Authorship Characteristics and Scientometric Indicators of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Iran on Psychiatry
Journal of Medical Library and Information Science,
Vol. 5 No. 5 (2024),
8 January 2024
,
Page 1-17
https://doi.org/10.22037/jmlis.v5i.46063
Abstract
Introduction: Systematic review and meta-analysis articles are some of the most important sources for generating evidence in all medical science fields, including psychiatry. This study investigates the authorship characteristics and scientometric indicators of the sources of publishing systematic review and meta-analysis articles of Iran on psychiatry.
Methods: The present study used qualitative content analysis and scientometric methods. The research community included 206 systematic reviews and meta-analysis articles of Iran on psychiatry published in Scopus in 2021. Authorship characteristics, publication sources, and scientometric indicators of the publication sources of these articles were the things that were investigated. Data analysis was done with the help of Excel software and Scopus analysis facilities.
Results: The study revealed that the subject of 10.6% of the articles was depression and depressive disorder. 25.25% of the articles had between one and three authors, and 74.75% had more than three authors. In most articles, an Iranian was responsible author (85.9%) and first author (90.3%). The authors mainly were affiliated with Iran University of Medical Sciences and Tehran University of Medical Sciences. The first authors of articles were mostly affiliated with Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. The Swiss journal Frontiers in Psychiatry was ranked first among the most productive publishing sources. United Kingdom had the most publications of articles among the countries. Among the sources of publishing articles, the Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology Journal of United Kingdom had the highest number of scientific indicators.
Conclusion: Depression and depressive disorders accounted for the most significant percentage of the subjects of the articles. More than half of the articles were favorable regarding the number of authors on the research team. The scientometric indicators of the sources of publishing articles were not favorable, and they need more attention from those in charge.
- Systematic review
- Meta-analysis
- Psychiatry
- Authorship characteristics
- Scopus
- Scientometrics
- Iran
How to Cite
References
1. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Am Psychiatric Assoc. 2013;21(21):591-643. [Internet]. 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013 [cited 2024 Feb 18]. Available from: https://repository.poltekkes-kaltim.ac.id/657/1/Diagnostic%20and%20statistical%20manual%20of%20mental%20disorders%20_%20DSM-5%20(%20PDFDrive.com%20).pdf
2. Mental health [Internet]. World Health Organization. 2024 [cited 2024 Feb 18]. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/mental-health#tab=tab_2
3. Wu Y, Duan Z. Analysis on evolution and research focus in psychiatry field. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15:105. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0482-1
4. National Centre for Biotechnology Information [Internet]. National Library of Medicine. [cited 2024 Feb 18]. Medical Subject Headings: psychiatry. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/68011570
5. National Health System {Internet]. Crown [cited 2024 Feb 18]. Psychiatry. Available from: https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/talking-therapies-medicine-treatments/medicines-and-psychiatry/psychiatry/
6. Gray GE, Pinson LA. Evidence-based medicine and psychiatric practice. Psychiatr Q. 2003;74(4):387-399. doi: 10.1023/a:1026091611425
7. Gopalakrishnan S, Ganeshkumar P. Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis: Understanding the Best Evidence in Primary Healthcare. J Family Med Prim Care. 2013;2(1):9-14. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.109934
8. Myung SK. How to review and assess a systematic review and meta-analysis article: a methodological study (secondary publication). J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2023;20:24. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.24
9. Muka T, Glisic M, Milic J, Verhoog S, Bohlius J, Bramer W, et al. A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020;35(1):49–60. doi: 10.1007/s10654-019-00576-5
10. Urra Medina E, Barría Pailaquilén RM. Systematic review and its relationship with evidence-based practice in health. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2010;18(4):824-831. doi: 10.1590/s0104-11692010000400023
11. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372(71):1–8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71
12. Julian PT, Higgins SG. The Cochrane Collaboration [Internet]. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. [cited 2024 Aug 13]. Available from: https://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/
13. Dalili Sale M, Ziaee S. The role of librarians and Librarianship in the meta-analysis and meta-analysis studies. J Inf Syst Serv [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2024 Feb 18]; 5(3,4):55–67. Available from: https://sanad.iau.ir/en/Article/827996. [In Persian].
14. Nath A, Jana S. A scientometric review of global altmetrics research. Sci Technol Libr. 2021;40(3):325–340. doi: 10.1080/0194262X.2021.1918607
15. Dehghanbanadaki H, Khademsharif M, Aazami H, Azimi A. 32-Year scientometric analysis of the medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020;34:1. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.34.1
16. Jamali J, Dehghani M, AfzalAghaee M. Quality of journal of obstetrics and gynecology in ISI and Scopus databases based on indices of ranking journals. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil. 2014;17(108):9–20. doi: 10.22038/ijogi.2014.3175. [In Persian].
17. Jamali J, Salehi-Marzijarani M, Ayatollahi SM. Factors affecting journal quality indicator in Scopus (SCImago Journal Rank) in obstetrics and gynecology journals: A longitudinal study (1999-2013). Acta Inform Med. 2014;22(6):385-388. doi: 10.5455/aim.2014.22.385-38
18. Asareh F, Heydari G, Haji Zeinolabedini M, Horri A, Fraashbandi Zare F. From bibliometrics to webometrics: An analysis of fundamentals, perspectives, rules and indicators. Tehran: Librarian; 2013.
19. ELSSEVIER [Internet]. Scopus Sources. [cited 2024 Aug 03]. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/sources.uri
20. ELSEVIER [Internet]. CiteScore Metrics. [cited 2024 Aug 03]. Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/products/scopus/metrics/citescore
21. Elsevier [Internet]. CiteScoreTM metrics you can verify and trust. [cited 2024 Sep 02]. Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/products/scopus/metrics/citescore
22. SCImago Journal & Country Rank [Internet]. SJR Score. [cited 2024 Sep 02]. Available from: https://www.scimagojr.com/help.php#rank_journals
23. ELSEVIER [Internet]. Scopus Journals-level metrics. [cited 2024 Sep 02]. Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/products/scopus/metrics
24. Zhang N, Yan P, Feng L, Chu X, Li J, Li J, et al. Top 100 most-cited original articles, systematic reviews/meta-analyses in robotic surgery: A scientometric study. Asian J Surg. 2022;45(1):8–14. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.04.002
25. Hatami Yadegari M. Scientometric study of systematic review and meta-analysis of Iran in the field of medicine and related sciences indexing the database Web of Science. [Thesis]. Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences; 2022.
26. Wang Y, Wang C, Zheng L. Bibliometric analysis of systematic review and meta-analysis on diabetic foot ulcer. Heliyon. 2024;10(6):e27534. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e2753
27. Shahbodaghi A, Shekofteh M. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Articles of Iran Indexed in Scopus: Scientometric Indicators and Authorship Characteristics. Payavard [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Sep 02]; 17(6):518–530. Available from: http://payavard.tums.ac.ir/article-1-7603-en.html. [in Persian].
28. Stojic S, Minder B, Boehl G, Rivero T, Zwahlen M, Gemperli A, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis use in the field of spinal cord injury research: A bibliometric analysis. J Spinal Cord Med. 2023:1-11. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2023.2251205
29. Shadi S, Asadi S, Nourmohammadi H. The assessment of Iranian systematic review articles in biomedical sciences based on the scientometrics methods. Heal Inf Manag. 2019;16(5):260–266. doi: 0.22122/him.v16i5.3971. [in Persian].
30. Vaziri E, Feizabadi M. Scientometrics study of the Iranian medical sciences systhematic reviews. Sci Res J. 2017;3(2):83–96. doi: 10.22070/rsci.2017.511. [in Persian].
31. Wu Y, Duan Z. Visualization analysis of author collaborations in schizophrenia research. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15:27. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0407-z
32. Wu Y, Jin X, Xue Y. Evaluation of research topic evolution in psychiatry using co-word analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(25):e7349. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007349
33. Naveed S, Waqas A, Majeed S, Zeshan M, Jahan N, Haaris Sheikh M. Child psychiatry: A scientometric analysis 1980-2016. F1000Res. 2017;6:1293. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.12069.1
34. Depressive disorder (depression) [Internet]. World Health Organization. [cited 2024 Jul 16]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/depression
35. Amin-Esmaeili M, Shadloo B, Rahimi-Movaghar A, Samimi Ardestani SM, Hajebi A, Khatibzadeh S, et al. Major depressive disorder in Iran: Epidemiology, health care provision, utilization, and challenges. Arch Iran Med. 2022;25(5):329-338. doi: 10.34172/aim.2022.54
36. Lasserson TJ, Thomas J, Higgins JP. Starting a review. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2019;1-2. doi: /10.1002/9781119536604.ch1
37. Phillips V, Barker E. Systematic reviews: Structure, form and content. J Perioper Pract. 2021;31(9):349-353. doi: 10.1177/1750458921994693
38. Teixeira da Silva JA, Dobránszki J. Multiple authorship in scientific manuscripts: Ethical challenges, ghost and guest/gift authorship, and the cultural/disciplinary perspective. Sci Eng Ethics [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2024Nov 10]; 22(5):1457–172. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11948-015-9716-3
39. Karambakhsh A, Salesi M. The review of the scientific productions of Iran in the field of military psychology and psychiatry on the Scopus database: A scientometric study by 2018. J Mil Med [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2024Nov 10]; 21(6):557–566. Available from: https://militarymedj.bmsu.ac.ir/article_1000857.html?lang=en. [in Persian].
40. Rezaei-Ghaleh N, Siadat F, Azizi FE. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of Iranian biomedical publications in international journals between 1992 and 2002 according to their Impact Factor. Res Med [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2024Nov 10]; 27(2):139–143. Available from: http://pejouhesh.sbmu.ac.ir/article-1-194-en.html. [in Persian].
41. Ministry of Health and Medical Education [Internet]. Scientific-research rated publications. [cited 2024 Jul 30]. Available from: https://rsf.research.ac.ir/Index.php?itemId=104
42. Jahanbani A, Eskandari Roozbahani N. Pathology of Persian-Language Scientific Journals. J Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci. 2022; 21 (7) :795-798. doi: 10.52547/jrums.21.7.795
43. SCImago Journal & Country Rank [Internet]. Highest SJR score in Psychiatry and Mental Health. [cited 2024 Jul 16]. Available from: https://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?area=2700&year=2021&category=2738
44. SCImago Journal & Country Rank [Internet]. Highest score of citescore and SNIP in psychiatry and mental HealthClose. [cited 2024 Jul 16]. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/sources.uri
- Abstract Viewed: 223 times
- e61 (PDF) Downloaded: 269 times
