Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science
  • New Submission
  • Register
  • Login
  • English
    • فارسی

Advances in Nursing & Midwifery

  • Home
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Author Guideline
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Issues
    • Archives
    • Current
    • Accepted Manuscript
  • Indexing/Abstracting
  • Ethics
    • Ethical requirements
    • Publication Ethics and Research Misconduct
    • Ethical Considerations for Human Subjects
  • Declaration of AI Use
  • New Submission
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 22 No. 77 (2013): Spring 2013
  4. Research Article-Nursing

Vol. 22 No. 77 (2013)

April 2013

Comparison of ethical reasoning in nursing students and nurses in

  • mohammad Zirak
  • sima Mogadasian
  • farahnaz Abdullah-Zadeh
  • azad Rahmani

Advances in Nursing & Midwifery, Vol. 22 No. 77 (2013), 25 April 2013 , Page 1-9
https://doi.org/10.22037/anm.v22i77.4091 Published: 2013-03-03

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Abstract

Background and aim

High ethical reasoning ability is one of the main requirements of nursing profession. This ethical

reasoning should be improved in nursing student during educational period. It should be further

evolved during their independent clinical work as a nurse. Limited evidences are exist about the

level of ethical reasoning of nursing students and nurses in Iran. Therefore, the purpose of this study

was to compare the ethical reasoning of nursing students and nurses in Tabriz University of Medical

Sciences .

Materials and Methods

This descriptive-comparative study was performed on 115 nursing students and 269 nurses who

were selected by census. Nursing Dilemma Test NDT questionnaire was used for data collection. It

consists of 6 scenarios. Ethical reasoning score (Nursing Principled Thinking NP) was the sum of

scores of fifth and sixth levels of Kohlberg ethical development questionnaire. The scores varied

from 18 to 66. The data were analyzed using SPSS and by descriptive and inferential statistics.

Findings

Ethical reasoning score of nursing students (48.9±6.5; mean±SD) was significantly higher than the

score of nurses (46.6±6.7) (p=0.02). Also it was found that NP scores of nurses working in medical

wards are significantly higher than scores of other wards nurses (p=0.02). NP scores were declined

by increasing of clinical experience (p= 0.04).

Conclusion

Lower NP scores of nurses comparing with NP scores of nursing students is an alarm for nursing

managers and need a special attention.

Keywords

: Ethic, Ethical reasoning, Kohlberg, Nurses, Nursing students.

*

Corresponding author: Azad rahmani. PhD student in nursing education, Faculty of Nursing and

Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

E-mail:

 

azadrahmanims@yahoo.com

REFERENCES

-Auvinen J Suominen T Leino-Kilpi H et al (2004). The development of moral judgment during nursing education in

Finland. Nurse Education Today. 24 (7) 538-546.

-Bandman E Bandman B (1990). Nursing Ethics through the Life Span. Washington: Appleton & Lange Company.

-Borhani F Abbaszadeh A Kohan M et al (2010). [Comparison of the moral reasoning ability of nurses and nursing

students at Kerman University of Medical Sciences in dealing with ethical problems]. Journal of Medical Ethics and

History. 4 (1) 74-76. (Persian)

-Burnard P Chapman C (2003). Professional and Ethical Issues in Nursing, Edinburgh, Bailliere Tindall co.

-Chinn PL Kramer MK (1999). Theory and Nursing: Integrated Knowledge Development. St. Louis: Mosby.

-Fry S (1989). Towards a theory of nursing ethics. ANS Advances in Nursing Sciences. 11 (4) 9-22.

-Fry S (2002). Defining nurse's ethical practices in the 21

st

century. International Nursing Review. 49 (1) 1-3.

-Ham K (2002). A comparison of ethical reasoning abilities of senior baccalaureate nursing students and experienced

nurses (doctoral dissertation). The University of Memphis, United States of America.

-Krawczyk R (1997). Teaching ethics: Effect on moral development. Nursing Ethics. 4 (1) 56-65.

-Kelly B (1998). Preserving moral integrity: A follow up study with new graduate nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing.

28(5) 113-45.

-Ketefian S (1981). Moral reasoning and moral behavior among selected groups of practicing nurses. Nursing Research.

30(3) 171-76.

-Kudzma EAC (1980). Moral reasoning of nurses in the work setting (dissertation) Massachusetts, Boston University

School of Nursing.

-Mayberry M (1986). Ethical decision making: A response of hospital nurses. Nursing Administration Quarterly. 10 (3)

75-81.

-Murray N (1995). Moral reasoning in male and female nurses: A care perspective (dissertation). New Jersey: State

University of New Jersey.

-Negarandeh R Ghobadi S (2001). [Examination of knowledge and attitudes of nurses and midwives in Zanjan hospitals

toward ethical issues]. Journal of Zanjan University of Medical Sciences and Health, 36, 55-58. (Persian)

-Newfield S Newfield N Sperry J et al (2002). Ethical decision making among family therapists and individual therapist.

Family Process. 39 (2) 177-88.

-Numminen O Leino Kilpt H (2007). Nursing student's ethical decision making: A review of literature. Nurse Education

Today. 27 (7) 796-801.

-Pike AW (2010). I don’t know how ethical I am: An investigation into the practices nurses use to maintain their moral

integrity (dissertation) Massachusetts: Boston University.

-Rodney P Varcoe C Storch J et al (2002) Navigating towards a moral horizon: A multisite qualitative study of ethical

practice in nursing. Canadian Journal of Nursing. 34 (3) 75-102.

-Schroter K (2002). Ethic in preoperative practice- principles and application. AORN J. 75 (4) 818-24.

-Schroeter K (2002). Ethics in preoperative practice- patient advocacy. AORN J. 75 (5) 941-4

  • PDF

How to Cite

Zirak, mohammad, Mogadasian, sima, Abdullah-Zadeh, farahnaz, & Rahmani, azad. (2013). Comparison of ethical reasoning in nursing students and nurses in. Advances in Nursing & Midwifery, 22(77), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.22037/anm.v22i77.4091
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 1279 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 297 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Language

  • English
  • فارسی
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

Print ISSN: 2383-3750
Electronic ISSN: 2538-399X

Powered by OJSPlus