The Outcomes of Dome Cut in Rhinoplasty versus Alternative Methods in Patients with Various Nasal Tip Deformities
Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery,
Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020),
12 September 2020
,
Page 1-8
https://doi.org/10.22037/orlfps.v6i1.32223
Abstract
Background: There were several techniques for reconstruction of nasal tip cartilage. Dome cut is a technique that has recently proposed for nasal tip projection, this method is recently concern regarding its efficacy.
Aim: This study was performed to determine the outcomes of rhinoplasty with dome cut vs. alternative methods in patients with various nasal tip deformities.
Methods: A retrospective review from 36 cases was conducted. Patients were selected from a computerized rhinoplasty database of operative cases. The database was used to extract a subset population that had received the dome cut procedure and had follow-up data for 6 months or more after surgery. Patient satisfaction, physician evaluation, physical examination, blinded comparison of preoperative and postoperative photographs, and revision surgery necessitation were also analyzed in this review of results and complications.
Results: Initially 41.7 percent had saddle nose deformity, 41.7% had nasal tip deformity, and 16.7% had other types of deformity. 94.4% had successful outcomes whether the technique and type of deformity had no effect on success of results (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: According to the obtained results and comparison with other studies, it may be concluded that rhinoplasty with dome cut is a successful method and various methods and deformities have no effect on the outcomes.
- Dome cut; Rhinoplasty; Nasal tip deformities.
How to Cite
References
2. Sheen JH SA. Aesthetic Rhinoplasty. 2nd ed: St Louis, MO: CV Mosby; 1987. 1992;89:216-224.
3. Daniel RK. The Nasal Tip: Anatomy and Aesthetics. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1992;89(2):216-24.
4. RL G. A method of tip projection measurement. In: Powell N, Humphreys B, eds. Proportions of the Aesthetic Face. New York, NY: Thieme-Stratton;1984.
5. Crumley RL, Lanser M. Quantitative analysis of nasal tip projection. The Laryngoscope. 1988;98(2):202-8.
6. O’Neal RM IP, Schlesinger J. Surgical anatomy of the nose. Boston: Little Brown;1993.
7. Kridel RW, Konior RJ. Dome truncation for management of the overprojected nasal tip. Annals of plastic surgery. 1990;24(5):385-96.
8. Chang CW, Simons RL. Hockey-stick vertical dome division technique for overprojected and broad nasal tips. Archives of facial plastic surgery. 2008;10(2):88-92.
9. Adamson PA, McGraw-Wall BL, Morrow TA, Constantinides MS. Vertical dome division in open rhinoplasty. An update on indications, techniques, and results. Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery. 1994;120(4):373-80.
10. Simons RL FI, editor Evaluation of the Goldman tip in rhinoplasty. In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery of the Face and Neck. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium;1977; New York, NY.
11. Webster RC. Advances in surgery of the tip: intact rim cartilage techniques and the tip-columella-lip esthetic complex. Otolaryngologic clinics of North America. 1975;8(3):615-44.
12. Lipsett EM. A new approach surgery of the lower cartilaginous vault. AMA archives of otolaryngology. 1959;70(1):42-7.
13. Kabitzsch JJC. Nasenplastik und Sonstige Geischtsplastik Nebst Mammaplastik. Leipzig, Germany: Curt Kabitzsch;1931.
14. S. Corrective Rhinoplastic Surgery. New York, NY: P Hoeber;1935.
15. Close LG, Schaefer SD, Schultz BA. The over-projecting nasal tip: precise reduction without rotation. The Laryngoscope. 1987;97(8 Pt 1):931-6.
16. Foda HM. Alar setback technique: a controlled method of nasal tip deprojection. Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery. 2001;127(11):1341-6.
17. Soliemanzadeh P, Kridel RW. Nasal tip overprojection: algorithm of surgical deprojection techniques and introduction of medial crural overlay. Archives of facial plastic surgery. 2005;7(6):374-80.
18. Spina V, Kamakura L, Psillakis J. A new method for correction of the prominent nasal tip. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1973;51(4):416-20.
19. Ali Ghazipour NS, Fereydon Eslamijoo. Comparison of suture and vertical dome division techniques of bulbous nose refinement Apadana Journal of Clinical Research. 2012;1:26-32.
20. Funk E, Chauhan N, Adamson P. Refining Vertical Lobule Division in Open Septorhinoplasty. Archives of facial plastic surgery. 2009;11:120-5.
21. Yu MS, Jang YJ. Modified vertical dome division technique for rhinoplasty in Asian patients. The Laryngoscope. 2010;120(4):668-72.
22. Constantian MB. The two essential elements for planning tip surgery in primary and secondary rhinoplasty: observations based on review of 100 consecutive patients. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2004 Nov 1;114(6):1571-81.
23. Lavinsky-Wolff M, Dolci JEL, Camargo HL, Manzini M, Petersen S, Romanczuk S, et al. Vertical dome division: a quality-of-life outcome study. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery: official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2013;148(5):758-63.
- Abstract Viewed: 401 times
- PDF Downloaded: 419 times