Effect of Implant Diameter on its Survival Rate among a Group of Iranian Warfare Victims Presenting to QaziTabatabai Clinic Affiliated to Shahid Beheshti University during 2000-2010
Journal of Dental School,
Vol. 31 No. 1 (2013),
27 January 2013
,
Page 60-65
https://doi.org/10.22037/jds.v31i1.28680
Abstract
Objective: At present, treatment of edentulous areas with implant-supported prosthesis has greatly increased. The aim of this study was to assess the survival rate of implants with different diameters. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on 239 warfare victims presenting to Qazi Tabatabaie Clinic during 2000-2010. A total of 1,649 implants were placed. The success criteria included presence of osteointegrated implants with no sign of infection, mobility, or lucency around them. Data were extracted from patients’ records and recorded in questionnaires. Statistical analysis was carried out using Chi-square or Log-Rank test.
Results: A total of 1,533 implants were evaluated out of which, 61 (4%) had failed. Survival rate of implants of different brands had a significant association with implant diameter as the highest failure rate was observed in implants with 5-6.5 mm diameter and the lowest failure rate belonged to 3-3.5 mm diameter implants.
Conclusion: Study results demonstrated that the survival of implants may be affected by their diameter as the failure rate was higher in implants with greater diameters.
How to Cite
References
Mish CE. Dental implant prosthetics. 1st Ed. St.Louis: The C.V. Mosby Co. 2005; Chap 1: 1-17.
Cho P, Schneider GB, Krizan K, Keller JC. Examination of the bone-implant interface in experimentally induced osteoporotic bone. Implant Dent 2004;13:79-87.
De Pauw GA, Dermaut LR, Johansson CB, Martens G. A histomorphometric analysis of heavily loaded and non-loaded implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17: 405-412.
Carr AB, Gerard DA, Larsen PE. Histomorphometric analysis of implant anchorage for 3 types of dental implants following 6 months of healing in baboon jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:785-752.
Trisi P, Lazzara R, Rebaudi A, Rao W, Testori T, Porter SS. Bone-implant contact on machined and dual acid-etched surfaces after 2 months of healing in the human maxilla. J Periodontol 2003;74.945-956.
Ivanoff CJ, Gröndahl K, Sennerby L, Bergström C, Lekholm U. Influence of variations in implant diameters: a 3-to 5-year retrospective clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:173-180.
Langer B, Langer L, Herrmann I, Jorneus L. The wide fixture: a solution for special bone situations and a rescue for the compromised implant. Part 1. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:400-408.
Becker W, Becker BE, Alsuwyed A, Al-Mubarak S. Long-term evaluation of 282 implants in maxillary and mandibular molar positions: a prospective study. J Periodontol 1999;70:896-901.
Buser D, Weber H, Bragger U, Balsiger C. Tissue integration of one-stage ITI implants: 3-year results of a longitudinal study with Hollow-Cylinder and Hollow-Screw implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6:405-412.
Krennmair G, Waldenberger O. Clinical analysis of wide-diameter frialit-2 implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:710-715.
Mordenfeld MH, Johansson A, Hedin M, Billström C, Fyrberg KA. A retrospective clinical study of wide-diameter implants used in posterior edentulous areas. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:387-392.
Renouard F, Nisand D. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:35-51.
Romeo E, Bivio A, Mosca D, Scanferla M, Ghisolfi M, Storelli S. The use of short dental implants in clinical practice: literature review. Minerva Stomatol 2010;59:23-31.
das Neves FD, Fones D, Bernardes SR, do Prado CJ, Neto AJ. Short implants--an analysis of longitudinal studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:86-93.
Winkler S, Morris HF, Ochi S. Implant survival to 36 months as related to length and diameter. Ann Periodontology 2000;5:22-31.
Eckert SE, Meraw SJ, Weaver AL, Lohse CM. Early experience with Wide-Platform Mk II implants. Part I: Implant survival. Part II: Evaluation of risk factors involving implant survival. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:208-216.
Attard NJ, Zarb GA. Implant prosthodontic management of partially edentulous patients missing posterior teeth: The Toronto experience. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89: 352-359.
Shin SW, Bryant SR, Zarb GA. A retrospective study on the treatment outcome of wide-bodied implants. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17:52-58.
Handelsman M. Treatment planning and surgical considerations for placement of wide-body implants. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998; 19: 507-514.
Small PN, Tarnow DP, Cho SC. Gingival recession around wide-diameter versus standard- diameter implants: a 3-to 5-year longitudinal prospective study. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2001; 13: 143-146.
- Abstract Viewed: 191 times
- PDF Downloaded: 117 times