Estimating the Online Presence of COVID-19 Papers in Social Media: An Altmetric Study
Journal of Medical Library and Information Science,
Vol. 4 No. 4 (2023),
16 January 2023
,
Page 1-11
https://doi.org/10.22037/jmlis.v4i.39781
Abstract
Introduction: As the significant pandemic of the millennium, COVID-19 attracted research interest worldwide, and many papers have been published on the topic and increasingly shared in different social media. This study aimed to estimate the presence of COVID-19 papers in social media.
Methods: In this altmetric survey, Altmetric Explorer was used for data extraction. A comprehensive unlimited search was done on 9 July 2022 for COVID-19 papers mentioned at least once on social media. All 162,068 related papers as the study population was analyzed in Excel 2016 and SPSS v22.
Results: 151,956 COVID-19 papers (93.76%) were mentioned at least once on social media. Most papers (100,295) were within the altmetric attention score ranging from 1-10. As the top-ranked source, Twitter mentioned 144,073 papers (88.90%), followed by Mendeley, covering 129,328 (79.79%), papers and News Outlet covering 39,445 papers (24.33%). Most Twitter, Facebook, and News users were from the USA and the UK. "MedRexiv" ranked first with mentioning 10,971 papers, followed by the British Medical Journal with 2,122 mentioned papers and the Lancet with 692 mentioned papers. In the top highly-mentioned papers, some central aspects of the disease, such as its prevention, treatment, and vaccination, were considered as main public concerns.
Conclusions: COVID-19 research has been increasingly presented in social media, which is a sign of considering COVID-19 as a primary human concern. Thus, social media platforms have a prominent role in the reach and visibility of research output in COVID-19.
- Bibliometrics
- Social media
- Online systems
- Publications
- COVID-19
How to Cite
References
1. Rothan HA, Byrareddy SN. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. J Autoimmun. 2020;109:102433. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102433
2. Thelwall M, Thelwall S. Covid-19 tweeting in English: Gender differences. arXiv preprint arXiv:200311090. 2020. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2003.11090
3. Velavan TP, Meyer CG. The COVID‐19 epidemic. Trop Med Int Heal. 2020;25(3):278-280. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13383
4. Gralinski LE, Menachery VD. Return of the coronavirus: 2019-nCoV. Viruses. 2020;12(2):135. doi: 10.3390/v12020135
5. Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A descriptive study. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):507-13. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7
6. Chen Y, Liu Q, Guo D. Emerging coronaviruses: genome structure, replication, and pathogenesis. J Med Virol. 2020;92(4):418-23. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25681
7. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak situation 2020 [Internet]. World Health Organization. [cited 2020 Jan 6]. Available from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019
8. Zarea Gavgani V. Infodemic in the global coronavirus crisis. Depiction of Heal. 2020; 11 (1): 1-5. doi: 10.34172/doh.2020.01
9. Danesh F, Ghavidel S. Coronavirus: Scientometrics of 50 years of global scientific productions. Iran J Med Microbiol. 2020;14(1):1-16. doi: 10.30699/ijmm.14.1.1
10. Gunn W. Social signals reflect academic impact: What it means when a scholar adds a paper to Mendeley. Inf Stand Q. 2013;25(2):33-9. doi: 10.3789/isqv25no2.2013.06
11. Piwowar H, Priem J. The power of altmetrics on a CV. Bull Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2013;39(4):10-3. doi: 10.1002/bult.2013.1720390405
12. Priem J, Taraborelli D, Groth P, Neylon C. Altmetrics: A manifesto. Digit Nebraska – Lincoln [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2023 Jan 19]; Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. 185. Availiable from: http://altmetrics.org/manifesto
13. Sud P, Thelwall M. Evaluating altmetrics. Scientometrics. 2014;98(2):1131-43. doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1117-2
14. Falagas ME, Alexiou VG. The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2008;56(4):223-6. doi: 10.1007/s00005-008-0024-5
15. Mas-Bleda A, Thelwall M, Kousha K, Aguillo IF. Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social web? Scientometrics. 2014;101(1):337-56. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1345-0
16. Masic I. The importance of proper citation of references in biomedical articles. Acta Inform Med. 2013;21(3):148. doi: 10.5455/aim.2013.21.148-155
17. Mohammadi E, Thelwall M. M endeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2014;65(8):1627-1638. doi: 10.1002/asi.23071
18. Wang J. Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation. Scientometrics. 2013;94(3):851-72. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0775-9
19. Zahedi Z, Costas R, Wouters P. How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications. Scientometrics. 2014;101(2):1491-1513. doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1264-0
20. Czerniewicz L, Kell C, Willmers M, King T. Changing research communication practices and open scholarship: A framework for analysis. Sch Commun Africa Program. [Internet]. 2014. Availiable from: https://open.uct.ac.za/bitstream/handle/11427/9068/SCAP_Czerniewicz_ChangingResearchOpenScholarship_2014.pdf?sequence=1
21. Galligan F, Dyas-Correia S. Altmetrics: Rethinking the way we measure. Ser Rev. 2013;39(1):56-61. doi:10.1080/00987913.2013.10765486
22. Warren HR, Raison N, Dasgupta P. The rise of altmetrics. JAMA. 2017;317(2):131-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.18346
23. Batooli Z, Sayyah M. Measuring social media attention of scientific research on novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): An investigation on article-level metrics data of Dimensions. Res Sq. doi: 10.21203/rs-3/rs21980/v1
24. Tornberg HN, Moezinia C, Wei C, Bernstein SA, Wei C, Al-Beyati R, et al. Assessing the dissemination of COVID-19 articles across social media with Altmetric and PlumX metrics: Correlational study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(1):e21408. doi: 10.2196/21408
25. Vysakh C, Babu HR. An altmetric approach to measure the social media attention of COVID-19 articles. Libr Philos Pract [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Jan 12];4441. Availiable from: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4441/
26. Parabhoi L. Analysis of the Altmetric top 100 Altmetric attention score coronavirus publications. Libr Philos Pract [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Jan 12];1-10. Availiable from: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4426/
27. Borku Uysal B, Islamoglu MS, Koc S, Karadag M, Dokur M. Most notable 100 articles of COVID-19: an altmetric study based on bibliometric analysis. Ir J Med Sci. 2021;190(4):1335-1341. doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02460-8
- Abstract Viewed: 259 times
- e37 (PDF) Downloaded: 160 times
