The Evaluation of the Relation between Bladder Cancer and Oxidative Stress Using NRF-2/KEAP-1 Pathway, Zinc and Copper Levels
Urology Journal,
Vol. 18 No. 04 (2021),
20 September 2021
,
Page 422-428
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v18i04.6439
Abstract
Purpose: It has been shown that the Copper and Zinc contribute to the structure of the antioxidant enzymes. In addition NRF-2 and KEAP-1 complex have powerful effect on the intracellular organization of the antioxidants. We evaluated the relation of Copper, Zinc, NRF-2 and KEAP-1 complex regarding to the oxidative stress with tumor stage - grade in patients with bladder cancer.
Materials and Methods: A total of 52 patients (32 bladder cancer and 20 control group) were included to the study. The demographic properties of groups were identical. Serum NRF-2, KEAP-1, Cu and Zn levels were compared by ELISA method between the groups and tissue NRF-2, KEAP-1, Cu and Zn levels were evaluated also by ELISA method at cancer patients.
- Key words: Bladder cancer, NRF-2, KEAP-1, Urinary markers
How to Cite
References
1. Ferlay J, Bray F, Forman D, et al. GLOBOCAN 2008 v1.2, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC Cancer Base No. 10 2010, International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France.
2. Burger M, Catto JW, Dalbagni G, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer. EurUrol 2013 Feb;63(2):234-41.
3. M. Babjuk (Chair), A. Böhle, M. Burger, E. Compérat, E. Kaasinen, J. Palou et al.Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (Ta, T1 and CIS)2015
4. Cordon-Cardo C. Molecular alterations associated with bladder cancer initiation and progression. Scand J UrolNephrolSuppl. 2008: 154-165.
5. Valko M, Leibfritz D, Moncol J, Cronin MT, et al. Free radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2007;39:44- 84.
6. Nur A. Resveratrolün Hipoksi-reoksijenasyonu ile İndüklenen İn Vitro Endotel Hücresi Hasarına Etkisinin ve NRF-2 'nin Olası Rolünün Araştırılması (tez). İzmir Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi 2012
7. Hoekstra WG, Suttie JW, Ganther HG, Mentz W (1974) Trace elements metabolism in animals. University Park Press, Baltimore, 61
8. Song M. Songming H..Zinc and Copper Levels in Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.BiolTrace Elem Res (2013) 153:5–10
9. Navarro SS, Rohan TE (2007) Trace elements and cancer risk: a review of the epidemiologic evidence. CancerCauses Control 18:7–27
10. Kwak MK, Itoh K, Yamamoto M, et al. Enhanced expression of the transcription factor Nrf2 by cancer chemopreventive agents: role of antioxidant response element-like sequences in the nrf2 promoter. Mol Cell Biol 2002;22:2883-92.
11. Kaspar JW, Niture SK, Jaiswal AK. Nrf2:INrf2 (Keap1) signaling in oxidative stress. FreeRadic. Biol. Med. 2009; 47; 1304–1309.
12. Banning A, Deubel S, Kluth D et al. The GI-GPx gene is a target for Nrf2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005; 25; 4914–4923.
13. Ishii T, Itoh K, Takahashi S et al. Transcription factor Nrf2 coordinately regulates a group of oxidative stress-inducible genes in macrophages. J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275; 16023– 16029.
14. Katoh Y, Itoh K, Yoshida E et al. Twodomains of Nrf2 cooperatively bind CBP, a CREB binding protein, and synergistically activate transcription. GenesCells 2001; 6; 857–868.
15. Kim YC, Masutani H, Yamaguchi Y et al. Hemin-induced activation of the thioredoxin gene by Nrf2. A differential regulation of the antioxidant responsive element by a switch of its binding factors. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276; 18399–18406.
16. Zhang DD. Mechanistic studies of the Nrf2–Keap1 signaling pathway. DrugMetab. Rev. 2006; 38; 769–789.
17. Gutteridge JM, Halliwell B. Free radicals and antioxidants in the year 2000. A historical look to the future. Ann NY AcadSci 2000;899:136-47.
18. Akcay T, Saygili I, Andican G, Yalcin V (2003) Increased formation of 8-hydroxy-2′- deoxyguanosine in peripheral blood leukocytes in bladder cancer. IntUrol 71(3):271–274. doi:10.1159/000072677
19. Willett WC, MacMahon B (1984) Diet and cancer—an overview. N Engl J Med 310(11):697–703
20. Nelson RL (1992) Dietary iron colorectal cancer risk. FreeRadicBiolMed 12(2):161–168. doi:10.1016/0891-5849(92)90010-E
21. Shibata T, Ohta T, Tong KI et al. Cancer related mutations in NRF2 impair its recognition by Keap1–Cul3 E3 ligase and promote malignancy. Proc. NatlAcad. Sci. USA 2008; 105; 13568–13573.
22. Padmanabhan B, Tong KI, Ohta T et al. Structural basis for defects of Keap1 activity provoked by its point mutations in lung cancer. Mol. Cell 2006; 21; 689–700.
23. Kim YR, Oh JE, Kim MS et al. Oncogenic NRF2 mutations in squamous cell carcinomas of oesophagus and skin. J. Pathol. 2010; 220; 446–451.
24. Singh A, Misra V, Thimmulappa RK et al. Dysfunctional KEAP1– NRF2 interaction in non-small-celllungcancer. PLoSMed. 2006; 3; e420.
25. Shibata T, Kokubu A, Gotoh M et al. Geneticalteration of Keap1 confersconstitutive Nrf2 activation and resistance to chemotherapy in gallbladder cancer. Gastroenterology 2008; 135; 1358–1368.
26. Gecit I, Kavak S, Demir H, Gunes M, Pirincci N, Cetin C, Ceylan K, Benli E, Yildiz I (2011) Serum trace element levels in patients with bladder cancer. AsianPac J Cancer P 12:3409–3413
27. Guo KF, Zhang Z, Wang JY, Gao SL, Liu J, Zhan B, Chen ZP, Kong CZ (2012) Variation of urinary serum trace elements (Ca, Zn, Cu, Se) in bladder carcinoma in China. AsianPac J Cancer P 13:2057–2061
28. Mazdak H, Yazdekhasti F, Movahedian A, Mirkheshti N, Shafieian M (2010) The comparative study of serum iron, copper, and zinc levels between bladder cancer patients and a control group. IntUrolNephrol42:89–93
29. Hartikainen JM, Tengstrom M, Kosma VM, Kinnula VL, Mannermaa A, Soini Y. Genetic polymorphisms and protein expression of NRF-2 and sulfiredoxin predict surivival outcomes in breast cancer.CancerRes 2012; 72:5537-46.
30. Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor-2 activitycontrols 4-hydroxynonenal metabolism and activity in prostate cancer cellsP. Pettazzoni, E. Ciamporcero, C. Medana, S. Pizzimenti, F. Dal Bello, V.G. Minero, C. Toaldo, R. Minelli, K. Uchida, M.U. Dianzani, R. Pili, G. Barrera .FreeRadic. Biol. Med., 51 (2011), pp. 1610–1618
- Abstract Viewed: 139 times
- 6439/pdf Downloaded: 99 times