Influence of Different Surface Treatments on the Shear Bond Strength of Resin Cement to Base Metal Alloys
Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences,
Vol. 11 No. 1 (2020),
18 Dey 2020
,
Page 45-49
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of resin cement to nickel-chrome (Ni-Cr) alloy.
Methods: Forty disk-shaped specimens of Ni-Cr alloy were prepared and divided into 4 groups. In the first group, the specimens’ surface was sandblasted with 50 μ Al2O3 particles. In the second group, the specimens were prepared with the Er:YAG laser. In the third group, the specimens were prepared using the Er:YAG laser after sandblasting. In the fourth group, the specimens’ surface was covered with a thin layer of MKZ metal primer after sandblasting. Then the cylinders of composite resin were bonded to the treated metal surfaces using Panavia F2.0 resin cement. All of the samples were subjected to 2000 thermal cycles. The shear bond strength was tested using a universal testing machine at the crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The failure mode was also observed by a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using the one-way ANOVA and the Tukey HSD test at a significance level of 0.05.
Results: The shear bond strength from the highest to the lowest were as follows: the Er:YAG laser group, the sandblast and MKZ primer combination group, the sandblast group, and the sandblast and Er:YAG laser combination group. The mean differences of shear bond strength between the Er:YAG laser group and the sandblast group (P = 0.047) and also between the Er:YAG laser group and the sandblast and Er:YAG laser combination group (P = 0.015) were statistically significant.
Conclusion: Among the different surface treatments employed in this study, Er:YAG laser treatment increased the shear bond strength between the metal alloy and the resin cement (Pavnavia F2).
- Shear bond strength
- Alloy primer
- Er
- YAG laser
- Base metal alloys
How to Cite
References
Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Sorensen JA. In vitro Shear bond strength of cementing agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 92(3):265-73. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.06.027.
Abreu A, Loza MA, Elias A, Mukhopadhyay S, Looney S, Rueggeberg FA. Tensile bond strength of an adhesive
resin cement to different alloys having various surface treatments. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;101(2):107-18. doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60004-4.
Gorler O, Ozdemir AK. Bonding strength of ceromer with direct laser sintered, Ni-Cr-based, and ZrO2 metal infrastructures after Er:YAG, Nd:YAG, and Ho:YAG laser surface treatments - a comparative in vitro study. Photomed Laser Surg. 2016;34(8):355-62. doi: 10.1089/pho.2016.4129.
Shafiei F, Behroozibakhsh M, Abbasian A, Shahnavazi S. Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to base metal alloys having different surface treatments. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2018;15(1):63-70. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.223610.
Pegoraro LF, Barrack G. A Comparison of bond strength of adhesive cast restorations using different designs, bonding agents and luting agents. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;57(2):133-8. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(87)90134-x.
Al-Helou H, Swed E. Effect of metal type and surface treatment on shear bond strength of resin cement (in
vitro study). J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016;16(1):49-52. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.164882.
Sanohkan S, Urapepon S, Harnirattisai C, Sirisinha C, Sunintaboon P. Shear bond strength between
autopolymerizing acrylic resin and Co-Cr alloy using different primers. Dent Mater J. 2012;31(5):765-71. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2012-051.
Fonseca RG, Martins SB, de Oliveira Abi-Rached F, Dos Santos Cruz CA. Effect of different airborneparticle abrasion/bonding agent combinations on the bond strength of a resin cement to a base metal alloy. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;108(5):316-23. doi: 10.1016/S0022- 3913(12)60185-1.
Dede DÖ, Yenisey M, Rona N, Öngöz Dede F. Effects of Laser Treatment on the Bond Strength of Differently Sintered Zirconia Ceramics. Photomed Laser Surg. 2016;34(7):276-83. doi: 10.1089/pho.2015.4064.
Çağlar I, Yanikoğlu N. The effect of sandblasting, Er:YAG laser, and heat treatment on the mechanical properties
of different zirconia cores. Photomed Laser Surg. 2016;34(1):17-26. doi: 10.1089/pho.2015.3980.
Kurklu D, Yanikoglu N. SEM evaluation of surface morphologic analysis of restorative materials with three laser treatment. J Dent Lasers. 2013;7(1):9–16. doi: 10.4103/0976-2868.118414.
Oyar P. Laser sintering technology and balling phenomenon. Photomed Laser Surg. 2018;36(2):72-7. doi: 10.1089/pho.2017.4311.
Sadat Madani A, Astaneh PA, Shahabi S, Nakhaei MR, Bagheri HG, Chiniforush N. Influence of different power outputs of intraoral Nd:YAG laser on shear bond strength of a resin cement to nickel-chromium dental alloy. Lasers Med Sci. 2013;28(1):229-34. doi: 10.1007/ s10103-012-1095-2.
Kunt GE, Güler AU, Ceylan G, Duran I, Ozkan P, Kirtiloğlu T. Effects of Er:YAG laser treatments on surface roughness of base metal alloys. Lasers Med Sci. 2012;27(1):47-51. doi: 10.1007/s10103-010-0844-3.
Delmé KI, De Moor RJ. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of enamel and dentin surfaces after Er:YAG
laser preparation and laser conditioning. Photomed Laser Surg. 2007; 25(5):393– 401. doi: 10.1089/
pho.2006.2069.
Shiu P, De Souza-Zaroni WC, de Eduardo CP, Youssef MN. Effect of feldspathic ceramic surface treatments on bond strength to resin cement. Photomed Laser Surg. 2007;25(4):291-6. doi: 10.1089/pho.2007.2018.
Ferracane JL, Stansbury JW, Burke FJ. Self-adhesiveresin cements - chemistry, properties and clinical considerations. J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38(4):295–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02148.x.
Kunt GE, Güler AU, Ceylan G, Duran I, Ozkan P, Kirtiloğlu T. Effects of Er:YAG laser treatments on surface roughness of base metal alloys. Lasers Med Sci. 2012;27(1):47-51. doi: 10.1007/s10103-010-0844-3.
Kern M, Thompson VP. Sandblasting and silica-coating of dental alloys: volume loss, morphology and changes in the surface composition. Dent Mater. 1993;9(3):151-61. doi: 10.1016/0109-5641(93)90113-5.
Abreu A, Loza MA, Elias A, Mukhopadhyay S, Rueggeberg FA. Effect of metal type and Surface treatment on in vitro tensile strength of copings cemented to minimally retentive preparations. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;98(3): 199-207. doi: 10.1016/S0022- 3913(07)60056-0.
Raeisosadat F, Ghavam M, Hasani Tabatabaei M, Arami S, Sedaghati M. Bond strength of resin cements to noble Influence of Surface Treatments on Shear Bond and base metal alloys with different surface treatments. J Dent (Tehran). 2014;11(5):596-603.
da Silva Ferreira S, Hanashiro FS, de Souza-Zaroni WC, Turbino ML, Youssef MN. Influence of aluminum oxide sandblasting associated with Nd:YAG or Er:YAG lasers on shear bond strength of a feldspathic ceramic to resin cements. Photomed Laser Surg. 2010; 28(4):471–5. doi: 10.1089/pho.2009.2528.
Cavalcanti AN, Foxton RM, Watson TF, Oliveira MT, Giannini M, Marchi GM. Bond strength of resin cements to a zirconia ceramic with different surface treatments. Oper Dent. 2009;34(3):280–7. doi: 10.2341/08-80.
Akyil MS, Uzun IH, Bayindir F. Bond strength of resin cement to yttrium-stabilized tetragonal zirconia ceramic treated with air abrasion, silica coating, and laser irradiation. Photomed Laser Surg. 2010;28(6):801– 8. doi: 10.1089/pho.2009.2697.
Atsu SS, Kilicarslan MA, Kucukesmen HC, Aka PS. Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;95(6):430–6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.03.016.
- Abstract Viewed: 383 times
- PDF Downloaded: 297 times