In vitro Comparative Study of Compressive Strength of DifferentTypes of Composite Resins in Different Periods of Time Deposition of nano-crystalline fluorhydroxyapatite coatings on titanium substrates via sol-gel method
Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences,
Vol. 4 No. 1 (2008),
15 January 2008
,
Page 69-74
https://doi.org/10.22037/ijps.v4.39821
Abstract
To evaluate the ultimate compressive strength of five composite resins after 1 hour,24 hours, 7 days and 1 month. Twenty four cylindrical 4 mm×8mm specimens ofeach commonly used composite resins in posterior region (Nulite-F , Z250 , P60,Biscore, Tetric ceram HB) were prepared. Each group of composite resins weredivided into four time groups of 1 h, 24 h, 7 days and 1 month. All of specimensstored in an incubator with 37 °C. After each period of time all of the specimenswere tested by Zwick/Roell Z020 (Germany) for ultimate compressive strength atcross head speed of 0.5 cm/min. Results were analyzed by ANOVAand Scheffe test.P60 and Z250 had the highest and Nulite-F and Tetric ceram HB had the lowestcompressive strength at all the times. The difference between these two groups wasstatistically significant (p<0.05). The results of the Biscore was steady among theother groups. It is suggested to use Z250 or P60 in posterior restorations instead ofthe other composite resins tested.
- Compressive strength
- Composite resins
- Fiber reinforced composite resins
How to Cite
References
[2]Summitt JB, Robbins JW, Schwartz R.Fundamentals of operative dentistry. 3rd edition,USA, Quintessence books, 2006; pp.560-1.
[3]Van Noort R. Introduction to dental material.USA: Mosby, 2007; pp.48 , 99-126.
[4]Powers JM, Sakaguci RL. Craig's restorativedental materials. USA: Mosby, 2006; pp.64-5,189-213.
[5]Cho C, Kaneko M, Donovan E, Terence N, WhiteS. Diametral and compressive strength of dentalcore material. J Prosthet Dent1999; 82: 272-6.
[6]Combe EC, Shaglof A, Watts DC, Wilson NHF.Mechanical properties of direct core build upmaterials. Dental Material1999; 15:158-65.
[7]O`Brien WJ.Dental materials and their selection.3rd edition, USA: Quintessence books, 2002;378-81.
[8]Piwowarczyk A, Ottl P, Hans C, Buchler A.Laboratory strength of glass ionomer cement,compomers and resin composites. J Prosth 2002;11: 86-91.
[9]Carreiro D, Dos Santaos Cruz CA, Vergani CE.Hardness and compressive strength of indirectcomposite resins: effect of immersion in distilledwater. J Oral Rehabil2004; 31: 1085-9.
[10]Gomec Y, Dorter C, Dabanoglu A, Koray F. Effectof resin-based material combination on thecompressive and the flexural strength. J OralRehabil2005; 32: 122-7.
[11]Huget EF. Resin composites for foundationrestorations. J Tenn Dent Assoc1999; 79: 44-6. [12]Wang L, D'Alpino P, Lopes LG, Pereira JC.Mechanical properties of dental restorativematerials: relative contribution of laboratory tests.J Appl Oral Sci2003; 11: 162-7.
[13]Kalla I, Garcia-Godoy F. Mechanical propertiesof compomer restorative materials. J Oper Dent1999; 24: 2-8.
[14]Brosh T, Ganor Y, Belov I, Pilo R. Analysis ofstrength properties of light-cured resin composites.J Dent Mater 1999; 15: 174-9.
[15]www.nsidental.com. Scientific Documents &Instruction for use of Nulite Flast updated Aug 2008.
[16]www.3MESPE.com. Scientific Documents &Instruction for use of P60last updated Aug 2008.
[17]www.3MESPE.com. Scientific Documents &Instruction for use of Z250last updated Aug 2008.
[18]www.Bisco.com. Scientific Documents &Instruction for use of Biscorelast updated Aug 2008.
[19]www.vivadent.com. Scientific Documents &Instruction for use of Tetric Ceram HB,last updated Aug 2008.
[20]Albers HF. Tooth colored restoratives. UK:Hamilton, 2002 ; pp.1-4.
- Abstract Viewed: 90 times
- IJPS_Volume 4_Issue 1_Pages 69-74 Downloaded: 52 times