Short Dental Implants: An Umbrella Review of Current Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis on Survival Rate of Short Dental Implants
Regeneration, Reconstruction & Restoration (Triple R),
Vol. 5 (2020),
24 March 2020
,
Page e23
https://doi.org/10.22037/rrr.v5i.32850
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to report on systematic reviews assessing the survival/failure rate of short implants. Additionally, marginal bone loss (MBL) and factors affecting survival rates was assessed.
Materials and Methods: PubMed-Medline, Google Scholar, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched up to January 2020. Also reference lists of included systematic reviews were hand-searched. The AMSTAR tool was used for quality assessment.
Results: 659 studies were reviewed and 37 studies (25 metanalysis) were included. According to the AMSTAR tool, 19 of the 37 reviews were classified as high, 13 as medium and 5 as low quality. The mean score (±SD) was 7.10 (±2.74). The survival rate reported in studies varied from 84% to 100% for follow up periods of 1-5 years (more than 80% of included studies had a minimum follow-up period of 1-5 years), while failure rates ranged from 0% to 37.5% (the same as survival rate range from 62.5% to 100%). Included Systematic reviews reported no significant difference between survival rate/failure of Short implants (SIs) and standard implants with bone augmentation. Two high-quality metanalysis revealed a statistically significant lower survival rate for SIs as well as 2 systematic reviews which found SIs had significantly increased failures. Surface characteristics and implant location showed some association with survival rate. In some studies, SIs experienced lower MBL than standard implants while in others no differences were observed.
Conclusion: Current knowledge from systematic reviews demonstrated acceptable survival rates for SIs. No significant difference between survival rate/failure of SIs and standard implants with bone augmentation was reported in the majority of studies. Systematic review registration number: PROSPERO Number: CRD42020163931.
Keywords:
- Dental Implant
- Dental Implantation
- End Osseous
- Survival Rate
- Systematic Review
How to Cite
Ramezanzade, S., Tuminelli, F. ., Marques, D., Keyhan, S. O. ., Yousefi, P. ., & Lopez-Lopez, J. . (2020). Short Dental Implants: An Umbrella Review of Current Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis on Survival Rate of Short Dental Implants. Regeneration, Reconstruction & Restoration (Triple R), 5, e23. https://doi.org/10.22037/rrr.v5i.32850
References
References
1. Albrektsson T. A multicenter report on osseointegrated oral implants. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1988;60(1):75-84.
2. Simonis P, Dufour T, Tenenbaum H. Long‐term implant survival and success: a 10–16‐year follow‐up of non‐submerged dental implants. Clinical oral implants research. 2010;21(7):772-7.
3. Merli M, Moscatelli M, Pagliaro U, Mariotti G, Merli I, Nieri M. Implant prosthetic rehabilitation in partially edentulous patients with bone atrophy. An umbrella review based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials. European journal of oral implantology. 2018;11(3):261-80.
4. Renouard F, Nisand D. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. Clinical oral implants research. 2006;17 Suppl 2:35-51.
5. Dominguez EA, Guerrero C, Shehata E, Van Sickels JE. Zygoma Implants or Sinus Lift for the Atrophic Maxilla with a Dentate Mandible: Which is the Better Option? Dental clinics of North America. 2019;63(3):499-513.
6. Baj A, Trapella G, Lauritano D, Candotto V, Mancini GE, Giannì AB. An overview on bone reconstruction of atrophic maxilla: success parameters and critical issues. Journal of biological regulators and homeostatic agents. 2016;30(2 Suppl 1):209-15.
7. Yan M, Liu R, Bai S, Wang M, Xia H, Chen J. Transalveolar sinus floor lift without bone grafting in atrophic maxilla: A meta-analysis. Scientific reports. 2018;8(1):1451.
8. Abayev B, Juodzbalys G. Inferior alveolar nerve lateralization and transposition for dental implant placement. Part I: a systematic review of surgical techniques. Journal of oral & maxillofacial research. 2015;6(1):e2.
9. Spencer K. Implant based rehabilitation options for the atrophic edentulous jaw. Australian dental journal. 2018;63:S100-S7.
10. Urban IA, Monje A, Lozada JL, Wang HL. Long-term Evaluation of Peri-implant Bone Level after Reconstruction of Severely Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla via Vertical and Horizontal Guided Bone Regeneration in Combination with Sinus Augmentation: A Case Series with 1 to 15 Years of Loading. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2017;19(1):46-55.
11. Del Fabbro M, Bellini CM, Romeo D, Francetti L. Tilted implants for the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws: a systematic review. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2012;14(4):612-21.
12. Tuminelli FJ, Walter LR, Neugarten J, Bedrossian E. Immediate loading of zygomatic implants: A systematic review of implant survival, prosthesis survival and potential complications. European journal of oral implantology. 2017;10 Suppl 1:79-87.
13. Altaib FH, Alqutaibi AY, Al-fahd A, Eid S. Short dental implant as alternative to long implant with bone augmentation of the atrophic posterior ridge: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Quintessence International. 2019;50(8):636-50.
14. West T, Langer L, Karabin S, Grbic J, Budasoff D, Gottsegen R, et al. Re: A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces. Cochran DL (1999;70:1523-1539). Journal of periodontology. 2000;71(6):1051-3; author reply 5-6.
15. Carlson B, Carlsson GE. Prosthodontic complications in osseointegrated dental implant treatment. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants. 1994;9(1):90-4.
16. Lemos CAA, Ferro-Alves ML, Okamoto R, Mendonça MR, Pellizzer EP. Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of dentistry. 2016;47:8-17.
17. Mezzomo LA, Miller R, Triches D, Alonso F, Shinkai RS. Meta-analysis of single crowns supported by short (<10 mm) implants in the posterior region. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2014;41(2):191-213.
18. Ravida A, Wang IC, Barootchi S, Askar H, Tavelli L, Gargallo-Albiol J, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing clinical and patient-reported outcomes between extra-short (/=10 mm) implants. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2019;46(1):118-42.
19. Vazouras K, de Souza AB, Gholami H, Papaspyridakos P, Pagni S, Weber HP. Effect of time in function on the predictability of short dental implants ( 20. Quaranta A, DʼIsidoro O, Bambini F, Putignano A. Potential Bone to Implant Contact Area of Short Versus Standard Implants: An In Vitro Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis. Implant dentistry. 2016;25(1):97-102.
21. Jain N, Gulati M, Garg M, Pathak C. Short Implants: New Horizon in Implant Dentistry. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR. 2016;10(9):Ze14-ze7.
22. Hingsammer L, Watzek G, Pommer B. The influence of crown-to-implant ratio on marginal bone levels around splinted short dental implants: A radiological and clincial short term analysis. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2017;19(6):1090-8.
23. Meijer HJA, Boven C, Delli K, Raghoebar GM. Is there an effect of crown-to-implant ratio on implant treatment outcomes? A systematic review. Clinical oral implants research. 2018;29 Suppl 18(Suppl Suppl 18):243-52.
24. Atieh MA, Zadeh H, Stanford CM, Cooper LF. Survival of short dental implants for treatment of posterior partial edentulism: a systematic review. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants. 2012;27(6):1323-31.
25. Fan T, Li Y, Deng WW, Wu T, Zhang W. Short implants (5 to 8 mm) versus longer implants (> 8 mm) with sinus lifting in atrophic posterior maxilla: a meta‐analysis of RCTs. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2017;19(1):207-15.
26. Nisand D, Picard N, Rocchietta I. Short implants compared to implants in vertically augmented bone: a systematic review. Clinical oral implants research. 2015;26:170-9.
27. Thoma DS, Zeltner M, Husler J, Hammerle CH, Jung RE. EAO Supplement Working Group 4 - EAO CC 2015 Short implants versus sinus lifting with longer implants to restore the posterior maxilla: a systematic review. Clinical oral implants research. 2015;26 Suppl 11:154-69.
28. Lum LB. A biomechanical rationale for the use of short implants. The Journal of oral implantology. 1991;17(2):126-31.
29. Goene R, Bianchesi C, Huerzeler M, Del Lupo R, Testori T, Davarpanah M, et al. Performance of short implants in partial restorations: 3-year follow-up of Osseotite implants. Implant dentistry. 2005;14(3):274-80.
30. Telleman G, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, den Hartog L, Huddleston Slater JJ, Meijer HJ. A systematic review of the prognosis of short (<10 mm) dental implants placed in the partially edentulous patient. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2011;38(7):667-76.
31. Mertens C, Meyer-Bäumer A, Kappel H, Hoffmann J, Steveling HG. Use of 8-mm and 9-mm implants in atrophic alveolar ridges: 10-year results. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2012;27(6).
32. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D. Group P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339: b2535. 2009.
33. Higgins JP. green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version. 2011;5(0):3.
34. Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2017;358:j4008.
35. Al-Johany SS. Survival Rates of Short Dental Implants ( 36. Goncalves TM, Bortolini S, Martinolli M, Alfenas BF, Peruzzo DC, Natali A, et al. Long-term Short Implants Performance: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Essential Assessment Parameters. Brazilian dental journal. 2015;26(4):325-36.
37. Karthikeyan I, Desai SR, Singh R. Short implants: A systematic review. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. 2012;16(3):302-12.
38. Menchero-Cantalejo E, Barona-Dorado C, Cantero-Álvarez M, Fernández-Cáliz F, Martínez-González J-M. Meta-analysis on the survival of short implants. Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal. 2011;16(4):e546-51.
39. Monje A, Chan HL, Fu JH, Suarez F, Galindo-Moreno P, Wang HL. Are short dental implants (<10 mm) effective? a meta-analysis on prospective clinical trials. Journal of periodontology. 2013;84(7):895-904.
40. Monje A, Fu JH, Chan HL, Suarez F, Galindo-Moreno P, Catena A, et al. Do implant length and width matter for short dental implants (<10 mm)? A meta-analysis of prospective studies. Journal of periodontology. 2013;84(12):1783-91.
41. Neldam CA, Pinholt EM. State of the art of short dental implants: a systematic review of the literature. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2012;14(4):622-32.
42. Pommer B, Mailath-Pokorny G, Haas R, Buseniechner D, Millesi W, Furhauser R. Extra-short (< 7 mm) and extra-narrow diameter (< 3.5 mm) implants: a meta-analytic literature review. European journal of oral implantology. 2018;11 Suppl 1:S137-s46.
43. Srinivasan M, Vazquez L, Rieder P, Moraguez O, Bernard JP, Belser UC. Survival rates of short (6 mm) micro-rough surface implants: a review of literature and meta-analysis. Clinical oral implants research. 2014;25(5):539-45.
44. Ting M, Palermo M, Donatelli DP, Gaughan JP, Suzuki JB, Jefferies SR. A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics on the survival of the wide-diameter implant. International journal of implant dentistry. 2015;1(1):28.
45. Corbella S, Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M. Long‐term outcomes for the treatment of atrophic posterior maxilla: a systematic review of literature. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2015;17(1):120-32.
46. Sierra-Sanchez JL, Garcia-Sala-Bonmati F, Martinez-Gonzalez A, Garcia-Dalmau C, Manes-Ferrer JF, Brotons-Oliver A. Predictability of short implants ( < 10 mm) as a treatment option for the rehabilitation of atrophic maxillae. A systematic review. Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal. 2016;21(3):e392-402.
47. Palacios JAV, Garcia JJ, Carames JMM, Quirynen M, da Silva Marques DN. Short implants versus bone grafting and standard-length implants placement: a systematic review. Clinical oral investigations. 2018;22(1):69-80.
48. Ravida A, Barootchi S, Askar H, Suarez-Lopez Del Amo F, Tavelli L, Wang HL. Long-Term Effectiveness of Extra-Short ( 49. Uehara PN, Matsubara VH, Igai F, Sesma N, Mukai MK, Araujo MG. Short Dental Implants ( 50. Yan Q, Wu X, Su M, Hua F, Shi B. Short implants ( 51. Annibali S, Cristalli M, Dell’Aquila D, Bignozzi I, La Monaca G, Pilloni A. Short dental implants: a systematic review. Journal of dental research. 2012;91(1):25-32.
52. Chen S, Ou Q, Wang Y, Lin X. Short implants (5-8 mm) vs long implants (>/=10 mm) with augmentation in atrophic posterior jaws: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Journal of oral rehabilitation. 2019;46(12):1192-203.
53. Esposito M, Buti J, Barausse C, Gasparro R, Sammartino G, Felice P. Short implants versus longer implants in vertically augmented atrophic mandibles: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials with a 5-year post-loading follow-up. International journal of oral implantology (New Malden, London, England). 2019;12(3):267-80.
54. Pommer B, Frantal S, Willer J, Posch M, Watzek G, Tepper G. Impact of dental implant length on early failure rates: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2011;38(9):856-63.
55. Tolentino da Rosa de Souza P, Binhame Albini Martini M, Reis Azevedo-Alanis L. Do short implants have similar survival rates compared to standard implants in posterior single crown?: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2018;20(5):890-901.
56. Bitaraf T, Keshtkar A, Rokn AR, Monzavi A, Geramy A, Hashemi K. Comparing short dental implant and standard dental implant in terms of marginal bone level changes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2019.
57. Sun HL, Huang C, Wu YR, Shi B. Failure rates of short ( 58. Mokcheh A, Jegham H, Turki S. Short implants as an alternative to sinus lift for the rehabilitation of posterior maxillary atrophies: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of stomatology, oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2019;120(1):28-37.
59. Cruz RS, Lemos CAA, Batista VES, Oliveira H, Gomes JML, Pellizzer EP, et al. Short implants versus longer implants with maxillary sinus lift. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brazilian oral research. 2018;32:e86.
60. Lee S-A, Lee C-T, Fu MM, Elmisalati W, Chuang S-K. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the management of limited vertical height in the posterior region: short implants (5 to 8 mm) vs longer implants (> 8 mm) in vertically augmented sites. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2014;29(5).
61. Kotsovilis S, Fourmousis I, Karoussis IK, Bamia C. A systematic review and meta‐analysis on the effect of implant length on the survival of rough‐surface dental implants. Journal of periodontology. 2009;80(11):1700-18.
62. Aromataris E, Fernandez R, Godfrey CM, Holly C, Khalil H, Tungpunkom P. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. International journal of evidence-based healthcare. 2015;13(3):132-40.
63. Silva V, Grande AJ, Martimbianco AL, Riera R, Carvalho AP. Overview of systematic reviews - a new type of study: part I: why and for whom? Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina. 2012;130(6):398-404.
64. Nisand D, Renouard F. Short implant in limited bone volume. Periodontology 2000. 2014;66(1):72-96.
65. Schwartz SR. Short implants: are they a viable option in implant dentistry? Dental clinics of North America. 2015;59(2):317-28.
66. ten Bruggenkate CM, van den Bergh JP. Maxillary sinus floor elevation: a valuable pre‐prosthetic procedure. Periodontology 2000. 1998;17(1):176-82.
67. Diago MP, Ferrín LM, Oltra DP, Canullo L, Guirado JLC, Diago MP. Tilted implants for the restoration of posterior mandibles with horizontal atrophy: an alternative treatment. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2013;71(5):856-64.
68. Sharma A, Rahul GR. Zygomatic implants/fixture: a systematic review. The Journal of oral implantology. 2013;39(2):215-24.
69. Lee J-H, Frias V, Lee K-W, Wright RF. Effect of implant size and shape on implant success rates: a literature review. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2005;94(4):377-81.
70. Al-Hashedi AA, Taiyeb Ali TB, Yunus N. Short dental implants: an emerging concept in implant treatment. Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985). 2014;45(6):499-514.
71. das Neves FD, Fones D, Bernardes SR, do Prado CJ, Neto AJ. Short implants--an analysis of longitudinal studies. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants. 2006;21(1):86-93.
72. Esfahrood ZR, Ahmadi L, Karami E, Asghari S. Short dental implants in the posterior maxilla: a review of the literature. Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. 2017;43(2):70-6.
73. Tutak M, Smektala T, Schneider K, Golebiewska E, Sporniak-Tutak K. Short dental implants in reduced alveolar bone height: a review of the literature. Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research. 2013;19:1037-42.
74. Edher F, Nguyen CT. Short dental implants: A scoping review of the literature for patients with head and neck cancer. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2018;119(5):736-42.
75. Hagi D, Deporter DA, Pilliar R, Arenovich T. A targeted review of study outcomes with short (≤ 7 mm) endosseous dental implants placed in partially edentulous patients. Journal of periodontology. 2004;75(6):798-804.
76. Misch C. Short dental implants: a literature review and rationale for use. Dentistry today. 2005;24(8):64-6, 8.
77. Romeo E, Bivio A, Mosca D, Scanferla M, Ghisolfi M, Storelli S. The use of short dental implants in clinical practice: literature review. Minerva stomatologica. 2010;59(1-2):23-31.
78. Srinivasan M, Vazquez L, Rieder P, Moraguez O, Bernard J-P, Belser UC. Efficacy and predictability of short dental implants (< 8 mm): a critical appraisal of the recent literature. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2012;27(6).
79. Galvão FFdSA, Almeida-Júnior AA, Faria-Júnior NB, Caldas SGFR, Reis JMdSN, Margonar R. Previsibilidade de implantes curtos: revisão de literatura. RSBO (Impr). 2011;8(1):81-8.
80. Al-Moraissi EA, Altairi NH, Abotaleb B, Al-Iryani G, Halboub E, Alakhali MS. What Is the Most Effective Rehabilitation Method for Posterior Maxillas With 4 to 8 mm of Residual Alveolar Bone Height Below the Maxillary Sinus With Implant-Supported Prostheses? A Frequentist Network Meta-Analysis. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. 2019;77(1):70.e1-.e33.
81. Monje A, Suarez F, Galindo‐Moreno P, García‐Nogales A, Fu JH, Wang HL. A systematic review on marginal bone loss around short dental implants (< 10 mm) for implant‐supported fixed prostheses. Clinical oral implants research. 2014;25(10):1119-24.
82. Hingsammer L, Pommer B, Hunger S, Stehrer R, Watzek G, Insua A. Influence of Implant Length and Associated Parameters Upon Biomechanical Forces in Finite Element Analyses: A Systematic Review. Implant dentistry. 2019;28(3):296-305.
83. Curto Aguilera A. Evaluación de las tasas de supervivencia clínica de los implantes cortos: revisión de la literatura. Int j odontostomatol (Print). 2012;6(2):201-3.
84. Nagem Filho H, Nagem HD, Silva Filho ES, Silva ABS, Campi Júnior L. Eficácia e previsibilidade de implantes curtos - revisão sistemática. Full dent sci. 2014;5(17):81-6.
85. Gomide CWS, Gomes MB, Gonçalves AO, Vilela EM. Taxa de sobrevivência dos implantes após elevação atraumática do seio maxilar: revisão sistemática em diferentes técnicas nos últimos cinco anos. ImplantNewsPerio. 2016;1(2):290-8.
86. Blanes RJ. To what extent does the crown–implant ratio affect the survival and complications of implant‐supported reconstructions? A systematic review. Clinical oral implants research. 2009;20:67-72.
87. Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. 2011.
88. Coulthard P, Esposito M, Worthington HV, Jokstad A. Therapeutic use of hyperbaric oxygen for irradiated dental implant patients: a systematic review. Journal of dental education. 2003;67(1):64-8.
89. Roccuzzo M, Bunino M, Needleman I, Sanz M. Periodontal plastic surgery for treatment of localized gingival recessions: a systematic review. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2002;29:178-94.
90. Kotsovilis S, Karoussis IK, Trianti M, Fourmousis I. Therapy of peri‐implantitis: A systematic review. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2008;35(7):621-9.
91. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJM, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Controlled clinical trials. 1996;17(1):1-12.
1. Albrektsson T. A multicenter report on osseointegrated oral implants. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1988;60(1):75-84.
2. Simonis P, Dufour T, Tenenbaum H. Long‐term implant survival and success: a 10–16‐year follow‐up of non‐submerged dental implants. Clinical oral implants research. 2010;21(7):772-7.
3. Merli M, Moscatelli M, Pagliaro U, Mariotti G, Merli I, Nieri M. Implant prosthetic rehabilitation in partially edentulous patients with bone atrophy. An umbrella review based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials. European journal of oral implantology. 2018;11(3):261-80.
4. Renouard F, Nisand D. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. Clinical oral implants research. 2006;17 Suppl 2:35-51.
5. Dominguez EA, Guerrero C, Shehata E, Van Sickels JE. Zygoma Implants or Sinus Lift for the Atrophic Maxilla with a Dentate Mandible: Which is the Better Option? Dental clinics of North America. 2019;63(3):499-513.
6. Baj A, Trapella G, Lauritano D, Candotto V, Mancini GE, Giannì AB. An overview on bone reconstruction of atrophic maxilla: success parameters and critical issues. Journal of biological regulators and homeostatic agents. 2016;30(2 Suppl 1):209-15.
7. Yan M, Liu R, Bai S, Wang M, Xia H, Chen J. Transalveolar sinus floor lift without bone grafting in atrophic maxilla: A meta-analysis. Scientific reports. 2018;8(1):1451.
8. Abayev B, Juodzbalys G. Inferior alveolar nerve lateralization and transposition for dental implant placement. Part I: a systematic review of surgical techniques. Journal of oral & maxillofacial research. 2015;6(1):e2.
9. Spencer K. Implant based rehabilitation options for the atrophic edentulous jaw. Australian dental journal. 2018;63:S100-S7.
10. Urban IA, Monje A, Lozada JL, Wang HL. Long-term Evaluation of Peri-implant Bone Level after Reconstruction of Severely Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla via Vertical and Horizontal Guided Bone Regeneration in Combination with Sinus Augmentation: A Case Series with 1 to 15 Years of Loading. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2017;19(1):46-55.
11. Del Fabbro M, Bellini CM, Romeo D, Francetti L. Tilted implants for the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws: a systematic review. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2012;14(4):612-21.
12. Tuminelli FJ, Walter LR, Neugarten J, Bedrossian E. Immediate loading of zygomatic implants: A systematic review of implant survival, prosthesis survival and potential complications. European journal of oral implantology. 2017;10 Suppl 1:79-87.
13. Altaib FH, Alqutaibi AY, Al-fahd A, Eid S. Short dental implant as alternative to long implant with bone augmentation of the atrophic posterior ridge: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Quintessence International. 2019;50(8):636-50.
14. West T, Langer L, Karabin S, Grbic J, Budasoff D, Gottsegen R, et al. Re: A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces. Cochran DL (1999;70:1523-1539). Journal of periodontology. 2000;71(6):1051-3; author reply 5-6.
15. Carlson B, Carlsson GE. Prosthodontic complications in osseointegrated dental implant treatment. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants. 1994;9(1):90-4.
16. Lemos CAA, Ferro-Alves ML, Okamoto R, Mendonça MR, Pellizzer EP. Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of dentistry. 2016;47:8-17.
17. Mezzomo LA, Miller R, Triches D, Alonso F, Shinkai RS. Meta-analysis of single crowns supported by short (<10 mm) implants in the posterior region. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2014;41(2):191-213.
18. Ravida A, Wang IC, Barootchi S, Askar H, Tavelli L, Gargallo-Albiol J, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing clinical and patient-reported outcomes between extra-short (/=10 mm) implants. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2019;46(1):118-42.
19. Vazouras K, de Souza AB, Gholami H, Papaspyridakos P, Pagni S, Weber HP. Effect of time in function on the predictability of short dental implants ( 20. Quaranta A, DʼIsidoro O, Bambini F, Putignano A. Potential Bone to Implant Contact Area of Short Versus Standard Implants: An In Vitro Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis. Implant dentistry. 2016;25(1):97-102.
21. Jain N, Gulati M, Garg M, Pathak C. Short Implants: New Horizon in Implant Dentistry. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR. 2016;10(9):Ze14-ze7.
22. Hingsammer L, Watzek G, Pommer B. The influence of crown-to-implant ratio on marginal bone levels around splinted short dental implants: A radiological and clincial short term analysis. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2017;19(6):1090-8.
23. Meijer HJA, Boven C, Delli K, Raghoebar GM. Is there an effect of crown-to-implant ratio on implant treatment outcomes? A systematic review. Clinical oral implants research. 2018;29 Suppl 18(Suppl Suppl 18):243-52.
24. Atieh MA, Zadeh H, Stanford CM, Cooper LF. Survival of short dental implants for treatment of posterior partial edentulism: a systematic review. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants. 2012;27(6):1323-31.
25. Fan T, Li Y, Deng WW, Wu T, Zhang W. Short implants (5 to 8 mm) versus longer implants (> 8 mm) with sinus lifting in atrophic posterior maxilla: a meta‐analysis of RCTs. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2017;19(1):207-15.
26. Nisand D, Picard N, Rocchietta I. Short implants compared to implants in vertically augmented bone: a systematic review. Clinical oral implants research. 2015;26:170-9.
27. Thoma DS, Zeltner M, Husler J, Hammerle CH, Jung RE. EAO Supplement Working Group 4 - EAO CC 2015 Short implants versus sinus lifting with longer implants to restore the posterior maxilla: a systematic review. Clinical oral implants research. 2015;26 Suppl 11:154-69.
28. Lum LB. A biomechanical rationale for the use of short implants. The Journal of oral implantology. 1991;17(2):126-31.
29. Goene R, Bianchesi C, Huerzeler M, Del Lupo R, Testori T, Davarpanah M, et al. Performance of short implants in partial restorations: 3-year follow-up of Osseotite implants. Implant dentistry. 2005;14(3):274-80.
30. Telleman G, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, den Hartog L, Huddleston Slater JJ, Meijer HJ. A systematic review of the prognosis of short (<10 mm) dental implants placed in the partially edentulous patient. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2011;38(7):667-76.
31. Mertens C, Meyer-Bäumer A, Kappel H, Hoffmann J, Steveling HG. Use of 8-mm and 9-mm implants in atrophic alveolar ridges: 10-year results. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2012;27(6).
32. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D. Group P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339: b2535. 2009.
33. Higgins JP. green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version. 2011;5(0):3.
34. Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2017;358:j4008.
35. Al-Johany SS. Survival Rates of Short Dental Implants ( 36. Goncalves TM, Bortolini S, Martinolli M, Alfenas BF, Peruzzo DC, Natali A, et al. Long-term Short Implants Performance: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Essential Assessment Parameters. Brazilian dental journal. 2015;26(4):325-36.
37. Karthikeyan I, Desai SR, Singh R. Short implants: A systematic review. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. 2012;16(3):302-12.
38. Menchero-Cantalejo E, Barona-Dorado C, Cantero-Álvarez M, Fernández-Cáliz F, Martínez-González J-M. Meta-analysis on the survival of short implants. Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal. 2011;16(4):e546-51.
39. Monje A, Chan HL, Fu JH, Suarez F, Galindo-Moreno P, Wang HL. Are short dental implants (<10 mm) effective? a meta-analysis on prospective clinical trials. Journal of periodontology. 2013;84(7):895-904.
40. Monje A, Fu JH, Chan HL, Suarez F, Galindo-Moreno P, Catena A, et al. Do implant length and width matter for short dental implants (<10 mm)? A meta-analysis of prospective studies. Journal of periodontology. 2013;84(12):1783-91.
41. Neldam CA, Pinholt EM. State of the art of short dental implants: a systematic review of the literature. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2012;14(4):622-32.
42. Pommer B, Mailath-Pokorny G, Haas R, Buseniechner D, Millesi W, Furhauser R. Extra-short (< 7 mm) and extra-narrow diameter (< 3.5 mm) implants: a meta-analytic literature review. European journal of oral implantology. 2018;11 Suppl 1:S137-s46.
43. Srinivasan M, Vazquez L, Rieder P, Moraguez O, Bernard JP, Belser UC. Survival rates of short (6 mm) micro-rough surface implants: a review of literature and meta-analysis. Clinical oral implants research. 2014;25(5):539-45.
44. Ting M, Palermo M, Donatelli DP, Gaughan JP, Suzuki JB, Jefferies SR. A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics on the survival of the wide-diameter implant. International journal of implant dentistry. 2015;1(1):28.
45. Corbella S, Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M. Long‐term outcomes for the treatment of atrophic posterior maxilla: a systematic review of literature. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2015;17(1):120-32.
46. Sierra-Sanchez JL, Garcia-Sala-Bonmati F, Martinez-Gonzalez A, Garcia-Dalmau C, Manes-Ferrer JF, Brotons-Oliver A. Predictability of short implants ( < 10 mm) as a treatment option for the rehabilitation of atrophic maxillae. A systematic review. Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal. 2016;21(3):e392-402.
47. Palacios JAV, Garcia JJ, Carames JMM, Quirynen M, da Silva Marques DN. Short implants versus bone grafting and standard-length implants placement: a systematic review. Clinical oral investigations. 2018;22(1):69-80.
48. Ravida A, Barootchi S, Askar H, Suarez-Lopez Del Amo F, Tavelli L, Wang HL. Long-Term Effectiveness of Extra-Short ( 49. Uehara PN, Matsubara VH, Igai F, Sesma N, Mukai MK, Araujo MG. Short Dental Implants ( 50. Yan Q, Wu X, Su M, Hua F, Shi B. Short implants ( 51. Annibali S, Cristalli M, Dell’Aquila D, Bignozzi I, La Monaca G, Pilloni A. Short dental implants: a systematic review. Journal of dental research. 2012;91(1):25-32.
52. Chen S, Ou Q, Wang Y, Lin X. Short implants (5-8 mm) vs long implants (>/=10 mm) with augmentation in atrophic posterior jaws: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Journal of oral rehabilitation. 2019;46(12):1192-203.
53. Esposito M, Buti J, Barausse C, Gasparro R, Sammartino G, Felice P. Short implants versus longer implants in vertically augmented atrophic mandibles: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials with a 5-year post-loading follow-up. International journal of oral implantology (New Malden, London, England). 2019;12(3):267-80.
54. Pommer B, Frantal S, Willer J, Posch M, Watzek G, Tepper G. Impact of dental implant length on early failure rates: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2011;38(9):856-63.
55. Tolentino da Rosa de Souza P, Binhame Albini Martini M, Reis Azevedo-Alanis L. Do short implants have similar survival rates compared to standard implants in posterior single crown?: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2018;20(5):890-901.
56. Bitaraf T, Keshtkar A, Rokn AR, Monzavi A, Geramy A, Hashemi K. Comparing short dental implant and standard dental implant in terms of marginal bone level changes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2019.
57. Sun HL, Huang C, Wu YR, Shi B. Failure rates of short ( 58. Mokcheh A, Jegham H, Turki S. Short implants as an alternative to sinus lift for the rehabilitation of posterior maxillary atrophies: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of stomatology, oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2019;120(1):28-37.
59. Cruz RS, Lemos CAA, Batista VES, Oliveira H, Gomes JML, Pellizzer EP, et al. Short implants versus longer implants with maxillary sinus lift. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brazilian oral research. 2018;32:e86.
60. Lee S-A, Lee C-T, Fu MM, Elmisalati W, Chuang S-K. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the management of limited vertical height in the posterior region: short implants (5 to 8 mm) vs longer implants (> 8 mm) in vertically augmented sites. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2014;29(5).
61. Kotsovilis S, Fourmousis I, Karoussis IK, Bamia C. A systematic review and meta‐analysis on the effect of implant length on the survival of rough‐surface dental implants. Journal of periodontology. 2009;80(11):1700-18.
62. Aromataris E, Fernandez R, Godfrey CM, Holly C, Khalil H, Tungpunkom P. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. International journal of evidence-based healthcare. 2015;13(3):132-40.
63. Silva V, Grande AJ, Martimbianco AL, Riera R, Carvalho AP. Overview of systematic reviews - a new type of study: part I: why and for whom? Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina. 2012;130(6):398-404.
64. Nisand D, Renouard F. Short implant in limited bone volume. Periodontology 2000. 2014;66(1):72-96.
65. Schwartz SR. Short implants: are they a viable option in implant dentistry? Dental clinics of North America. 2015;59(2):317-28.
66. ten Bruggenkate CM, van den Bergh JP. Maxillary sinus floor elevation: a valuable pre‐prosthetic procedure. Periodontology 2000. 1998;17(1):176-82.
67. Diago MP, Ferrín LM, Oltra DP, Canullo L, Guirado JLC, Diago MP. Tilted implants for the restoration of posterior mandibles with horizontal atrophy: an alternative treatment. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2013;71(5):856-64.
68. Sharma A, Rahul GR. Zygomatic implants/fixture: a systematic review. The Journal of oral implantology. 2013;39(2):215-24.
69. Lee J-H, Frias V, Lee K-W, Wright RF. Effect of implant size and shape on implant success rates: a literature review. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2005;94(4):377-81.
70. Al-Hashedi AA, Taiyeb Ali TB, Yunus N. Short dental implants: an emerging concept in implant treatment. Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985). 2014;45(6):499-514.
71. das Neves FD, Fones D, Bernardes SR, do Prado CJ, Neto AJ. Short implants--an analysis of longitudinal studies. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants. 2006;21(1):86-93.
72. Esfahrood ZR, Ahmadi L, Karami E, Asghari S. Short dental implants in the posterior maxilla: a review of the literature. Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. 2017;43(2):70-6.
73. Tutak M, Smektala T, Schneider K, Golebiewska E, Sporniak-Tutak K. Short dental implants in reduced alveolar bone height: a review of the literature. Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research. 2013;19:1037-42.
74. Edher F, Nguyen CT. Short dental implants: A scoping review of the literature for patients with head and neck cancer. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2018;119(5):736-42.
75. Hagi D, Deporter DA, Pilliar R, Arenovich T. A targeted review of study outcomes with short (≤ 7 mm) endosseous dental implants placed in partially edentulous patients. Journal of periodontology. 2004;75(6):798-804.
76. Misch C. Short dental implants: a literature review and rationale for use. Dentistry today. 2005;24(8):64-6, 8.
77. Romeo E, Bivio A, Mosca D, Scanferla M, Ghisolfi M, Storelli S. The use of short dental implants in clinical practice: literature review. Minerva stomatologica. 2010;59(1-2):23-31.
78. Srinivasan M, Vazquez L, Rieder P, Moraguez O, Bernard J-P, Belser UC. Efficacy and predictability of short dental implants (< 8 mm): a critical appraisal of the recent literature. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2012;27(6).
79. Galvão FFdSA, Almeida-Júnior AA, Faria-Júnior NB, Caldas SGFR, Reis JMdSN, Margonar R. Previsibilidade de implantes curtos: revisão de literatura. RSBO (Impr). 2011;8(1):81-8.
80. Al-Moraissi EA, Altairi NH, Abotaleb B, Al-Iryani G, Halboub E, Alakhali MS. What Is the Most Effective Rehabilitation Method for Posterior Maxillas With 4 to 8 mm of Residual Alveolar Bone Height Below the Maxillary Sinus With Implant-Supported Prostheses? A Frequentist Network Meta-Analysis. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. 2019;77(1):70.e1-.e33.
81. Monje A, Suarez F, Galindo‐Moreno P, García‐Nogales A, Fu JH, Wang HL. A systematic review on marginal bone loss around short dental implants (< 10 mm) for implant‐supported fixed prostheses. Clinical oral implants research. 2014;25(10):1119-24.
82. Hingsammer L, Pommer B, Hunger S, Stehrer R, Watzek G, Insua A. Influence of Implant Length and Associated Parameters Upon Biomechanical Forces in Finite Element Analyses: A Systematic Review. Implant dentistry. 2019;28(3):296-305.
83. Curto Aguilera A. Evaluación de las tasas de supervivencia clínica de los implantes cortos: revisión de la literatura. Int j odontostomatol (Print). 2012;6(2):201-3.
84. Nagem Filho H, Nagem HD, Silva Filho ES, Silva ABS, Campi Júnior L. Eficácia e previsibilidade de implantes curtos - revisão sistemática. Full dent sci. 2014;5(17):81-6.
85. Gomide CWS, Gomes MB, Gonçalves AO, Vilela EM. Taxa de sobrevivência dos implantes após elevação atraumática do seio maxilar: revisão sistemática em diferentes técnicas nos últimos cinco anos. ImplantNewsPerio. 2016;1(2):290-8.
86. Blanes RJ. To what extent does the crown–implant ratio affect the survival and complications of implant‐supported reconstructions? A systematic review. Clinical oral implants research. 2009;20:67-72.
87. Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. 2011.
88. Coulthard P, Esposito M, Worthington HV, Jokstad A. Therapeutic use of hyperbaric oxygen for irradiated dental implant patients: a systematic review. Journal of dental education. 2003;67(1):64-8.
89. Roccuzzo M, Bunino M, Needleman I, Sanz M. Periodontal plastic surgery for treatment of localized gingival recessions: a systematic review. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2002;29:178-94.
90. Kotsovilis S, Karoussis IK, Trianti M, Fourmousis I. Therapy of peri‐implantitis: A systematic review. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2008;35(7):621-9.
91. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJM, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Controlled clinical trials. 1996;17(1):1-12.
- Abstract Viewed: 422 times
- PDF Downloaded: 165 times