Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science
  • New Submission
  • ثبت‌نام
  • ورود
  • فارسی
    • English

Advances in Nursing & Midwifery

  • Home
  • اطلاعیه‌ها
  • درباره
    • درباره‌ی مجله
    • Editorial Board
    • Author Guideline
    • بیانه حریم خصوصی
    • اطلاعات تماس
  • Issues
    • بایگانی‌ها
    • شماره جاری
    • Accepted Manuscript
  • Indexing/Abstracting
  • Ethics
    • Ethical requirements
    • Publication Ethics and Research Misconduct
    • Ethical Considerations for Human Subjects
  • Declaration of AI Use
  • New Submission
جستجوی پیشرفته
  1. صفحه اصلی
  2. بایگانی‌ها
  3. دوره 34 شماره 1 (2025): Advances in Nursing & Midwifery- Continuous Volume
  4. Research Article

دوره 34 شماره 1 (2025)

ژانویهٔ 2025

Factors Influencing E-Learning Quality from the Perspective of Medical Sciences Students at Alborz University of Medical Sciences

  • Mahsa Khedmatizare
  • Nilufar Shahmirzad
  • Mehrad Nekouei
  • Elaheh Sanjari
  • Maryam Aghabarary

Advances in Nursing & Midwifery, دوره 34 شماره 1 (2025), 15 ژانویهٔ 2025 , صفحه 23-34
https://doi.org/10.22037/anm.v34i1.48470 چاپ شده: 2025-10-15

  • مقاله
  • دانلود
  • ارجاع
  • مراجع
  • آمار
  • اشتراک

چکیده

Abstract
Introduction: Given the widespread use of e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic and the post-pandemic period—particularly in the critical field of medical sciences—examining students' perspectives on factors influencing e-learning quality is essential. The present study was conducted to investigate medical sciences students' perspectives on the factors affecting e-learning quality.
Methods: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, 854 medical sciences students at Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran, were selected using convenience sampling between January and May 2022. The data collection instrument was a researcher-developed questionnaire comprising two sections: demographic information and factors influencing e-learning quality. After data collection, the data were analyzed using SPSS version 20, employing descriptive and inferential statistics at the P ≤ 0.05 significance level.
Results: The mean score for instructor-related factors was 141.64 ± 19.41 (range: 35–175); for factors related to the educational content delivered, it was 55.32 ± 7.84 (range: 13–65); and for factors related to facilities, equipment, and infrastructure, it was 26.52 ± 3.63 (range: 6–30). Based on the results of the Friedman test, the highest-ranked domain was "factors related to facilities, equipment, and infrastructure". Among all dimensions, the items with the highest mean scores were as follows: teaching skills, mastery of the subject matter, ability to integrate theoretical and clinical content during instruction to facilitate better understanding, clear presentation of key and practical points in the instructional content, alignment between the amount of educational content and the learning objectives, scientific accuracy of the content, and inclusion of up-to-date material, the functioning microphone and uninterrupted audio, adequate internet speed, and availability of online class recording.
Conclusions: The development of adequate technical infrastructure, targeted investment, and the establishment of clear standards for evaluating learners' performance are essential for the effective utilization of e-learning. It is recommended that educational authorities and policymakers focus their efforts on enhancing the infrastructure of educational platforms and improving internet speed and quality. Additionally, organizing training workshops for faculty members on the principles of designing and conducting online classes, as well as producing standard electronic content, can contribute to improving instructors’ teaching competencies and better addressing students’ learning needs.

کلمات کلیدی:
  • Education
  • Learning
  • Educational Technology
  • Computer-Assisted Instruction
  • Teaching Quality
  • Students
  • pdf (English)

ارجاع به مقاله

Khedmatizare , M., Shahmirzad , N., Nekouei , M., Sanjari, E., & Aghabarary, M. (2025). Factors Influencing E-Learning Quality from the Perspective of Medical Sciences Students at Alborz University of Medical Sciences. Advances in Nursing & Midwifery, 34(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.22037/anm.v34i1.48470
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.acm-sig-proceedings##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.acs-nano##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.apa##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.associacao-brasileira-de-normas-tecnicas##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.chicago-author-date##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.harvard-cite-them-right##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.ieee##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.modern-language-association##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.turabian-fullnote-bibliography##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.vancouver##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.download.ris##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.download.bibtex##

مراجع

1. Mian A, Khan S. Medical education during pandemics: a UK perspective. BMC Med. 2020;18(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01577-y pmid: 32268900

2. Tabatabai S. COVID-19 impact and virtual medical education. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2020;8(3):140-3. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2020.86070.1213 pmid: 32802908

3. Learning. In: Spielman RM, Jenkins WJ, Lovett MD, editors. Psychology 2e. Houston (TX): OpenStax; 2024.

4. Keegan D. A typology of distance teaching system. Distance education: new perspectives: Routledge; 2013. p. 62-76.

5. Wang VX. Encyclopedia of E-Leadership, Counseling and Training2012.

6. Mortazavi F, Salehabadi R, Sharifzadeh M, Ghardashi F. Students' perspectives on the virtual teaching challenges in the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. J Educ Health Promot. 2021;10:59. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_861_20 pmid: 34084806

7. Nikokaran J, Fatemi Aghda SA, Dehghan H, Mirfakhraei M, Poornematy MM, Mirfakhraei M. Usability Evaluation of the Ministry of Health Exam System : Viewpoint the Users. Journal of Health and Biomedical Informatics. 2024;11(3):176-85. doi: 10.34172/jhbmi.2024.23

8. Soled D, Goel S, Barry D, Erfani P, Joseph N, Kochis M, et al. Medical Student Mobilization During a Crisis: Lessons From a COVID-19 Medical Student Response Team. Acad Med. 2020;95(9):1384-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003401 pmid: 32282373

9. Bianchi S, Gatto R, Fabiani L. Effects of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on medical education in Italy: Considerations and tips. EuroMediterranean Biomedical Journal. 2020;15(24):100-1.

10. Ahmady S, Shahbazi S, Heidari M. Transition to Virtual Learning During the Coronavirus Disease-2019 Crisis in Iran: Opportunity Or Challenge? Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020;14(3):e11-e2. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.142 pmid: 32375914

11. Carvalho VO, Conceicao LSR, Gois MB, Jr. COVID-19 pandemic: Beyond medical education in Brazil. J Card Surg. 2020;35(6):1170-1. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14646 pmid: 32531127

12. Garbuja CK, Surkhali B. Virtual Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic: Pros and Cons. Journal of Lumbini Medical College. 2020;8(1):154-5. doi: 10.22502/jlmc.v8i1.363

13. Pandey D, Ogunmola GA, Enbeyle W, Abdullahi M, Pandey BK, Pramanik S. COVID-19: A Framework for Effective Delivering of Online Classes During Lockdown. Human Arenas. 2021;5(2):322-36. doi: 10.1007/s42087-020-00175-x

14. Atashinsadaf A, Ramezani-Badr F, Long T, Imanipour M, Amini K. Facilities, challenges, attitudes, and preferences of nursing students related to e-learning in the Covid-19 pandemic in Iranian context: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05029-6 pmid: 38200572

15. Pallavi DR, Ramachandran M, Sathiyaraj C. An Empirical Study On Effectiveness of E-Learning Over Conventional Class Room Learning – A Case Study with Respect to Online Degree Programmes in Higher Education. Recent trends in Management and Commerce. 2022;3(1):25-33. doi: 10.46632/rmc/3/1/5

16. Cornelius S. Facilitating in a demanding environment: Experiences of teaching in virtual classrooms using web conferencing. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2013;45(2):260-71. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12016

17. Sleiwah A, Mughal M, Hachach-Haram N, Roblin P. COVID-19 lockdown learning: The uprising of virtual teaching. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020;73(8):1575-92. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.05.032 pmid: 32565141

18. Spencer J. Learning and teaching in the clinical environment. BMJ. 2003;326(7389):591-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7389.591 pmid: 12637408

19. Burgess A, van Diggele C, Roberts C, Mellis C. Feedback in the clinical setting. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(Suppl 2):460. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02280-5 pmid: 33272265

20. Elendu C, Amaechi DC, Okatta AU, Amaechi EC, Elendu TC, Ezeh CP, et al. The impact of simulation-based training in medical education: A review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024;103(27):e38813. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038813 pmid: 38968472

21. Mukhtar K, Javed K, Arooj M, Sethi A. Advantages, Limitations and Recommendations for online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(COVID19-S4):S27-S31. doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.COVID19-S4.2785 pmid: 32582310

22. George PP, Papachristou N, Belisario JM, Wang W, Wark PA, Cotic Z, et al. Online eLearning for undergraduates in health professions: A systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and satisfaction. Journal of Global Health. 2014;4(1). doi: 10.7189/jogh.04.010406

23. Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Szostek JH, Wang AT, et al. Technology-Enhanced Simulation for Health Professions Education. Jama. 2011;306(9). doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1234

24. Kononowicz AA, Woodham LA, Edelbring S, Stathakarou N, Davies D, Saxena N, et al. Virtual Patient Simulations in Health Professions Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(7):e14676. doi: 10.2196/14676 pmid: 31267981

25. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. A critical review of simulation-based mastery learning with translational outcomes. Med Educ. 2014;48(4):375-85. doi: 10.1111/medu.12391 pmid: 24606621

26. Yammine K, Violato C. A meta-analysis of the educational effectiveness of three-dimensional visualization technologies in teaching anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2015;8(6):525-38. doi: 10.1002/ase.1510 pmid: 25557582

27. Manteghinejad A, Sadeghi H, Najimi A. Anatomy education during COVID-19 era: Evaluation of an anatomy blended course for medical students. J Educ Health Promot. 2023;12:460. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1378_22 pmid: 38464650

28. Zarifsanaiey N, Farrokhi MR, Karimian Z, Hoseini S, Chahartangi F, Shahraki HR. Lesson learned from assessing teachers' and students' perspectives regarding the quality of e-learning in medical education during the pandemic: a mixed-methods study. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05160-4 pmid: 38388898

29. Wilcha RJ. Effectiveness of Virtual Medical Teaching During the COVID-19 Crisis: Systematic Review. JMIR Med Educ. 2020;6(2):e20963. doi: 10.2196/20963 pmid: 33106227

30. Frei-Landau R, Avidov-Ungar O. Educational equity amidst COVID-19: Exploring the online learning challenges of Bedouin and Jewish Female Preservice Teachers in Israel. Teach Teach Educ. 2022;111:103623. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2021.103623 pmid: 36567702

31. Kumar A, Kalal N, Rana N, Vyas H, Choudhary V, Rani R. Online learning in nursing students: Satisfaction and barriers. J Educ Health Promot. 2021;10:411. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1221_20 pmid: 35071617

32. Memari AH, Kordi R, Ziaee V, Pourgharib Shahi MH, Sohrabpour AA, Dastjerdi N, et al. Iran's higher education and COVID-19: the "new normal" for Tehran University of Medical Sciences. J Clin Transl Sci. 2022;6(1):e3. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.879 pmid: 35079434

33. Liu Y, Zhao L, Su YS. The Impact of Teacher Competence in Online Teaching on Perceived Online Learning Outcomes during the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Moderated-Mediation Model of Teacher Resilience and Age. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(10). doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106282 pmid: 35627819

34. Elsaeed Z, Mahmoud S. Lecturers’ Teaching Competence and Nursing Students’ Engagement in the Use of On-Line Learning. Tanta Scientific Nursing Journal. 2022;27(4):84-102. doi: 10.21608/tsnj.2022.267249

35. Badeleh A, Shamloo N. Identifying the effective factors of improving the quality of virtual education based on the lived experiences of elementary school teachers in the education of the Corona era. Research in Curriculum Development. 2023;19(48):26-40.

36. Feili A, Jabari O, Safaei M, Sabet A. Identifying and ranking the factors affecting the quality of virtual education during COVID-19 crisis using DANP technique. Journal of Modern Medical Information Sciences. 2021;7(1):19-28. doi: 10.52547/jmis.7.1.19

37. Kazemi Malekmahmoudi S, PiriTosanloo M, Norouzi N, Aryaie M. Investigation of factors affecting E-learning development according to students' viewpoint of Golestan University of Medical Sciences. Educational Development of Judishapur. 2015;6(3):229-36.

38. Golband F, Mojtahedzadeh R, Hosseini A, Mirhosseini F, Bigdeli S. Effective e-learning view point of tehran university of medical sciences virtual faculty post-graduate students. Education Strategies in Medical Sciences. 2014;7(2):93-7.

39. Veisi M, Mosavi F, Malekian F, Karamafrooz M. Analyzing Effectiveness of Successful Online Teaching in the Classroom: Phenomenological Analysis Quarterly Management on Police Training. Quarterly Management on Police Training. 2021;14(56):11-54.

40. Andolmaleki S, Maleki H, Farjadmand L. Factors affecting effective teaching teachers (The case of the fifth grade of primary school teachers in Tehran). Teaching and Learning Research. 2019;16(1):123-35.

41. Bashardoust N, Ghadiri D, Haghani SO, Bagheri SS, Mirfarhadi N. Effective criterion on theoretical and practical Teaching from Guilan Dental Students’ Viewpoint. Research in Medical Education. 2020;12(2):31-8. doi: 10.29252/rme.12.2.31

42. Lawshe CH. A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity1. Personnel Psychology. 2006;28(4):563-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x

43. Moslehi L, Alidoust Ghahfarrokhi E. Identifying and Prioritizing Factors Affecting the Quality of E-learning of Physical Education Students During the Outbreak of Covid-19 Pandemic. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education. 2022;28(4):201-17.

44. Salmani N, Bagheri I, Dadgari A. Iranian nursing students experiences regarding the status of e-learning during COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One. 2022;17(2):e0263388. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263388 pmid: 35108327

45. Cheraghbeigi N, Molavynejad S, Rokhafroz D, Elahi N, Rezaei E. Nursing students' learning strategies for e-learning during the Covid-19 pandemic in Iran: a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04270-9 pmid: 37158882

46. Kaup S, Jain R, Shivalli S, Pandey S, Kaup S. Sustaining academics during COVID-19 pandemic: The role of online teaching-learning. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68(6):1220-1. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1241_20 pmid: 32461490

47. Hodgson JC, Hagan P. Medical education adaptations during a pandemic: Transitioning to virtual student support. Med Educ. 2020;54(7):662-3. doi: 10.1111/medu.14177 pmid: 32291794

48. Elemam RF, El Swiah JM, Durda AO, Hegazy NN. Cross-sectional study of attitudes toward online continuing dental education in Libya during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One. 2024;19(1):e0296783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296783 pmid: 38198489

49. Mortagy M, Abdelhameed A, Sexton P, Olken M, Hegazy MT, Gawad MA, et al. Online medical education in Egypt during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide assessment of medical students' usage and perceptions. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03249-2 pmid: 35354406

50. Cakmakkaya OS, Meydanli EG, Kafadar AM, Demirci MS, Suzer O, Ar MC, et al. Factors affecting medical students' satisfaction with online learning: a regression analysis of a survey. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04995-7 pmid: 38172870

51. Sahu P. Closure of Universities Due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Impact on Education and Mental Health of Students and Academic Staff. Cureus. 2020;12(4). doi: 10.7759/cureus.7541

52. Watson C, Templet T, Leigh G, Broussard L, Gillis L. Student and faculty perceptions of effectiveness of online teaching modalities. Nurse Educ Today. 2023;120:105651. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105651 pmid: 36436270

53. Chamasemani M, Ehtesham Z. E Designing a conceptual model of factors affecting the quality of university virtual education and evaluate its quality during the COVID. 19 pandemic. Digital Transformation. 2021;2(1):71-89.

54. Bao W. COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Hum Behav Emerg Technol. 2020;2(2):113-5. doi: 10.1002/hbe2.191 pmid: 32510042

55. Karimian Z, Barkhor A, Mehrabi M, Khojasteh L. Which virtual education methods do e‑students prefer? Design and validation of Virtual Education Preferences Questionnaire (VEPQ). BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):722. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04687-2 pmid: 37789327

56. Ghoneim AH, Ghoneim SH, Bairaqi SA, Yassin MY, AlAhmed AB, Aldhamen KM, et al. Virtual and Traditional Learning in Undergraduate Radiology Education: A Cross-sectional Comparative Study from Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2022;10(2):151-6. doi: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_619_21 pmid: 35602401

57. Zareisaroukolaei M, Shams G, Rezaeizadeh M, Ghahremani M. Determinants of e-learning effectiveness: A qualitative study on the instructor. Research in Teaching. 2020;8(2):79-55.

58. Jallad ST, Isik B. The effectiveness of virtual reality simulation as learning strategy in the acquisition of medical skills in nursing education: a systematic review. Ir J Med Sci. 2022;191(3):1407-26. doi: 10.1007/s11845-021-02695-z pmid: 34227032

59. Ratish S. Effectiveness of simulation among nursing students: A systematic review. International Journal of Advance Research in Nursing. 2025;8(1):202-6. doi: 10.33545/nursing.2025.v8.i1.C.464

60. Chan KS, Zary N. Applications and Challenges of Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Integrative Review. JMIR Med Educ. 2019;5(1):e13930. doi: 10.2196/13930 pmid: 31199295

61. Hung M-L, Chou C, Chen C-H, Own Z-Y. Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computers & Education. 2010;55(3):1080-90. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.004

  • چکیده مشاهده شده: 210 بار
  • pdf (English) دانلود شده: 154 بار

آمار دانلود

  • لینکدین
  • تویتر
  • فیسبوک
  • گوگل پلاس
  • تلگرام

اطلاعات

  • برای خوانندگان
  • برای نویسندگان
  • برای کتابداران

زبان

  • English
  • فارسی
  • صفحه اصلی
  • بایگانی
  • ارسال مقاله
  • درباره‌ی مجله
  • تیم سردبیری
  • اطلاعات تماس

Print ISSN: 2383-3750
Electronic ISSN: 2538-399X

قدرت یافته از OJSPlus