Forensic Science Research on the Web of Science Database Over 22 Years: A Bibliometric Analysis Forensic Science Research
International Journal of Medical Toxicology and Forensic Medicine,
Vol. 14 No. 4 (2024),
12 October 2024
https://doi.org/10.32598/ijmtfm.v14i4.45153
Abstract
Background: We reviewed the literature on forensic genetics from 1991 to 2022, emphasizing short tandem repeats. The objectives were to assess the caliber of research and draw attention to issues facing scientists and practitioners.
Methods: Except for China, a metrological study was performed on forensic literature from 1991 to 2022 using the Web of Science (WoS).
Results: The “journal of forensic sciences” had 380 papers that were the most read out of 2139 publications in the study. Also, “forensic science international: Genetics” had the most citations. Analysis with R software showed that 2001 was the peak publication year. “Journal of forensic sciences” and Budowle B were the most prolific. “Forensic science international: genetics” and Heller MJ received the most citations, and “forensic science”, “STRs”, and “DNA typing” were among the frequently used keywords.
Conclusion: The study could help scientists understand the trends of short tandem repeats based on forensic science research by highlighting the top ten research institutions, funding prospects, authors, and high-citation journals to anticipate future research directions.
- Forensic Genetics
- Short tandem repeats
- Simple repetitive sequence
How to Cite
References
Butler JM. Forensic DNA testing. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols. 2011; 2011(12):1438-50. [DOI:10.1101/pdb.top066928] [PMID]
Chatfield L. Forensic DNA typing: Biology and technology behind STR markers. Heredity. 2002; 89(4):327. [DOI:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800124]
Ge J, Budowle B. Forensic investigation approaches of searching relatives in DNA databases. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2021; 66(2):430-43. [DOI:10.1111/1556-4029.14615] [PMID]
Ayanoğlu FB, Elçin AE, Elçin YM. Bioethical issues in genome editing by CRISPR-Cas9 technology. Turkish Journal of Biology. 2020; 44(2):110-20. [DOI:10.3906/biy-1912-52] [PMID] [PMCID]
Foley MM, Oldoni F. A global snapshot of current opinions of next-generation sequencing technologies usage in forensics. Forensic Science International. Genetics. 2023; 63:102819. [DOI:10.1016/j.fsigen.2022.102819] [PMID]
Parson W, Gusmão L, Hares DR, Irwin JA, Mayr WR, Morling N, et al. DNA commission of the international society for forensic genetics: Revised and extended guidelines for mitochondrial DNA typing. Forensic Science International. Genetics. 2014; 13:134-42. [DOI:10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.07.010] [PMID]
Sobrino B, Brión M, Carracedo A. SNPs in forensic genetics: A review on SNP typing methodologies. Forensic Science International. 2005; 154(2-3):181-94. [DOI:10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.10.020] [PMID]
Wyner N, Barash M, McNevin D. Forensic autosomal short tandem repeats and their potential association with phenotype. Frontiers in Genetics. 2020; 11:884. [DOI:10.3389/fgene.2020.00884] [PMID] [PMCID]
Peterson J, Leggett AS. The evolution of forensic science: Progress AMID the pitfalls. Stetson Law Review. 2007; 36:621. [Link]
Wani AK, Akhtar N, Singh R, Prakash A, Raza SHA, Cavalu S, et al. Genome centric engineering using ZFNs, TALENs and CRISPR-Cas9 systems for trait improvement and disease control in Animals. Veterinary Research Communications. 2023; 47(1):1-16. [DOI:10.1007/s11259-022-09967-8] [PMID]
Stasi A, Mir TUG, Pellegrino A, Wani AK, Shukla S. Forty years of research and development on forensic genetics: A bibliometric analysis. Forensic Science International. Genetics. 2023; 63:102826. [DOI:10.1016/j.fsigen.2023.102826] [PMID]
Baldwin J, Alhawi OM, Shaughnessy S, Akinbi A, Dehghantanha A. Emerging from the cloud: A bibliometric analysis of cloud forensics studies. In: Dehghantanha A, Conti M, Dargahi T, editors. Cyber threat intelligence. Berlin: Springer; 2018. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-73951-9_16]
Öner BS, Orbay M. Assessing the publication output in the field of forensic science and legal medicine using Web of Science database from 2011 to 2020. Forensic Sciences Research. 2022; 7(4):748-760. [DOI:10.1080/20961790.2021.2002525] [PMID] [PMCID]
Shepherd E. Electronic records in the manuscript repository. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2010; 61(7):1512-3. [DOI:10.1002/asi.22883]
Castillo FA, Hallinger P. Systematic review of research on educational leadership and management in Latin America, 1991–2017. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 2018; 46(2):207-25. [DOI:10.1177/1741143217745882]
Xing Z, Yong-feng H, Yun-ying Z, Yu-zhe L, Bo-feng Z. Bibliometric Analysis of Forensic Genetics Literatures in SCIE from 1989 to 2019. J Forensic Med. 2021; 37(2):192-205. [Link]
Keerti A, Ninave S. DNA Fingerprinting: Use of autosomal short tandem repeats in forensic DNA typing. Cureus. 2022; 14(10):e30210. [DOI:10.7759/cureus.30210] [PMID] [PMCID]
Ball R. An introduction to bibliometrics. Amsterdam: ScienceDirect; 2017. [DOI:10.1016/C2016-0-03695-1]
Muritala BA, Sánchez-Rebull MV, Hernández-Lara AB. A bibliometric analysis of online reviews research in tourism and hospitality. Sustainability. 2020; 12(23):9977. [DOI:10.3390/su12239977]
Ogunsakin RE, Ebenezer O, Ginindza TG. A bibliometric analysis of the literature on norovirus disease from 1991-2021. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(5):2508. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph19052508] [PMID] [PMCID]
Nurdin BV, Hutagalung SS, Yulianto, Kurniawan RC, Hermawan D. Bibliometric analysis on governance index topics using scopus database and vosviewer. Journal of Physics. 2021; 1933(1):012047. [DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1933/1/012047]
Shah SH, Lei S, Ali M, Doronin D, Hussain ST. Prosumption: Bibliometric analysis using histcite and VOSviewer. Kybernetes. 2020; 49(3):1020-45. [DOI:10.1108/K-12-2018-0696]
Kayser M, Caglià A, Corach D, Fretwell N, Gehrig C, Graziosi G, et al. Evaluation of Y-chromosomal STRs: A multicenter study. International Journal of Legal Medicine. 1997; 110(3):125-33. [DOI:10.1007/s004140050051] [PMID]
Butler JM. Genetics and genomics of core short tandem repeat loci used in human identity testing. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2006; 51(2):253-65. [DOI:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00046.x] [PMID]
Urquhart A, Kimpton CP, Downes TJ, Gill P. Variation in short tandem repeat sequences--A survey of twelve microsatellite loci for use as forensic identification markers. International Journal of Legal Medicine. 1994; 107(1):13-20. [DOI:10.1007/BF01247268] [PMID]
Gusmão L, Butler JM, Carracedo A, Gill P, Kayser M, Mayr WR, et al. DNA Commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics (ISFG): An update of the recommendations on the use of Y-STRs in forensic analysis. Forensic Science International. 2006; 157(2-3):187-97. [DOI:10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.04.002] [PMID]
Szibor R, Krawczak M, Hering S, Edelmann J, Kuhlisch E, Krause D. Use of X-linked markers for forensic purposes. International Journal of Legal Medicine. 2003; 117(2):67-74. [DOI:10.1007/s00414-002-0352-5] [PMID]
Parson W, Ballard D, Budowle B, Butler JM, Gettings KB, Gill P, et al. Massively parallel sequencing of forensic STRs: Considerations of the DNA commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG) on minimal nomenclature requirements. Forensic Science International. Genetics. 2016; 22:54-63. [DOI:10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.01.009] [PMID]
Ballantyne KN, Goedbloed M, Fang R, Schaap O, Lao O, Wollstein A, et al. Mutability of Y-chromosomal microsatellites: rates, characteristics, molecular bases, and forensic implications. Am J Hum Genet. 2010; 87(3):341-53. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.08.006] [PMID] [PMCID]
Wiegand P, Budowle B, Rand S, Brinkmann B. Forensic validation of the STR systems SE 33 and TC 11. Int J Legal Med. 1993; 105(6):315–20. [Link]
Lygo JE, Johnson PE, Holdaway DJ, Woodroffe S, Whitaker JP, Clayton TM, et al. The validation of short tandem repeat (STR) loci for use in forensic casework. International Journal of Legal Medicine. 1994; 107(2):77-89. [DOI:10.1007/BF01225493] [PMID]
Novroski NMM, King JL, Churchill JD, Seah LH, Budowle B. Characterization of genetic sequence variation of 58 STR loci in four major population groups. Forensic Science International. Genetics. 2016; 25:214-26. [DOI:10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.09.007] [PMID]
Jan van Eck N, Waltman L. Visualizing bibliometric networks. In: Ding Y, Rousseau R, Wolfram D, editors. Measuring scholarly impact. Berlin: Springer; 2014. [Link]
- Abstract Viewed: 342 times
- pdf Downloaded: 293 times