Journal of Medical Library and Information Science

O’Shea M. A series of case studies to enhance the social utility of RSS [Internet]. Birkbeck, University of London; 2016. Available from: https://www.dcs.bbk.ac.uk/site/assets/files/1025/moshea.pdf

O’Shea M, Levene M. Mining and visualising information from RSS feeds: A case study. Int J Web Inf Syst. 2011;7:105–129. doi: 10.1108/17440081111141763

Al-Aufi A, Fulton C. Impact of social networking tools on scholarly communication: A cross-institutional study. Electron Libr. 2015;33(2):224–241. doi:10.1108/EL-05-2013-0093

Shrivastava R, Mahajan P. Influence of social networking sites on scholarly communication: A study using literature in Artificial Intelligence. J Librariansh Inf Sci. 2016. doi:10.1177/0961000616678309

Giglia E. Academic social networks: it’s time to change the way we do research. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011;47(2):345–349. Available from: https://core.ac.uk/reader/11888450

Codina L. Science 2.0: Social networks and online applications for scholars. Hipertext net [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2020 Oct 10];7. Available from: https://www.upf.edu/hipertextnet/en/numero-7/ciencia-2-0.html

Home Feed | ResearchGate [Internet]. ResearchGate. [cited 2020 Oct 10]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/

Madhusudhan M. Use of social networking sites by research scholars of the University of Delhi: A study. Int Inf Libr Rev. 2012;44(2):100–113. doi:10.1080/10572317.2012.10762919

Gruzd A, Staves K, Wilk A. Connected scholars: Examining the role of social media in research practices of faculty using the UTAUT model. Comput Human Behav. 2012;28(6):2340–250. doi:10.1016/J.CHB.2012.07.004

Bullinger AC, Renken U, Moeslein KM. Understanding online collaboration technology adoption by researchers - a model and empirical study. In: International Conference on Information Systems 2011, ICIS 2011. [conference proceedings on the Internet]. Shanghai; 2011 [cited 2020 Oct 12]. p. 3094–3104. Available from: https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2011/proceedings/onlinecommunity/2/

Bullinger AC, Hallerstede SH, Renken U, Söldner J-H, Möslein KM. Towards research collaboration – a taxonomy of social research network sites. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems [conference proceedings on the Internet]. Lima, Peru, August 12-15, 2010 [cited 2020 Oct 12]. Limah; 2010. Available from: https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2010/92/

Ali MY, Richardson J. Pakistani LIS scholars’ altmetrics in ResearchGate. Progr Electron Libr Inf Syst. 2017;51(2):152–169. doi:10.1108/PROG-07-2016-0052

Janmohammadi M, Rahmani M, Rootan Z. Review of RG indices And Ranking of Researchers in Research Gate: Case Study: Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran. In: International Interactive Information Retrieval Conference. [conference proceedings on the Internet] Tehran; 2017 [cited 2020 Oct 12]. p. 7. Available from: https://civilica.com/doc/572869/ [In Persian]

Asnafi A, Rahmani M, Roeentan Marjan Alimohammadi Z. RG Score compared with H-Index: An altmetrics study. 2018;4:61–76. doi:10.22091/stim.2018.3320.1224

Nikkar M, Alijani R, Ghazizadeh khalifeh mahaleh H. Investigation of the presence of surgery researchers in research gate scientific network: an altmetrics study. Iran J Surg [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 Oct 12]; 25(2):76–82. Available from: http://www.ijs.ir/library/upload/article/af_53833548%20Research%20Gate-Dr.%20Alijani%20%201981.pdf [In Persian]

NK S, K. SM. ResearchGate Profiles of Naval Architecture Scientists in India: An Altmetric Analysis. Libr Philos Pract [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Oct 10]. Available from: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/2305/

Shrivastava R, Mahajan P. An altmetric analysis of ResearchGate profiles of physics researchers: A study of University of Delhi (India). Perform Meas Metrics. 2017;18(1): 52-66. doi:10.1108/PMM-07-2016-0033

Joshi ND, Lieber B, Wong K, Al-Alam E, Agarwal N, Diaz V. Social Media in Neurosurgery: Using ResearchGate. World Neurosurg. 2019;127:e950–6. doi:10.1016/J.WNEU.2019.04.007

Ramezani A, Ghazimirsaeed S, Papi A, YektaKooshali MH, Ramezani-Pakpour-Langeroudi F. Evaluation Altmetric Indicators of Iranian Medical Universities in Academic Social Networks: ResearchGate and Academia.edu. Knowl Inf Syst [Internet]. 2018[cited 2020 Oct 10];4:23–30. Available from: http://lib.journals.pnu.ac.ir/article_4802_50ba7cc0710f932fa845c0cae51fb021.pdf?lang=en [In Persian]

Hirsch JE, Buela-Casal G. The meaning of the h-index. Int J Clin Heal Psychol. 2014;14(2):161–164. doi:10.1016/S1697-2600(14)70050-X

Shrivastava R, Mahajan P. Relationship amongst ResearchGate altmetric indicators and Scopus bibliometric indicators: The case of Panjab University Chandigarh (India). New Libr World. 2015;116(9):564–577. doi:10.1108/NLW-03-2015-0017

Erfanmanesh M, Asnafi A, Arshadi H. Iranian universities and research institutions in the ResearchGate: An altmetric study. Q J Knowl Stud [Internet]. 2015[cited 2020 Oct 10];8(30):59–72. Available from: http://qje.iau-tnb.ac.ir/article_522156_9b46d875e138bbd659bcf01bdae48c7e.pdf [In Persian]

Khalili L. Participation of Iranian Medical Universities in ResearchGate. Heal Inf Manag [Internet]. 2016[cited 2020 Oct 12];13(4):273–279. Available from: http://him.mui.ac.ir/index.php/him/article/view/2726/3549 [In Persian]

Borrego Á. Institutional repositories versus ResearchGate: The depositing habits of Spanish researchers. Learn Publ. 2017;30(3):185–192. doi:10.1002/leap.1099.

Yu MC, Wu YCJ, Alhalabi W, Kao HY, Wu WH. ResearchGate: An effective altmetric indicator for active researchers? Comput Human Behav. 2016;55:1001–1006. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.007

Kraker P, Lex E. A Critical Look at the ResearchGate Score as a Measure of Scientific Reputation. In: ASCW’15 Workshop at Web Science 2015. 2015; p. 7–9. doi:10.5281/zenodo.35401

Jordan K. Exploring the ResearchGate score as an academic metric: Reflections and implications for practice. Quantifying Anal Sch Commun Web [Internet]. 2015[cited 2020 Oct 10]. Available from: http://oro.open.ac.uk/43538/

Copiello S, Bonifaci P. A few remarks on ResearchGate score and academic reputation. Scientometrics. 2018;114(1):301–306. doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2582-9

Orduna-Malea E, Martín-Martín A, Thelwall M, Delgado López-Cózar E. Do ResearchGate Scores create ghost academic reputations? Scientometrics. 2017;112(1):443–460. doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2396-9

Memon AR. ResearchGate is no longer reliable: Leniency towards ghost journals may decrease its impact on the scientific community. J Pak Med Assoc [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 Oct 10];66(12):1643–1647. Available from: https://www.jpma.org.pk/article-details/8019

Jamali HR. Copyright compliance and infringement in ResearchGate full-text journal articles. Scientometrics. 2017;112(1):241–254. doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2291-4

Mas-Bleda A, Thelwall M, Kousha K, Aguillo IF. Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social web? Scientometrics. 2014;101(1):337-356. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1345-0

Ortega JL. Relationship between altmetric and bibliometric indicators across academic social sites: The case of CSIC’s members. J Informetr. 2015;9(1). doi:10.1016/j.joi.2014.11.004

Davis P, Fromerth M. Does the arXiv lead to higher citations and reduced publisher downloads for mathematics articles? Scientometrics. 2007;71(2):203–215. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1661-8

Gargouri Y, Hajjem C, Larivière V, Gingras Y, Carr L, Brody T, et al. Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PLoS One [Internet]. 2010;5(10):e13636. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013636

Kousha K, Abdoli M. The citation impact of open access agricultural research: a comparison between OA and non-OA publications. Online Inf Rev. 2010;34(5):772–785. doi:10.1108/14684521011084618

Abbasi Z, Shekofteh M, Shahbodaghi A, Kazemi E. Citation indicators’ comparison of LIS open access and subscription publications based on Scopus. Glob Knowledge, Mem Commun [Internet]. 2019;68(4/5):288–299. doi:10.1108/GKMC-02-2018-0016

Ranking Methodology of Academic Ranking of World Universities - 2020 [Internet]. ShanghaiRanking Consultancy. 2020[cited 2020 Oct 10]. Available from: http://www.shanghairanking.com/Academic-Ranking-of-World-Universities-2020-Press-Release.html

OCallaghan C. QS World University Rankings by Subject 2020: Methodology [Internet]. QS Top Universities. 2020[cited 2020 Oct 10]. Available from: topuniversities.com/subject-rankings/methodology

Bothwell E, Baker S, Grove J. THE World University Rankings 2020: methodology [Internet]. Times Higher Education (THE). THE World Universities Insights Limited. 2019[cited 2020 Oct 10]. Available from: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/world-university-rankings-2020-methodology