Microshear Bond Strength of a Self-adhesive Composite to Erbium Laser-Treated Primary Enamel
Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences,
Vol. 11 No. 2 (2020),
15 March 2020
,
Page 181-186
Abstract
Introduction: Advances have been made in the composition of flowable composites in recent years and self-adhering composites, which do not require a bonding agent, have recently been introduced to the market. This study aimed to assess the microshear bond strength (μSBS) of a self-adhering flowable composite (Vertise) to primary enamel treated with a graphite disc with silicon carbide particles (SIC) and laser irradiation, the result of which was compared to that of a conventional flowable composite (Premise).
Methods: In this in vitro, experimental study, 72 samples of sound primary enamel were evaluated. A smooth enamel surface was obtained using a graphite disc. Next, the erbium chromium yttrium scandium gallium garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser was used for enamel surface treatment in half of the samples (n = 36). All the samples were then randomly divided into 4 groups of (i) Premise flowable composite (PF) without laser (n = 18), (ii) Vertise flowable composite (VF) without laser (n = 18), (iii) PF with laser (n = 18), and (iv) VF with laser (n = 18). The teeth were then incubated at 37°C for 24 hours and were then subjected to thermocycling. The μSBS of samples was measured using a universal testing machine and reported in megapascal (MPa). Data were analyzed using SPSS via the two-way ANOVA and independent-samples t test at P < 0.05.
Results: The mean μSBS of VF was significantly higher to the laser-treated samples (13.60 ± 5.47) compared with the non-treated samples (5.89 ± 2.42) (P < 0.001). However, no significant difference was noted in the μSBS of PF to the laser-treated (13.18 ± 3.45) and non-treated samples (16.06 ± 3.52) (P = 0.058).
Conclusion: The μSBS of the conventional flowable composite is higher than that of the self-adhering flowable composite to the enamel of primary teeth. Enamel surface treatment with laser irradiation increases the μSBS of self-adhering flowable composites.
- Microshear Bond Strength
- Self-adhering Flowable Composite
- Laser
- Primary Enamel
How to Cite
References
Lenzi TL, Gimenez T, Tedesco TK, Mendes FM, Rocha Rde O, Raggio DP. Adhesive systems for restoring primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016;26(5):364-75. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12210.
Rengo C, Goracci C, Juloski J, Chieffi N, Giovannetti A, Vichi A, et al. Influence of phosphoric acid etching on microleakage of a self-etch adhesive and a self-adhering composite. Aust Dent J. 2012;57(2):220-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2012.01689.x.
Altunsoy M, Botsali MS, Sari T, Onat H. Effect of different surface treatments on the microtensile bond strength of two self-adhesive flowable composites. Lasers Med Sci. 2015;30(6):1667-73. doi: 10.1007/s10103-014-1640-2.
Altunsoy M, Tanriver M, Ok E, Kucukyilmaz E. Shear bond strength of a self-adhering flowable composite and a flowable base composite to mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium-enriched mixture cement, and biodentine. J Endod. 2015;41(10):1691-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.06.013.
Yazici AR, Agarwal I, Campillo-Funollet M, Munoz-Viveros C, Antonson SA, Antonson DE, et al. Effect of laser preparation on bond strength of a self-adhesive flowable resin. Lasers Med Sci. 2013;28(1):343-7. doi: 10.1007/s10103-012-1158-4.
Fu J , Kakuda S, Pan F, Hoshika S, Ting S, Fukuoka A, et al. Bonding performance of a newly developed step-less all-in-one system on dentin. Dent Mater J. 2013;32(2):203-11. doi:10.4012/dmj.2012-204.
Vichi A, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Clinical study of the self-adhering flowable composite resin Vertise Flow in Class I restorations: six-month follow-up. Int Dent SA. 2010;12(1):14-23.
Roeder L, Pereira PN, Yamamoto T, Ilie N, Armstrong S, Ferracane J. Spotlight on bond strength testing--unraveling the complexities. Dent Mater. 2011;27(12):1197-203. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2011.08.396.
Placido E, Meira JB, Lima RG, Muench A, de Souza RM, Ballester RY. Shear versus micro-shear bond strength test: a finite element stress analysis. Dent Mater. 2007;23(9):1086-92. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2006.10.002.
Armstrong S, Geraldeli S, Maia R, Raposo LH, Soares CJ, Yamagawa J. Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of "micro" bond strength test methods. Dent Mater. 2010;26(2):e50-62. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.155.
Moslemi M, Fotouhi Ardakani F, Javadi F, Khalili Sadrabad Z, Shadkar Z, Shadkar MS. Evaluation of Er,Cr:YSGG laser effect on microshear bond strength of a self-adhesive flowable composite in the dentin of permanent molar: an in vitro study. Scientifica (Cairo). 2016;2016:4856285. doi: 10.1155/2016/4856285.
Lenzi TL, Guglielmi Cde A, Arana-Chavez VE, Raggio DP. Tubule density and diameter in coronal dentin from primary and permanent human teeth. Microsc microanal. 2013;19(6):1445-
doi: 10.1017/S1431927613012725.
Duddu MK, Muppa R, Panthula P, Srinivas N. Comparison of shear bond strength and micro-leakage of three commercially available seventh generation bonding agents in primary anterior teeth: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2015;33(2):116-21. doi:10.4103/0970-4388.155123.
International Organization for Standrdization. ISO/TS 11405. Dental materials guidance on testing of adhesion to tooth structure .Geneva : ISO ; 2015.
Garcia RN, Silva CS, Silva GG, Mocellin G, Ozelame J, Fracasso L, et al. Bonding Performance of a self-adhering flowable composite to indirect restorative materials. RBSO. 2014;11(1):6-12.
Almaz ME, Oba AA, Sönmez IŞ, Sönmez D. Comparison of shear bond strength of self- adhering flowable composite with different flowable composites to dentin. Eur J Gen Dent. 2016;5(1):6-10. doi: 10.4103/2278-9626.172735.
Erdemir U, Sancakli HS, Sancakli E, Eren MM, Ozel S, Yucel T, et al. Shear bond strength of a new self-adhering flowable
composite resin for lithium disilicate-reinforced CAD/CAM ceramic material. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014;6(6):434-43. doi: 10.4047/jap.2014.6.6.434.
Mine A, De Munck J, Van Ende A, Poitevin A, Matsumoto M, Yoshida Y, et al. Limited interaction of a self-adhesive
flowable composite with dentin/enamel characterized by TEM. Dent Mater. 2017;33(2):209-217. doi: 10.1016/j. dental.2016.11.010.
Sachdeva P, Goswami M, Singh D. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and nanoleakage of conventional
and self-adhering flowable composites to primary teeth dentin. Contemp Clin Dent. 2016;7(3):326-31. doi:10.4103/0976-237X.188549.
Pacifici E, Chazine M, Vichi A, Grandini S, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Shear-bond strength of a new self-adhering flowable restorative material to dentin of primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013;38(2):149-54. doi: 10.17796/ jcpd.38.2.l3q5l3128k2870j7.
Poorzandpoush K, Shahrabi M, Heidari A, Hosseinipour ZS. Shear bond strength of self-adhesive flowable composite,conventional flowable composite and resinmodified glass ionomer cement to primary dentin. Front Dent. 2019;16(1):62-8. doi: 10.18502/fid.v16i1.1111.
Memarpour M, Shafiei F, Razmjoei F, Kianimanesh N. Effect of laser preparation on adhesion of a self-adhesive flowable composite resin to primary teeth. Microsc Res Tech. 2016; 79(4):334-41. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22635.
Shafiei F, Saadat M. Micromorphology and bond strength evaluation of adhesive interface of a self-adhering flowable composite resin-dentin: effect of surface treatment. Microsc Res Tech. 2016;79(5):403-7. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22643.
Jaberi Ansari Z, Fekrazad R, Feizi S, Younessian F, Kalhori KA, Gutknecht N. The effect of an Er,Cr:YSGG laser on the micro-shear bond strength of composite to the enamel and dentin of human permanent teeth. Lasers Med Sci. 2012;27(4):761-5. doi: 10.1007/s10103-011-0961-7.
Davari A, Sadeghi M, Bakhshi H. Shear Bond Strength of an etch-and-rinse adhesive to Er:YAG laser- and/or phosphoric acid treated dentin. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2013;7(2):67-73. doi: 10.5681/joddd.2013.012.
Shakya VK, Singh RK, Pathak AK, Singh BP, Chandra A, Bharti R, et al. Analysis of micro-shear bond strength of self-etch adhesive systems with dentin: an in vitro study. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2015;5(3):185-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2015.07.006.
Kasraei S, Yarmohammadi E, Ghazizadeh MV. Microshear bond strength of OptiBond all-in-one self-adhesive agent to Er:YAG laser treated enamel after thermocycling and water storage. J Lasers Med Sci. 2016;7(3):152-158. doi:10.15171/jlms.2016.26.
McDonough WG, Antonucci JM, He J, Shimada Y, Chiang MY, Schumacher GE, et al. A microshear test to measure
bond strengths of dentin-polymer interfaces. Biomaterials. 2002;23(17):3603-8. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00089-3
- Abstract Viewed: 598 times
- PDF Downloaded: 505 times