Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science
  • New Submission
  • Register
  • Login
  • English
    • فارسی

Advances in Nursing & Midwifery

  • Home
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Author Guideline
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Issues
    • Archives
    • Current
    • Accepted Manuscript
  • Indexing/Abstracting
  • Ethics
    • Ethical requirements
    • Publication Ethics and Research Misconduct
    • Ethical Considerations for Human Subjects
  • Declaration of AI Use
  • New Submission
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 31 No. 3 (2022): Advances in Nursing & Midwifery
  4. Research Article

Vol. 31 No. 3 (2022)

July 2022

The Workplace Bullying in Nurses: A Psychometric Propertises of Iranian Version of Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised

  • Soheyla Kalantari
  • Hamid Sharif Nia
  • Samieh Ghana
  • Amir Hossein Goudarzian
  • Maryam Chehrehgosha

Advances in Nursing & Midwifery, Vol. 31 No. 3 (2022), 15 July 2022 , Page 39-46
https://doi.org/10.22037/anm.v31i3.39502 Published: 2022-07-15

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Abstract
Introduction: Workplace bullying is a persistent amount of negative conduct which one individual is subjected to by another, and it is emotionally and psychologically aggravating. Nurses are exposed to a greater risk of bullying, due to their direct contact with patients and their associates. The present study aims to investigate the factor structure of Iranian version of Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised.
Methods: The present methodological study was conducted amongst 400 nurses working in various hospitals affiliated to the Gorgan University of Medical Sciences, over a three month period in 2017. Construct validity of the questionnaire was assessed, and its reliability was also verified for internal consistency, and construct reliability.
Results: Exploratory factor analysis led to the extraction of the following three factors: Physically intimidating bullying, person-related bullying, and work-related bullying. The model's good fit indices confirmed the workplace bullying in nursing tool as follows: PCFI= 0.767, PNFI= 0.721, CMIN/DF= 2.325, RMSEA= 0.081, AGFI= 0.815, IFI= 0.912, and CFI= 0.918. The convergent validity and discriminant validity of the construct of workplace bullying in nursing as well as its internal consistency and construct reliability (>0.7) were confirmed.
Conclusions: The present study results showed that the three-factor construct of workplace bullying in nursing has good validity and reliability. Given its favorable psychometric properties, this questionnaire can be effective in assessing the incidence rate of workplace bullying in the nursing profession.

Keywords:
  • Workplace Bullying;
  • Psychometric
  • Factor Analysis
  • Nursing
  • PDF

How to Cite

Kalantari, S., Sharif Nia, H., Ghana, S., Goudarzian, A. H., & Chehrehgosha, M. (2022). The Workplace Bullying in Nurses: A Psychometric Propertises of Iranian Version of Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised. Advances in Nursing & Midwifery, 31(3), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.22037/anm.v31i3.39502
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

Ramzy O, El Bedawy R, Maher A. Dysfunctional behavior at the workplace and its impact on employees' job performance. Int J Business Admin. 2018;9(4):224-33. doi: 10.5430/ijba.v9n4p224

Feijo FR, Graf DD, Pearce N, Fassa AG. Risk Factors for Workplace Bullying: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(11). doi: 10.3390/ijerph16111945 pmid: 31159344

Salin D. Workplace bullying and gender: An overview of empirical findings. Dignity and inclusion at work. 2021:331-61. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-0218-3_12

Conway PM, Høgh A, Balducci C, Ebbesen DK. Workplace bullying and mental health. Pathways of job-related negative behaviour. 2021:101-28. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-0935-9_5

De Cieri H, Sheehan C, Donohue R, Shea T, Cooper B. Workplace bullying: an examination of power and perpetrators. Personnel Review.2019.

Einarsen S, Hoel H, Notelaers G. Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised. Work Stress. 2009;23(1):24-44. doi: 10.1080/02678370902815673

Marx J, Walls R, Hockberger R. Rosen's Emergency Medicine-Concepts and Clinical Practice E-Book: Elsevier Health Sciences2013.

Kriszbacher I, Bodis J, Csoboth I, Boncz I. The occurrence of acute myocardial infarction in relation to weather conditions. Int J Cardiol. 2009;135(1):136-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.01.048 pmid: 18571257

Anusiewicz CV, Ivankova NV, Swiger PA, Gillespie GL, Li P, Patrician PA. How does workplace bullying influence nurses' abilities to provide patient care? A nurse perspective. J Clin Nurs. 2020;29(21-22):4148-60. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15443 pmid: 32757394

Arnetz JE, Fitzpatrick L, Cotten SR, Jodoin C, Chang CD. Workplace Bullying Among Nurses: Developing a Model for Intervention. Violence Vict. 2019;34(2):346-62. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-17-00211 pmid: 31019016

Gemzøe Mikkelsen E, Hogh A, Berg Puggaard L. Prevention of bullying and conflicts at work: Process factors influencing the implementation and effects of interventions. Int J Workplace Health Manag. 2011;4(1):84-100. doi: 10.1108/17538351111118617

Golparvar M, Rafizadeh H. The Relationship Between Bullying at Workplace with Psychological and Spiritual Well Being of Nurses. Humanit Soc Sci Lett. 2014;2(2):120-8.

Hogh A, Mikkelsen EG, Hansen AM. Individual consequences of workplace bullying/mobbing2011. 107-28 p.

Nielsen MB, Matthiesen SB, Einarsen S. The impact of methodological moderators on prevalence rates of workplace bullying. A meta‐analysis. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2010;83(4):955-79. doi: 10.1348/096317909X481256

Salmivalli C. Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggress Violent Behav. 2010;15(2):112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007

Akar N. The relationships among perceived job stressors, workplace bullying and job stress in the health care services in Turkey: A Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) approach. Int J Humanit Soc Sci. 2013;3(14):248-57.

Razzaghian M, Shah A. Prevalence, antecedents, and effects of workplace bullying: A review.2011.

Vie TL, Glaso L, Einarsen S. Health outcomes and self-labeling as a victim of workplace bullying. J Psychosom Res. 2011;70(1):37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.06.007 pmid: 21193099

Lutgen‐Sandvik P, Tracy SJ, Alberts JK. Burned by bullying in the American workplace: Prevalence, perception, degree and impact. J Manag Stud. 2007;44(6):837-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00715.x

Trepanier SG, Fernet C, Austin S. A longitudinal investigation of workplace bullying, basic need satisfaction, and employee functioning. J Occup Health Psychol. 2015;20(1):105-16. doi: 10.1037/a0037726 pmid: 25151460

Ajoodaniyan N, Sorushan V, Rahmani A, Ghaderi B. Ethical climate governed on hospital environments from the perspective of nurses employed in intensive care units. Med Ethics J. 2016;4(13):39-59.

DeMarco R, Roberts SJ, Norris A, McCurry MK. The development of the Nurse Workplace Scale: self-advocating behaviors and beliefs in the professional workplace. J Prof Nurs. 2008;24(5):296-301. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2007.10.009 pmid: 18804083

Simons S. Workplace bullying experienced by Massachusetts registered nurses and the relationship to intention to leave the organization. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2008;31(2):E48-59. doi: 10.1097/01.ANS.0000319571.37373.d7 pmid: 18497581

Nielsen MB, Notelaers G, Einarsen S. Measuring exposure to workplace bullying. Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice. 2011;2:149-74. doi: 10.1201/EBK1439804896-9

Tsuno K, Kawakami N, Inoue A, Abe K. Measuring workplace bullying: reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the negative acts questionnaire. J Occup Health. 2010;52(4):216-26. doi: 10.1539/joh.l10036 pmid: 20571253

MacCallum RC, Widaman KF, Zhang S, Hong S. Sample size in factor analysis. Psychol Method. 1999;4(1):84. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84

Einarsen S, Raknes B, Matthiesen S, Hellesøy O. Negative acts questionnaire, revised. Bergen, Norway: Bergen Bullying Research Group.1994.

Einarsen S. The Negative Acts Questionnaire: Development, validation and revision of a measure of bullying at work. Paper presented at the 10th European Congress on Work and Organisational Psychology Prague (Czech Republic): 10th European Congress on Work and Organizational Psychology2001.

Organization WH. Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. 2009. Available from: http://www who int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/.

Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT. Exploratory factor analysis: Oxford University Press2011.

Çokluk Ö, Koçak D. Using Horn's Parallel Analysis Method in Exploratory Factor Analysis for Determining the Number of Factors. Educat Sci Theory Pract. 2016;16(2):537-51.

Hahs-Vaughn DL. Applied multivariate statistical concepts: Routledge2016.

De Vellis RF, Dancer LS. Scale development: theory and applications. J Educ Meas. 1991;31(1):79-82.

Vinzi VE, Chin WW, Henseler J, Wang H. Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications: Springer Science & Business Media2010.

Silva IV, de Aquino EM, Pinto ICdM. Psychometric properties of the Negative Acts Questionnaire for the detection of workplace bullying: an evaluation of the instrument with a sample of state health care workers. Rev Bras Saúde Ocup. 2017;42. doi: 10.1590/2317-6369000128715

Malinauskiene V, Bernotaite L. The Impact of Event Scale - Revised: psychometric properties of the Lithuanian version in a sample of employees exposed to workplace bullying. Acta Med Litu. 2016;23(3):185-92. doi: 10.6001/actamedica.v23i3.3384 pmid: 28356808

Charilaos K, Michael G, Chryssa BT, Panagiota D, George CP, Christina D. Validation of the negative acts questionnaire (NAQ) in a sample of Greek teachers. Psychol Method. 2015;6(1):63. doi: 10.4236/psych.2015.61007

Lee Y, Lee M. [Development and validity of workplace bullying in nursing-type inventory (WPBN-TI)]. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2014;44(2):209-18. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2014.44.2.209 pmid: 24859126

Giorgi G, Arenas A, Leon-Perez JM. An operative measure of workplace bullying: the negative acts questionnaire across Italian companies. Ind Health. 2011;49(6):686-95. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.ms1287 pmid: 22020012

Jiménez BM, Muñoz AR, Gamarra MM, Herrer MG. Assessing workplace bullying: Spanish validation of a reduced version of the Negative Acts Questionnaire. Span J Psychol. 2007;10(2):449-57. doi: 10.1017/S1138741600006715

Golparvar M, Sadeghi S, Mosahebi M. Construction and validation of bullying at workplace.2012.

AbuAlRub RF, Al Khawaldeh AT. Workplace physical violence among hospital nurses and physicians in underserved areas in Jordan. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23(13-14):1937-47. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12473 pmid: 24354354

Spector PE, Zhou ZE, Che XX. Nurse exposure to physical and nonphysical violence, bullying, and sexual harassment: a quantitative review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014;51(1):72-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.01.010 pmid: 23433725

Nielsen MB, Einarsen S. Outcomes of exposure to workplace bullying: A meta-analytic review. Work Stress. 2012;26(4):309-32. doi: 10.1080/02678373.2012.734709

Quine L. Workplace bullying in nurses. J Health Psychol. 2001;6(1):73-84. doi: 10.1177/135910530100600106 pmid: 22049239

Sa L, Fleming M. Bullying, burnout, and mental health amongst Portuguese nurses. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2008;29(4):411-26. doi: 10.1080/01612840801904480 pmid: 18382918

Agervold M, Mikkelsen EG. Relationships between bullying, psychosocial work environment and individual stress reactions. Work Stress. 2004;18(4):336-51. doi: 10.1080/02678370412331319794

Cevik Akyil R, Tan M, Saritas S, Altuntas S. Levels of mobbing perception among nurses in Eastern Turkey. Int Nurs Rev. 2012;59(3):402-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2012.00974.x pmid: 22897193

Efe SY, Ayaz S. Mobbing against nurses in the workplace in Turkey. Int Nurs Rev. 2010;57(3):328-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2010.00815.x pmid: 20796062

Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Multivariate data analysis. 4th ed ed: Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall1995.

Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Market Res. 1981:39-50. doi: 10.2307/3151312

Dussault M, Frenette É. Loneliness and Bullying in the Workplace. Am J Appl Psychol. 2014;2(4):94-8.

Sharif Nia H, Pahlevan Sharif S, Goudarzian AH, Haghdoost AA, Ebadi A, Soleimani MA. An evaluation of psychometric properties of the Templer's Death Anxiety Scale-Extended among a sample of Iranian chemical warfare veterans. Hayat. 2016;22(3):229-44.

Floyd FJ, Widaman KF. Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychol Assess. 1995;7(3):286. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286

Nemeth LS, Stanley KM, Martin MM, Mueller M, Layne D, Wallston KA. Lateral Violence in Nursing Survey: Instrument Development and Validation. Healthcare (Basel). 2017;5(3). doi: 10.3390/healthcare5030033 pmid: 28753961

Jeon J. The Strengths and Limitations of the Statistical Modeling of Complex Social Phenomenon: Focusing on SEM, Path Analysis, or Multiple Regression Models. Int J Soc Behav Educ Econ Bus Ind Eng. 2015;9:1559-67.

  • Abstract Viewed: 349 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 228 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Language

  • English
  • فارسی
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

Print ISSN: 2383-3750
Electronic ISSN: 2538-399X

Powered by OJSPlus