Dental Implants and Quality of Life: An Assessment of the Impact on Oral Health (OHIP-14) Dental Implants and Quality of Life
Regeneration, Reconstruction & Restoration (Triple R),
Vol. 9 (2024),
1 Dey 2024
https://doi.org/10.22037/rrr.v9.46888
Abstract
Background and objectives: Oral health impact profile index (OHIP-14) is considered one of the most famous and reliable known strategies for identifying and evaluating various aspects of the quality of life associated with oral health. In spite of the developmental studies in this field, very few studies have implant-dependent prostheses recipients are a community of their own. In the present study, which is conducted in Iran for the first time, we intend to study the effect of using implant-dependent prostheses on the quality of life during 6 and 12 weeks.
Materials and methods: The research was a descriptive cross-sectional study in which 126 patients referred to a number of dental clinics. The Implant-based Treatment Plan was considered for their prosthetic treatments. They are interviewed before the start of the treatment process and respond to questions from the OHIP-14 questionnaire. In addition, after the relative improvement of the site of implant surgery, the questionnaire was reinstated by the patients before the process of prosthetic rehabilitation was started. In the next stage, after receiving the prosthesis, after 6 weeks and then 12 weeks, the questionnaire was completed again.
Results: The mean score of the questionnaire before the treatment was 39.17, after the surgical stage, 41.47, six weeks after the delivery of the prosthesis 30.15 and 12 weeks after the delivery of the final prosthesis was 27.87. The average of the total scores varied in different stages, increasing between the first and second stages, and then decreasing further, and the difference between the mean of the total scores in these sections was significant (P < 0.0001). In other words, the quality of life associated with oral health in postoperative patients decreases somewhat and will increase significantly in post-delivery delivery of the final prosthesis.
Conclusion: In conclusion, an increase in quality of life was observed after the completion of prosthetic reconstruction in all domains of OHIP-14. The patients with prosthesis receiving more than three units generally have better results in physical scales.
- Oral health related quality of life
- dental prosthesis
- dental implants
How to Cite
References
Anbarserri NM, Ismail KM, Anbarserri H, Alanazi D, AlSaffan AD, Baseer MA, et al. Impact of severity of tooth loss on oral-health-related quality of life among dental patients. Journal of family medicine and primary care. 2020;9(1):187-91.
Atarbashi-Moghadam F, Atarbashi-Moghadam S, Kazemifard S, Sijanivandi S, Namdari M. Oral rehabilitation of Papillon-Lefèvre syndrome patients by dental implants: a systematic review. Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. 2020;46(4):220-7.
Pjetursson BE, Asgeirsson AG, Zwahlen M, Sailer I. Improvements in implant dentistry over the last decade: comparison of survival and complication rates in older and newer publications. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants. 2014;29 Suppl:308-24.
Batista M, Bonachela W, Soares J. Progressive recovery of osseoperception as a function of the combination of implant-supported prostheses. Clinical oral implants research. 2008;19(6):565-9.
Jenei Á, Sándor J, Hegedűs C, Bágyi K, Nagy L, Kiss C, et al. Oral health-related quality of life after prosthetic rehabilitation: a longitudinal study with the OHIP questionnaire. Health and quality of life outcomes. 2015;13:99.
Sheiham A. Oral health, general health and quality of life. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2005;83(9):644.
Naito M, Yuasa H, Nomura Y, Nakayama T, Hamajima N, Hanada N. Oral health status and health-related quality of life: a systematic review. Journal of oral science. 2006;48(1):1-7.
Schiegnitz E, Kämmerer PW, Sagheb K, Wendt AJ, Pabst A, Al-Nawas B, et al. Impact of maxillary sinus augmentation on oral health-related quality of life. International journal of implant dentistry. 2017;3(1):10.
Motallebnejad M, Hadian H, Mehdizadeh S, Hajiahmadi M. Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the oral health impact profile (OHIP)-14. Caspian journal of internal medicine. 2011;2(4):314-20.
Helsinki WMADo. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine. 2001;8(3):221-3.
Saimadhavi N, Raju MAKV, Reddy R, Ramesh T, Tabassum D, Ramya K. Impact of oral diseases on quality of life in subjects attending out-patient department of a dental hospital, India. Journal of Orofacial Sciences. 2013;5(1):27-31.
Gates WD, 3rd, Cooper LF, Sanders AE, Reside GJ, De Kok IJ. The effect of implant-supported removable partial dentures on oral health quality of life. Clinical oral implants research. 2014;25(2):207-13.
Peršić S, Ćelić R, Vojvodić D, Petričević N, Kranjčić J, Zlatarić DK, et al. Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Different Types of Mandibular Implant Overdentures in Function Longer Than 3 Years. The International journal of prosthodontics. 2016;29(1):28-30.
Alzarea BK. Assessment and Evaluation of Quality of Life (OHRQoL) of Patients with Dental Implants Using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) - A Clinical Study. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR. 2016;10(4):Zc57-60.
Zhang L, Lyu C, Shang Z, Niu A, Liang X. Quality of Life of Implant-Supported Overdenture and Conventional Complete Denture in Restoring the Edentulous Mandible: A Systematic Review. Implant dentistry. 2017;26(6):945-50.
Reissmann DR, Dard M, Lamprecht R, Struppek J, Heydecke G. Oral health-related quality of life in subjects with implant-supported prostheses: A systematic review. Journal of dentistry. 2017;65:22-40.
Yoshida T, Masaki C, Komai H, Misumi S, Mukaibo T, Kondo Y, et al. Changes in oral health-related quality of life during implant treatment in partially edentulous patients: A prospective study. Journal of prosthodontic research. 2016;60(4):258-64.
Beresford D, Klineberg I. A Within-Subject Comparison of Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life Between a Two-Implant Overdenture and a Three-Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prosthesis in the Mandible. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants. 2018;33(6):1374-82.
- Abstract Viewed: 224 times
- PDF Downloaded: 101 times