Evaluation of Microleakage in Resin Composites Bonded to an Er:YAG Laser and Bur-Prepared Root and Coronal Dentin Using Different Bonding Agents Microleakage of resin composite to Er:YAG laser and bur-prepared
Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences,
Vol. 12 (2021),
13 Bahman 2021
,
Page e74
Abstract
Introduction: This study was conducted to assess the microleakage in Er: YAG laser-ablated and burprepared root and coronal dentin cavities using self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems.
Methods: Sixty extracted caries-free human third molars were sectioned for dentin exposure. Then, two standard class V cavities were prepared in the root and coronal dentin of each tooth and allocated to one of the following conditioning groups randomly (n=12/Group): G1: Diamond bur for cavity preparation and single bond (BESB) etch-and-rinse adhesive for bonding, G2: Er: YAG laser (160 MJ, 20 Hz, 29.88 J/cm2) and SB (LESB), G3: Er: YAG laser and SB without acid etching (LSB), G4: Diamond bur and Clearfil SE Bond (BCSE) self-etch system, and G5: Er: YAG laser and Clearfil SE Bond (LCSE). The cavities were filled with Z100 composite resin. Dye penetration was assessed after thermocycling. Data analysis was done by Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05.
Results: The results showed there were no statistically significant differences in microleakage between the two preparation methods (bur and laser) or the bonding agents applied (P>0.05). Regardless of the cavity preparation method, dye penetration was significantly higher in coronal dentin than in root dentin (P<0.05).
Conclusion: The Er: YAG laser had the same efficacy as the conventional method for cavity preparation, and microleakage did not depend on the bonding agent. Microleakage was significantly higher in coronal restorations than in root restorations.
- Dentin
- Er
- YAG laser
- Microleakage
- Composite Resin
- Self-etching primer
How to Cite
References
Hepdeniz O, Ermis R. Comparative evaluation of marginal adaptation and microleakage of low-shrinking composites after thermocycling and mechanical loading. Niger J Clin Pract .2019;22(5):633-41. DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_567_18.
Almojaly SA, Al-Hamdan RS, Alrahlah A, Qutub OA, Alnajashi S, Vohra F, et al. Effect of Er, Cr: YSGG on bond strength and microleakage of dentin bonded to resin composite with different distance and irradiation time. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2019; 25:204-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2018.10.017.
Korkmaz Y, Gurgan S, Firat E, Nathanson D. Effect of adhesives and thermocycling on the shear bond strength of a nano-composite to coronal and root dentin. Oper Dent. 2010;35(5):522-9. DOI: 10.2341/09-185-L.
Silva AC, Melo P, Ferreira JC, Oliveira T, Gutknecht N. Adhesion in dentin prepared with Er, Cr: YSGG laser: Systematic review. Contemp Clin Dent. 2019;10(1):129-34. DOI: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_302_18.
Zhang J, Sardana D, Wong M, Leung K, Lo E. Factors Associated with Dental Root Caries: A Systematic Review. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2020;5(1):13-29. DOI: 10.1177/2380084419849045.
Hariyani N, Spencer AJ, Luzzi L, Do LG. Root surface caries among older Australians. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2018;46(6):535-44. DOI: 10.1111/cdoe.12386.
Kallis A, Tolidis K, Gerasimou P, Dionysopoulos D. Qualitative evaluation of hybrid layer formation using Er: YAG laser in QSP mode for tooth cavity preparations. Lasers Med Sci. 2019;34(1):23-34. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-018-2575-9.
Li T, Zhang X, Shi H, Ma Z, Lv B, Xie M. Er: YAG laser application in caries removal and cavity preparation in children: a meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci. 2019;34(2):273-80. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-018-2582-x.
Oskoee PA, Kimyai S, Ebrahimi M, Rikhtegaran S, Pournaghi-Azar F. Cervical margin integrity of Class II resin composite restorations in laser-and bur-prepared cavities using three different adhesive systems. Oper Dent. 2012;37(3):316-23. DOI: 10.2341/10-403-L.
Geraldo-Martins V, Thome T, Mayer M, Marques M. The use of bur and laser for root caries treatment: a comparative study. Oper Dent. 2013;38(3):290-8. DOI: 10.2341/11- 345-L.
Ferreira DM, Zângaro RA, Villaverde AB, Cury Y, Frigo L, Picolo G, Longo I, Barbosa DG. Analgesic effect of He-Ne (632.8 nm) low-level laser therapy on acute inflammatory pain. Photomed Laser Surg. 2005;23(2):177-81. DOI: 10.1089/pho.2005.23.177.11
Shahabi S, Ebrahimpour L, Walsh L. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er, Cr: YSGG laser radiation. Aust Dent J. 2008;53(2):172-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00028.x.
Luong E , Shayegan A. Assessment of microleakage of class V restored by resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer and pit and fissure resin-based sealants following Er:YAG laser conditioning and acid etching: in vitro study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2018;10:83-92.DOI: 10.2147/CCIDE.S153989.
Ergin E, Oz FD, Gurgan S. Comparison of Er, Cr: YSGG Laser Handpieces for Class II Preparation and Microleakage of Silorane-or Methacrylate-Based Composite Restorations. Photomed Laser Surg. 2018;36(9):499-505. DOI: 10.1089/pho.2018.4459.
Ertürk Avunduk AT, Bağlar S. Evaluation of microleakage in class v cavities prepared by different caries removal methods. Microsc Res Tech. 2019;82(9):1566-74. DOI: 10.1002/jemt.23322.
Vohra F, Alghamdi A, Aldakkan M, Alharthi S, Alturaigi O, Alrabiah M, et al. Influence of Er: Cr: YSGG laser on adhesive strength and microleakage of dentin bonded to resin composite. In-vitro study. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2018; 23:342-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2018.08.002.
Ferreira LS, Apel C, Francci C, Simoes A, Eduardo CP, Gutknecht N. Influence of etching time on bond strength in dentin irradiated with erbium lasers. Lasers Med Sci. 2010;25(6):849-54. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-009-0715-y.
Guven Y, Aktoren O. Shear bond strength and ultrastructural interface analysis of different adhesive systems to Er: YAG laser-prepared dentin. Lasers Med Sci. 2015;30(2):769-78. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-013-1424-0.
GARCÍA L, GIL AC, PUY CL. In vitro evaluation of microleakage in Class II composite restorations: High-viscosity bulk-fill vs conventional composites. Dent Mater. 2019;38(5):721-727. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2018-160.
Bahrololoomi Z, Heydari E. Assessment of tooth preparation via Er: YAG laser and bur on microleakage of dentin adhesives. J Dent (Tehran).2014;11(2):172-78.
Heintze SD. Clinical relevance of tests on bond strength, microleakage and marginal adaptation. Dent Mater.2013 Jan 29(1):59-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.07.158.
Ferreira Zanatta R,Wiegand A,Dullin Ch, BühlerBorges A,Torres C,Rizk M. Comparison of micro-CT and conventional dye penetration for microleakage assessment after different aging conditions. Int J Adhesion and Adhesives. 2019;89:161-167. doi:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.01.008
Moldes VL, Capp CI, Navarro RS, Matos AB, Youssef MN, Cassoni A. In vitro microleakage of composite restorations prepared by Er: YAG/Er, Cr: YSGG lasers and conventional drills associated with two adhesive systems. J Adhes Dent. 2009;11(3): 221-9.
Ergucu Z, Celik E, Turkun M. Microleakage study of different adhesive systems in Class V cavities prepared by Er, Cr: YSGG laser and bur preparation. Gen Dent. 2007;55(1):27-32.
Bertrand M-F, Brulat N, Lazzarini V, Marcato G, Namour S, Rocca J-P. Er: YAG laser cavity preparation and semi-direct composite resin restoration: a microleakage study. Photomed Laser Surg. 2008;26(5):473-7. DOI: 10.1089/pho.2007.2182.
Korkmaz Y, Ozel E, Attar N, Bicer CO, Firatli E. Microleakage and scanning electron microscopy evaluation of all-in-one self-etch adhesives and their respective nanocomposites prepared by erbium: yttrium–aluminum–garnet laser and bur. Lasers med sci. 2010;25(4):493-502. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-009-0672-5.
Chiniforush N, Nokhbatolfoghahaei H, Monzavi A, Pordel E, Ashnagar S. Surface treatment by different parameters of erbium: yttrium–aluminum–garnet (Er: YAG) laser:12 scanning electron microscope (SEM) evaluation. J Lasers Med Sci. 2016;7(1):37-9. DOI: 10.15171/jlms.2016.08.
Synarellis A, Kouros P, Koulaouzidou E, Strakas D, Koliniotou-Koumpia E. In vitro microleakage of class V composite restorations prepared by Er, Cr: YSGG laser and carbide bur. Balk J Dent Med. 2017;21(1):24-31. DOI:10.1515/bjdm-2017-0004.
Bertrand MF, Hessleyer D, Muller‐Bolla M, Nammour S, Rocca JP. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of resin–dentin interface after Er: YAG laser preparation. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine: Lasers Surg Med. 2004;35(1):51-7.DOI: 10.1002/lsm.20063.
Shirani F, Birang R, Malekipur M, Zeilabi A, Shahmoradi M, Kazemi S, et al. Adhesion to Er: YAG laser and bur prepared root and crown dentine. Aust dent J. 2012;57(2):138-43. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2012.01682.x.
Alshahni RZ, Shimada Y, Zhou Y, Yoshiyama M, Sadr A, Sumi Y, et al. Cavity adaptation of composite restorations prepared at crown and root: Optical assessment using SS-OCT. Dent mate J. 2019;38(5):779-789. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2018-265.
- Abstract Viewed: 667 times
- PDF Downloaded: 368 times