Multi-Objective Dhole Optimization for Saturation-Aware Autonomous Underwater Forensic Search and Evidence Recovery Missions
International Journal of Medical Toxicology and Forensic Medicine,
Vol. 16 (2026),
1 Dey 2026
,
Page 1-7
https://doi.org/10.22037/ijmtfm.v16.53384
Abstract
Background: Underwater forensic investigations frequently involve searching, locating, and recovering submerged human remains and associated forensic evidence under challenging environmental conditions. Efficient coordination of multiple unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs) can support forensic investigators by reducing search time, improving spatial coverage, and limiting unnecessary energy consumption during underwater recovery operations. This study proposes a Multi-Objective Dhole Optimization Algorithm (MO-DOA) for discrete saturation-aware allocation.
Methods: The method maps each candidate to a continuous latent score matrix, decodes it to UUV-to-region assignments, repairs assignment and saturation violations, and uses Pareto dominance with a diversity-preserving external archive to select leaders for the Dhole Optimization Algorithm search, encircling, and attack phases.
Results: Evaluation uses an 800 m × 500 m maritime benchmark with eight UUVs, four clustered target regions, and three inaccessible reef zones. In the supplied 20-run results package, MO-DOA attained HV = 0.921, IGD = 0.048, mission effectiveness = 93.8, energy/travel cost = 142.6, threat exposure = 0.220, saturation deviation = 0.50, and runtime = 10.7 s, outperforming CEA, Improved WOA, MDO, IMMP-GWO, and IPSO-VP on the reported criteria. Convergence curves show earlier improvement and sustained Pareto-front quality.
Conclusion: The findings support MO-DOA as a compact Pareto-based allocation framework, subject to final verification of the supplied run-level statistics.
- Dhole optimization algorithm, Multi-objective optimization, Unmanned underwater vehicle, Task allocation, Saturation-aware allocation, Pareto archive
How to Cite
References
[1] Kumar A, Ahuja NJ, Thapliyal M, Dutt S, Kumar T, Pacheco DADJ, et al. Blockchain for unmanned underwater drones: research issues, challenges, trends and future directions. J Netw Comput Appl. 2023;215:103649. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jnca.2023.103649]
[2] Cai W, Liu Z, Zhang M, Wang C. Cooperative artificial intelligence for underwater robotic swarm. Robot Auton Syst. 2023;164:104410. [DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2023.104410]
[3] Sun B, Niu N. Multi-AUVs cooperative path planning in 3D underwater terrain and vortex environments based on improved multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm. Ocean Eng. 2024;311:118944. [DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118944]
[4] Cai C, Liu Y, Chen D, Cai L. A fast multi-AUV multi-regional coverage path planner in coverage tasks based on co-evolution. Complex Intell Syst. 2025. [DOI: 10.1007/s40747-025-02207-x]
[5] Jandaghi E, Zhou M, Stegagno P, Yuan C. Adaptive formation learning control for cooperative AUVs under complete uncertainty. Front Robot AI. 2025;11:1491907. [DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1491907]
[6] Wu X, Gao Z, Yuan S, Hu Q, Dang Z. A dynamic task allocation algorithm for heterogeneous UUV swarms. Sensors. 2022;22(6):2122. [DOI: 10.3390/s22062122]
[7] Liang H, Fu Y, Gao J. Bio-inspired self-organized cooperative control consensus for crowded UUV swarm based on adaptive dynamic interaction topology. Appl Intell. 2021;51(7):4664-81. [DOI: 10.1007/s10489-020-02104-5]
[8] Zhao Q, Yang T, Tang G, Yang Y, Dong F, Xi Z, et al. Bio-inspired swarm of underwater robots: a review. Bioinspir Biomim. 2025;20(4):041002. [DOI: 10.1088/1748-3190/ade215]
[9] Wu D, Zhang L, Hao L. Consensus-based distributive task allocation for multi-AUV in searching and detecting. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA). IEEE; 2021. p. 1448-53. [DOI: 10.1109/ICMA52036.2021.9512633]
[10] Mohammed BO, Aghdasi HS, Salehpour P. Dhole optimization algorithm: a new metaheuristic algorithm for solving optimization problems. Cluster Comput. 2025;28(7):430. [DOI: 10.1007/s10586-024-05005-1]
[11] Mirjalili S, Saremi S, Mirjalili SM, Coelho LDS. Multi-objective grey wolf optimizer: a novel algorithm for multi-criterion optimization. Expert Syst Appl. 2016;47:106-19. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.10.039]
[12] Guesmi T, Mahadevan N, Karunanidy D, Alqunun K. A multi-objective grey wolf optimizer for grid-based mobile robot path planning with turn-aware optimization. AIMS Math. 2026;11(4):11882-923. [DOI: 10.3934/math.2026488]
- Abstract Viewed: 22 times
- 53384 Downloaded: 3 times