• Register
  • Login

Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

  • Home
  • Journal Info
    • About the Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Team
    • Indexing & Abstracting
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact us
  • Issues
    • Current
    • Archives
  • New Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • Policies & Process
    • Peer Review
    • Article Processing Charge (APC)
    • Publication Ethics
    • Open Access Policy
    • Plagiarism
    • Retraction Policies
    • Archiving
    • Post-publication discussion and correction
  • Ethical Considration
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 22 No. 1 (2026): IJPS_Volume22_Issue1(2026)
  4. Research/Original Articles

Vol. 22 No. 1 (2026)

January 2026

2D and 3D-QSAR Modeling of Hydrazone Derivatives as Antiplatelet Agents

  • Azad Soltani
  • Farzad Kobarfard
  • Zahra Hajimahdi
  • Salimeh Amidi

Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vol. 22 No. 1 (2026), 26 January 2026 , Page 362-375
https://doi.org/10.22037/ijps.v22i1.51576 Published: 2026-10-11

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the leading cause of mortality worldwide, with platelet aggregation playing a key role in thrombus formation. Hydrazone derivatives have emerged as promising antiplatelet agents, yet a systematic understanding of their structure–activity relationships remains limited. In this study, we developed predictive 2D and 3D QSAR models for a series of hydrazone derivatives as inhibitors of arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation.

In 2D-QSAR analysis, the stepwise multiple linear regression (SW-MLR) and genetic algorithm-based MLR (GA-MLR) models exhibited satisfactory predictive accuracy for both the training and test sets. Notably, the GA-MLR model showed better external predictivity, with an R²test value of 0.81, compared to the SW-MLR model.

Based on the 3D-QSAR analysis, the CoMFA model showed better performance in predicting pIC₅₀ values (R²train = 0.920, Q2LOO = 0.531, and R²test = 0.677) than the CoMSIA model (R²train = 0.890, Q2LOO = 0.502, and R²test = 0.600). Furthermore, 3D-QSAR studies using CoMFA and CoMSIA further revealed that steric, electrostatic, hydrophobic, and hydrogen-bond donor/acceptor fields influence antiplatelet activity. Overall, the 2D and 3D QSAR models provide a reliable predictive framework for the antiplatelet potency of hydrazone derivatives and can guide the design of more potent and selective inhibitors, supporting future cardiovascular drug discovery.

Keywords:
  • Hydrazone derivatives
  • Platelet aggregation
  • QSAR
  • CoMFA
  • CoMSIA
  • cardiovascular disease
  • IJPS_Volume22_Issue1_Pages362-375

How to Cite

Soltani, A., Kobarfard, F., Hajimahdi, Z., & Amidi, S. (2026). 2D and 3D-QSAR Modeling of Hydrazone Derivatives as Antiplatelet Agents. Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 22(1), 362–375. https://doi.org/10.22037/ijps.v22i1.51576
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

1. Papapanagiotou, A., et al., The Role of Platelets in Cardiovascular Disease: Molecular Mechanisms. Curr Pharm Des, 2016. 22(29): p. 4493-4505.

2. Renga, B. and F. Scavizzi, Platelets and cardiovascular risk. Acta Cardiol, 2017. 72(1): p. 2-8.

3. Stanger, L., A. Yamaguchi, and M. Holinstat, Antiplatelet strategies: past, present, and future. J Thromb Haemost, 2023. 21(12): p. 3317-3328.

4. Badimon, L., et al., The key contribution of platelet and vascular arachidonic acid metabolism to the pathophysiology of atherothrombosis. Cardiovasc Res, 2021. 117(9): p. 2001-2015.

5. van der Meijden, P.E.J. and J.W.M. Heemskerk, Platelet biology and functions: new concepts and clinical perspectives. Nat Rev Cardiol, 2019. 16(3): p. 166-179.

6. Haj Mohammad Ebrahim Tehrani, K., et al., Synthesis, Antiplatelet Activity and Cytotoxicity Assessment of Indole-Based Hydrazone Derivatives. Iran J Pharm Res, 2015. 14(4): p. 1077-86.

7. Haffouz, A., et al., Synthesis and structural characterization of coumarin-hydrazone derivatives as antiplatelet agents: in vitro and in silico evaluation of activity and toxicity. 3 Biotech, 2025. 15(9): p. 322.

8. Katritzky, A.R., et al., QSAR study of antiplatelet agents. Bioorg Med Chem, 2006. 14(22): p. 7490-500.

9. Ramzan, A., et al., Antiplatelet activity, molecular docking and QSAR study of novel N′-arylmethylidene-3-methyl-1-phenyl-6-p-chlorophenyl-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-b] pyridine-4-carbohydrazides. Med Chem Res, 2017. 27(2): p. 388-405.

10. Hao, M., et al., Combined 3D-QSAR, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics study on piperazinyl-glutamate-pyridines/pyrimidines as potent P2Y12 antagonists for inhibition of platelet aggregation. J Chem Inf Model, 2011. 51(10): p. 2560-72.

11. Shunlai, L., et al., Essential Structural Profile of Novel Adenosine Derivatives as Antiplatelet Aggregation Inhibitors Based on 3D-QSAR Analysis Using CoMFA, CoMSIA, and SOMFA. Russ J Bioorg Chem, 2020. 46(3): p. 448-457.

12. Yan, Y., et al., Studies of tricyclic piperazine/piperidine furnished molecules as novel integrin αvβ3/αIIbβ3 dual antagonists using 3D-QSAR and molecular docking. J Mol Graph Model, 2011. 29(5): p. 747-62.

13. Farhady, S., et al., Synthesis and Antiplatelet Activity Evaluation of a Group of Novel Ethyl Acetoacetate Phenylhydrazone Derivatives. Iran J Pharm Res, 2021. 20(2): p. 307-315.

14. Haj Mohammad Ebrahim Tehrani, K., et al., One pot synthesis and biological activity evaluation of novel Schiff bases derived from 2-hydrazinyl-1,3,4-thiadiazole. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo), 2013. 61(2): p. 160-6.

15. Mashayekhi, V., et al., Synthesis of novel indole hydrazone derivatives and evaluation of their antiplatelet aggregation activity. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo), 2013. 61(2): p. 144-50.

16. Mirfazli, S.S., et al., Design, synthesis and QSAR study of arylidene indoles as anti-platelet aggregation inhibitors. Med Chem Res, 2016. 25(1): p. 1-18.

17. Martin, T.M., et al., Does Rational Selection of Training and Test Sets Improve the Outcome of QSAR Modeling? J Chem Inf Model, 2012. 52(10): p. 2570-2578.

18. Yap, C.W., PaDEL-descriptor: an open source software to calculate molecular descriptors and fingerprints. J Comput Chem, 2011. 32(7): p. 1466-74.

19. Ballabio, D., et al., A novel variable reduction method adapted from space-filling designs. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst, 2014. 136: p. 147-154.

20. Ambure, P., et al., “NanoBRIDGES” software: Open access tools to perform QSAR and nano-QSAR modeling. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst, 2015. 147: p. 1-13.

21. Shayanfar, A. and S. Shayanfar, Is regression through origin useful in external validation of QSAR models? Eur J Pharm Sci, 2014. 59: p. 31-35.

22. Dowlati Beirami, A., Z. Hajimahdi, and A. Zarghi, Docking-based 3D-QSAR (CoMFA, CoMFA-RG, CoMSIA) study on hydroquinoline and thiazinan-4-one derivatives as selective COX-2 inhibitors. J Biomol Struct Dyn, 2019. 37(11): p. 2999-3006.

23. Todeschini, R. and V. Consonni, Handbook of Molecular Descriptors. Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry, ed. R. Mannhold, H. Kubinyi, and H. Timmerman. Vol. 11. 2000, Weinheim: Wiley.

  • Abstract Viewed: 26 times
  • IJPS_Volume22_Issue1_Pages362-375 Downloaded: 8 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Developed By

Open Journal Systems

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

Creative Commons License
This journal (and its contents) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Print ISSN: 1735-2444

Online ISSN: 2252-0457

Powered by OJSPlus