In Vitro Comparison of the Effects of Two Different Acid Etchants on the Microleakage of Composite Restorations
Journal of Dental School,
Vol. 32 No. 1 (2014),
27 January 2014
,
Page 9-15
https://doi.org/10.22037/jds.v32i1.24753
Abstract
Objective: Etching of enamel and dentin is an important step in restoration of teeth with composite resin ensuring the retention of restoration and decreasing microleakage. This in vitro study sought to compare the effects of Kimiya and Etch-Rite acid etchants on the microleakage of composite restorations.
Methods: This experimental study was conducted on 30 sound human molar teeth. Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surface of teeth and the teeth were randomly divided into 2 groups of
15. Iranian acid etchant (Kimiya, Iran) was used in group 1 and Etch-Rite (Pulpdent, Watertown, MA, USA) in group 2. The teeth were restored with Valux Plus (3M, ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) composite resin and polished by disc. The canal apices were sealed with sticky wax and the entire tooth surface was coated with 2 layers of nail varnish except for 1 mm around the restoration margins. Specimens were immersed in 2% Fuchsin (Fuchsin Dye, Merck, Germany) for 24h and then buccolingually sectioned. Specimens were evaluated under a stereomicroscope (SF-100B, Lomo, Russia) at 40X magnification and the degree of microleakage was determined using a 0-4 scale. The degree of microleakage was statistically analyzed using Mann Whitney U test.
Results: No significant difference was found between the two groups of Kimiya and Etch-Ritein the degree of microleakage at the occlusal wall (p=0.1). The degree of microleakage at the gingival wall was not significantly different between the two groups either (p=0.68).
Conclusion: Based on the results, Kimiya Iranian acid etchant has an efficacy equal to that of Etch- rite.
- Acid etchant
- Microleakage
- Thickening agent
How to Cite
References
Sumitt JB, Robbins JW, Schwartz RS, Santos JD. Fundamentals of operative dentistry. 3rd Ed. Quintessence Publishing Co. 2001; Chap 9: 261-263.
Davidson CI, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and Polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent 1997; 25: 435-440.
Cara RR, Fleming GJP, Plain WM, Walmsley AD. Cuspal deflection and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with resin-based composites with and without an intermediary flowable layer. J Dent 2007; 35:482-489.
Perdigao J, Swift JR, Edward J. Fundamental concepts of enamel and dentin adhesion In: Theodor MR, Haraldo H, Edward Js. Sturdevant`s art & science of operative dentistry. 4th Ed. St. Louis: The C. V. Mosby Co. 2002; Chap 5: 238-239.
Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Oberschachtsiek H, Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Hybridization of dental hard tissues. 1st Ed. Tokyo: Quintessence Publishing Co. 1998; Chap 3: 37-39.
Buonocore MG. A simple method for increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955; 34:849-853.
Barkmeier WW, Shaffer SE, Gwinnett AJ. Effect of 15 vs. 60 second enamel acid conditioning on adhesion and morphology. Oper Dent 1986; 11:111-116.
Ben-Amar A, Cardash HS, Judes H. The sealing of the tooth/amalgam interface by corrosion products. J Oral Rehabil 1995; 22:101-104.
Fusayama T, Nakamura M, Kurosaki N, Iwaku M. Non-pressure adhesion of a new adhesive restorative resin. J Dent Res 1979; 58: 1364-1370.
Nakabayashi N, Nakamura M, Yasudo N. Hybrid layer as a dentin-bonding mechanism. J Esthetic Dent 1991; 3: 133-138.
Deliperi S, Bardwell DN. An alternative method to reduce polymerization shrinkage in direct posterior composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2002; 133: 1387-1398.
Titley K, Chernecky R, Maric B, Smith D. Penetration of a dentin bonding agent into dentin. Am J Dent 1994; 7: 190-194.
Asmussen E. Clinical relevance of physical, chemical and bonding properties of composite resins. Oper Dent 1985; 10: 61-73.
Pashley DH, Horner JA, Brewer PD. Interactions of conditioners on the dentin surface. Oper Dent 1992; Suppl 5: 137-150.
Nakabayashi N, Ashizawa M, Nakmuram M. Identification of a resin–dentin hybrid layer in vital human dentin created in vivo: durable bonding to vital dentin. Quintessence Int 1992; 32: 135- 141.
Pashley DH, Carvalho RM. Dentine permeability and dentine adhesion. J Dent 1997; 25: 355-372.
Silvestone LM. Fissure sealants: Laboratory studies. Caries Res 1974; 8: 2-26.
Grim GA, Shay JS. Effect of etchant time on microleakage. ASDC J Dent Child 1987; 54: 339- 340.
Gilpatrick RO, Ross JA, Simonsen RJ. Resin-to-enamel bond strength with various etching times. Quintessence 1991; 22: 47-49.
Kerjci F, Lutz F. Marginal adaptation of class V restoration using different restorative technique. J Dent 1991; 19: 24-32.
Bagheri M, Ghawamnasiri M. Effect of cavosurface margin configuration of class V cavity preparations on microleakage of composite resin restoration. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008; 9: 122- 129.
Ameri H, Ghavamnasiri M, Abdoli E. Effects of load cycling on the microleakage of beveled and nonbeveled margins in class V resin-based composite restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2010; 11: 025-32.
AL Ehaideb A, Mohammed H. Shear bond strength of one bottle dentin adhesive. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84: 408-412.
Crim GA, Swartz ML, Philis RW. Comparison of four thermocycling techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 53: 50-53.
Taylor MJ, Lynch E. Microleakage. J Dent 1992; 20: 3-10.
Alani AH. Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: a review. Oper Dent 1997; 22: 173-185.
Perdiago J, Lambrechts P, van Meerbeek B, Tome AR, Vanherle G, Lopes AB. Morphological field emission-SEM study of the effect of six phosphoric acid etching agents on human dentin. Dent Mater 1996; 12: 262-271.
- Abstract Viewed: 202 times
- PDF Downloaded: 206 times