Credibility of health websites on infectious diseases: Are there any fully trustable website to read on Ebola?
Archives of Advances in Biosciences,
Vol. 9 No. 3 (2018),
3 Tir 2018
,
Page 23-31
https://doi.org/10.22037/jps.v9i3.19330
Abstract
When a new disease develops, people are looking for information about that disease where the internet is considered as one of the sources of health information. Beside empowering individuals to identify and select valid information, reliable and up-to-date websites should also be introduced for them. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate and identify the high quality websites on Ebola virus and disease. To do this study, the term "Ebola" was searched for in Google, Yahoo, and Bing search engines using the Google Chrome browser. Three pages were obtained from the search in these three selected search engines and were examined, with the exclusion of duplicate websites, non-English websites, the results related to news, images, ads, and inaccessible websites; finally, 43 websites out of the 90 retrieved websites were selected for evaluation. The research tools included the HONcode toolbar and an eight-item checklist was developed by the researchers based on the HONcode of conducts. The result showed that out of 43 websites evaluated, only 6 websites (14%) were trustable and the 86% were not approved after evaluation based on the HONcode criteria. Only 37% of evaluated websites have been considered complementarity criterion. Justifiability was the most considered criterion and 95% of evaluated websites had paid to distribute information fairly enough. Online information about Ebola is available on many websites and this information affects people's health decisions and behaviors. Physicians and other health professionals can help patients and other community members to find their needed information on infectious diseases (e.g. on Ebola) from the most reputable and valid international websites.
- Patient Portals
- Health Communication
- Patient Education
- HONcode
- Ebola Virus Disease
- website evaluation
How to Cite
References
World Health Organization (WHO) [Internet]. Ebola virus disease. 2017 [cited 2017 Nov 10]. Available from: http://www.who.int/topics/haemorrhagic_fevers_viral/en/
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [Internet]. About Ebola Virus Disease. 2017 [cited 2017 Nov 10]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/about.html
MedlinePlus [Internet]. Ebola. 2017 [cited 2017 Nov 10]. Available from: https://medlineplus.gov/ebola.html
Tseng C-P, Chan Y-J. Overview of Ebola virus disease in 2014. J Chinese Med Assoc. 2015;78(1):51–5.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [Internet]. Signs and Symptoms. 2017 [cited 2017 Nov 10]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/symptoms/index.html
PURCELL K, BRENNER J;, RAINIE LEE. Search Engine Use 2012. Vol. 2016. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project; 2012.
iProspect Blended Search Results Study. Vol. 2014. 2008.
The HON Code of Conduct for medical and health Web sites (HONcode) [Internet]. [cited 2017 Nov 10]. Available from: http://www.hon.ch/HONcode/
Saraswat I, Abouassaly R, Dwyer P, Bolton DM, Lawrentschuk N. Female urinary incontinence health information quality on the Internet: a multilingual evaluation. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(1):69–76.
Grohol JM, Slimowicz J, Granda R. The quality of mental health information commonly searched for on the Internet. Cyberpsychology, Behav Soc Netw. 2014;17(4):216–21.
Hanna K, Brennan D, Sambrook P, Armfield J. Third molars on the Internet: a guide for assessing information quality and readability. Interact J Med Res. 2015;4(4):e19.
Lawrentschuk N, Sasges D, Tasevski R, Abouassaly R, Scott AM, Davis ID. Oncology health information quality on the Internet: a multilingual evaluation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(3):706–13.
Guardiola-Wanden-Berghe R, Gil-Pérez JD, Sanz-Valero J, Wanden-Berghe C. Evaluating the quality of websites relating to diet and eating disorders. Health Info Libr J. 2011;28(4):294–301.
Hendrick PA, Ahmed OH, Bankier SS, Chan TJ, Crawford SA, Ryder CR, et al. Acute low back pain information online: An evaluation of quality, content accuracy and readability of related websites. Man Ther [Internet]. 2012;17(4):318–24. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2012.02.019
Corcelles R, Daigle CR, Talamas HR, Brethauer SA, Schauer PR. Assessment of the quality of Internet information on sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(3):539–44.
Janatian S, Mojiri S, Shahrzadi L, Al. E. Evaluating the Quality of Persian Depression Websites Based On Webmedqual Scale. J Heal Inf. 2014;17(55):89–98.
Kaicker J, Debono VB, Dang W, Buckley N, Thabane L. Assessment of the quality and variability of health information on chronic pain websites using the DISCERN instrument. BMC Med. 2010;8(1):59.
Hayati Z, Dehghan L. A Survey of Acquaintance and Application of Web Information Quality Criteria: A Case Study of Post-Graduate Students in Shiraz University. Inf Process Manag. 2012;27(4):1011–31.
- Abstract Viewed: 352 times
- PDF Downloaded: 222 times