Mycoprotein Production from Date Waste Using Fusarium venenatum in a Submerged Culture
Applied Food Biotechnology,
Vol. 5 No. 4 (2018),
17 September 2018
,
Page 243-352
https://doi.org/10.22037/afb.v5i4.23139
Abstract
Background and objective: Production of single cell protein has various outstanding advantages, e.g., it can be grown on waste and it is environmental friendly as it helps in upgrading agricultural wastes. In the present study, the influence of process parameters on the biomass formation (g l-1), protein production (% w w-1) and volumetric productivity (g l-1 h-1) of Fusarium venenatum IR372C was determined.
Material and methods: The Vogel medium was used with glucose as the carbon source for pre culture cultivation and date sugar as the carbon source for production medium. In the first phase of the study, submerged fermentation was conducted in 500 ml flasks and a 3l stirred-tank bioreactor was exploited to conduct the submerged fermentation in the second phase. Plackett-Burman Design with eleven factors, i.e., date sugar concentration, NH4H2PO4, peptone, MgSO4, KH2PO4, temperature, time, shake rate, inoculate age, inoculate size, pH in two levels and Response Surface Methodology with three variables, i.e., date sugar concentration, time and inoculate size were employed to determine the fermentation condition by which the maximum biomass, protein and productivity were achieved.
Results and conclusion: Based on obtained results, by using the selected levels of influencing process variables, a relatively high amount of total protein (ca. 4 g l-1, 65.3% in the first phase using flasks and 5.5 g l-1, 76% in the second phase by using the bioreactor, respectively) was achieved. The amino and fatty acid profiles of mycoprotein and its relatively high fiber content (6%) imply that mycoprotein could be incorporated in various types of foods as a functional ingredient.
Conflict of interest All authors have declared that they don’t have any conflict of interest for publishing this research.
- ▪ Date waste ▪ Food grade ▪ Fusarium venenatum ▪ Inoculate size ▪ Mycoprotein ▪ Submerged fermentation
How to Cite
References
Verstraete W, Clauwaert P, Vlaeminck SE. Used water and nutrients: Recovery perspectives in a ‘panta rhei’ context. Bioresource Technol. 2016; 215:199–208.
DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.094
Yunus F, Nadeem M, Rashid F. Single-cell protein production through microbial conversion of lignocellulosic residue (wheat bran) for animal feed. J Inst Brew. 2015; 121: 553–557.
DOI: 10.1002/jib.251
Rasoul-Amini S, Morowvat MH, Younes Gh. Single Cell Protein: Production and Process. American J Food Technol 2011; 6: 103-116.
DOI: 10.3923/ajft.2011.103.116.
Ferreira, JA, Mahboubi A, Lennartsson PR, Taherzadeh MJ. Waste biorefineries using filamentous ascomycetes fungi: Present status and future prospects. Biores Technol. 2016; 215, 334–345.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.018
Wiebe M. Myco-protein from Fusarium venenatum: a well-established product for human consumption. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002; 58 (4): 421–427.
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-002-0931-x
Asgar MA, Fazilah A, Huda N, Bhat R, Karim AA. Nonmeat protein alternatives as meat extenders and meat analogs. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2010; 9:513–29.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00124.x
Hosseini SM, Khosravi-Darani K, Mohammadifar MA, Nikoopour H. Production of Mycoprotein by Fusarium venenatum Growth on Modified Vogel Medium. Asian J Chem. 2009; 21(5): 4017–4022.
Bottin J, Swann JR, Cropp E, Chambers E S, Ford HE, Ghatei M A, et al. Mycoprotein reduces energy intake and postprandial insulin release without altering glucagon-like peptide-1 and peptide tyrosine-tyrosine concentrations in healthy overweight and obese adults: a randomised-controlled trial. Br J Nutr. 2016; 116: 360–374.
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114516001872
Fiinnigan TJA. Mycoprotein: origins, production and properties. In: Philips GO, Williams PA, Handbook of Food Proteins, Cambridge: Woodhead publishing limited. 2011, 335 – 352.
Joshi VK, Kumar S. Meat Analogues: Plant based alternatives to meat products-a review. Int J Food Ferment Technol. 2015; 5(2): 107-119.
DOI: 10.5958/2277-9396.2016.00001.5.
Uçkun Kıran E, Trzcinski AP, Liu Y. Platform chemical production from food wastes using a biorefinery concept. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2015; 90, 1364–1379.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4551
Suman G, Nupur M, Anuradha S, Pradeep B. Single Cell Protein Production: A Review. Int J Curr Microbio App Sci. 2009; 4 (9): 251–269.
Ukaegbu-Obi KM. Single Cell Protein: A Resort to Global Protein Challenge and Waste Management. J Microbiol. Microbial Technol. 2016; 1 (1), 1–5.
Hosseini SM, Khosravi-Daran K. Response Surface Methodology for Mycoprotein Production by Fusarium Venenatum ATCC 20334. J Bioprocess Biotech. 2011; 1:102.
DOI: 10.4172/2155-9821.1000102.
Akanni G, Ntuli V, du Preez J. Cactus pear biomass, a potential lignocellulose raw material for Single Cell Protein production (SCP): A Review. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2014; 3(7): 171–197.
Srividya AR, Vishnuvarthan VJ, Murugappan M et al. Single cell protein-a review, Int J Pharma Res Sch. 2014; 472–485.
Prakash P, Namashivyam SKR, Narendrakumar G. Optimization of Growth Parameters for Elevated Production of Mycoprotein-Fusarium venenatum Using RSM. J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2014; 8(6): 4843–4849.
Prakash P, Karthick RNS, Swetha S. Design of Medium Components for the Enhanced Production of Mycoprotein By Fusarium venenatum using Plackett Burman Model. Res J Pharm Biol Chem Sci. 2015; 6(1): 1251-1255.
Adoki A. Factors affecting yeast growth and protein yield production from orange, plantain and banana wastes processing residues using Candida sp. Afr J Biotechnol. 2008; 7(3), 290–295.
DOI: 10.4314/ajb.v7i3.58406.
Srivastava S, Pathak N, Srivastava P. Identification of Limiting Factors for the Optimum Growth of Fusarium Oxysporum in Liquid Medium. Toxicol Int. 2011; 18(2): 111–116.
doi: 10.4103/0971-6580.84262.
Ghaly AE, Kamal M., Correia L.R. Kinetic modelling of continuous submerged fermentation of cheese whey for SCP production. Bioresour Technol. 2005. 96, 1143–1152.
doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.09.027.
Haddish K. Production of Single Cell Protein from Fruit of Beles (Opuntia Ficus-Indica L.) Peels Using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Microbiol Exp. 2015; 3 (1).00073.
DOI: 10.15406/jmen.2015.02.00073.
Pradeep FS, Pradeep BV. Optimization of pigment and biomass production from Fusarium moniliforme under submerged fermentation conditions. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2013; 5(3): 526–535.
Ferreira JA, Lennartsson PR, Taherzadeh MJ. Production of ethanol and biomass from thin stillage using food-grade zygomycetes and ascomycetes filamentous fungi. Energies 2014; 7, 3872–3885.
DOI:10.3390/en7063872.
Ardestani F, Alishahi F. Optimization of Single Cell Protein Production by Aspergillus niger Using Taguchi Approach. J Food Biosci Technol. 2015; 5 (2): 73–79.
Fazenda M, Seviour R, McNeil B, Harvey LM. Submerged culture fermentation of ‘‘higher fungi”: the macrofungi. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2008; 63, 33–103.
doi: 10.1016/S0065-2164(07)00002-0
Slocombe SP, Ross M, Thomas N, McNeill S, Stanley MS. A rapid and general method for measurement of protein in micro-algal biomass. Bioresour Technol. 2013; 129, 51–57.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.163
Yadav JSS, Bezawada J, Ajila CM, Yan S, Tyagi RD, Surampalli RY. Mixed culture of Kluyveromyces marxianus and Candida krusei for single-cell protein production and organic load removal from whey. Bioresour Technol. 2014; 164.119–127.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.04.069
Zhao CH, Chi Z, Zhang F, Guo FJ, Li M, Song WB, et al. Direct conversion of inulin and extract of tubers of Jerusalem artichoke into single cell oil by co-cultures of Rhodotorula mucilaginosa TJY15a and immobilized inulinase-producing yeast cells. Bioresour Technol. 2011; 102, 6128–6133.
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.02.077
Rajoka MI, Khan SH, Jabbar M.A. Awan M.S., Hashmi A.S. Kinetics of batch single cell protein production from rice polishings with Candida utilis in continuously aerated tank reactors. Bioresour Technol. 2006; 97, 1934–1941.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.08.019
Anvari M, Khayati G. Submerged Yeast Fermentation of Cheese Whey for Protein Production and Nutritional Profile Analysis. Adv J Food Sci Technol. 2011; 3(2): 122-126.
Sen R, Swaminathan T. Application of response surface methodology to evaluate the optimum environmental conditions for the enhanced production of surfactin. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2004; 47: 358–363.
DOI:10.1007/s002530050940
Mnif I, Chaabouni-Ellouze S, Ghribi D. Optimization of inocula conditions for enhanced biosurfactant production by Bacillus subtilis SPB1, in submerged culture, using Box–Behnken design. Probiotic Antimicrobial Prot. 2013; 5(2): 92–98.
doi: 10.1007/s12602-012-9113-z
Onwosi CO, Odibo FJC. Use of response surface design in the optimization of starter cultures for enhanced rhamnolipid production by Pseudomonas nitroreducens. Afr J Biotechnol. 2013; 12(19): 2611-2617.
DOI: 10.5897/AJB12.2635
Farkya S, Pandey AK, Rajak RS. Mycoherbicides potential of Fusarium spp. against Parthenium: Factors affecting invitro growth and sporulation. Bioved. 1996; 7, 1–9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10045-010-0076-3
Gupta VK, Misra AK, Gaur RK. Growth characteristics of fusarium spp. causing wilt disease in Psidium Guajava L in India. J plant Prot Res. 2010; 50(4):452-462.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10045-010-0076-3.
Hezarjaribi M, Ardestani F, Ghorbani H. Single cell protein production by saccharomyces cerevisiae using an optimized culture medium composition in a batch submerged bioprocess. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2016; 179(8):1336-45.
DOI: 10.1007/s12010-016-2069-9.
Khosravi-darani K, Zoghi A, Fatemi SSA. Application of plackett-burman design for citric acid production from pretreated and untreated wheat straw. Iran J Chem Chem Eng. 2008; 27: 91-104.
Jin B, Van Leeuwen HJ, Patel B, Yu Q. Utilisation of starch processing wastewater for production of microbial biomass protein and fungal α-amylase by Aspergillus oryzae. Bioresour Technol. 1998; 66: 201-206.
Doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(98)00060-1.
Hejazi TH, Salmasnia A, Bastan M. Optimization of Correlated Multiple Response Surfaces with Stochastic covariate. Int J Comp Theor Eng. 2013; 5 (2) 341-345.
DOI: 10.7763/IJCTE.2013.
- Abstract Viewed: 5912 times
- PDF Downloaded: 3020 times