Beyond Collections: The Evolving Role of Medical Librarians in Research Data Management
Journal of Medical Library and Information Science,
Vol. 6 No. 6 (2025),
5 April 2025
,
Page 1-4
https://doi.org/10.22037/jmlis.v6i6.52444
Abstract
Contemporary scientific inquiry is firmly situated in the era of Big Data, characterized by an unprecedented growth in research data volumes. This data ecosystem encompasses a vast spectrum of inputs, ranging from clinical trials and longitudinal cohort studies to high-throughput genomic sequencing, medical imaging, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), and outputs derived from emerging artificial intelligence technologies (1). Yet, amidst this surge, the critical challenge lies not merely in data generation, but in its optimal management.
Research data are increasingly recognized as independent, primary scholarly outputs. When curated effectively, these assets become FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable), enabling seamless sharing, secondary analysis, and integration into future research endeavors (2-4). Furthermore, the systematic reuse of research data significantly enhances scientific efficiency by reducing redundant data collection, thereby saving time, effort, and financial resources (5, 6). It is precisely these benefits that have propelled Research Data Management (RDM) to the forefront of strategic priorities in recent decades (2, 7).
In essence, RDM is an integral component of the research lifecycle, extending from initial project planning through post-project archival, sharing, and eventual disposition (8, 9). The RDM framework encompasses a holistic set of activities: Data planning, documentation, secure storage, access control, long-term preservation, and the facilitation of data reuse (10-12). Technological advancements have now enabled the collection, storage, and cross-disciplinary analysis of scientific data at a global scale. Consequently, governments, funding agencies, and publishers are increasingly mandating comprehensive Data Management Plans (DMPs) and the implementation of Open Data policies (4).
In this landscape, rigorous RDM is indispensable for ensuring research transparency, data integrity, and the continuous advancement of knowledge. Sound data management practices not only facilitate the verification of research findings—thereby accelerating scientific progress—but also ensure that data are accurately documented, organized, and archived for future utility. Ultimately, when implemented effectively, RDM serves as a cornerstone for improving data quality and fostering robust collaboration across institutions, research groups, and individual investigators. By mitigating the risks of data loss and minimizing redundant efforts, high-quality RDM acts as a catalyst for a more efficient and collaborative global research enterprise (13-15).
Libraries and research institutions serve as the fundamental pillars of research support, possessing invaluable expertise in the organization, preservation, control, and curation of information (16). As the prominence of RDM continues to escalate, the field of Library and Information Science (LIS) is witnessing the emergence of transformative professional opportunities (17-21). Consequently, libraries are progressively expanding their service portfolios to meet the rigorous demands of RDM, increasingly viewing this integration as a cornerstone of their future institutional roles (22, 23).
To facilitate this transition, organizations such as the Medical Library Association (MLA) have sought to empower librarians through specialized data services training. These pedagogical initiatives enable librarians to acquire essential competencies in data collection, organization, evaluation, and dissemination, while simultaneously instilling a profound understanding of the ethical dimensions and best practices inherent in RDM (24). Furthermore, an increasing number of libraries have assumed the responsibility of providing critical guidance on data literacy (25).
Despite these global advancements, the specialized role of the “Data Librarian” has yet to be fully institutionalized in several contexts, including Iran. While existing literature has endeavored to delineate the necessary competencies and capabilities required for data librarians to contribute effectively to RDM (18, 19, 26-30), including the development of competency models specifically tailored for biomedical data management (31), there remains a significant gap between theoretical frameworks and professional practice.
Therefore, it is imperative that the findings of such studies be utilized by policymakers, academic planners, and strategic decision-makers to design both short-term and long-term curricular interventions. Such efforts should focus on revising Medical Library and Information Science curricula to specifically cultivate the next generation of data librarians. Moreover, research centers and academic organizations, at both micro and macro levels, should adopt these established competency models as benchmarks to assess the proficiency of their staff and to facilitate the recruitment of qualified data professionals.
Given the burgeoning importance of RDM, we strongly advocate that the human resource frameworks within the Ministry of Health and Medical Education be modernized. By adopting the data librarian competency models (31), the Ministry should not only facilitate the recruitment of PhD holders in Medical Library and Information Science into research-oriented faculty positions but also formally establish dedicated “Data Librarian” job descriptions within medical research centers and health science organizations. Such structural reforms are essential to fortify the research infrastructure and ensure the sustainable management of scientific knowledge.
- Data librarian
- Research librarian
- Research data management
How to Cite
References
1. Luo J, Wu M, Gopukumar D, Zhao Y. Big Data Application in Biomedical Research and Health Care: A Literature Review. Biomed Inform Insights. 2016;8:1-10. doi: 10.4137/BII.S31559
2. Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A, et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data. 2016;3:160018. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
3. Borgman CL. The conundrum of sharing research data. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 2012; 63:1059–1078. doi: 10.1002/asi.22634
4. Tenopir C, Talja S, Horstmann W, Late E, Hughes D, Pollock DE, et al. Research data services in European academic research libraries. Lib Q. 2017;27(1):23–44. doi: 10.18352/lq.10180
5. Sielemann K, Hafner A, Pucker B. The reuse of public datasets in the life sciences: potential risks and rewards. PeerJ. 2020;8:e9954. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9954
6. Scorrano M. The effect of Open Data on cost savings. In: Apartis S, Catalano G, Consiglio G, Costas R, Delugas E, Rosnay MD de, et al. editors. Open Science Impact Indicator Handbook [book on the Internet]. Zenodo [cited 2025 Sep 26]. Available from: https://handbook.pathosproject.eu/sections/0_causality/open_data_citation_advantage.html
7. Tenopir C, Allard S, Douglass K, Aydinoglu AU, Wu L, Read E, Manoff M, Frame M. Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
8. Kanza S, Knight NJ. Behind every great research project is great data management. BMC Res Notes. 2022;15(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-05908-5
9. Willoughby C, Frey JG. Data management matters. Digit Discov 2022;1:183–194. doi: 10.1039/D1DD00046B
10. Hickson S, Poulton KA, Connor M, Richardson J, Wolski M. Modifying researchers’ data management practices: A behavioural framework for library practitioners. IFLA journals [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2025 Sep 26]; 42(4):253–65. Available from: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5816694&info=resumen&idioma=ENG
11. Cox AM, Pinfield S. Research data management and libraries: Current activities and future priorities. J Librariansh Inf Sci. 2014;46:299–316. doi: 10.1177/0961000613492542
12. Corti L, Eynden V Van den, Bishop L, Woollard M.. Managing and sharing research data: A guide to good practice. [book on the Internet]. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2020. doi: 10.4135/9781526482419
13. Kahn M, Higgs R, Davidson J, Jones S. Research Data Management in South Africa: How We Shape Up. Aust Acad Res Libr. 2014;45(4):296–308. doi: 10.1080/00048623.2014.951910
14. Curdt C, Hoffmeister D. Research data management services for a multidisciplinary, collaborative research projectDesign and implementation of the TR32DB project database. Progr Electron Libr Inf Syst. 2015;49(4):494–512. doi: 10.1108/PROG-02-2015-0016
15. Cunha-Oliveira T, Ioannidis JPA, Oliveira PJ. Best practices for data management and sharing in experimental biomedical research. Physiol Rev. 2024;104(3):1387-1408. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00043.2023
16. Soleymani N, Mansouri A, Shabani A, Seyadat A. Components of Research Data Management (RDM) in Academic Libraries. Librariansh Inf Organ Stud. 2022;33(1):20–39. doi: 10.30484/NASTINFO.2022.3125.2126. [In Persian].
17. Davidson J, Jones S, Molloy L, Kjser U. Emerging Good Practice in Managing Research Data and Research Information within UK Universities. Procedia Comput Sci. 2014;33:215–222. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2014.06.035
18. Koltay T. Accepted and Emerging Roles of Academic Libraries in Supporting Research. J Acad Librariansh 2019;45:75–80. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2019.01.001
19. Federer L. Defining data librarianship: A survey of competencies, skills, and training. J Med Libr Assoc. 2018;106:294–303. doi: 10.5195/JMLA.2018.306
20. Sheikh A, Malik A, Adnan R. Evolution of research data management in academic libraries: A review of the literature. Inf Dev. 2023;1–15. doi: 10.1177/02666669231157405
21. Ashiq M, Warraich NF. Librarian’s perception on data librarianship core concepts: A survey of motivational factors, challenges, skills and appropriate trainings platforms. Libr Hi Tech. 2024;42:849–866. doi: 10.1108/LHT-12-2021-0487
22. Ritchie A, Kuusniemi ME. Developing Research Data Management Practices at a University Hospital Library in Australia–An International Collaborative Project. InKnowledge, Research, Innovation... eHealth 15th EAHIL Conference 2016 Jun (pp. 6-11). [conference proceeding on the Internet]. 15th Eahil Conference 06-11 June 2016 – Seville, Spain. [cited 2025 Sep 16]; Available from: https://www.bvsspa.es/eahil2016/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/E6.pdf
23. Read KB, Koos J, Miller RS, Miller C, Phillips G, Scheinfeld L, et al. A model for initiating research data management services at academic libraries. J Med Libr Assoc. 2019;107:432–441. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2020.947
24. Data Services Specialization (DSS) | NNLM [Internet]. [cited 2025 Sep 26]. Available from: https://www.nnlm.gov/training/specialization/data-services-specialization
25. Federer L, Lu Y, Joubert D. Data literacy training needs of biomedical researchers. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016;104: 52–57. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.104.1.008
26. Ehteshami Z, Shahbodaghi A, Mansourzadeh MJ. expected competencies and capabilities of data librarians in research data management according to the harvard biomedical data life cycle: A scoping review. Payavard Salamat [Internet]. 2024 Nov 10 [cited 2025 Sep 26]; 18(5):502–19. Available from: http://payavard.tums.ac.ir/article-1-7805-en.html. [In Persian].
27. Federer L, Foster ED, Glusker A, Henderson M, Read K, Zhao S . The medical library association data services competency: A framework for data science and open science skills development. J Med Libr Assoc. 2020;108:304–309. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2020.909
28. Ashiq M, Warraich N. A systematized review on data librarianship literature: Current services, challenges, skills, and motivational factors. J Librariansh Inf Sci. 2022;55:1–20. doi: 10.1177/09610006221083675
29. Brochu L, Burns J. Librarians and Research Data Management–A Literature Review: Commentary from a Senior Professional and a New Professional Librarian. New Rev Acad Librariansh. 2019;25:49–58. doi: 10.1080/13614533.2018.1501715
30. Ruttenberg J, Shearer K.. Librarian competencies in support of research data management, scholarly communication, open access. Association of Research Libraries—ARL News [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2025 Sep 26]. Available from: https://www.arl.org/news/librarian-competencies-in-support-of-research-data-management-scholarly-communication-open access/
31. Ehteshami Z. Developing the research librarian model with an emphasis on its role in medical research data management based on the Harvard biomedical data life-cycle. [Thesis]. Iran: Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, 1403. [In Persian].
- Abstract Viewed: 49 times
- e78 (PDF) Downloaded: 24 times
