• Register
  • Login

Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

  • Home
  • Journal Info
    • About the Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Team
    • Indexing & Abstracting
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact us
  • Issues
    • Current
    • Archives
  • New Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • Policies & Process
    • Peer Review
    • Article Processing Charge (APC)
    • Publication Ethics
    • Open Access Policy
    • Plagiarism
    • Retraction Policies
    • Archiving
    • Post-publication discussion and correction
  • Ethical Considration
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 22 No. 1 (2026): IJPS_Volume22_Issue1(2026)
  4. Research/Original Articles

Vol. 22 No. 1 (2026)

January 2026

Evaluation and Optimization of Thromboprophylaxis in Hospitalized Cancer Patients by Pharmacist Intervention

  • Maria Tavakoli-Ardakani
  • Azin Azizi
  • Bardia Rahmati-Kamel
  • Amir Farrokhian
  • Sina Salari
  • Saeed Azimi

Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vol. 22 No. 1 (2026), 26 January 2026 , Page 433-441
https://doi.org/10.22037/ijps.v22i1.51560 Published: 2026-11-03

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the second leading cause of death in cancer patients. This clinical survey aimed to study thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized cancer patients and the pharmacist's role in optimizing anticoagulant administration. Three hundred and three cancer patients were categorized into three groups: mild (5.9%), moderate (57.1%), and severe (37%), based on the Padua Prediction Score and Khorana score for VTE risk. The pharmacist evaluated all cases in accordance with thromboprophylaxis guidelines and recommended changes to anticoagulant therapy (switching from enoxaparin to unfractionated heparin for cost reasons) or initiation of therapy. The primary reasons for physicians' reluctance to initiate or change anticoagulants were also examined. Among the 303 hospitalized cancer patients evaluated, 285 (94.1%) required thromboprophylaxis based on the Padua and Khorana scores. Of these, 159 (55.8%) were already receiving anticoagulants, while 126 (44.2%) were not. Following the pharmacist’s evaluation, heparin was recommended for 126 untreated patients, and physicians accepted the recommendation in 22 cases (17.5%), disagreed in 71 (56.3%), and 33 patients (26.2%) were unavailable for intervention. Among the 108 patients receiving enoxaparin, switching to heparin was proposed for economic optimization. Physicians agreed in 36 cases (33.3%), disagreed in 61 (56.5%), and 11 patients (10.2%) were unavailable for intervention. The main physician-related reasons for not initiating or changing therapy included preference for enoxaparin as first-line therapy, concerns about thrombocytopenia, or the patient's terminal condition. Overall, pharmacist interventions improved adherence to thromboprophylaxis guidelines and resulted in treatment initiation or switching in 58 of the 190 patients available for these interventions (30.5%), demonstrating significant clinical and economic benefits. Assessing VTE risk in cancer patients using the Padua Prediction Score and Khorana score provides a rational basis for prescribing anticoagulants. Collaboration with pharmacists in selecting and administering appropriate anticoagulants (type, dose, duration) can help reduce costs and improve outcomes in cancer patients.

Keywords:
  • Cancer
  • Thromboprophylaxis
  • Heparin
  • Pharmacist intervention
  • DOAC
  • Enoxaparin
  • IJPS_Volume22_Issue1_Pages433-441

How to Cite

Tavakoli-Ardakani, M., Azizi, A., Rahmati-Kamel, B., Farrokhian, A., Salari, S., & Azimi, S. (2026). Evaluation and Optimization of Thromboprophylaxis in Hospitalized Cancer Patients by Pharmacist Intervention. Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 22(1), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.22037/ijps.v22i1.51560
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

1. Siu, A.L. and U.P.S.T. Force, Screening for breast cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Annals of internal medicine, 2016. 164(4): p. 279–296.

2. Morelli, T., et al., Infections due to dysregulated immunity: an emerging complication of cancer immunotherapy. Thorax, 2021.

3. Cameron, A.C., R.M. Touyz, and N.N. Lang, Vascular complications of cancer chemotherapy. Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 2016. 32(7): p. 852–862.

4. Devlin, E.J., L.A. Denson, and H.S. Whitford, Cancer treatment side effects: a meta-analysis of the relationship between response expectancies and experience. Journal of pain and symptom management, 2017. 54(2): p. 245–258. e2.

5. Chang, H.-M., et al., Cardiovascular complications of cancer therapy: best practices in diagnosis, prevention, and management: part 1. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2017. 70(20): p. 2536–2551.

6. Stone, J., et al., Deep vein thrombosis: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and medical management. Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2017. 7(Suppl 3): p. S276.

7. Franchini, M., et al. Arterial thrombosis in cancer patients: an update. in Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis. 2021. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY ….

8. Van Es, N., et al., Screening for occult cancer in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Annals of internal medicine, 2017. 167(6): p. 410–417.

9. Falanga, A., et al., Mechanisms and risk factors of thrombosis in cancer. Critical reviews in oncology/hematology, 2017. 118: p. 79–83.

10. Salla, E., et al., Venous thromboembolism in patients diagnosed with lung cancer. Angiology, 2016. 67(8): p. 709–724.

11. Azimi, S., et al., Efficacy and Safety of a DOAC Compared to Unfractionated Heparin and A Low Molecular Weight Heparin in the Prevention of Thromboembolism in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients. Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research: IJPR, 2024. 23(1): p. e143213.

12. Carrier, M., et al., Lack of evidence to support thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients with cancer. Am J Med, 2014. 127(1): p. 82–6.e1.

13. Benelhaj, N.B., et al., Cancer patients’ experiences of living with venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and qualitative thematic synthesis. Palliative Medicine, 2018. 32(5): p. 1010–1020.

14. Kourlaba, G., et al., The humanistic and economic burden of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a systematic review. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis, 2015. 26(1): p. 13–31.

15. Cohoon, K.P., et al., Direct medical costs attributable to cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: a population-based longitudinal study. The American journal of medicine, 2016. 129(9): p. 1000. e15–1000. e25.

16. Roberts, L.N., et al., Thromboprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism prevention in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2022. 20(10): p. 2237–2245.

17. Al‐Ansari, A.M., et al., Thromboprophylaxis for inpatient with advanced cancer receiving palliative care: A retrospective study. European Journal of Haematology, 2022. 109(5): p. 494–503.

18. Kiracı, Z.K., et al., Education and clinical pharmacist-led management strategies for the risk and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in general surgery. Thrombosis journal, 2023. 21(1): p. 86.

19. Santschi, V., et al., Improving Blood Pressure Control Through Pharmacist Interventions: A Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Journal of the American Heart Association, 2014. 3(2): p. e000718.

20. Ravn-Nielsen, L.V., et al., Effect of an In-Hospital Multifaceted Clinical Pharmacist Intervention on the Risk of Readmission: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Internal Medicine, 2018. 178(3): p. 375–382.

21. Colombo, L.R.P., et al., The effects of pharmacist interventions on adult outpatients with cancer: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 2017. 42(4): p. 414–424.

22. Staynova, R., E. Gavazova, and D. Kafalova, Clinical Pharmacist-Led Interventions for Improving Breast Cancer Management—A Scoping Review. Current Oncology, 2024. 31(8): p. 4178–4191.

23. Shrestha, S., et al., Pharmacist Involvement in Cancer Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Journal of Pain, 2022. 23(7): p. 1123–1142.

24. Choukroun, C., et al., Impact of a pharmacist and geriatrician medication review on drug-related problems in older outpatients with cancer. Journal of Geriatric Oncology, 2021. 12(1): p. 57–63.

25. Kefale, B., et al., The effect of pharmacist-led interventions on the appropriateness and clinical outcomes of anticoagulant therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes, 2024. 10(6): p. 488–506.

26. Bakey, K.H. and C.-T.N. Nguyen, Impact of a Pharmacist Intervention in the Emergency Department on the Appropriateness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Prescribed in Venous Thromboembolism Patients. Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 2022. 35(4): p. 599–605.

27. Kurimura, T., et al., Significance of pharmacist intervention to oral antithrombotic therapy in the pharmaceutical outpatient clinic of cardiovascular internal medicine: a retrospective cohort study. Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences, 2023. 9(1): p. 28.

28. Ambrus, J.L., et al., Causes of death in cancer patients. J Med, 1975. 6(1): p. 61–4.

29. Johnson, M.J., M.W. Sproule, and J. Paul, The prevalence and associated variables of deep venous thrombosis in patients with advanced cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol), 1999. 11(2): p. 105–10.

30. Arora, M. and T. Wun, Adverse impact of venous thromboembolism on patients with cancer. Semin Thromb Hemost, 2014. 40(3): p. 313–8.

31. Khorana, A.A., et al., Health care costs associated with venous thromboembolism in selected high-risk ambulatory patients with solid tumors undergoing chemotherapy in the United States. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res, 2013. 5: p. 101–8.

32. Ades, S., et al., Venous thromboembolism prevention program implementation in a community oncology practice: a cohort study. The Lancet Regional Health – Americas, 2024. 38.

33. Levine, M., et al., Double-blind randomised trial of a very-low-dose warfarin for prevention of thromboembolism in stage IV breast cancer. Lancet, 1994. 343(8902): p. 886–9.

34. Agnelli, G., et al., Enoxaparin plus compression stockings compared with compression stockings alone in the prevention of venous thromboembolism after elective neurosurgery. N Engl J Med, 1998. 339(2): p. 80–5.

35. Bergqvist, D., et al., Duration of prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism with enoxaparin after surgery for cancer. N Engl J Med, 2002. 346(13): p. 975–80.

36. Khorana, A.A., et al., Dalteparin thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism: A randomized trial. Thromb Res, 2017. 151: p. 89–95.

37. Bernier, M.C., et al., Implementation and evaluation of a pharmacy-led thromboprophylaxis campaign in a community hospital. J Thromb Thrombolysis, 2011. 32(4): p. 431–8.

38. Cook, D., et al., Thromboprophylaxis for hospitalized medical patients: a multicenter qualitative study. J Hosp Med, 2009. 4(5): p. 269–75.

39. Kahn, S.R., et al., Effectiveness of interventions for the implementation of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalised patients at risk of venous thromboembolism: an updated abridged Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open, 2019. 9(5): p. e024444.

40. Jones, K.L., et al., Clinical outcomes of a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation service for breast cancer patients. Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, 2012. 18(1): p. 122–127.

41. Ranjan Dash, S. and M. Kumar Sahu, Pharmacists-led interventions to improve medication adherence in global health settings. Journal of Neonatal Surgery, 2025. 14(1S): p. 566–.571.

42. Kandemir, E.A., A. Bayraktar-Ekincioglu, and S. Kilickap, Assessment of adherence to cancer-associated venous thromboembolism guideline and pharmacist’s impact on anticoagulant therapy. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. 29(3): p. 1699–1709.

43. Steward, V.M., H. Hamid, and K. Hooker, Impact of Pharmacists' Interventions on Prescribing Patterns for the Treatment of VTE in Patients with Cancer. Journal of Hematology Oncology Pharmacy, 2012. 2(4).

44. Pelletier, R., Assessing the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in ambulatory patients with cancer: Rationale and implementation of a pharmacist-led VTE risk assessment program in an ambulatory cancer centre. Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, 2021. 27(4): p. 911–918.

  • Abstract Viewed: 46 times
  • IJPS_Volume22_Issue1_Pages433-441 Downloaded: 21 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Developed By

Open Journal Systems

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

Creative Commons License
This journal (and its contents) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Print ISSN: 1735-2444

Online ISSN: 2252-0457

Powered by OJSPlus