Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences

  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
  • Journal Info
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Indexing/Abstracting
    • Contact Us
  • Author Guideline
    • Submission Guide
    • Author Statement Form
    • Peer Review Process
    • Publication Fee
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Ethical Requirements
    • Authorship Rules
    • Withdrawal Regulations
    • Retraction Considerations
    • Privacy Statement
  • Reviewer Guideline
  • New Submission
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 10 No. 3 (2019): Summer
  4. Original Article

Vol. 10 No. 3 (2019)

July 2019

Laser Versus Pneumatic Lithotripsy With Semi-Rigid Ureteroscope; A Comparative Randomized Study

  • Seyed Mohammadreza Rabani
  • Seyed Hossein Rabani
  • Najmeh Rashidi

Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences, Vol. 10 No. 3 (2019), 6 July 2019 , Page 185-188
Published: 2019-07-06

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Introduction: Ureteral stones are among the most common disorders in the urologic field. Miniaturization of endoscopic devices in urology and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) has revolutionized the management of ureteral stones. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and results of laser versus pneumatic lithotripsy (PL) with semi-rigid ureteroscope in a randomized prospective clinical trial in removing stones.


Methods: 117 adult patients underwent transurethral lithotripsy (TUL) in a single academic center and by a single surgeon. The patients were randomized in 2 groups: In group 1, 58 patients with ureteral stones underwent ureteroscopy and stone fragmentation was done by Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy (LL) and in group 2, 59 patients underwent PL (Swiss LithoClast) by using the same ureteroscope.


Results: Mean age was 41.77 years and 41.1years in group one and 2 respectively (P = 0.79), there was no significant difference in male to female ratio and mean stone in both groups. The success rate for stone clearance was 79.31% and 77.96% in group 1 and 2 respectively (P = 0.52). No difference between complications was seen in both groups, but the duration of operations was different (significantly lower in group 2).


Conclusion: In both techniques, acceptable results were achieved. We have found a significant statistical difference in duration of operation between our results (P = 0.001) and similar studies, while this was shorter in the pneumatic group in our study, it was longer in other similar ones. This might be a result of more experience in working with PL in our center.


Keywords: Laser lithotripsy, Pneumatic lithotripsy, Ureteroscopy


Keywords:
  • Laser lithotripsy
  • Pneumatic lithotripsy
  • Ureteroscopy
  • PDF

How to Cite

Rabani, S. M., Rabani, S. H., & Rashidi, N. (2019). Laser Versus Pneumatic Lithotripsy With Semi-Rigid Ureteroscope; A Comparative Randomized Study. Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences, 10(3), 185–188. Retrieved from https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/jlms/article/view/21214
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

Tiselius H-G. Stone incidence and prevention. Braz J Urol. 2000;26(5):452-62.

Degirmenci T, Gunlusoy B, Kozacioglu Z, Arslan M, Koras O, Arslan B, et al. Comparison of Ho: YAG laser and pneumatic lithotripsy in the treatment of impacted ureteral stones: an analysis of risk factors. The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences. 2014;30(3):153-8.

Tipu SA, Malik HA, Mohhayuddin N, Sultan G, Hussain M, Hashmi A, et al. Treatment of ureteric calculi-use of Holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy versus pneumatic lithoclast. JPMA. 2007;57:440-3.

Yin X, Tang Z, Yu B, Wang Y, Li Y, Yang Q, et al. Holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy versus pneumatic lithotripsy for treatment of distal ureteral calculi: a meta-analysis. Journal of endourology. 2013;27(4):408-14.

Binbay M, Tepeler A, Singh A, Akman T, Tekinaslan E, Sarilar O, et al. Evaluation of pneumatic versus holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy for impacted ureteral stones. International urology and nephrology. 2011;43(4):989-95.

Razzaghi MR, Razi A, Mazloomfard MM, Taklimi AG, Valipour R, Razzaghi Z. Safety and efficacy of pneumatic lithotripters versus holmium laser in management of ureteral calculi: a randomized clinical trial. Urology journal. 2013;10(1):762.

Teichman JM, Vassar GJ, Bishoff JT, Bellman GC. Holmium: YAG lithotripsy yields smaller fragments than lithoclast, pulsed dye laser or electrohydraulic lithotripsy. The Journal of urology. 1998;159(1):17-23.

Li L, Pan Y, Weng Z, Bao W, Yu Z, Wang F. A prospective randomized trial comparing pneumatic lithotripsy and holmium laser for management of middle and distal ureteral calculi. Journal of Endourology. 2015;29(8):883-7.

Kitano H, Shinmei S, Goriki A, Iwamoto H, Hayashi T, Mutaguchi K. Comparison of pneumatic lithotripter and holmium YAG laser in transureteral lithotripsy (TUL). Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai zasshi The japanese journal of urology. 2013;104(3):513-20.

Jou Y-c, Shen C-h, Cheng M-c, Chen P-c. High-power holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser for percutaneous treatment of large renal stones. Urology. 2007;69(1):22-5.

Liu C, Zhou H, Jia W, Hu H, Zhang H, Li L. The Efficacy of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Using Pneumatic Lithotripsy vs. the Holmium Laser: a Randomized Study. Indian Journal of Surgery. 2017;79(4):294-8.

Jou Y-C, Shen J-H, Cheng M-C, Lin C-T, Chen P-C. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with holmium: Yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and fiber guider—report of 349 cases. Urology. 2005;65(3):454-8.

Jeon SS, HYUN JH, LEE KS. A comparison of holmium: YAG laser with Lithoclast lithotripsy in ureteral calculi fragmentation. International journal of urology. 2005;12(6):544-7.

Bapat SS, Pai KV, Purnapatre SS, Yadav PB, Padye AS. Comparison of holmium laser and pneumatic lithotripsy in managing upper-ureteral stones. Journal of endourology. 2007;21(12):1425-8.

  • Abstract Viewed: 641 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 288 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Make a Submission

Make a Submission

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

Iranian Medical Laser Association 

                                        

 

This journal is distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC 3.0.
Design and publishing by SBMU journals. All credits and honors to PKP for their OJS. 

Powered by OJSPlus