Top-down auditory plasticity: Acceptable noise level predicts and reflects the effect of perceptual learning in experience-induced plasticity
Iranian Journal of Child Neurology,
Vol. 13 No. 2 (2019),
4 March 2019
,
Page 103-111
https://doi.org/10.22037/ijcn.v13i2.18034
Abstract
Objective: In the auditory system, tinnitus and superior speech perception in noise are examples of negative and positive plasticity that can result from sensory neural hearing loss and life experiences dealing with more complex stimuli and learning, respectively. Positive plasticity occurs as a result of learned skills and sensory stimuli; plasticity involves specific neural pathways and can be observed in auditory ascending or descending pathways.
Materials & Methods: In this study, we document a form of plasticity in top-down auditory pathways through the measurement of acceptable noise level in 60 adults (27 females and 33 males) with normal hearing. Individuals were assigned to one of two groups: those with and without occupational experience of speech perception in noise.
Result: The results showed that the test group had statistically significant lower acceptable noise level and significantly higher background noise level scores compared with the control group.
Conclusion: Using acceptable noise level, we attributed differences in individuals’ abilities to tolerate varying amounts of background noise and speech perception in noise function to the auditory efferent system. We therefore concluded that working in crowded locations due to job nature can influence differences in speech perception in noise function.- Acceptable noise level
- noise
- hearing
- auditory efferent system
How to Cite
References
Anderson, S., et al., A dynamic auditory-cognitive system supports speech-in-noise perception in older adults. Hear Res, 2013. 300: p. 18-32.
White, E.J., et al., Learning, neural plasticity and sensitive periods: implications for language acquisition, music training and transfer across the lifespan. Front Syst Neurosci, 2013. 7: p. 90.
Guinan Jr, J.J., Cochlear mechanics, otoacoustic emissions, and medial olivocochlear efferents: twenty years of advances and controversies along with areas ripe for new work in Perspectives on Auditory Research A.N. Popper and R.R. Fay, Editors. 2014, Springer p. 229-246.
de Boer, J. and A.R. Thornton, Neural correlates of perceptual learning in the auditory brainstem: efferent activity predicts and reflects improvement at a speech-in-noise discrimination task. J Neurosci, 2008. 28(19): p. 4929-37.
de Boer, J., A.R. Thornton, and K. Krumbholz, What is the role of the medial olivocochlear system in speech-in-noise processing? J Neurophysiol, 2012. 107(5): p. 1301-12.
Brown, G.J., R.T. Ferry, and R. Meddis, A computer model of auditory efferent suppression: implications for the recognition of speech in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 2010. 127(2): p. 943-54.
Andeol, G., et al., Auditory efferents facilitate sound localization in noise in humans. J Neurosci, 2011. 31(18): p. 6759-63.
Ciuman, R.R., The efferent system or olivocochlear function bundle - fine regulator and protector of hearing perception. Int J Biomed Sci, 2010. 6(4): p. 276-88.
P., P. and S. S., Efferent Auditory System Functioning and Speech Perception in Noise in Individuals with Type II Diabetes Mellitus. . Journal of Phonetics & Audiology
2(1).
Guinan, J.J., Jr., Olivocochlear efferents: anatomy, physiology, function, and the measurement of efferent effects in humans. Ear Hear, 2006. 27(6): p. 589-607.
Harkrider, A.W. and J.W. Tampas, Differences in responses from the cochleae and central nervous systems of females with low versus high acceptable noise levels. J Am Acad Audiol, 2006. 17(9): p. 667-76.
Shetty, H.N., S. Mahadev, and D. Veeresh, The Relationship Between Acceptable Noise Level and Electrophysiologic Auditory Brainstem and Cortical Signal to Noise Ratios. Audiol Res, 2014. 4(1): p. 93.
Nabelek, A.K., F.M. Tucker, and T.R. Letowski, Toleration of background noises: relationship with patterns of hearing aid use by elderly persons. J Speech Hear Res, 1991. 34(3): p. 679-85.
Shetty, H.N. and S. Subbanna, Acceptable noise level as a deciding factor for prescribing hearing aids for older adults with cochlear hearing loss – A scoping review. Journal of Otology, 2015. 10(3): p. 93-98.
Freyaldenhoven, M.C. Acceptable Noise Level (ANL): Research and Current Application. Available from: http://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/acceptable-noise-level-anl-research-956.
Freyaldenhoven, M.C., et al., Acceptable noise level: reliability measures and comparison to preference for background sounds. J Am Acad Audiol, 2006. 17(9): p. 640-8.
Kim, J.H., J.H. Lee, and H.K. Lee, Advantages of Binaural Amplification to Acceptable Noise Level of Directional Hearing Aid Users. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol, 2014. 7(2): p. 94-101.
Shi, L.F., G. Azcona, and L. Buten, Acceptance noise level: effects of the speech signal, babble, and listener language. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 2015. 58(2): p. 497-508.
Ahmadi, A., et al., Developing and evaluating the reliability of acceptable noise level test in Persian language. Scientific Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 2015. 4(4): p. 109-117.
- Abstract Viewed: 233 times