Different Aspect of Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Pyelolithotomy for Management of Pelvic Stones Larger than 20 mm: a Cuasi-Experimental Study in Male Patients
Archives of Men's Health,
Vol. 4 No. 1 (2020),
19 April 2020
,
Page e13
https://doi.org/10.22037/mhj.v4i1.31862
Abstract
Background: We study different aspect of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (LP) in patients with large renal pelvis stone regarding success rate, complications as well as the recurrence free status.
Material and methods: From July 2015 to January 2019, 32 patients underwent LP for single large renal pelvis stone ($\ge$2 cm). Patient characteristics, preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin, creatinine as well as possible complications based on Clavien classification were recorded. Stone free status was evaluated using computed tomography scan one month after the surgery. Any particle bigger than 4 mm was considered as significant residual stone. During the next one years after the operation, renal ultrasonography was performed for all patients every six month to find any stone recurrence.
Results: Mean operation time was 134.55$\pm$31.41 minutes. Patients were hospitalized 3.36$\pm$1.13 days in the LP group. Patients showed hemoglobin decrease of 1.50$\pm$1.05 (P=0.2). Stone free rate was 93.75\% and Mean overall stone free status estimated to be 32 months.
Conclusion: PCNL has been the treatment of choice for large renal pelvis stones; however, in expert hands, LP is an appropriate substitute with superior stone free rate, less bleeding and remarkably less stone recurrence.
How to Cite
References
2. Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP, et al. Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART II. The Journal of urology. 2016.
3. Gaur D, Agarwal D, Purohit K, Darshane A. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy. The Journal of urology. 1994;151(4):927-9.
4. Micali S, Moore R, Averch T, Adams J, Kavoussi L. The role of laparoscopy in the treatment of renal and ureteral calculi. The Journal of urology. 1997;157(2):463-6.
5. Ramakumar S, Lancini V, Chan DY, Parsons JK, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy. The Journal of urology. 2002;167(3):1378-80.
6. Goel A, Hemal A. Evaluation of role of retroperitoneoscopic pyelolithotomy and its comparison with percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. International urology and nephrology. 2003;35(1):73-6.
7. Casale P, Grady RW, Joyner BD, Zeltser IS, Kuo RL, Mitchell ME. Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy after failed percutaneous access in the pediatric patient. The Journal of urology. 2004;172(2):680-3.
8. Gallucci M, Fortunato P, Schettini M, Vincenzoni A. Management of hemorrhage after percutaneous renal surgery. Journal of endourology. 1998;12(6):509-12.
9. Harmon WJ, Kleer E, Segura JW. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy for calculus removal in a pelvic kidney. The Journal of urology. 1996;155(6):2019-20.
10. Meria P, Milcent S, Desgrandchamps F, Mongiat-Artus P, Duclos J, Teillac P. Management of pelvic stones larger than 20 mm: laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelolithotomy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Urologia internationalis. 2005;75(4):322-6.
11. Wang X, Li S, Liu T, Guo Y, Yang Z. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy compared to percutaneous nephrolithotomy as surgical management for large renal pelvic calculi: a meta-analysis. The Journal of urology. 2013;190(3):888-93.
12. Salvadó JA, Guzmán S, Trucco CA, Parra CA. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy: optimizing surgical technique. Journal of endourology. 2009;23(4):575-8.
13. Goel A, Hemal A. Evaluation of role of retroperitoneoscopic pyelolithotomy and its comparison with percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. International urology and nephrology. 2003;35(1):73-6.
14. Lee JW, Cho SY, Jeong CW, Yu J, Son H, Jeong H, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with multiple renal stones in various parts of the pelvocalyceal system. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. 2014;24(9):634-9.
15. Meria P, Milcent S, Desgrandchamps F, Mongiat-Artus P, Duclos JM, Teillac P. Management of pelvic stones larger than 20 mm: laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelolithotomy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Urologia internationalis. 2005;75(4):322-6.
16. Al-Hunayan A, Khalil M, Hassabo M, Hanafi A, Abdul-Halim H. Management of solitary renal pelvic stone: laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Journal of endourology. 2011;25(6):975-8.
17. Li S, Liu T-Z, Wang X-H, Zeng X-T, Zeng G, Yang Z-H, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of large renal pelvic calculi: a pilot study. Journal of endourology. 2014;28(8):946-50.
18. SINHA R, SHARMA N. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic management of urolithiasis. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. 1997;7(2):95-8.
19. Gaur D, Agarwal D, Purohit K, Darshane A. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy. The Journal of urology. 1994;151(4):927-9.
20. Micali S, Moore R, Averch T, Adams J, Kavoussi L. The role of laparoscopy in the treatment of renal and ureteral calculi. The Journal of urology. 1997;157(2):463-6.
- Abstract Viewed: 347 times
- pdf Downloaded: 254 times