The Role of Cardiac Arrest Sonographic Exam (CASE) in Predicting the Outcome of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation; a Cross-sectional Study Cardiac Arrest Sonographic Exam
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine,
Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021),
1 January 2021
,
Page e48
https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v9i1.1272
Abstract
Introduction: Ultrasonography (US) has been suggested as an integral part of resuscitation to identify potentially reversible causes of cardiac arrest (CA). This study aimed to evaluate the association between cardiac activity on ultrasonography during resuscitation and outcome of patients with non-shockable rhythms.
Methods: We conducted a prospective, observational study on adult patients presenting with CA or experiencing CA in the emergency department (ED), and initial non-shockable rhythm. US examination of the sub-xiphoid region was performed during the 10-second interval of rhythm and pulse check and the association of US findings and patients’ outcomes was evaluated.
Results: 151 patients with the mean age of 65.32 ± 11.68 years were evaluated (76.2% male). 43 patients (28.5%) demonstrated cardiac activity on the initial US. The rate of asystole in initial rhythm was 58.9% (n=89). Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved in 36 (23.8%) patients, twenty (13.2%) survived to hospital admission and seven (4.6%) survived to hospital discharge. When the cardiac standstill duration increased to six minutes, no patient survived hospital discharge. Potentially reversible causes were detected in 15 cases (9.9%), and four of them survived to hospital discharge. Cardiac activity on first scan was associated with ROSC (OR: 6.86, 95%CI: 2.92-16.09; p < 0.001), survival to hospital admission (OR: 17.80, 95%CI: 3.95–80.17; p < 0.001), and survival to hospital discharge (OR: 17.35, 95%CI: 2.02–148.92; p = 0.001).
Conclusion: In non-traumatic cardiac arrest patients with non-shockable rhythms, bedside US is of great importance in predicting ROSC. The presence of pulseless electrical activity (PEA) rhythm and cardiac activity on initial US were associated with ROSC, survival to hospital admission, and hospital discharge. When the cardiac standstill duration increased to six minutes, no patient survived hospital discharge.
- Heart arrest
- Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
- Return of Spontaneous Circulation
- Ultrasonography
How to Cite
References
Chardoli M, Heidari F, Shuang-ming S, Rabiee H, Sharif-Alhoseini M, Rahimi-Movaghar V, et al. Echocardiography integrated ACLS protocol versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients with pulseless electrical activity cardiac arrest. Chinese Journal of Traumatology. 2012;15(5):284-7.
Chan PS, McNally B, Tang F, Kellermann A. Recent trends in survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States. Circulation. 2014;130(21):1876-82.
Wu C, Zheng Z, Jiang L, Gao Y, Xu J, Jin X, et al. The predictive value of bedside ultrasound to restore spontaneous circulation in patients with pulseless electrical activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one. 2018;13(1):e0191636.
Tsou P-Y, Kurbedin J, Chen Y-S, Chou EH, Lee M-tG, Lee MC-H, et al. Accuracy of point-of-care focused echocardiography in predicting outcome of resuscitation in cardiac arrest patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2017;114:92-9.
Gaspari R, Weekes A, Adhikari S, Noble VE, Nomura JT, Theodoro D, et al. Emergency department point-of-care ultrasound in out-of-hospital and in-ED cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2016;109:33-9.
Bolvardi E, Pouryaghobi SM, Farzane R, Chokan NMJ, Ahmadi K, Reihani H. The prognostic value of using ultrasonography in cardiac resuscitation of patients with cardiac arrest. International journal of biomedical science: IJBS. 2016;12(3):110.
Ketelaars R, Beekers C, Van Geffen G-J, Scheffer GJ, Hoogerwerf N. Prehospital echocardiography during resuscitation impacts treatment in a physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical service: an observational study. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2018;22(4):406-13.
Blanco P, Buendía CM. Point-of-care ultrasound in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a concise review. Journal of ultrasound. 2017;20(3):193-8.
Clattenburg EJ, Wroe P, Brown S, Gardner K, Losonczy L, Singh A, et al. Point-of-care ultrasound use in patients with cardiac arrest is associated prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation pauses: a prospective cohort study. Resuscitation. 2018;122:65-8.
Reed MJ, Gibson L, Dewar A, Short S, Black P, Clegg GR. Introduction of paramedic led Echo in Life Support into the pre-hospital environment: The PUCA study. Resuscitation. 2017;112:65-9.
Zengin S, Yavuz E, Al B, Cindoruk Ş, Altunbaş G, Gümüşboğa H, et al. Benefits of cardiac sonography performed by a non-expert sonographer in patients with non-traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest. Resuscitation. 2016;102:105-9.
Cohn B. Does the absence of cardiac activity on ultrasonography predict failed resuscitation in cardiac arrest? 2013.
Merchant R, Topjian A, Panchal A, Cheng A, Aziz K, Berg K, et al. Adult basic and advanced life support, pediatric basic and advanced life support, neonatal life support, resuscitation education science, and systems of care writing groups. Part 1: executive summary: 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2020;142(16_Suppl_2):S337-S57.
Soar J, Berg KM, Andersen LW, Böttiger BW, Cacciola S, Callaway CW, et al. Adult Advanced Life Support: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Resuscitation. 2020;156:A80-A119.
Thomas AJ, Newgard CD, Fu R, Zive DM, Daya MR. Survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests with initial asystole or pulseless electrical activity and subsequent shockable rhythms. Resuscitation. 2013;84(9):1261-6.
Atkinson PR, Beckett N, French J, Banerjee A, Fraser J, Lewis D. Does point-of-care ultrasound use impact resuscitation length, rates of intervention, and clinical outcomes during cardiac arrest? A study from the sonography in hypotension and cardiac arrest in the emergency department (SHoC-ED) investigators. Cureus. 2019;11(4).
Cebicci H, Salt O, Gurbuz S, Koyuncu S, Bol O. Benefit of cardiac sonography for estimating the early term survival of the cardiopulmonary arrest patients. Hippokratia. 2014;18(2):125.
Hussein L, Rehman MA, Sajid R, Annajjar F, Al-Janabi T. Bedside ultrasound in cardiac standstill: a clinical review. The ultrasound journal. 2019;11(1):1-8.
Rabjohns J, Quan T, Boniface K, Pourmand A. Pseudo-pulseless electrical activity in the emergency department, an evidence based approach. The American journal of emergency medicine. 2020;38(2):371-5.
Flato UAP, Paiva EF, Carballo MT, Buehler AM, Marco R, Timerman A. Echocardiography for prognostication during the resuscitation of intensive care unit patients with non-shockable rhythm cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2015;92:1-6.
Lalande E, Burwash-Brennan T, Burns K, Atkinson P, Lambert M, Jarman B, et al. Is point-of-care ultrasound a reliable predictor of outcome during atraumatic, non-shockable cardiac arrest? A systematic review and meta-analysis from the SHoC investigators. Resuscitation. 2019;139:159-66.
Beckett N, Atkinson P, Fraser J, Banerjee A, French J, Talbot J-A, et al. Do combined ultrasound and electrocardiogram-rhythm findings predict survival in emergency department cardiac arrest patients? The Second Sonography in Hypotension and Cardiac Arrest in the Emergency Department (SHoC-ED2) study. CJEM. 2019;21(6):739-43.
- Abstract Viewed: 774 times
- pdf Downloaded: 321 times
