Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences

  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
  • Journal Info
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Indexing/Abstracting
    • Contact Us
  • Author Guideline
    • Submission Guide
    • Author Statement Form
    • Peer Review Process
    • Publication Fee
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Ethical Requirements
    • Authorship Rules
    • Withdrawal Regulations
    • Retraction Considerations
    • Privacy Statement
  • Reviewer Guideline
  • New Submission
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 2 No. 4 (2011): Autumn
  4. Original Article

Vol. 2 No. 4 (2011)

February 2012

Comparison between the Holmium Laser (Made in Iran) and Pneumatic Lithotripsy in Patients Suffering from Upper Ureteral Stone between 1-2cm

  • Mohammad Reza Razaghi
  • Abdollah Razi

Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences, Vol. 2 No. 4 (2011), 8 February 2012 , Page 144-147

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to compare holmium laser (LL) with pneumatic lithoclast (PL) in patients with upper ureteral stones and their ability to destruct the stones and making the patient stone free. We also compare the duration of these procedures and their complications, such as urosepsis, perforation, and pushing the stone backward.

METHODS: This has been a clinical randomized trail study in 26 patients with upper ureteral stone more than 1 cm. Patients were divided into 2 randomized groups, each treated with one of the following approaches: pneumatic lithoclast(14 patients), or holmium laser(12 patients). The goal of lithotripsy was to break the stone into particles less than 3 mm. IVP (Intravenous Pyelogram) was performed 4 weeks after.

RESULTS: The immediate stone free rate was 100% in LL group and 42.9% in PL group (P=0.001). Stone pushing back was 0% in LL group and 57.1% in PL group. Complications such as a perforation, or urosepsis, or bleeding were not seen in any of these groups. Fever more than 38º C was observed in 1.8% in LL, and 3.8% in PL group (p=0.56). After 4 weeks no complication was seen in IVP.

CONCLUSION: According to our experience, for upper ureteral stones larger than 1 cm, lithotripsy with holmium laser is preferred approach with high success rate and low complication. 

Keywords:
  • success rate
  • ureteral stone
  • lithotripsy
  • PDF

How to Cite

Razaghi, M. R., & Razi, A. (2012). Comparison between the Holmium Laser (Made in Iran) and Pneumatic Lithotripsy in Patients Suffering from Upper Ureteral Stone between 1-2cm. Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences, 2(4), 144–147. Retrieved from https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/jlms/article/view/2623
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

Pearle MS, Lotan Y. Urinary Lithiasis: Etiology, Epidemiology, and Pathogenesis. Wein A.j, Kavousi l.R Novick A.C, partin A.W, peters C.A. Campbell- Walsh urology, 9th edition 2007; chapter 42:1363p.

Denstedt JD, Eberwein PM,Singh RR. The Swiss lithoclast: a new device for intracorporeal lithotripsy. J Urol. 1992;148:1088-90.

Robert M, Bennani A, Guiter J, Averus M, Grasset D. Treatment of 150 ureteric calculi with the lithoclast. Eur Urol 1994;26(3):212-15.

Vorreuther R, Klots T, Heidenreich A, Nayal W, Engelmann U. Pneumatic vs electrokinetic lithotripsy in treatment of ureteral stones. J Endourol 1998;12:233-6.

Lingeman JE, Matlaga BR, Evan AP. Surgical Management of Upper Urinary Tract Calculi. Wein A.j, Kavousi l.R Novick A.C, partin A.W, peters C.A. Campbell- Walsh urology, 9th edition 2007; chapter 44:1460-3p.

Bapat SS, Pai KV, Purnapatre SS, Yadav PB, Padye AS. Comparison of holmium laser and pneumatic lithotripsy in managing upper-ureteral stones. J Endourol 2007; 21(12):1425-7.

Manohar T, Ganpule A, Desai M. Comparative evaluation of Swiss LithoClast 2 and holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for impacted upper-ureteral stones. J Endourol 2008; 22(3):443-6.

Mugiya S, Nagata M, Un-No T, Takayama T, Suzuki K, Fujita K. Endoscopic management of impacted ureteral stones using a small caliber ureteroscope and a laser lithotriptor. J Urol 2000;164(2):329-31.

  • Abstract Viewed: 467 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 308 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Make a Submission

Make a Submission

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

Iranian Medical Laser Association 

                                        

 

This journal is distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC 3.0.
Design and publishing by SBMU journals. All credits and honors to PKP for their OJS. 

Powered by OJSPlus