Iranian Center for Endodontic Research
  • Login
  • Register

Iranian Endodontic Journal

  • Register
  • Home
  • About the journal
  • Issues
    • Current
    • Archives
  • For Authors/Reviewers
    • Submissions
    • Author Guidelines
    • Ethics Policy
    • Editorial & Peer Review Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Reviewers Information
  • Indexing/Abstracting
  • Editorial Team
  • Announcements
  • Contact Us
  • Congress Proceedings
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 3 No. 3 (2008): SUMMER 2008
  4. Systematic Review

Vol. 3 No. 3 (2008)

July 2008

Comparison of Pulpotomy with for Mocresol and MTA in Primary Molars: a Systematic Review and Meta - Analysis

  • Masoud Fallahinejad Ghajari
  • Mahkameh Mirkarimi
  • Mehdi Vatanpour
  • Mohammad Javad Kharrazi Fard

Iranian Endodontic Journal, Vol. 3 No. 3 (2008), 10 July 2008 , Page 45-49
https://doi.org/10.22037/iej.v3i3.769 Published: 2009-02-28

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Introduction: There are various studies looking at the effects of formocresol (FC) and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) on pulpotomy of primary molars. This is a systematic review of literature comparing the success rates of MTA and FC in pulpotomy of primary molars. Materials and Methods: The study list was obtained using PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Science Citation Index, Iran Medex, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library, and also some hand searches contains through dental journals approved by the Iranian Ministry of Health. Papers which met the inclusion were accepted. The quality of studies for the meta-analysis was assessed by a series of validity criteria according to Jadad's scale. Eight qualified studies met the criteria. Terms of clinical outcomes and radiographic findings were evaluated in all studies to assess clinical success and root resorption. Fixed model was applied to aggregate the data of homogenous studies. A random effect model was carried out for measuring the effect size of heterogeneous studies. Results: The overall clinical and radiographic success rates based on the data suggested that MTA was superior to FC (P=0.004) with the Odds Ratio=3.535 and 95% confidence interval (1.494-8.369). Conclusion: Primary molars pulpotomy with MTA have better clinical and radiographic success rates than FC.

Keywords:
  • Formocresol
  • Meta-analysis
  • MTA
  • Primary molar
  • Pulpotomy
  • Systematic review
  • PDF

How to Cite

1.
Fallahinejad Ghajari M, Mirkarimi M, Vatanpour M, Kharrazi Fard MJ. Comparison of Pulpotomy with for Mocresol and MTA in Primary Molars: a Systematic Review and Meta - Analysis. Iran Endod J [Internet]. 2009 Feb. 28 [cited 2026 Jul. 8];3(3):45-9. Available from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/iej/article/view/769
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 396 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 414 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Make a Submission

Make a Submission

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Developed By

Open Journal Systems

Indexing/Abstracting

This journal is indexed in:

  • PubMed
  • Europe PMC
  • Scopus
  • SCImago
  • MIAR
  • CINAHL
  • CAS (Chemical Abstracts)
  • Dimensions
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • FATCAT
  • Google Scholar
  • IMEMR (Index Medicus for the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region)
  • Index Copernicus
  • ISC (Islamic World Science Citation Center)
  • Magiran
  • ROAD
  • SID (Scientific Information Database) 
  • SUDOC
  • UC Santa Barbara University
  • WIKIDATA
  • ZDB
    • This journal is Member of: COPE; ICMJ

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Browse

  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

   Iranian Endodontic Journal is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).

Powered by OJSPlus