Comparison of the Effectiveness of Combined Diode Laser and GLUMA Bonding Therapy With Combined Diode Laser and 5% Sodium Fluoride Varnish in Patients With Dentin Hypersensitivity Diode Laser vs GLUMA in Dentin Hypersensitivity
Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences,
Vol. 12 (2021),
13 February 2021
,
Page e62
Abstract
Introduction: Dentin hypersensitivity (DH) is one of the most common complaints of patients referred to a dental office, so this study aimed to compare the effectiveness of combined diode laser and GLUMA bonding therapy with combined diode laser and 5% sodium fluoride varnish in patients with DH.
Methods: Sixty patients were divided into three groups (bonding, laser-bonding, laser-varnish), and before the intervention, the amount of DH was measured with the visual analog scale (VAS) scale. In the bonding group, GLUMA Desensitizer solution was applied and then air-dried. In the bonding laser group, first bonding was used, and then the affected tooth was irradiated with a diode laser. In the varnish-laser group, 5% sodium fluoride varnish was coated and then the laser was irradiated with the said method. DH was measured immediately after the treatment and then 2, 7 and 30 days after the treatment.
Results: Laser-varnish treatment was not different from laser-bonding treatment at all measurement times (P=1). Laser-varnish and bonding treatment were not significantly different up to one week after the intervention, but on the 30th day after the intervention, the difference in pain was significant (P=0.01). There was no significant difference in laser-bonding treatment up to one week after the intervention, but on the 30th day after the intervention, the difference in pain was significant (P=0.003).
Conclusion: The combined treatment with GLUMA bonding and the 660 nm diode laser is effective in reducing DH and this is more effective than GLUMA bonding alone in the long term. However, it does not have a significant advantage over the combined varnish-laser method, but it seems that due to its ease of use, it can be a suitable alternative to the varnish-laser method.
- GLUMA bonding; Sodium fluoride varnish; Dentin hypersensitivity enhancement
How to Cite
References
Bartold PM. Dentinal hypersensitivity: a review. Aust Dent J. 2006;51(3):212-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819. 2006.tb00431.x
Marini I, Checchi L, Vecchiet F, Spiazzi L. Intraoral fluoride releasing device: a new clinical therapy for dentin sensitivity. J periodontol. 2000;71(1):90-5. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.1.90
West NX, Lussi A, Seong J, Hellwig E. Dentin hypersensitivity: pain mechanisms and aetiology of exposed cervical dentin. Clin Oral Invest. 2013;17(1):9-19. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-012-0887-x
Brannstrom M. The hydrodynamics of the dentine. Its possible relationship to dentinal pain. Int Dent J. 1972; 22(2):219-27.
Holland G, Narhi MN, Addy M, Gangarosa L, Orchardson R. Guidelines for the design and conduct of clinical trials on dentine hypersensitivity. J Clin Periodontol. 1997 Nov;24(11):808. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1997.tb01194.x
Lan WH, Liu HC, Lin CP. The combined occluding effect of sodium fluoride varnish and Nd: YAG laser irradiation on human dentinal tubules. J Endod. 1999;25(6):424-6. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80271-4
Porto IC, Andrade AK, Montes MA. Diagnosis and treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. J Oral Sci. 2009;51(3):323-32. DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.51.323
Bissada NF. Symptomatology and clinical features of hypersensitive teeth. Arch Oral Biol. 1994;39 Suppl:31S-32S. DOI: 10.1016/0003-9969(94)90185-6
Tate Y, Yoshiba K, Yoshiba N, Iwaku M, Okiji T, Ohshima H. Odontoblast responses to GaAlAs laser irradiation in rat molars: an experimental study using heat‐shock protein‐25 immunohistochemistry. Euro j oral sci. 2006;114(1):50-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00261.x
Lin PY, Cheng YW, Chu CY, Chien KL, Lin CP, Tu YK. In‐office treatment for dentin hypersensitivity: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2013;40(1):53-64. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12011.
Hansen EK. Dentin hypersensitivity treated with a fluoride‐containing varnish or a light‐cured glass‐ionomer liner. Eur J Oral Sci. 1992;100(6):305-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722. 1992.tb01076.x
Ide M, Morel AD, Wilson RF, Ashley FP. The rôle of a dentine‐bonding agent in reducing cervical dentin sensitivity. J Clin Periodontol. 1998;25(4):286-90. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1998.tb02442.x
Schupbach P, Lutz F, Finger WJ. Closing of dentinal tubules by Gluma desensitizer. Eur J Oral Sci. 1997;105(5P1):414-21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722. 1997.tb02138.x
Lan WH, Liu HC, Lin CP. The combined occluding effect of sodium fluoride varnish and Nd: YAG laser irradiation on human dentinal tubules. J Endod. 1999;25(6):424-6. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80271-4
Nemezio MA, Carvalho SC, Scatolin RS, Colucci V, Galo R, Corona SA. Effect of fluoride varnish combined with Er: YAG laser on the permeability of eroded dentin: an in situ study. Braz Dent J. 2015;26(6):671-7. Doi:10.1590/0103-6440201300034
Brannstrom M, Johnson G, Nordenvall KJ. Transmission and control of dentinal pain: resin impregnation for the desensitization of dentin. J Am Dent Assoc. 1979;99(4):612-8. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1979.0337
Tengrungsun T, Sangkla W. Comparative study in desensitizing efficacy using the GaAlAs laser and dentin bonding agent. J Dent. 2008;36(6):392-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.02.012
Brahmbhatt N, Bhavsar N, Sahayata V, Acharya A, Kshatriya P. A double blind controlled trial comparing three treatment modalities for denti hypersensitivity Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012;17(3): e483-90. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.17594
Ladalardo TC, Pinheiro A, Campos RA, Brugnera Júnior A, Zanin F, Albernaz PL, Weckx LL. Laser therapy in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity. Braz Dent J. 2004;15(2):144-50. DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402004000200011
Suri I, Singh P, Shakir QJ, Shetty A, Bapat R, Thakur R. A comparative evaluation to assess the efficacy of 5% sodium fluoride varnish and diode laser and their combined application in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2016;20(3):307. DOI: 10.4103/0972-124x.181243
Holland G, Narhi MN, Addy M, Gangarosa L, Orchardson R. Guidelines for the design and conduct of clinical trials on dentine hypersensitivity. J Clin Periodontol. 1997;24(11):808-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1997.tb01194.x
Rees JS. The prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity in general dental practice in the UK. J Clin Periodontol. 2000;27(11):860-5. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027011860.x.
Wichgers TG, Emert RL. Dentin hypersensitivity. Oral Health. 1997;87(3):51-61.
Absi EG, Addy M, Adams D. Dentine hypersensitivity: a study of the patency of dentinal tubules in sensitive and non‐sensitive cervical dentine. J Clin Periodontol. 1987;14(5):280-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1987.tb01533.x
Kimura Y, Wilder‐Smith P, Yonaga K, Matsumoto K. Treatment of dentine hypersensitivity by lasers: a review. J Clin Periodontol. 2000;27(10):715-21. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000. 027010715.x
Sicilia A, Cuesta‐Frechoso S, Suárez A, Angulo J, Pordomingo A, De Juan P. Immediate efficacy of diode laser application in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity in periodontal maintenance patients: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36(8):650-60. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.2009. 01433.x
Naghsh N, Kachuie M, Kachuie M, Birang R. Evaluation of the Effects of 660-nm and 810-nm Low-Level Diode Lasers on the Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity. J Lasers Med Sci. 2020;11(2):126-34. DOI: 10.34172/jlms.2020.22
Tunér J, Hode L. Laser therapy- Clinical practice and scientific background. Prima Books AB;2002.
Yilmaz HG, Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Cengiz E, Bayindir H, Aykac Y. Clinical evaluation of Er, Cr: YSGG and GaAlAs laser therapy for treating dentine hypersensitivity: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent. 2011;39(3):249-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.01.003
Etemadi A, Sadeghi M, Dadjou MH. The Effects of Low Level 660nm Laser Irradiation on Pain and Teeth Hypersensitivity after Periodontal Surgery. J Lasers Med Sci. 2011; 2(3):103-8.
Sgolastra F, Petrucci A, Severino M, Gatto R, Monaco A. Lasers for the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity: a meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2013; 92(6):492-9. DOI: 10.1177/0022034513487212
Vieira AH, Passos VF, de Assis JS, Mendonça JS, Santiago SL. Clinical evaluation of a 3% potassium oxalate gel and a GaAlAs laser for the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. Photomed Laser Surg. 2009;27(5):807-12. DOI: 10.1089/pho.2008.2364
Dilsiz A, Canakci V, Ozdemir A, Kaya Y. Clinical evaluation of Nd: YAG and 685-nm diode laser therapy for desensitization of teeth with gingival recession. Photomed Laser Surg. 2009;27(6):843-8. DOI: 10.1089/pho.2009.2593
Corona SA, Nascimento TD, Catirse AB, Lizarelli RF, Dinelli W, Palma‐Dibb RG. Clinical evaluation of low‐level laser therapy and fluoride varnish for treating cervical dentinal hypersensitivity. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30(12):1183-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2003. 01185.x
- Abstract Viewed: 612 times
- PDF Downloaded: 443 times