SBMU Journals
  • New Submission
  • Register
  • Login
  • English
    • 简体中文

Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine

  • Home
  • About
    • Policies
    • Editorial Team
    • Reviewer guideline
    • Statistics
    • Contact
  • Issues
    • Current
    • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Indexing/Abstracting
  • For authors
    • New Submission
    • Author guidelines
    • Article withdrawal
    • Peer review process
    • FAQ
  • Ethics
    • Ethical requirements
    • Plagiarism Policy
    • Authorship conflicts
    • Malpractice statements
    • Copyright Notice
    • Intellectual properties
    • Privacy Statement
    • Artificial intelligence & Authorship
    • Retraction Cosiderations
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021): Continuous volume
  4. Original/Research Article

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021)

January 2021

Comparison of Digital (Two-finger) and Video Laryngoscopy Methods during Nasogastric Tube Insertion in Intubated Patients Digital (Two-finger) and Video Laryngoscopy Methods during NGT Insertion

  • Mehdi Nasr Isfahani
  • Elahe Nasri Nasrabadi

Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021), 1 January 2021 , Page e55
https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v9i1.1281 Published: 2021-08-16

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Background: Performing Nasogastric Tube (NGT) insertion is very challenging in anesthetized and intubated patients and a conclusive method has not yet been presented in this regard. Hence, the current study aimed at comparing Digital (two-finger) and Video Laryngoscopy methods during NGT insertion.

Materials and Methods: The present clinical trial was performed on 76 intubated patients that were randomly divided into two groups. Groups A and B underwent Video Laryngoscopy and Digital (two-finger) methods, respectively. Then, the success rate, the number of attempts to insert NGT, duration of insertion, hemodynamic parameters, and patients’ satisfaction level were recorded and examined in this study.

Results: The results of the study revealed that the duration of NGT insertion in group A with a mean of 19.07±2.07 seconds was significantly higher than that of group B with a mean of 11.53±2.16 seconds (P-value <0.001). Furthermore, the success rate was higher in group B as compared with group A (94.7% vs. 78.9%; P-value <0.05). Considering the interfering factors such as patients’ BMI, the chance of success in group B was reported to be 8.49 times higher than that of group A (P-value <0.05).

Conclusion: Given the high success rate of NGT insertion and the speed of performing this process in the Digital method compared to Video Laryngoscopy method, the Digital method can be regarded as a safe and appropriate method. Hence, Digital method can be used in medical centers due to its ease of implementation, practicality, availability, and lack of need for advanced and expensive devices. However, application and integration of new methods with conventional ones can yield a more desirable output with a very high success rate.

 

 

Keywords:
  • Digital Laryngoscopy, Nasogastric Tube (NGT), Video Laryngoscopy
  • pdf

How to Cite

1.
Nasr Isfahani M, Nasri Nasrabadi E. Comparison of Digital (Two-finger) and Video Laryngoscopy Methods during Nasogastric Tube Insertion in Intubated Patients: Digital (Two-finger) and Video Laryngoscopy Methods during NGT Insertion. Arch Acad Emerg Med [Internet]. 2021 Aug. 16 [cited 2025 May 25];9(1):e55. Available from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem/index.php/AAEM/article/view/1281
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

Isfahani MN, Heydari F, Azizollahi A, Noorshargh P. Comparison of Three Methods for NG Tube Placement in Intubated Patients in the Emergency Department. Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2020; 5(1): e6.

Mandal MC, Dolai S, Ghosh S, Mistri PK, Roy R, Basu SR, et al. Comparison of four techniques of nasogastric tube insertion in anaesthetised, intubated patients: A randomized controlled trial. 2014;58(6):714.

Mandal M, Karmakar A, Basu SRJIjoa. Nasogastric tube insertion in anaesthetised, intubated adult patients: A comparison between three techniques. 2018;62(8):609.

Roberts JR. Roberts and Hedges’ Clinical Procedures in Emergency Medicine and Acute Care E-Book: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2017.

Ghatak T, Samanta S, Baronia AKJNAjoms. A new technique to insert nasogastric tube in an unconscious intubated patient. 2013;5(1):68.

Appukutty J, Shroff PPJA, Analgesia. Nasogastric tube insertion using different techniques in anesthetized patients: a prospective, randomized study. 2009;109(3):832-5.

Alcalde HM, Martínez JB, Rubio AMJTiA, Care C. Digital intubation: Never blind anymore. 2016;6:28-31.

Jaber S, De Jong A, Pelosi P, Cabrini L, Reignier J, Lascarrou JBJCC. Videolaryngoscopy in critically ill patients. 2019;23(1):221.

Chun D-H, Kim NY, Shin Y-S, Kim SHJWjos. A randomized, clinical trial of frozen versus standard nasogastric tube placement. 2009;33(9):1789-92.

Fakhari S, Bilehjani I, Negargar S, MIRINEZHAD M, Azarfarin R. Split endotracheal tube as a guide tube for gastric tube insertion in anesthetized patients: A randomized clinical trial. 2009.

Tantri AR, Mangkuwerdojo LJMJoI. A randomized clinical trial of nasogastric tube insertion in intubated patient: comparison between finger method and reverse Sellick maneuver. 2019;28(4):311-5.

Fassoulaki A, Athanassiou E. Cardiovascular responses to the insertion of nasogastric tubes during general anaesthesia. Canadian Anaesthetists’ Society Journal. 1985;32(6):651.

Liao C-C, Liu F-C, Li AH, Yu H-PJEromd. Video laryngoscopy-assisted tracheal intubation in airway management. 2018;15(4):265-75.

Cavus E, Thee C, Moeller T, Kieckhaefer J, Doerges V, Wagner KJBa. A randomised, controlled crossover comparison of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with direct laryngoscopy in 150 patients during routine induction of anaesthesia. 2011;11(1):6.

  • Abstract Viewed: 878 times
  • pdf Downloaded: 219 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Make a Submission

Make a Submission

SJR

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

This journal is distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC 3.0. Design and publishing by SBMU journals. All credits and honors to PKP for their OJS. 

 Sitemap | ISSN-ONLINE: 2645-4904

Support Contact: ma.saghaei63@gmail.com

With the goal of net zero carbon emissions, this journal is published only in electronic format.

Powered by OJSPlus