Assessing Health-Related Quality of Life with Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy (APDT) and Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) after Third Molar Removal
Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences,
Vol. 4 No. 3 (2013),
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (APDT) and low level laser therapy (LLLT) on wound healing, pain intensity, swelling problems, halitosis and the postoperative usage of analgesics after surgical removal of lower third molars.
Methods: One hundred and fifty patients, randomly divided into three groups were selected (50 per each group). The P1 group received the APDT after a third molar surgery, the P2 group received the LLLT and the C group (control group) was without any additional therapy after surgery. A photoactive substance was applied in the APDT study group before suturing. After 60 seconds the photosensitive substance was thoroughly washed with saline water and the laser light was applied in two intervals (30 seconds each). The irradiation power was 50 mW while the wavelength was 660 nm. The laser therapy in P2 group was performed before suturing and the laser light was applied also in two intervals (90 seconds each), the irradiation power was 90 mW while the wavelength was the same as in the first group – 660 nm. Postoperative follow-ups were scheduled on the third and the seventh day in patients who received laser therapy.
Results: The results of the postoperative evaluation showed that there was a statistically significant difference in the postoperative wound healing, pain intensity, swelling problems, halitosis and analgesics intake between patients in all three groups (p<0.001). The patients that were subjected to APDT (P1) had the least postoperative problems. After the laser therapy (P1 and P2) wound healing was without any complications, opposite from the patients from the C group (p<0.001). Postoperative application of a laser therapy significantly reduced patient’s use of analgesics over the observed period of time (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Both modalities of laser therapy significantly reduced postoperative problems after surgical removal of third lower molars with the best results in both laser groups.
- low level laser therapy
- photodynamic therapy
- third molar extraction
- postoperative complications
- diode laser
How to Cite
Aimbire F, Albertini R, Pacheco MT, Castro-Faria-Neto HC, Leonardo PS, Iversen VV, et al. Low-level laser therapy induces dose-dependent reduction of TNFalpha levels in acute inflammation. Photomed Laser Surg 2006;24(1):33-7.
Lievens PC. The effect of a combined HeNe and IR laser treatment on the regeneration of the lymphatic system during the process of wound healing. Lasers Med Sci 1991; 6:193-9.
Meneguzzo DT, Pallotta RC, Marco RL, Penna SC, Ramos L, Teixeira SA et al. Near infrared laser therapy (810 nm) on lymph nodes: effects on acute inflammatory process. Photomed Laser Surg. 2009; 27(1):157.
Aras MH, Güngörmü M. The effect of low-level laser therapy on trismus and facial swelling following surgical extraction of a lower third molar. Photomed Laser Surg.2009;27(1):21-4.
Yamamoto Y, Kono T, Kotani H, Kasai S, Mito M, et al. Effect of low-power laser irradiation on procollagen synthesis in human fibroblasts. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 1996; 14(3):129-32.
Amat A, Rigau J, Nicolau R, Aalders M, Fenoll MR, van Gemert M, et al. Effect of red and near-infrared laser light on adenosine triphosphate (ATP) in the luciferineluciferase reaction. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem. 2004;168(1-2):59-65.
Huang YY, Chen AC, Carroll JD, Hamblin MR. Biphasic dose response in low level laser therapy. Dose Response. 2009; 7(4):358-83.
Chow RT, David MA, Armati PJ. 830 nm laser irradiation induces varicosity formation, reduces mitochondrial membrane potential and blocks fast axonal flow in small and medium diameter rat dorsal root ganglion neurons: implications for the analgesic effects of 830 nm laser. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2007; 12(1):28-39.
Montesinos M, et al. Experimental effects of low power laser in encephalin and endorphin synthesis. J Eur Med Laser Assoc. 1988;1(3):2-6.
Robert A. Principles and Practice of Laser dentistry. New York: Hospital Queens, Private Practice. 2010.
Karu TI, Ryabykh TP, Antonov SN. Different sensitivity of cells from tumor-bearing organisms to countinuouswave and pulsed laser radiation (632.8 nm) evaluated by chemiluminescence test. I. Comparison of responses of murine splenocytes: intact mice and mice with transplanted leukemia EL-4. Lasers Life Sci. 1996; 7(2):91-8.
Karu TI, Ryabykh TP, Antonov SN. Different sensitivity ofcells from tumor-bearing organisms to continuouswave and pulsed laser radiation (632.8 nm) evaluated by chemiluminescence test. II. Comparison of responses of human blood: healthy persons and patients with colon cancer. Lasers Life Sci. 1996; 7(2):99-106.
Karu TI, Ryabykh TP, Letokhov VS. Different sensitivity of cells from tumor-bearing organisms to continuouswave and pulsed laser radiation (632.8 nm) evaluated by chemiluminescence test. III. Effect of dark period between pulses. Lasers Life Sci. 1997; 7(3):141-56.
Poeschl PW, Eckel D, Poeschl E. Postoperative prophylactic antibiotic treatment in third molar surgery – a necessity? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62(1):3-8.
Savin J, Ogden GR. Third molar surgery – a preliminary report on aspects affecting quality of life in the early postoperative period. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;35(4):246-53.
McGrath C, Comfort MB, Lo EC, Luo Y. Changes in life quality following third molar surgery – the immediate postoperative period. Br Dent J. 2003;194(5):265-8.
López-Ramírez M, Vílchez-Pérez MA, Gargallo-Albiol J, Arnabat-Domínguez J, Gay-Escoda C. Efficacy of low-level laser therapy in the management of pain, facial swelling, and postoperative trismus after a lower third molar extraction. A preliminary study. Lasers Med Sci. 2012;27(3):559-66.
Braams JW, Stegenga B, Raghoebar GM, Roodenburg JL, van der Weele LT. Treatment with soft laser. [The effect on complaints after the removal of wisdom teeth in the mandible]. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 1994;101(3):100- 3.Dutch.
Wahl G, Bastänier S. [Soft laser in postoperative care in dentoalveolar treatment]. ZWR. 1991;100(8):512-5. German.
Tunér J, Hode L. It’s all in the parameters: a critical analysis of some well-known negative studies on low-level laser therapy. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 1998;16(5):245–8.
Pandurić DG, Brozović J, Sušić M, Katanec D, Bego K, Kobler P. Assessing health-related quality of life outcomes after the surgical removal of a mandibular third molar. Coll Antropol. 2009; 33(2):437-47.
Gbotolorun OM, Olojede AC, Arotiba GT, Ladeinde AL, Akinwande JA, Bamgbose BO. Impacted mandibular third molars: presentation and postoperative complications at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital. Nig Q J Hosp Med. 2007;17(1):26-9.
Mattiello FD, Coelho AA, Martins OP, Mattiello RD, Ferrão Júnior JP. In vitro effect of photodynamic therapy on aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Streptococcus sanguinis. Braz Dent J. 2011; 22(5):398- 403.
Marković AB, Todorović L. Postoperative analgesia after lower third molar surgery: contribution of the use of long-acting local anesthetics, low-power laser, and diclofenac. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006; 102(5):e4-8.
Aras MH, Güngörmüş M. Placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of the effect two different low-level laser therapies (LLLT)-intraoral and extraoral-on trismus and facial swelling following surgical extraction of the lower third molar. Lasers Med Sci. 2010; 25(5):641-5.
Markovic A, Todorovic Lj. Effectiveness of dexamethasone and low-power laser in minimizing oedema after third molar surgery: a clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 36(3):226-9.
- Abstract Viewed: 395 times
- PDF Downloaded: 127 times