Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciecnes
  • Register
  • Login

Regeneration, Reconstruction & Restoration (Triple R)

  • Home
  • Journal Info
    • About the Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Privacy Statement
    • Journal History
  • Issues
    • Current
    • Archives
  • Publication Ethics
  • Journal Policies
    • Licensing
    • Copyright
    • Archiving
    • Repository
    • Pre-Print
    • Reviewing Policy
    • Plagirism Checking
    • Using Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Article Processing Charge (APC)
  • Guidelines
    • Guidelines for Authors
    • Guidelines for Reviewers
    • Files for Submission
  • Submit
  • Contact Us
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 9 (2024)
  4. Original/Research Article

Vol. 9 (2024)

Dey 2024

Effectiveness of Ibuprofen versus Novafen in Reducing Pain after Molar Extractions Novafen versus Iboprofen after Molar Extraction

  • Mehdi Taghian
  • Mohadeseh Heidari
  • Jamshid Yazadani
  • Tohid Arian
  • Melika Mollaei
  • Amirreza Tabarestani
  • Leyli Sadri

Regeneration, Reconstruction & Restoration (Triple R), Vol. 9 (2024), 1 Dey 2024
https://doi.org/10.22037/rrr.v9.44511 Published: 2024-12-31

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Background and objectives: Tooth extraction is often associated with pain and discomfort for patients. There are still controversies over the proper painkiller with minimum side effects to be prescribed after extractions. Therefore, the current study aims to compare the pain-relieving effect of Novafen versus Ibuprofen after maxillary and mandibular molar extractions.

Materials and methods: The present cohort study consisted of 80 healthy individuals who were candidates for extraction of their molar teeth under local anesthesia. Patients were randomly divided into two groups (N = 40) and were instructed to use Novafen or Ibuprofen, respectively, every 6 hours post-extraction. Pain assessment was conducted using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Data analysis was performed using SPSS v25. The Chi square test was performed for qualitative and t-tests for quantitative variables. Pain relief times were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression, with hazard ratios assessing differences between the two drugs.

Results: The findings revealed that both medications affected similarly up to 12 hours post-treatment; however, Novafen exhibited a shorter time to pain relief than Ibuprofen after 12 hours. Thus, Novafen demonstrated a significantly faster time to pain relief than Ibuprofen (P < 0.005). Moreover, the hazard ratio for the analgesic effect of Novafen relative to Ibuprofen was 2.55, indicating that Novafen has a shorter time to pain relief than Ibuprofen (P < 0.002).

Conclusion: Both Novafen and Ibuprofen are effective in reducing pain after molar extractions; however, Novafen can be a more reliable choice in reducing pain and discomfort.

Keywords:
  • Molar Extraction, Dental Pain, Painkiller, Gelofen, Novafen
  • PDF

How to Cite

1.
Taghian M, Heidari M, Yazadani J, Arian T, Mollaei M, Tabarestani A, et al. Effectiveness of Ibuprofen versus Novafen in Reducing Pain after Molar Extractions: Novafen versus Iboprofen after Molar Extraction . Regen Reconstr Restor [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 31 [cited 2026 Jul. 7];9. Available from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/tripleR/article/view/44511
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

Nosrati K, Baradaran M, Habibi Savadkoohi M. Analgesic effect of Acetaminophen and Ibuprofen in pain relief after extraction of mandibular first molar. Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences. 2004;6(5):35-9.

Sweetman S. Martindale: The complete drug reference. Pharmaceutical Press: London; 2007. p 1093. Goodman and Gilmans The Phamacological basis of therapeutics, 11th edition, Chicago New York MCG Raw-Hill medical publishing division. 2006:284.

Forster J, Burnett D, Muse W, Matson K, Crouse C, Mioduszewski R, et al. 1. Taylor, P. Anticholinesterase Agents. In Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, Limbird, LE, Hardman, JG, Eds.; McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing Division: New York, NY, 2006; pp 201-216. 2. Lander, F; Lings, S. Variation in plasma cholinesterase activity among greenhouse workers, fruitgrowers and slaughtermen. Br. J. Ind. Med. 1991, 48, pp 164-166. I it EDGEWOOD. 2010:69.

Mehrvarzfar P, Abbott P, Saghiri MA, Delvarani A, Asgar K, Lotfi M, et al. Effects of three oral analgesics on postoperative pain following root canal preparation: a controlled clinical trial. International endodontic journal. 2012;45(1):76-82.

Wisher D. Martindale: The Complete Drug Reference. 37th ed. J Med Libr Assoc. 2012 Jan;100(1):75–6. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.100.1.018

Arak I. Effect of Caffeine on Blood Pressure during Resistance Exercise in Sedentary Healthy Male. Journal of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences. 2014;14(1):79-87.

Diamond S, Freitag FG. The use of ibuprofen plus caffeine to treat tension-type headache. Current pain and headache reports. 2001;5(5):472-8.

Weiser T, Richter E, Hegewisch A, Muse DD, Lange R. Efficacy and safety of a fixed‐dose combination of ibuprofen and caffeine in the management of moderate to severe dental pain after third molar extraction. European Journal of Pain. 2018 Jan;22(1):28-38.

Dejkam SM, Kashefienejad M, Mirzaeerad S, Moghadamnia A, Gholinia H. Evaluation of pretreatment with Ibuprofen and novafen on pain relief after endodontic treatment; A double-blind randomized clinical trial study. Caspian Journal of Dental Research. 2015;4(1):37-42.

Gogulanathan M, Elavenil P, Gnanam A, Raja VK. Evaluation of fibrin sealant as a wound closure agent in mandibular third molar surgery—a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2015;44(7):871-5.

Craig RM, Wescott WB, Correll R. A well-defined coronal radiolucent area involving an impacted third molar. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939). 1984;109(4):612-3.

Kashefimehr A, Babaloo A, Ghanizadeh M, Ghasemi S, Mollazadeh H. Effect of prophylactic administration of Novafen for periodontal surgery on postoperative pain relief. Journal of medicine and life. 2017;10(2):127.

Atkinson HC, Currie J, Moodie J, Carson S, Evans S, Worthington JP, et al. Combination paracetamol and Ibuprofen for pain relief after oral surgery: a dose ranging study. European journal of clinical pharmacology. 2015;71:579-87.

Pahlavani Z, Eghbalian F, Zeraati F, Torabikhah Z. Comparative Study of Acetaminophen, Ibuprofen and Combination Effects for Pain Relief Following Tooth Extraction in Children under Local Anesthesia. Avicenna Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2012;18(4):5-9.

Merry A, Gibbs R, Edwards J, Ting G, Frampton C, Davies E, et al. Combined acetaminophen and Ibuprofen for pain relief after oral surgery in adults: a randomized controlled trial. British journal of anaesthesia. 2010;104(1):80-8.

Gazal G, Mackie IC. A comparison of paracetamol, Ibuprofen or their combination for pain relief following extractions in children under general anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2007;17(3):169-77.

  • Abstract Viewed: 499 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 1210 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Developed By

Open Journal Systems

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

This work is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International.

Powered by OJSPlus