Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE) Questionnaire
Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery,
Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023),
2 September 2023
https://doi.org/10.22037/orlfps.v9i1.44348
Abstract
Background: Rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation (ROE) is a type of quality-of-life questionnaire. The ROE questionnaire, originally developed in English, has been translated into several languages.
Aim: This study focuses on assessing the reliability and validity of the Persian version of the questionnaire.
Methods: The study utilized a cross-sectional descriptive-analytical method to validate the Persian version of the rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation (ROE) questionnaire. The translation process involved two independent translators. The Persian version was then translated back into English and sent to the original designers of the questionnaire for permission. The content validity of the questionnaire was assessed by a group of experts, and the content validity ratio (CVR) and content validity index (CVI) were calculated. To assess reliability, test-retest, and Cronbach's alpha coefficient were used.
Results: The questionnaire demonstrated good reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.76, indicating internal consistency. The inter-item correlation (IIC) of the current questionnaire was equal to 0.727. The CVR of all questions was higher than the standard CVR for 10 experts, that is 0.62, except for question number two, which had a CVR of 0.564.
Conclusion: The research effectively confirmed the reliability and validity of the ROE questionnaire version in evaluating contentment after rhinoplasty procedures. This questionnaire now serves as an accurate tool specifically designed for assessing satisfaction, among individuals, in Iran.
- Rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation; Questionnaires; Validity; Reliability.
How to Cite
References
Faidiga GB, Carenzi LR, Yassuda CC, Silveira F, do Lago T, Leite MGJ, et al. Long-term evaluation in aesthetic rhinoplasty in an academic referral center. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. 2010;76:437-41.
Alsarraf R. Outcomes research in facial plastic surgery: a review and new directions. Aesthetic plastic surgery. 2000;24:192-7.
Saraf A, Gupta N, Manhas M, Kalsotra P. Evaluation of quality of life after septorhinoplasty using Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation questionnaire. The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology. 2023;39:82.
Çelik M, Altıntaş A. The Turkish Version of the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation Questionnaire: Validation and Clinical Application. Balkan Med J. 2019;36:129-33.
Mahmoudi S, Rabbani Zadeh M. Development and Validation of the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE) Questionnaire: An Analytical Study. World J Plast Surg. 2022;11:68-74.
Izu SC, Kosugi EM, Brandão KV, Lopes AS, Garcia LBS, Suguri VM, et al. Normal values for the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology (English Edition). 2012;78:76-9.
Mulafikh DS, Alharethy SE, Alqabbani AA, Mesallam TA. Validation and clinical application of the Arabic rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation questionnaire. Saudi Medical Journal. 2021;42:655.
Mulafikh DS, Alharethy SE, Alqabbani AA, Mesallam TA. Validation and clinical application of the Arabic rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation questionnaire. Saudi Medical Journal. 2021;42:655-9.
Bulut OC, Plinkert PK, Wallner F, Baumann I. Quality of life in functional rhinoplasty: rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation German version (ROE-D). European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 2016;273:2569-73.
Çelik M, Altıntaş A. The turkish version of the rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation questionnaire: validation and clinical application. Balkan medical journal. 2019;36:129.
Izu SC, Kosugi EM, Lopes AS, Brandão KV, Sousa LB, Suguri VM, et al. Validation of the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire adapted to Brazilian Portuguese. Quality of life research: an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation. 2014;23:953-8.
Izu SC, Kosugi EM, Brandão KV, Lopes AS, Garcia LBS, Suguri VM, et al. Normal values for the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire. Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. 2012;78:76-9.
Hellings PW, Trenité GJN. Long‐term patient satisfaction after revision rhinoplasty. The Laryngoscope. 2007;117:985-9.
AlHarethy S, Al-Angari SS, Syouri F, Islam T, Jang YJ. Assessment of satisfaction based on age and gender in functional and aesthetic rhinoplasty. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2017;274:2809-12.
Biggs T, Fraser L, Ward M, Sunkaraneni V, Harries P, Salib R. Patient reported outcome measures in septorhinoplasty surgery. The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2015;97:63-5
- Abstract Viewed: 51 times
- PDF Downloaded: 48 times