SBMU Journals
  • New Submission
  • Register
  • Login
  • English
    • 简体中文

Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine

  • Home
  • About
    • Policies
    • Editorial Team
    • Reviewer guideline
    • Contact
  • Issues
    • Current
    • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Indexing/Abstracting
  • For authors
    • New Submission
    • Author guidelines
    • Article withdrawal
    • Peer review process
    • FAQ
  • Ethics
    • Ethical requirements
    • Plagiarism Policy
    • Authorship conflicts
    • Malpractice statements
    • Copyright Notice
    • Intellectual properties
    • Preprint Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Artificial intelligence & Authorship
    • Retraction Cosiderations
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021): Continuous volume
  4. Original/Research Article

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021)

January 2021

HEART Score in Predicting One-Month Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients with Acute Chest Pain; a Diagnostic Accuracy Study Assessment of HEART scoring scale

  • Hossein Alimohammadi
  • Majid Shojaee
  • Mohammad Reza Sohrabi
  • Saman Salahi

Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021), 1 January 2021 , Page e31
https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v9i1.1052 Published: 2021-03-27

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Introduction: Screening of high-risk patients and accelerating their therapeutic procedures can reduce the burden of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of HEART score in predicting the risk of one-month major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in these patients.

Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional study, the accuracy of HEART score in patients over 18 years old who presented to emergency department following acute chest pain, was evaluated during a 21-month period. Each patient was followed up regarding the incidence of MACE for one month via phone call and the hospital’s integrated health information system.

Results: 240 cases with the mean age of 60.50 ± 16.07 years were studied (56.3% male).  MACE was observed in 77 (32.1%) cases. The most common MACE was percutaneous coronary artery revascularization (PCAR) (12.9%). The mean HEART score of studied cases was 4.74 ± 2.12. The mean score of cases with MACE was significantly higher than others (6.25 ± 1.97 versus 4.03 ± 1.79; p < 0.0001).  Based on this score, the risk of MACE was high in 34 (14.2%), moderate in 118 (49.2%), and low in 88 (36.7%) cases. The incidence of one-month MACE was 85.3% in high-risk cases, 35.6% in moderate one, and 6.8% in low-risk cases based on HEART score. The area under the ROC curve of HEART score in predicting the risk of MACE was 0.796 (95% CI: 0.736 – 0.856). The best cut off point of HEART score in this regard was calculated as 4.5. The sensitivity and specificity of this score in 4.5 cut off were 83.11% (95% CI: 72.49 – 90.35) and 66.25% (95% CI: 58.38 – 73.35), respectively.

Conclusion: Based on the findings of the present study the mean HEART score of ACS patients with one-month MACE was significantly higher than others and the incidence of MACE in high-risk patients was significantly higher. But the overall accuracy of score in predicting one-month MACE in ACS patients was in moderate range.

Keywords:
  • Chest pain
  • heart diseases
  • Heart Disease Risk Factors
  • Acute Coronary Syndrome
  • Emergency Service
  • Hospital
  • pdf

How to Cite

1.
Alimohammadi H, Shojaee M, Sohrabi MR, Salahi S. HEART Score in Predicting One-Month Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients with Acute Chest Pain; a Diagnostic Accuracy Study: Assessment of HEART scoring scale. Arch Acad Emerg Med [Internet]. 2021 Mar. 27 [cited 2026 Jul. 25];9(1):e31. Available from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem/index.php/AAEM/article/view/1052
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

Clark JC, Lan VM. Heart failure patient learning needs after hospital discharge. Applied Nursing Research. 2004;17(3):150-7.

Tahmasebi H, Mahmoodi G, Mokhberi V, Hassani S, Akbarzadeh H, Rahnamai N. The Impact of Aromatherapy on the Anxiety of Patients Experiencing Coronary Angiography. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2012;14(3):e93565.

Black JM, Hawks JH, Keene AM. Medical-surgical nursing: Clinical management for positive outcomes: WB Saunders; 2001.

Niknejad R, Mirmohammad-Sadeghi M, Akbari M, Ghadami A. Effects of an orientation tour on preoperative anxiety in candidates for coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized clinical trial. ARYA atherosclerosis. 2019;15(4):154.

Hadaegh F, Harati H, Ghanbarian A, Azizi F. Prevalence of coronary heart disease among Tehran adults: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. EMHJ-Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 15 (1), 157-166, 2009. 2009.

Paul B, Vitaly L, Elena Z, editors. New methods for healthcare system evaluation using human reliability analysis. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting; 2017: SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.

Freund Y, Goulet H, Bokobza J, Ghanem A, Carreira S, Madec D, et al. Factors associated with adverse events resulting from medical errors in the emergency department: two work better than one. The Journal of emergency medicine. 2013;45(2):157-62.

Crim MT, Berkowitz SA, Saheed M, Miller J, Deutschendorf A, Gerstenblith G, et al. Novel emergency department risk score discriminates acute coronary syndrome among chest pain patients with known coronary artery disease. Critical pathways in cardiology. 2016;15(4):138-44.

Rodríguez-López C, Garlito-Díaz H, Madroñero-Mariscal R, Sánchez-Cervilla PJ, Graciani A, López-Sendón JL, et al. Earlobe crease shapes and cardiovascular events. The American journal of cardiology. 2015;116(2):286-93.

Raff GL, Hoffmann U, Udelson JE. Trials of imaging use in the emergency department for acute chest pain. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2017;10(3):338-49.

McCord J, Cabrera R, Lindahl B, Giannitsis E, Evans K, Nowak R, et al. Prognostic utility of a modified HEART score in chest pain patients in the emergency department. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2017;10(2):e003101.

Gershon CA, Yagapen AN, Lin A, Yanez D, Sun BC. Inter‐rater Reliability of the HEART Score. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2019;26(5):552-5.

Poldervaart JM, Reitsma JB, Backus BE, Koffijberg H, Veldkamp RF, Ten Haaf ME, et al. Effect of using the HEART score in patients with chest pain in the emergency department: a stepped-wedge, cluster randomized trial. Annals of internal medicine. 2017;166(10):689-97.

Mahler SA, Hiestand BC, Goff Jr DC, Hoekstra JW, Miller CD. Can the HEART score safely reduce stress testing and cardiac imaging in patients at low risk for acute coronary syndrome? Critical pathways in cardiology. 2011;10(3):128.

Six AJ, Cullen L, Backus BE, Greenslade J, Parsonage W, Aldous S, et al. The HEART score for the assessment of patients with chest pain in the emergency department: a multinational validation study. Critical pathways in cardiology. 2013;12(3):121-6.

Melki D, Jernberg T. HEART score: a simple and useful tool that may lower the proportion of chest pain patients who are admitted. Critical pathways in cardiology. 2013;12(3):127-31.

Gharaee R, Zohari Anboohi S, Shiri H, Nasiri M. Comparison of triage effectiveness based on ESI and HEART scale in diagnosis of outcome in patients with chest pain. Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences. 2019;21(1):299-305.

Backus B, Six A, Kelder J, Bosschaert M, Mast E, Mosterd A, et al. A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients at the emergency department. International journal of cardiology. 2013;168(3):2153-8.

Leite L, Baptista R, Leitão J, Cochicho J, Breda F, Elvas L, et al. Chest pain in the emergency department: risk stratification with Manchester triage system and HEART score. BMC cardiovascular disorders. 2015;15(1):1-7.

  • Abstract Viewed: 1273 times
  • pdf Downloaded: 591 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Make a Submission

Make a Submission

SJR

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

COPE

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

This journal is distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC 3.0. Design and publishing by SBMU journals. All credits and honors to PKP for their OJS. 

 Sitemap | ISSN-ONLINE: 2645-4904

Support Contact: ma.saghaei63@gmail.com

With the goal of net zero carbon emissions, this journal is published only in electronic format.

Powered by OJSPlus