Associated Factors of Leaked Repair Following Omentopexy for Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease; a Cross-sectional Study
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine,
Vol. 12 No. 1 (2024),
1 January 2024
,
Page e18
https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v12i1.2169
Abstract
Introduction: Previous studies have reported numerous clinico-pathologic risk factors associated with increased risk of leaked repair following omental patch for perforated peptic ulcer disease (PPUD). This study aimed to analyze the risk factors associated with leaked repair of omental patch and document the management and outcome of established cases of leaked repair in a resource-poor setting.
Methods: This is a multicenter cross-sectional study of leaked repair after omental patch of PPUD between January 2016 to December 2022. Following primary repair of PPUD with omental pedicle reinforcement, associated factors of leaked repair were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses.
Results: Overall, 360 cases were evaluated (62.8% male). Leaked repair rate was 11.7% (42 cases). Those without immunosuppression were 3 times less likely to have leaked repair (aOR= 0.34; 95% CI: 0.16 - 0.72; p = 0.003) while those with sepsis were 4 times more likely to have leaked repair (aOR=4.16; 95% CI: 1.06 - 12.36; p = 0.018). Patients with delayed presentation (>48 hours) were 2.5 times more likely to have leaked repair than those who presented in 0 - 24 hours (aOR=2.51; 95% CI: 3.62 - 10.57; p = 0.044). Those with Perforation diameter 2.1-3.0 cm were 8 times (aOR=7.98; 95% CI: 2.63-24.21; p<0.0001), and those with perforation diameter > 3.0cm were 33 times (aOR=33.04; 95% CI: 10.98-100.25; p<0.0001) more likely to have leaked repair than those with perforation diameter of 0-1.0 cm. Similarly, in those with no perioperative shock, leaked repair was 4 times less likely to develop than those with perioperative shock (aOR= 0.42; 95% CI: 0.41-0.92; p = 0.041). There was significant statistical difference in morbidity (p = 0.003) and mortality (p < 0.0001) rates for cases of leaked repairs and successful repairs.
Conclusion: Leaked repair following omentopexy for peptic ulcer perforation was significantly associated with large perforation diameter, delayed presentation, sepsis, immunosuppressive therapy, and perioperative shock.
- Jejunal patch
- omentopexy
- peptic ulcer
- perforation diameter
- mortality rate
- leaked repair
How to Cite
References
Teshome H, Birega M, Taddese M. Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease in a Tertiary Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Five Year Retrospective Study. Ethiopian J Health Sci. 2020;30(3):363-70.
Ugochukwu A, Amu O, Nzegwu M, Dilibe U. Acute perforated peptic ulcer: on clinical experience in an urban tertiary hospital in south east Nigeria. Int J Surg. 2013;11(3):223-7.
Dongo AE, Uhunmwagho O, Kesieme EB, Eluehike SU, Alufohai EF. A Five-Year Review of Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease in Irrua, Nigeria. Int Sch Res Notices. 2017;2017:8375398.
Bekele A, Kassa S, Taye M. The Jejunal Serosal Patch Procedure: A Successful Technique for Managing Difficult Peptic Ulcer Perforation. East Cent Afr J Surg. 2016;21(3):63-7.
Thorsen K, Søreide JA, Søreide K. What is the best predictor of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer disease? A population-based, multivariable regression analysis including three clinical scoring systems. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(7):1261-8.
Irabor DO. An audit of peptic ulcer surgery in Ibadan, Nigeria. West Afr J Med. 2005;24(3):242-5.
Chalya PL, Mabula JB, Koy M, McHembe MD, Jaka HM, Kabangila R, et al. Clinical profile and outcome of surgical treatment of perforated peptic ulcers in Northwestern Tanzania: A tertiary hospital experience. World J Emerg Surg. 2011;6:31.
Levi A, Gross DJ, Egelko A, Roudnitsky V. A Novel Approach to Managing Giant Duodenal Ulcer Perforations: Minimizing Ostomies, Maximizing Decompression. A Case Report. Surg Case Rep (Tallinn). 2019;2(5):1-3.
Gupta S, Kaushik R, Sharma R, Attri A. The management of large perforations of duodenal ulcers. BMC Surg. 2005;5:15.
Eğin S, Gökçek B, Yeşiltaş M, Hot S, Karakaş D. Improvement of a duodenal leak: Two-way vacuum-assisted closure. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2019;25(1):89-92.
Agarwal N, Malviya NK, Gupta N, Singh I, Gupta S. Triple tube drainage for "difficult" gastroduodenal perforations: A prospective study. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;9(1):19-24.
Sanjanwala SS, Thati VN, Rohondia OS, Rambhia SU. Comparison of operative procedures for re-leaks duodenal perforation: a cross-sectional analysis from a tertiary care hospital in a developing country. Int Surg J. 2016;3(3):1314-7.
Rajput M, Rani S, MH M. Analysis of risk factors contributing to re-leak of duodenal ulcer perforation: Experience of surgical closure by Graham’s Patch. Pak J Surg. 2010;26(3):217-20.
Unver M, Fırat Ö, Ünalp Ö V, Uğuz A, Gümüş T, Sezer T, et al. Prognostic factors in peptic ulcer perforations: a retrospective 14-year study. Int Surg. 2015;100(5):942-8.
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med. 2007;4(10):e296.
Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2007;4(10):e297.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205-13.
Kutlu OC, Garcia S, Dissanaike S. The successful use of simple tube duodenostomy in large duodenal perforations from varied etiologies. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2013;4(3):279-82.
Gan T, Lee D, Li L, Shulin J. Duodenojejunostomy, an old technique but novel solution for giant duodenal perforations–A report of four cases and review of literature. Surg Case Rep. 2020;3(1):1-5.
Alegbeleye BJ. A modified open omental plugging of peptic ulcer perforation in a mission hospital, North Western Cameroon. J Clin Invest Stud. 2019;2:1-9.
Abdallah HA, Abd-El-Aal AS. Comparative study between Graham’s omentopexy and modified-Graham’s omentopexy in treatment of perforated duodenal ulcers. Egyptian J Surg. 2018;37(4):485-9.
Budipramana VS. Lactate Level as a Prediction Factor of Reperforation after Repairing Gastric Perforation. Fol Med Indones. 2019;55(1):43-7.
Bader FG, Schröder M, Kujath P, Muhl E, Bruch HP, Eckmann C. Diffuse postoperative peritonitis -- value of diagnostic parameters and impact of early indication for relaparotomy. Eur J Med Res. 2009;14(11):491-6.
Bertleff MJ, Lange JF. Perforated peptic ulcer disease: a review of history and treatment. Dig Surg. 2010;27(3):161-9.
Chung KT, Shelat VG. Perforated peptic ulcer - an update. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;9(1):1-12.
Søreide K, Thorsen K, Harrison EM, Bingener J, Møller MH, Ohene-Yeboah M, et al. Perforated peptic ulcer. Lancet. 2015;386(10000):1288-98.
El-Nakeeb A, Fikry A, Abd El-Hamed TM, Fouda el Y, El Awady S, Youssef T, et al. Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on ulcer recurrence after simple closure of perforated duodenal ulcer. Int J Surg. 2009;7(2):126-9.
Wilhelmsen M, Møller MH, Rosenstock S. Surgical complications after open and laparoscopic surgery for perforated peptic ulcer in a nationwide cohort. Br J Surg. 2015;102(4):382-7.
Ibrahim A, Arunkumar A. Comparison of Surgical Techniques for Gastro Duodenal Perforation Closure: A Prospective Study of Falciformligament Patch Versus Graham Omental Patch. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2017;16(12):44-50.
Maghsoudi H, Ghaffari A. Generalized peritonitis requiring re-operation after leakage of omental patch repair of perforated peptic ulcer. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(2):124-8.
Tarasconi A, Coccolini F, Biffl WL, Tomasoni M, Ansaloni L, Picetti E, et al. Perforated and bleeding peptic ulcer: WSES guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. 2020;15:3.
Bowling K, Balcombe A, Rait J, Andrews S. Technique to manage persistent leak from a prepyloric ulcer where a distal gastrectomy is not appropriate. J Surg Case Rep. 2015;2015(8):rjv103.
Abd Ellatif ME, Salama AF, Elezaby AF, El-Kaffas HF, Hassan A, Magdy A, et al. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: patch versus simple closure. Int J Surg. 2013;11(9):948-51.
Rix TE, Bates T. Pre-operative risk scores for the prediction of outcome in elderly people who require emergency surgery. World J Emerg Surg. 2007;2:16.
Gokakin AK, Atabey M, Koyuncu A, Topcu O. Peptic Ulcer Perforation in Elderly: 10 years' Experience of a Single Institution. Int J Gerontology. 2016;10(4):198-201.
Saunders DI, Murray D, Pichel AC, Varley S, Peden CJ. Variations in mortality after emergency laparotomy: the first report of the UK Emergency Laparotomy Network. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109(3):368-75.
Sartelli M, Chichom-Mefire A, Labricciosa FM, Hardcastle T, Abu-Zidan FM, Adesunkanmi AK, et al. The management of intra-abdominal infections from a global perspective: 2017 WSES guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections. World J Emerg Surg. 2017;12:29.
Chichom-Mefire A, Fon TA, Ngowe-Ngowe M. Which cause of diffuse peritonitis is the deadliest in the tropics? A retrospective analysis of 305 cases from the South-West Region of Cameroon. World J Emerg Surg. 2016;11:14.
Neri A, Marrelli D, Scheiterle M, Di Mare G, Sforza S, Roviello F. Re-evaluation of Mannheim prognostic index in perforative peritonitis: prognostic role of advanced age. A prospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2015;13:54-9.
Ogbuanya AU, Anyanwu SNC, Ajah A, Otuu O, Ugwu NB, Boladuro EA, et al. Surgical Capacity in Rural Southeast Nigeria: Barriers and New Opportunities. Ann Glob Health. 2021;87(1):118.
Sorour M, Ghazal A-H, Kassem M, El-Khashab E, Shehata G. Study of the role of jejunal serosal patch in the management of large gastroduodenal perforations. Egypt J Surg. 2012;31(3):116-22.
Alaswad F. Large posterior perforation of duodenal ulcer: A rare surgical emergency. Asian J Health Sci. 2019;5(1):8.
Tochie JN, Agbor NV, Frank Leonel TT, Mbonda A, Aji Abang D, Danwang C. Global epidemiology of acute generalised peritonitis: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2020;10(1):e034326.
Gona SK, Alassan MK, Marcellin KG, Henriette KY, Adama C, Toussaint A, et al. Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Retrospective Cohort Study of Risk Factors among Black Africans in Côte d'Ivoire. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2016:2640730.
Oribabor FO, Adebayo BO, Aladesanmi T, Akinola DO. Perforated duodenal ulcer; management in a resource poor, semi-urban nigerian hospital. Niger J Surg. 2013;19(1):13-5.
Ogbuanya AU, Nnadozie UU, Enemuo VC, Ewah RL, Boladuro EO, Owusi OM. Perioperative mortality among surgical patients in a low-resource setting: A multi-center study at District hospitals in Southeast Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2022;25(7):1004-13.
Ogbuanya AU, Enemuo VC, Eni UE, Nwigwe CG, Otu O. Mortality audit in general surgery unit and lessons learned at a Nigerian tertiary hospital: a single centre observational study. Pan Afr Med J. 2022;41:228.
Ogbuanya AU, Ugwu NB, Kwento N, Enyanwuma EI, Anyigor FF, Oko U. Abdominal Injuries from Civilian Conflicts: An Emerging Global Health Challenge in Rural Southeast Nigeria. Ann Glob Health. 2023;89(1):4.
- Abstract Viewed: 343 times
- pdf Downloaded: 1022 times