Comparison of Health-Related Quality of Life Changes in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic versus Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic review
Vol. 20 (2023),
25 December 2022
Aim: To compare the effects of RALP and LRP on health-related QoL following radical prostatectomy, focusing on studies performed via validated QoL questionnaires measuring particularly general health-related QoL.
Material and Methods: A systematic search was conducted using Web of Science, PubMed (MEDLINE) on 15 January 2023 with the following search terms solely or in combination: "robotic radical prostatectomy", "laparoscopic radical prostatectomy," and "quality of life". After retrieving the titles and abstracts of selected articles, the full texts of related articles were screened.
Results: After full-text evaluation, among 185 articles, 23 articles were found eligible for inclusion. Hoze et al. reported that the global health status at the 12th month of the surgery was almost the same in both groups according to EORTC- QLQ-C30 scores (76.3 in the RALRP group vs. 76.1 in the LRP group). Wang et al. reported a 75 point of EORTC-QOL-C30 global health status ten years after LRP. Wyler et al. found that the 1-3 month EORTC-QLQ-C30 global health score was significantly worser than the baseline score, 65.3±18.3 vs. 77.2±18.2; however, it returned to baseline in 13-24 months (77.7±16.8) even proceed baseline score in experienced hands at 49-58 months follow up, 78.2±17.8 vs. 85.3±15.5. The frequently used patient-reported quality of life questionnaire following RALRP was EORTC-QLQ.
Conclusion: Both robotic-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy are valid treatment options to achieve a good quality of life following surgery. The intermediate and long-term results in regard to QoL are comparable between the two procedures. RALRP might be superior to LRP in terms of immediate health-related quality of life, which might contribute to early recovery of urinary function.
- robotic-assisted surgery
- laparoscopic surgery
- radical prostatectomy
- quality of life
How to Cite
Rawla P. Epidemiology of prostate cancer. World journal of oncology. 2019;10:63.
Denmeade SR, Isaacs JT. A history of prostate cancer treatment. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2002;2:389-96.
Wang MC, Valenzuela LA, Murphy GP, Chu TM. Purification of a human prostate specific antigen. Invest Urol. 1979;17:159-63.
Litwin MS, Tan H-J. The diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer: a review. Jama. 2017;317:2532-42.
Walsh PC. Anatomic radical prostatectomy: evolution of the surgical technique. J Urol. 1998;160:2418-24.
Le CQ, Gettman MT. Laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy. Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy. 2014;6:1003-11.
Parsons JK, Bennett JL. Outcomes of Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robotic-Assisted Prostatectomy. Urology. 2008;72:412-6.
Holze S, Lemaire E, Mende M, et al. Quality of life after robotic-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (LAP-01). Prostate. 2022;82:894-903.
Shin DW, Lee SH, Kim TH, et al. Health-Related Quality of Life Changes in Prostate Cancer Patients after Radical Prostatectomy: A Longitudinal Cohort Study. Cancer Research and Treatment. 2019;51:556-67.
Bolenz C, Freedland SJ, Hollenbeck BK, et al. Costs of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a systematic review. European urology. 2014;65:316-24.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International journal of surgery. 2021;88:105906.
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000100.
Acar C, Schoffelmeer CC, Tillier C, de Blok W, van Muilekom E, van der Poel HG. Quality of Life in Patients with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer. A Comparative Retrospective Study: Brachytherapy Versus Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Versus Active Surveillance. Journal of Endourology. 2014;28:117-24.
Anceschi U, Gaffi M, Molinari C, Anceschi C. Posterior Reconstruction and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in a High-Risk Setting. Jsls-Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. 2013;17:535-42.
Aning JJ, MacKenzie KR, Fabricius M, et al. Detailed analysis of patient-reported lower urinary tract symptoms and effect on quality of life after robotic radical prostatectomy. Urologic Oncology-Seminars and Original Investigations. 2018;36.
Dijkstra-Eshuis J, Van den Bos TWL, Splinter R, et al. Effect of Preoperative Pelvic Floor Muscle Therapy With Biofeedback Versus Standard Care on Stress Urinary Incontinence and Quality of Life in Men Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Randomised Control Trial. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2015;34:144-50.
Feng M, Sun YL, Zhang N, Chen LL. Application effect of perioperative comprehensive nursing intervention on laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2020;13:6983-9.
Garcia-Sanchez C, Martin AAR, Conde-Sanchez JM, Congregado-Ruiz CB, Osman-Garcia I, Medina-Lopez RA. Comparative analysis of short - term functional outcomes and quality of life in a prospective series of brachytherapy and Da Vinci robotic prostatectomy. International Braz J Urol. 2017;43:216-23.
Haga N, Aikawa K, Hoshi S, et al. The Effect of the Vesical Adaptation Response to Diuresis on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Pilot Proof of Concept Study. Plos One. 2016;11.
Haga N, Kurita N, Yanagida T, et al. Effects of barbed suture during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy on postoperative tissue damage and longitudinal changes in lower urinary tract outcome. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. 2018;32:145-53.
Hagens MJ, Veerman H, de Ligt KM, et al. Functional outcomes rather than complications predict poor health-related quality of life at 6 months after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Journal of Robotic Surgery. 2022;16:453-62.
Hikita K, Honda M, Shimizu R, et al. Longitudinal, 5-year long-term outcomes for urinary continence and quality of life after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Japanese patients. Luts-Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. 2022;14:178-85.
Joshi N, de Blok W, van Muilekom E, van der Poel H. Impact of posterior musculofascial reconstruction on early continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective parallel group trial. European urology. 2010;58:84-9.
Namiki S, Egawa S, Baba S, et al. Recovery of quality of life in year after laparoscopic or retropubic radical prostatectomy: A multi-institutional longitudinal study. Urology. 2005;65:517-23.
Namiki S, Egawa S, Terachi T, et al. Changes in quality of life in first year after radical prostatectomy by retropubic, laparoscopic, and perineal approach: Multi-institutional longitudinal study in Japan. Urology. 2006;67:321-7.
Rush S, Alibhai SMH, Xu LZ, et al. Health-related quality of life in robotic versus open radical prostatectomy. Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal. 2015;9:179-87.
Umari P, Eden C, Cahill D, Rizzo M, Eden D, Sooriakumaran P. Retzius-Sparing versus Standard Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Comparative Prospective Study of Nearly 500 Patients. Journal of Urology. 2021;205:780-90.
van der Poel HG, de Blok W. Role of Extent of Fascia Preservation and Erectile Function After Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy. Urology. 2009;73:816-21.
van der Poel HG, de Blok W, Joshi N, van Muilekom E. Preservation of Lateral Prostatic Fascia is Associated with Urine Continence after Robotic-Assisted Prostatectomy. European Urology. 2009;55:892-901.
Wang CX, Song Z, Li SH, Tai S. Extended nursing for the recovery of urinary functions and quality of life after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2018;26:1553-60.
Wang EYH, Eriksson HG. Quality of life and functional outcomes 10 years after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences. 2014;119:32-7.
Wang L, Chung SF-CM, Yip SKH, Lau WKO, Cheng CWS, Sim HG. The natural history of voiding function after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations. 2011;29:177-82.
Wyler SF, Ruszat R, Straumann U, et al. Short-, intermediate-, and long-term quality of life after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - Does the learning curve of LRP have a negative impact on patients' quality of life? European Urology. 2007;51:1004-14.
Xylinas E, Ploussard G, Salomon L, et al. Intrafascial Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy with a Laparoscopic Robot-Assisted Extraperitoneal Approach: Early Oncological and Functional Results. Journal of Endourology. 2010;24:577-82.
Agochukwu NQ, Wittmann D, Boileau NR, et al. Validity of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sexual Interest and Satisfaction Measures in Men Following Radical Prostatectomy. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2019;37:2017-+.
Dommer L, Birzele JA, Ahmadi K, Rampa M, Stekhoven DJ, Strebel RT. Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) before and after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: does improvement of LUTS mitigate worsened incontinence after robotic prostatectomy? Translational Andrology and Urology. 2019;8:320-8.
Litwin MS, Hays RD, Fink A, Ganz PA, Leake B, Brook RH. The UCLA Prostate Cancer Index: development, reliability, and validity of a health-related quality of life measure. Medical care. 19981002-12.
Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM. The rand 36‐item health survey 1.0. Health economics. 1993;2:217-27.
Kelleher C, Cardozo L, Khullar V, Salvatore S. A new questionnaire to assess the quality of life of urinary incontinent women. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 1997;104:1374-9.
- Abstract Viewed: 35 times
- Just Accepted-7707 Downloaded: 17 times