cite

Ngatirah, N., Hidayat, C., Rahayu, E. S., & Utami, T. (2023). Antibacterial activities of purified monolaurin obtained from enzymatic glycerolysis of palm kernel olein-stearin blend against Bacillus subtilis. Applied Food Biotechnology, 10(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.22037/afb.v10i2.40728

References

Farhanghi A, Aliakbarlu J, Tajik H, Mortazavi N, Manafi L, Jalilzadeh‐Amin G. Antibacterial interactions of pulegone and 1,8‐cineole with monolaurin ornisin against Staphylococcus aureus. Food Sci Nutr. 2022; 00: 1-8.

https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2870

Barboza GR, De Almeida JM, Silva NCC. Use of natural substrates as an alternative for the prevention of microbial contamination in the food industry. Food Sci Technol. 2022; 42: 1-6.

https://doi.org/10.1590/fst.05720

Simbine EO, Rodrigues LC, Lapa-Guimaraes J, Kamimura ES, Corassin CH, de Oliveira CAF. Application of silver nanoparticles in food packages: A review. Food Sci Technol. 2019; 39: 793-802.

https://doi.org/10.1590/fst.36318

Yoon BK, Jackman JA, Valle-Gonzalez ER, Cho NJ. Antibacterial free fatty acids and monoglycerides: Biological activities, experimental testing and therapeutic applications. Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 19(4): 1114.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19041114

Wang W, Wang R, Zhang G, Chen F, Xu B. In vitro antibacterial activities and mechanisms of action of fatty acid monoglycerides against four food-borne bacteria. J Food Prot. 2020; 83: 331-337.

https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-19-259

Lu W, Kelly AL, Miao S. Improved bioavailability of encapsulated bioactive nutrients delivered through mono-glyceride-structured O/W emulsions. J Agric Food Chem. 2017; 65: 3048-3055.

https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b05644

Nitbani FO, Jumina J. Monoglycerides as an Antifungal Agent. In Apolipoproteins, Triglycerides and Cholesterol 2020: pp1-18.

https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.91743

Sevcikova P, Kasparkova V, Hauerlandova I, Humpolicek P, Kucekova Z, Bunkova L. Formulation, antibacterial activity and cytotoxicity of 1-monoacylglycerol microemulsions. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol. 2014; 116: 448-457.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.201300171

Schlievert PM, Peterson ML. Glycerol monolaurate antibacterial activity in broth and biofilm cultures. Plos One 2012; 7: e40350.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040350

Satyawali Y, Cauwenberghs L, Maesen M, Dejonghe W. Lipase catalyzed solvent free synthesis of monoacylglycerols in various reaction systems and coupling reaction with pervaporation for in situ water removal. Chem Eng Process-Process Intensif. 2021; 166: 108475.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2021.108475

Sui M, Sumaryati E, Anggraeni FD, Utomo Y, Anggraini N, Rofiqoh NL. Monoglyceride biosynthesis from coconut milk with lypase enzyme of sesame seed sprouts as biocatalyst. Food Sci Technol. 2021; 41: 328-333.

https://doi.org/10.1590/fst.08820

Schlievert PM, Kilgore SH, Kaus GM, Ho TD, Ellermeier CD. Glycerol monolaurate (GML) and a nonaqueous five-percent GML gel kill Bacillus and Clostridium Spores. mSphere 2018; 3: 1-9.

https://doi.org/10.1128/mspheredirect.00597-18

Ngatirah N, Hidayat C, Rahayu ES, Utami T. The role of fat blends in improving the physicochemical properties of palm kernel oil for monolaurin synthesis. Trends Sci. 2022; 19: 1-10.

https://doi.org/10.48048/tis.2022.4214

Ngatirah N, Hidayat C, Rahayu ES, Utami T. Enzymatic glycerolysis of palm kernel olein and palm kernel stearin in different ratios for monolaurin synthesis. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2021; 1192: 012018.

https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1192/1/012018

Ngatirah N, Hidayat C, Rahayu ES, Utami T. Enzymatic glycerolysis of palm kernel olein-stearin blend for monolaurin synthesis as an emulsifier and antibacterial. Foods 2022; 11: 2412.

https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11162412

Ruzicka J, Velclova K, Janis R, Krejci J. Antimicrobial effects of 1-monoacylglycerols prepared by catalytic reaction of glycidol with fatty acids. Eur Food Res Technol. 2003; 217: 329-331.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-003-0764-6

Bunkova L, Bunka F, Janis R, Krejci J, Dolezalkova I, Pospisil Z, Ruzicka J, Tremlova B. Comparison of antibacterial effect of seven 1-monoglycerides on food-borne pathogens or spoilage bacteria. Acta Vet. Brno 2011; 80: 029-039.

https://doi.org/10.2754/avb201180010029

Ham Y, Kim TJ. Inhibitory activity of monoacylglycerols on biofilm formation in Aeromonas hydrophila, Streptococcus mutans, Xanthomonas oryzae and Yersinia enterocolitica. Springerplus 2016; 5: 1526.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3182-5

Cho W, Chung MS. Bacillus Spores: A review of their properties and inactivation processing technologies. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2020; 29: 1447-1461.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-020-00809-4

Zhang H, Cui Y, Zhu S, Feng F, Zheng X. Characterization and antimicrobial activity of a pharmaceutical microemulsion. Int J Pharm. 2010; 395: 154-160.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.05.022

Zhang H, Wei H, Cui Y, Zhao G, Feng F. Antibacterial interactions of monolaurin with commonly used antimicrobials and food components. J Food Sci. 2009; 74 (7): 418-421.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01300.x

Fu X, Zhang M, Huang B, Liu J, Hu H, Feng F. Enhancement of antimicrobial activities by the food-grade monolaurin microemulsion system. J Food Process Eng. 2009; 32: 104-111.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.05.022

Klangpetch W, Nakai T, Noma S, Igura N, Shimoda M. Combined effects of carbonation with heating and fatty acid esters on inactivation and growth inhibition of various Bacillus Spores. J Food Prot. 2013; 76: 1568-1574.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.05.022

Kmiha S, Aouadhi C, Aziza K, Bejaoui A, Maaroufi A. Comparison of synergistic effect of nisin and monolaurin on the inactivation of three heat resistant spores studied by design of experiments in milk. J Food Qual. 2021; 2021: 9977646.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9977646

Nitbani FO, Jumina, Siswanta D, Sholikhah EN, Fitriastuti D. Synthesis and antibacterial activity of 2-Monolaurin. Orient. J Chem. 2016; 32: 3113-3120.

https://doi.org/10.13005/ojc/340233

Hauerlandova I. Antimicrobial Activity of Non-Traditional Monoacylglycerols;.Faculty of Technology, Tomas Bata University, Zlin, 2012 :

Chaibi A, Ababouch LH, Busta FF. Inhibition of bacterial spores and vegetative cells by glycerides. J Food Prot. 1996; 59: 716-722.

https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-59.7.716

Dufour M, Manson JM, Bremer PJ, Dufour JP, Cook GM, Simmonds RS. Characterization of monolaurin resistance in Enterococcus faecalis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007; 73: 5507-5515.

https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01013-07

Andriani Y, Safitri R, Rochima E, Fakhrudin SDD. Characterization of Bacillus subtilis and B. licheniformis potentials as probiotic bacteria in vanamei shrimp feed (Litopenaeus Vannamei Boone, 1931). Nusant. Biosci. 2017; 9: 188-193.

https://doi.org/10.13057/nusbiosci/n090214

Liu Y, Su A, Tian R, Li J, Liu L, Du G. Developing rapid growing Bacillus subtilis for improved biochemical and recombinant protein production. Metab Eng Commun. 2020; 11: e00141.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mec.2020.e00141

Mansour M, Milliere JB. An inhibitory synergistic effect of a nisin-monolaurin combination on Bacillus Sp. vegetative cells in milk. Food Microbiol. 2001; 18: 87-94.

https://doi.org/10.1006/fmic.2000.0379

Zhang S, Xiong J, Lou W, Ning Z, Zhang D, Yang J. The key lethal effect existed in the antibacterial behavior of short, medium and long chain fatty acid monoglycerides on Escherichia coli. BioRxiv 2018; 6: 339309.

https://doi.org/10.1101/339309

Schlievert PM, Kilgore SH, Seo KS, Leung, DYM. Glycerol monolaurate contributes to the antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activity of human milk. Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 1-9.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51130-y

Van Heerden JH, Kempe H, Doerr A, Maarleveld T, Nordholt N, Bruggeman FJ. Statistics and simulation of growth of single bacterial cells: Illustrations with B. subtilis and E. coli. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 1-11.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15895-4

Budianto B, Suprastyani H. Aktivitas antagonis Bacillus subtilis terhadap Streptococcus iniae dan Pseudomonas fluorescens. J Vet. 2017; 18: 409-415.

https://doi.org/10.19087/jveteriner.2017.18.3.403

Green J, Korza G, Granados MR, Zenick B, Schlievert PM, Mok WMK, Setlow P. Lack of efficient killing of purified dormant spores of Bacillales and Clostridiales species by glycerol monolaurate in a non-aqueous Gel. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2020; 70: 407-412.

https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.13290

Setlow P. Germination of spores of Bacillus species: What we know and do not know. J Bacteriol. 2014; 196: 1297-1305.

https://doi.org/doi: 10.1128/JB.01455-13

Wu WJ, Chang J. Effect of oxygen on the germination and culturability of Bacillus atrophaeus spores. Int. Microbiol. 2022; 25: 353-363.

https://doi.org/doi: 10.1007/s10123-021-00229-2

Rihakova Z, Filip V, Plockova M, Smidrkal J, Cervenkova R. Inhibition of Aspergillus niger DMF 0801 by monoacylglycerols prepared from coconut oil. Czech J. Food Sci. 2018; 20: 48-52.

https://doi.org/10.17221/3509-cjfs

Tominaga Y, Qiuyue Z, Noma S, Igura N, Shimoda M. Inactivation of Bacillus subtilis spores by heat treatment after carbonation in the presence of monoglycerol fatty acid esters. Food Sci Technol Res. 2017; 23: 561-565.

https://doi.org/10.3136/fstr.23.561

Gogra AB, Yao J, Sandy EH, Zheng S, Zaray G, Koroma BM, Hui Z. Cell surface hydrophobicity (CSH) of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Aspergillus niger and the Biodegradation of Diethyl Phthalate (DEP) via microcalorimetry. J Am Sci. 2010; 6(7): 78-88.

Lather P, Mohanty AK, Jha P, Garsa AK. Contribution of cell surface hydrophobicity in the resistance of Staphylococcus aureus against antimicrobial agents. Biochem Res Int. 2016; 2016: 1091290.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1091290

Silva-Dias A, Miranda IM, Branco J, Monteiro-Soares M, Pina-Vaz C, Rodrigues AG. Adhesion, biofilm formation, cell surface hydrophobicity and antifungal planktonic susceptibility: Relationship among Candida Spp. Front Microbiol. 2015; 6: 205.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00205

Nachtigall C, Vogel C, Rohm H, Jaros D. How capsular exopolysaccharides affect cell surface properties of lactic acid bacteria. Microorganisms 2020; 8: 1-15.

https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8121904

Danchik C, Casadevall A. Role of cell surface hydrophobicity in the pathogenesis of medically-significant fungi. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021; 10: 1-7.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.594973

Di Ciccio P, Vergara A, Festino AR, Paludi D, Zanardi E, Ghidini S, Ianieri A. Biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus on food contact surfaces: Relationship with temperature and cell surface hydrophobicity. Food Control 2015; 50: 930-936.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.10.048

Oberoi AS, Philip L. Variation in cell surface characteristics and extracellular polymeric substances during the biodegradation of monocyclic and heterocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in single and multi-substrate systems. Environ. Technol. (United Kingdom) 2018; 39: 3115-3126.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2017.1375019

Amadou I, Sun GW, Gbadamos OS, Le GW. Antimicrobial and cell surface hydrophobicity effects of chemically synthesized fermented foxtail millet meal fraction peptide (FFMp10) mutants on Escherichia coli ATCC 8099 Strain. Int Food Res J. 2016; 23: 708-714.

Schiffer C, Hilgarth M, Ehrmann M, Vogel RF. Bap and cell surface hydrophobicity are important factors in Staphylococcus xylosus biofilm formation. Front Microbiol. 2019; 10: 1-10.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01387

Kurincic M, Jersek B, Klancnik A, Mozina SS, Fink R, Drazic G, Raspor P, Bohinc K. Effects of natural antimicrobials on bacterial cell hydrophobicity, adhesion and zeta potential. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2016; 67: 39-45.

https://doi.org/10.1515/aiht-2016-67-2720

Krasowska A, Sigler K. How microorganisms use hydrophobicity and what does this mean for human needs? Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2014; 4: 1-7.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2014.00112

Kalamara M, Abbott JC, Macphee CE, Stanley-Wall NR. Biofilm hydrophobicity in environmental isolates of Bacillus subtilis. Microbiol. (United Kingdom) 2021; 167: 001082.

https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.001082

Shebl RI, Farouk F, Azzazy HMES. Effect of surface charge and hydrophobicity modulation on the antibacterial and antibiofilm potential of magnetic iron nanoparticles. J. Nanomater. 2017; 3528295.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3528295

Balleza D, Alessandrini A, Beltran Garcia MJ. Role of lipid composition, physicochemical interactions and membrane mechanics in the molecular actions of microbial cyclic lipopeptides. J Membr Biol. 2019; 252: 131-157.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00232-019-00067-4

Pisoschi AM, Pop A, Georgescu C, Turcuş V, Olah NK, Mathe E. An overview of natural antimicrobials role in food. Eur. J Med Chem. 2018; 143: 922-935.

https://doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.11.095

  • Abstract Viewed: 1050 times
  • pdf Downloaded: 547 times

Download Statastics

Developed By

Open Journal Systems

Language

Information