Anxiety Effect: A Case of Text Modification and the Effect of High and Low Anxiety Levels on Medical Students’ Comprehension Performance
Archives of Advances in Biosciences,
Vol. 10 No. 1 (2019),
12 January 2019
,
Page 20-26
https://doi.org/10.22037/jps.v10i1.24111
Abstract
Introduction: The current study sought to investigate the impact of text modifications (lexically and grammatically modified) on reading comprehension ability of medical students with high and low levels of anxiety.
Materials and Methods: To pursue the purpose of this study, 150 male and female medical students from Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences participated in the study. The participants did not take a language proficiency test to ensure homogeneity, as pretesting might affect the internal and external validity of the study due to the interaction effect of pretesting [1]. The framework proposed by [2]. Moreover, a questionnaire developed by [3] entitled “Foreign Language Reading Anxiety Scale (FLRAS)” on a five-point Likert scale with 20 items served as an instrument. MANOVA was run to analyze the data.
Results: The findings revealed that there was a significant difference between the reading comprehension ability of medical students with high and low levels of anxiety exposed to lexically modified (p<0.01), grammatically modified (p<0.01), lexically and grammatically modified (p<0.01), and unmodified passages (p<0.01).
Conclusion: It is hoped that the findings from this study will guide researchers into new directions so that they may go on to discover profound insights about text simplification for medical students in Iran and all over the world.
- Anxiety
- Grammatical Modification
- Lexical Modification
- Medical Students Reading Medical Passages
How to Cite
References
Best JW, Kahn, JV. Research in education. 10th ed. Boston: Pearson Education; 2006.
Van den Branden, K. Does negotiation of meaning promote reading comprehension? A study of multilingual primary school classes. Reading Research Quarterly. 2000; 35(3): 426-443.
Saito Y, Horwitz EK, Garza TJ. Foreign language reading anxiety. The Modern Language Journal. 1999; 83(2): 202-218.
Huang, HC, Chern CL, Lin CC. EFL learners’ use of online reading strategies and comprehension of texts: An Exploratory study. Computers and Education. 2009; 52(2):13-2
Palinesar AS, Brown AL. Teaching and practicing thinking skills to promote comprehension in the context of group problem solving. Reading and Special Education. 2002; 9(1): 53-59.
Repley WH, Blair TR. Effective reading instruction for struggling readers: the role of direct/explicit teaching. Reading & Writing Quarterly. 2009; 25(2): 125-138.
Krashen SD. The input hypothesis and its rivals. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 45-77). New York, NY: Academic Press; 1994.
Krashen SD. The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Harlow: Longman; 1985.
Long M H. Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp.377-393). Rowley, MA: Newbury House; 1985.
Prabhu NS. Acquisition through comprehension: Three procedures. In R. Singh (Ed.), Grammar, language, and society: Contemporary Indian contributions (pp. 343-356). New Delhi, India: Sage; 1997.
Hill D. Graded (basal) readers: Choosing the best. Language Teacher. 2008; 21(1): 21-26.
Sarason IG. Stress, anxiety, and cognitive interference: Reactions to tests. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1984; 46(4): 929-938.
Spielberger CD. Theory and research on anxiety. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.), Anxiety and behavior (pp. 3-20). New York, NY: Academic Press; 1983.
MacIntyre PD. How does anxiety affect second language learning? A reply to Sparks and Ganschow. The Modern Language Journal. 1995; 79 (1): 90-99.
Gardner RC, Macintyre PD. On the measurement of affective variables in second language learning. Language Learning. 1993; 43(2): 157-194.
Echevarria J, Vogt ME, & Short DJ. Making content comprehensible for elementary English language learners: The SIOP model. Boston, MA: Pearson; 2010.
Keshavarz HM, Atai RM, Ahmadi H. Content schemata, linguistic simplification, and EFL readers’’ comprehension and recall. Reading in a Foreign Language. 2007; 19(1): 19-33.
Brantmeier C. Anxiety about L2 reading of L2 reading task: A study with advanced language learners. The Reading Matrix. 2005; 5(2): 67-85.
Chang ACS. Second-language listening anxiety before and after a 1-Yr. Intervention in extensive listening compared with standard foreign language instruction. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2010; 110(2): 355-365.
Kim JH. Foreign language listening anxiety; A study of Korean students learning English. Austin, TX: The University of Texas; 2001.
Kimura H. Foreign language listening anxiety; Its dimensionality and group differences. JALT Journal. 2008; 30(2): 173-196.
Ko YA. The Effect of pedagogical agents on listening anxiety and listening comprehension in an English as a foreign language context (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).Utah State University, Logan, Utah. Available from:
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent/ [Accessed 19th January 2019].
Kim JH. Foreign language listening anxiety; A study of Korean students learning English. Austin, TX: The University of Texas; 2001.
Palinesar AS, Brown AL. Interactive teaching to promote interdependent learning from text. Reading Teacher. 2001; 39: 771-777.
Paris SG, Wasic BA, Turner JC. The development of strategic readers. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 609-641). Mahwah, NJ: LEA; 2010.
Rodriguez M. Foreign language classroom anxiety and students’’ success in EFL classes. Linguistica Aplicado. 1995; 1(1): 23-32.
Horwitz EK, Horwitz MB, Cope J. Foreign language classroom anxiety. Modern Language Journal. 1986; 70(2): 125-132.
Chastain A. Affective and ability factors in second language acquisition. Language Learning. 1975; 25(1): 153-161.
Kleinman H. Avoidance behavior in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning. 2009; 27(1): 93-107.
Capan SA, Karaca M. A comparative study of listening anxiety and reading anxiety. Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012; 70(2): 1360-1373.
Javanbakht N, Hadian M. The effects of test anxiety on learners’ reading test performance. Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014; 9(1): 775-783.
Vasa R A, Pine DS. Neurobiology in anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2004.
Alpert R, Haber RN. Anxiety in academic achievement situations. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology. 2003; 61(2): 207-215.
Scovel T. The effect of affect: A review of the anxiety literature. Language Learning. 1991; 28: 129-142.
Guiora AZ. The dialectic of language acquisition. Language Learning. 1983; 33(5): 3-12.
Aveni VAP. Study abroad and second language use: Constructing the self. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
Gardner RC, Macintyre PD. On the measurement of affective variables in second language learning. Language Learning. 1991; 43(2): 157-194.
- Abstract Viewed: 276 times
- PDF Downloaded: 229 times