Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciecnes
  • Register
  • Login

Regeneration, Reconstruction & Restoration (Triple R)

  • Home
  • Journal Info
    • About the Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Privacy Statement
    • Journal History
  • Issues
    • Current
    • Archives
  • Publication Ethics
  • Journal Policies
    • Licensing
    • Copyright
    • Archiving
    • Repository
    • Pre-Print
    • Reviewing Policy
    • Plagirism Checking
    • Using Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Article Processing Charge (APC)
  • Guidelines
    • Guidelines for Authors
    • Guidelines for Reviewers
    • Files for Submission
  • Submit
  • Contact Us
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 1 No. 3 (2016)
  4. Restoration

Vol. 1 No. 3 (2016)

September 2016

Comparison of Morphine and Diclofenac Intra-articular Injection in Temporomandibular Joint Disorders: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

  • Shahrokh Raeesian
  • Hamid Reza Fallahi
  • Mahdis Masoudrad

Regeneration, Reconstruction & Restoration (Triple R), Vol. 1 No. 3 (2016), 24 September 2016 , Page 149-152
https://doi.org/10.22037/rrr.v1i3.10664 Published: 2016-09-24

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Introduction: Intra-articular injection has been used in patients with chronic temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain for several years; however, there are still doubts regarding its effectiveness and duration of action. The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic effects of intra-articular injection of morphine, diclofenac, and isotonic saline on the patients with chronic TMJ pain. Materials and Methods: Sixty-six patients with TMJ pain were enrolled in a prospective randomized double-blind and placebo-controlled clinical study. Patients were randomly allocated into three groups in which 12 patients consisted in each group. The analgesic effect of intermittent morphine injection (10 mg/ml), diclofenac sodium (25mg/ml), and normal saline was evaluated. In each group, pain reduction was evaluated by using visual analog scale (VAS) by following time points: 10, 60 min, and a week after injection. Results: All patients in the three groups experienced pain reduction during the experiment. Among them, patients who received morphine showed significantly more reduction in pain than the other the two groups at 60 minutes (P<0.05) and a week after the second injection (P<0.001). Conclusion: Regardless of the type of treatment, TMJ pain was initially reduced presumably due to the arthrocenthesis effect of the drug or because of the placebo effect. According to the analytical results, 10 mg of morphine had a longer effect on pain reduction followed by diclofenac.
Keywords:
  • Morphine
  • Diclofenac sodium
  • Temporomandibular joint
  • PDF

How to Cite

1.
Raeesian S, Fallahi HR, Masoudrad M. Comparison of Morphine and Diclofenac Intra-articular Injection in Temporomandibular Joint Disorders: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Regen Reconstr Restor [Internet]. 2016 Sep. 24 [cited 2026 Jul. 8];1(3):149-52. Available from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/tripleR/article/view/10664
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 819 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 348 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Developed By

Open Journal Systems

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

This work is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International.

Powered by OJSPlus