International Clinical Neuroscience Journal

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2015)

The Spine Vertebral Bodies 3D Modeling and its Biomechanical Advantages

International Clinical Neuroscience Journal, Vol. 2 No. 1 (2015), 3 March 2015 , Page 23-25
https://doi.org/10.22037/icnj.v2i1.8172

Abstract

To perform an accurate approach to the spine specially for fracture stabilization a 3D model of spine surgical region may improve this mechanism and it can help the surgeon to have a deeper glance to this scenario. The pre-op planning facility is another advantage of the patient spine specific model to take a chance of making guides to direct pedicle screws safely and increase the pathomechanics of volumes of interest stability factor parallel with its mobility restoration. There are some algorithms for making 3D-reconstruction from CT or MR data-set but the main goal of in-vivo component 3D making is right component extraction from its peripheral segments to achieve the best judgment especially about the surgical approach. Here is a cervical vertebral bodies segmentation and 3D-reconstruction of two cervical adjacent levels combined with the registration process that is shown the intervertebral degree regarding to range of motion percent.

Keywords:
  • Spine
  • Vertebral Body
  • Registration
  • Fluoroscopy

How to Cite

1.
Saveh A, Zali A, Ashrafi F, Shahzadi S, Seddighi A, Momenzadeh S, et al. The Spine Vertebral Bodies 3D Modeling and its Biomechanical Advantages. Int Clin Neurosci J [Internet]. 2015 Feb. 26 [cited 2026 Jul. 25];2(1):23-5. Available from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/neuroscience/article/view/8172

References

Bogduk N, Mercer S. Biomechanics of the cervical spine. I: Normal kinematics. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2000 Nov;15(9):633-48.

Bifulco P; Cesarelli M; Cerciello T; Romano M. A continuous description of intervertebral motion by means of spline interpolation of kinematic data extracted by videofluoroscopy. J Biomech 2012 Feb 23;45(4):634-41.

Anderst WJ, Donaldson WF 3rd, Lee JY, Kang JD. Continuous cervical spine kinematics during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension. Spine J. 2014 Jul 1;14(7):1221-7.

Tsang SM, Szeto GP, Lee RY. Normal kinematics of the neck: the interplay between the cervical and thoracic spines. Man Ther. 2013 Oct;18(5):431-7.

Barrey C, Champain S, Campana S, Ramadan A, Perrin G, Skalli W. Sagittal alignment and kinematics at instrumented and adjacent levels after total disc replacement in the cervical spine. Eur Spine J. 2012 Aug;21(8):1648-59.

Bohrer SP, Chen YM, Sayers DG. Cervical spine flexion patterns. Skeletal Radiol. 1990;19(7):521-5.

Dugailly PM, Sobczak S, Sholukha V, Van Sint Jan S, Salvia P, Feipel V, et al. In vitro 3D-kinematics of the upper cervical spine: helical axis and simulation for axial rotation and flexion extension. Surg Radiol Anat. 2010 Feb;32(2):141-51.

Richter M, Wilke HJ, Kluger P, Claes L, Puhl W. Load-displacement properties of the normal and injured lower cervical spine in vitro. Eur Spine J. 2000 Apr;9(2):104-8.

Anderst WJ, Donaldson WF, Lee JY, Kang JD. Cervical spine intervertebral kinematics with respect to the head are different during flexion and extension motions. J Biomech. 2013 May 31;46(8):1471-5.

Lin CC, Lu TW, Wang TM, Hsu CY, Hsu SJ, Shih TF. In vivo three-dimensional intervertebral kinematics of the subaxial cervical spine during seated axial rotation and lateral bending via a fluoroscopy-to-CT registration approach. J Biomech. 2014 Oct 17;47(13):3310-7.

  • Abstract Viewed: 380 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 266 times

Download Statastics