SBMU Journals
  • New Submission
  • Register
  • Login
  • English
    • 简体中文

Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine

  • Home
  • About
    • Policies
    • Editorial Team
    • Reviewer guideline
    • Contact
  • Issues
    • Current
    • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Indexing/Abstracting
  • For authors
    • New Submission
    • Author guidelines
    • Article withdrawal
    • Peer review process
    • FAQ
  • Ethics
    • Ethical requirements
    • Plagiarism Policy
    • Authorship conflicts
    • Malpractice statements
    • Copyright Notice
    • Intellectual properties
    • Preprint Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Artificial intelligence & Authorship
    • Retraction Cosiderations
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 3 No. 4 (2015): Autumn (November)
  4. Evidence-Based Emergency Medicine

Vol. 3 No. 4 (2015)

November 2015

Part 3: Positive and Negative Likelihood Ratios of Diagnostic Tests

  • Alireza Baratloo
  • Saeed safari
  • Mohamed Elfil
  • Ahmed Negida

Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 3 No. 4 (2015), 1 November 2015 , Page 170-171
https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v3i4.299 Published: 2018-12-26

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

In the previous two parts of educational manuscript series in Emergency, we explained some screening characteristics of diagnostic tests including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. In the 3rd  part we aimed to explain positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR) as one of the most reliable performance measures of a diagnostic test. To better understand this characteristic of a test, it is first necessary to fully understand the concept of sensitivity and specificity. So we strongly advise you to review the 1st part of this series again. In short, the likelihood ratios are about the percentage of people with and without a disease but having the same test result. The prevalence of a disease can directly influence screening characteristics of a diagnostic test, especially its sensitivity and specificity. Trying to eliminate this effect, LR was developed. Pre-test probability of a disease multiplied by positive or negative LR can estimate post-test probability. Therefore, LR is the most important characteristic of a test to rule out or rule in a diagnosis. A positive likelihood ratio > 1 means higher probability of the disease to be present in a patient with a positive test. The further from 1, either higher or lower, the stronger the evidence to rule in or rule out the disease, respectively. It is obvious that tests with LR close to one are less practical. On the other hand, LR further from one will have more value for application in medicine. Usually tests with 0.1 < LR > 10 are considered suitable for implication in routine practice.
Keywords:
  • Screening performance characteristics
  • Positive and Negative Likelihood Ratios
  • Diagnostic Tests
  • PDF
  • HTML

How to Cite

1.
Baratloo A, safari S, Elfil M, Negida A. Part 3: Positive and Negative Likelihood Ratios of Diagnostic Tests. Arch Acad Emerg Med [Internet]. 2018 Dec. 26 [cited 2026 Jul. 7];3(4):170-1. Available from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem/index.php/AAEM/article/view/299
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

Safari S, Baratloo A, Elfil M, Negida AS. Part 2: Positive and negative predictive values of diagnostic tests. Emergency. 2015;3(3):87-8.

Baratloo A, Hosseini M, Negida A, El Ashal G. Part 1: Simple Definition and Calculation of Accuracy, Sensitivity and Specificity. Emergency. 2015;3(2):48-9.

McGee S. Simplifying likelihood ratios. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(8):647-50.

Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Refining clinical diagnosis with likelihood ratios. Lancet. 2005;365(9469):1500-5.

Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios. BMJ. 2004;329(7458):168-9.

Aminiahidashti H, Hosseininejad SM, Montazer H, Bozorgi F, Jahanian F, Raee B. Diagnostic Accuracy of Ascites Fluid Gross Appearance in Detection of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis. Emergency. 2014;2(3):138-40.

Taghizadieh A, Ala A, Rahmani F, Nadi A. Diagnostic Accuracy of Chest x-Ray and Ultrasonography in Detection of Community Acquired Pneumonia; a Brief Report. Emergency. 2015;3(3):114-6.

  • Abstract Viewed: 473 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 3459 times
  • HTML Downloaded: 37 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Make a Submission

Make a Submission

SJR

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

COPE

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

This journal is distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC 3.0. Design and publishing by SBMU journals. All credits and honors to PKP for their OJS. 

 Sitemap | ISSN-ONLINE: 2645-4904

Support Contact: ma.saghaei63@gmail.com

With the goal of net zero carbon emissions, this journal is published only in electronic format.

Powered by OJSPlus